04/01/2016

India's Solar Surge May Slash Coal Imports

Fairfax - Angela Macdonald-Smith

Solar power appears to be rapidly overtaking thermal coal imports in competitiveness for power generation in India. Photo: Adam Ferguson


Dramatic cost declines in solar power tenders in India have shaken up expectations on pricing for the renewable fuel and have triggered warnings that the country's need for thermal coal imports will be much lower than some are banking on.
Huge solar power contracts awarded by Indian states to global players in November and December have been priced at levels more than 20 per cent below 12 months ago and point to solar power rapidly overtaking thermal coal imports in competitiveness for power generation.
The figures signal that forecasts for growth in thethermal coal trading market by the International Energy Agency are too bullish even though they were cut back in December, according to Tim Buckley, director of energy finance studies at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, which supports renewable energy.
Mr Buckley said coal miners such as Adani and BHP Billiton were guilty of "ingrained thinking" in pressing ahead with coal expansion plans.
"A company that denies a technology change is real makes mistakes," Mr Buckley said. "The implication is for coal mining, coal railways and coal ports."
India's Minister for Energy, Piyush Goyal​, has said India should be able to end thermal coal imports by 2017.
Others doubt this target can be met, however. Melbourne-based Project Monitor describes the assumptions underlying claims from environmental groups that renewable energy growth would damp India's coal demand as "tenuous". It points out the problem of intermittent power generation from solar and wind, and casts doubt on India's ambitions to meet its 2020 coal production target.
"The confidence expressed by some that, over the next decade, coal demand will slow significantly and imports will drop to near-zero is almost certain not to be realised," the consultancy said.
A win by US-based solar major SunEdison of a $US500 million, 500-megawatt solar auction in the southern Indian state of Andhra Pradesh in November shocked the market with its pricing of 4.63 rupees per kilowatt-hour (US7.1¢/kWh), 10 per cent below the previous record low set three months earlier.
That pricing was regarded by many as irrational and as an aggressive chase for market share in the fast-growing market, until the award of a 350 MW contract in December to a consortium led by Japanese telecommunications company SoftBank at the same price.
The contracts should act as a warning to Australian coal exporters not to rely on IEA forecasts, Mr Buckley said.
India's ambitious National Solar Mission is targeting 100 gigawatts of solar capacity by 2022, and several solar majors are committing huge investments there, helping drive down costs.
IEEFA is forecasting reductions in solar tariffs will run at 5 per cent a year in India over the next decade, making solar cheaper than power generated even from domestic coal.
In its latest coal outlook report in December, the IEA pointed to India as one of the few remaining major growth markets for thermal coal exports, along with south-east Asia.
The IEA is forecasting the world's seaborne thermal coal market will reach 1.06 billion tonnes by 2020, a reduction from its previous forecast, but still above many other analysts. It assumes India will increase its thermal coal imports to 204 million tonnes by the end of the decade, representing an increase of 73 million tonnes from 2014.
Macquarie Research puts the market size in 2020 at 25 per cent less, but still assumes a modest increase in traded thermal coal volumes. Macquarie described the IEA's forecast for Indian coal imports as "staggering", saying it expected the increased demand for thermal coal to be met mostly from domestic sources.

Winning World War III, Climate Change Edition

CleanTechnica - Tina Casey

The impacts of climate change have long crossed the line of plausible deniability and we are now deep into a period that has all the hallmarks of a world war in terms of human suffering and the destruction of infrastructure and resources. So, if you were to ask us something like “what are the policies that governments should take to encourage public-private partnership and enable the private sector to develop the goods and services necessary for a global transition to a low-carbon economy by 2030,” we would say that government should require itself to speak with a unified voice on climate change, just as it would answer any other human threat to its existence.
Is that so hard?


Public-Private Partnerships For Climate Change Action
The aforementioned question comes to us from the Masdar 2016 Engage Blogging Contest. The topic of public-private partnerships is of critical interest to Masdar, which is a subsidiary of the company Mubadala, which is this:
In 2002, Mubadala – the Arabic word for ‘exchange’ – was established by the Government of Abu Dhabi as a principal agent in the diversification of Abu Dhabi’s economy.
[snip]
Mubadala was established to strengthen Abu Dhabi’s growth potential, and to help the government meet its socioeconomic targets…
While Mubadala’s first major venture involved natural gas production and transportation, in 2006 it created Masdar as a subsidiary, which quickly went to work and formed a partnership with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2007 to create the Masdar Institute of Science and Technology.
The Masdar Institute should ring plenty of bells with CleanTechnica readers. We’ve been following Masdar’s work on solar energy, including last summer’s opening of the new “Masdar Solar Hub” R&D facility.
Masdar has also been active in the field of aviation biofuel, focusing on salt-loving plants that can thrive in arid conditions, including a “closed loop” system that integrates biofuel crops with food production.

One For All, All For Climate Change Action…Or Not
In an early piece on Masdar back in 2011, CleanTechnica referenced the institute’s work on the energy-nexus in an article titled “U.S. Fiddles While Others Work For New Energy Future,” and that brings us to the point.
The U.S. stacks up pretty well when it comes to developing strategies for transitioning to a low carbon economy by forming public-private partnerships, but there is one key difference.  The economic value of the sustainability policies being pursued by the Obama Administration has been drowned out by an aggressive public relations effort in support of the fossil fuel industry, spearheaded by powerful federal legislators such as Senator James Inhofe and Senator Ted Cruz, who is currently running for the Republican nomination for president under a platform that includes abolishing the Department of Energy, and abetted by state legislators and executives such as New Jersey Governor Chris Christie (yes, this guy), who is also running for the Republican nomination.
The problem is that the experience of climate change has already crossed the barrier from theory to reality, so while government policy has enabled the development of the necessary technology, the pace of progress has been slowed artificially, by the fossil lobby.
In a “free” market nation like the U.S., the missing piece needed to accelerate the pace of change is the engagement and enthusiasm of consumers at every level, as individuals, businesses, institutions and government agencies.
The last time that happened was during World War II under a unified government campaign in support of the war effort, which was coincidentally the last time that the U.S. was attacked on its own shores by another sovereign nation.

Links