24/01/2016

Mike Baird Changes Tack On Coal As NSW Starts To Prepare For Industry's Decline

Fairfax - Peter Hannam

Digging a deeper hole: the NSW coal industry's grim outlook is triggering a reassessment of the industry in many quarters. Photo: Wolter Peeters

The government has met with a series of anti-mining activists amid slumping industry fortunes, apparently making good on a pledge to give more equal weight to environmental and social issues when considering mine approvals.
The conciliatory approach with activists comes at a crucial time for the coal mining industry, with Premier Mike Baird's government considering approvals to mine 1.2 billion tonnes, after approving 1.8 billion tonnes of new coal mining since he became premier.
An open-cut coal mine looms over Muswellbrook. Photo: Wolter Peeters

On Wednesday and Thursday senior officials were dispatched on a road trip to hear concerns of anti-coal activists.
Deputy secretary Simon Draper and executive director Liz Livingstone, both from the Premier's department, and a policy officer spent two days hearing from farmers, winemakers and other groups opposed to coal mine expansion. The tour adds to signs that the push to develop coal mines is stalling, and may even face stiff new regulation.

Officials are quietly seeking more accurate readings of the future of coal mining amid a slump in prices and demand.
Poor market conditions are likely to force companies to scale back plans or sell assets.
It is understood moves are afoot to impose tighter controls on coal mining in the so-called Special Area of the Sydney catchment.
The tour, organised by environmental campaigners Lock the Gate, included Newcastle, Bulga, and the Liverpool Plains before ending in the Pilliga where coal seam gas is also a contested issue.
"We gave them a great deal to think about," said Rosemary Nankivell​, chairman of the SOS Liverpool Plains group, who met the officials at Breeza on Thursday. "It's very significant that it's someone from the Premier's office rather than the usual rabble."'

'Nothing unusual'?
The visit to anti-mining groups follows the creation by the Premier's office in November of a taskforce to reduce conflicts between communities and resource use. The trip was "nothing unusual" as officials regularly seek a range of views, a spokeswoman said.
Others, though, take a different view, including John Krey, who heads the Bulga Milbrodale Progress Association and met the group in Bulga on Wednesday.
"They were not visiting any mining facility, they were not meeting any mining companies – the Minerals Council will probably not be happy," Mr Krey said.
The council, headed by Stephen Galilee, a former chief of staff for Mr Baird, was not given prior warning of the tour.
"We would expect the same officials to want to visit mine sites and meet with mine workers and local suppliers as part of their duties in relation to these issues," Mr Galilee said.
NSW Greens mining spokesperson Jeremy Buckingham said it was urgent the government recognised "coal is in inexorable decline" and it drafts "a strategy for a managed transition, rather than allow a chaotic collapse".
"The Baird government's approval of 1.8 billion tonnes of coal mining in less than two years is reckless in an age of climate change," he said.
"With 1.2 billion extra tonnes of coal awaiting approval, including controversial mines on the Liverpool Plains, Bylong Valley and Southern Highlands, Premier Baird must recognise that enough is enough."
Adam Searle, Shadow Minister for Industry, Resources and Energy, said Labor supported transparent planning process for all land use: "This is something the O'Farrell and Baird Governments abandoned for a number of years."

Caroona question
When it comes to shelving mines, one candidate is understood to be BHP Billiton and its proposed 10 million tonne a year thermal coal mine at Caroona – one of the regions visited by the Draper team.
BHP denied it is planning to hand back its licence. The company "continues to progress the approvals process" and is finalising work for the start of its environment impact statement, a spokeswoman said.
Treasury, meanwhile, has once again had to slash its forecast for mining royalties, slashing the expected take by $129 million for the current fiscal year, according to its mid-year update. The reduction swells to $373 million by 2018-19. (See chart below of Treasury forecasts:)

'Profitless prosperity'
The industry's growth looks to be stalling. Coal exports volumes – about 80 per cent of which are bound for power plants and the rest used to make steel – rose every year in the last decade – doubling since 2000 – but fell 1 per cent last year, according to energy analyst Tim Buckley.
Mr Buckley, a former Citi analyst and now with the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, said NSW is not alone – joining Queensland and federal agencies among others – in reviewing mining's prospects.
"The government in various areas is finding the historical way of doing things is not working," Mr Buckley said.
The Minerals Council said the overall mining industry contributed about $21 billion to the state last year, including $1.27 billion in royalties, and employs 35,000 directly and indirectly.
The council pointed to a report by the International Energy Agency last year that projected continued growth for the industry, with Australia set to overtake Indonesia as the world's biggest coal exporter.
Mr Buckley, though, said a bigger market share would be a poor guide of the industry's health.
"This is profitless prosperity," he said. "The average mine is making no money."

Links

Tony Abbott's Climate Claims Debunked: Researcher Dissects 2013 Statement

The Guardian

Sophie Lewis was so annoyed about the way science was ignored in the political debate about climate change she went to work to disprove the myths
A researcher has debunked climate change claims made by the former prime minister Tony Abbott in 2013. Photograph: Julian Smith/AAP

Climate scientists are regularly infuriated by the things politicians say. But it's not often they publish a scientific paper tearing a politician's comments to shreds.
Sophie Lewis, from the Australian Research Council's centre for excellence in climate science, has done exactly that, dissecting statements about climate records made by the former prime minister Tony Abbott in 2013.
Last week, temperature figures showed 2015 was officially the hottest year on record. Before that, 2014 was the hottest year on record. And scientists are expecting 2016 to once again win the dubious honour.
Heat records are being broken with wild abandon. Last year, 10 months broke temperature records.
Climate scientists say a rise in the average temperature caused by greenhouse gas emissions makes extreme heat records more likely.
In 2013, the UN's top climate official, Christiana Figueres, linked bushfires in Australia to climate change. Abbott called such claims "complete hogwash" and said drawing links between broken records and climate change was a sign of desperation.
He went on: "The thing is that at some point in the future, every record will be broken, but that doesn't prove anything about climate change. It just proves that the longer the period of time, the more possibility of extreme events."
It drives me mental that these sorts of statements go unaddressed. Sophie Lewis
Superficially it seems to make sense: if you wait long enough, you're bound to see records fall. Lewis suspected many people shared Abbott's interpretation, and set out to show it was wrong.
Lewis says she was frustrated by the gap she saw between what the science showed and what some politicians said was happening.
In a peer-reviewed paper published in the journal Weather and Climate Extremes, Lewis pulls Abbot's comments apart, shred by shred.
The first way to understand Abbott's claim is that in any system, the longer you wait, the more often you will see records fall. But Lewis points out that the exact opposite is true. In a system without any sort of trend, such as a random string of temperatures, the first one will be a record-breaker, by default. The second one will have a 50% chance of being a record-breaker. The third has a one in three chance of being a record breaker … and so on. In a very long temperature series, you should see very few records being broken, and they will break less often over time.
Unless, of course, there is a warming or cooling trend.
Alternatively, Abbott might simply have meant there was no connection between extreme heat records and climate change. Instead, natural variability might be to blame: natural variability includes things such as the El NiƱo phenomenon, which push temperature around year-to-year.
To test if that might be the case, Lewis ran a series of climate models in which the greenhouse effect was removed – so all that was left was natural variability. Unsurprisingly, in those models, high temperature records were less common than they are in reality. In other words, the record-breaking that we have seen cannot be explained by natural variation.
"It drives me mental that these sorts of statements go unaddressed," Lewis says. She says scientific literature generally tries to simply explain what is happening, ignoring misunderstandings in the public sphere.
"This was an attempt to bridge that gap."

Links