New Matilda - Thom Mitchell
|
US Sea Hawk helicopters in Kuwait. (IMAGE: New York National Guard, Flickr). |
Malcolm Turnbull's
Defence White Paper
has done what Abbott's energy equivalent failed to do,
acknowledging climate change as a fundamental and overarching influence
on Australia's long-term future and the stability of the region.
There is a growing awareness among international security experts,
already embedded in the long-term plans of other nations, that climate
change has huge potential to force geopolitical instability, shape
conflicts, and require humanitarian deployments.
As New Matilda has previously reported, the toxicity of Canberra's debate on climate change had
contributed to Australia's tardiness in incorporating it into strategic plans.
Indeed an issues paper released in 2014 by then Defence Minister
David Johnston, when Tony Abbott was Prime Minister, didn't mention
climate change at all.
But then, hardly either did the Abbott-era Energy White Paper, said
to be 'technology neutral', which mentioned climate change only twice to
reference the Coalition's Direct Action policy.
|
Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott. |
The full Defence White paper released today goes a little
further. "Climate change will be a major challenge for countries in
Australia's immediate region," the paper concedes.
"Within the South Pacific, variable economic growth, crime and
social, governance and climate change challenges will all contribute to
uneven progress and may lead to instability in some countries," it
states.
"Climate change will see higher temperatures, increased sea-level
rise and will increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather
events. These effects will exacerbate the challenges of population
growth and environmental degradation, and will contribute to food
shortages and undermine economic development."
The White Paper also acknowledges the threat that climate change
poses to the 'defence estate' – Australia's Navy bases will be impacted
by rising seas and "more extreme weather events more frequently putting
facilities at risk of damage".
Ultimately, beyond 2025, climate change will contribute to a need to
develop "new bases, wharves, airfields and training and weapons testing
ranges".
That's pretty much the sum-total of the paper's focus on climate
change, though. Despite anticipating climate change will be an important
contributor to state fragility – one of six key drivers that the paper
says will shape Defence thinking out to 2035 – it's mentioned less than
10 times, and only in a perfunctory sense.
|
Rob Faulkner, Flickr |
As New Matilda
reported in June last year,
other countries have been making more serious and methodical attempts
to integrate climate change into their long-term strategic thinking.
A former senior advisor to the UK government, Rear Admiral
Neill Morisetti said at the time that other countries are now
"instinctively saying 'we must factor in the impact of a changing
climate along with all the other points'".
He said the "political context presents a challenge in Australia".
Defence was being hampered, and political influences
dissuading proper acknowledgement of climate change's pervasive presence
as a 'multiplyer' of other threats to geopolitical stability, a report
from the Centre for Policy Development suggested.
Today's White Paper shows the first signs that those roadblocks to an
un-politicised approach to strategic planning may be coming down under
Turnbull's leadership.
Clearly, though, there's still plenty of work to be done to put flesh
on the bare bones that are outlined in the Defence White Paper.
Links