02/06/2016

Climate Records Fall With Autumn Leaves

New Matilda

(IMAGE: Mendhak, Flickr.)


In keeping with the now-perennial trend, another Australian climate record has fallen. As the Great Barrier Reef was scalded white, air temperatures during Autumn 2016 were the hottest they've been since records began in 1910.
A mercurial March made its way into the history books, posting the hottest average temperature ever and breaking the national record. April and May were the second-warmest they've ever been, and both were well above their historical means.
The Climate Council has put out a report analysing fresh data from the Bureau of Meteorology, which it says "add to the overwhelming evidence for human-driven climate change".
It also notes that the hot air temperatures were accompanied by unusually warm waters, and that this has contributed to the bleaching that's killed off more than a third of coral on some parts of the Great Barrier Reef.
(IMAGE: Coral Watch.)
National air temperatures were 1.86 degrees celsius above the Autumn average this year, which the Bureau of Meteorology said is the greatest margin of anomaly for any season on record.
In its latest report, the Bureau said:
"The season started with a prolonged heatwave that included Australia's hottest March days on record. Notably warm nights persisted throughout March, resulting in a record national March mean temperature for Australia as a whole. Warmth continued into April, resulting in daytime temperatures that were highest on record across large areas of the continent. Late season heat records were observed in all States and Territories as warm weather persisted throughout the second half of April.
"There was yet more unseasonable warmth in May, with record high maximum and minimum temperatures being recorded for many locations across large areas of northern and eastern Australia. May finished the season with another spell of well-above-average temperatures and late-season warmth across the tropics and eastern states, with some further records being set in the month's final week."
The scolding temperatures have been driven by an El Nino weather system, and bolstered by rising mean global temperatures. Late last year it was confirmed climate change has already pushed global average temperatures up one degree, halfway to the two degree 'red line' countries agreed not to cross at the Paris climate conference in December.
Protestors at the COP21 Paris climate talks. (IMAGE: Thom Mitchell, New Matilda)
The tragic impacts of this warming have been on display over recent months, with 93 per cent of the Great Barrier Reef suffering coral bleaching that has killed off more than one third of coral in sections of the natural wonder.
Increasingly, scientists are warning that the Great Barrier Reef as we know it will not survive. Last year the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority warned that the Reef would be unlikely to persist in its current "coral dominated" form if temperatures rise by more than 1.2 degrees.
With temperatures already driven up by one degree, significant warming 'locked in' by existing greenhouse gas emissions, and the use of fossil fuels growing, the future looks grim for the Australian icon.
In April, scientists suggested that the recent mass-bleaching event was made 175 times more likely by climate change. The Reef had already been declining before the bleaching, losing more than half of its hard coral cover over the last 30 years.
As New Matilda has been reporting, scientists have criticised the major parties for failing to commit the resources necessary to give the Great Barrier Reef a fighting chance as temperatures continue to climb.
(IMAGE: Paul Toogood, Flickr)
In their report, released yesterday, the Climate Council warned that there will likely be no respite from the record-breaking temperatures that have contributed to the Reef's demise.
This year is tipped to topple 2015 as the hottest on the global record, which dates back to 1880. As the Climate Council notes, 13 of the 15 hottest years on the international record have occurred since the year 2000.
And the trend is accelerating: The previous 12 months all broke their respective global temperature records. "May is likely to have continued this trend", the Climate Council said, marking more than a year of broken climate records for the combined ocean and atmosphere temperatures.
"The record-breaking hot years the world has experienced in the last few decades would have been virtually impossible in a world without climate change," the Climate Council report said.

Links

Denial Won't Save Jobs: We Need A Plan To Transition From Coal
Labor's $500 Million Commitment Not Enough To Save The Reef
Tinfoil Ideologues: The Coalition's Problem With Climate Change
The Importance Of Getting Emotional About Climate Change And The Reef

Australia Brown Coal Warriors Switch To Solar, Disruptive Technologies

Renew Economy - Giles Parkinson

This must be a sign of the times: The two men who ran Australia's two dirtiest brown coal generators, and who were one-time trenchant critics of climate and renewable energy policies, have switched sides. They have now thrown in their lot with the solar industry and other disruptive technologies.
Tony Concannon is the former Australian boss of GDF Suez, now Engie, which operates the Hazelwood brown coal generator, among other assets. He has now re-emerged as the chief executive of Reach Solar, which is looking at solar projects and battery storage across Australia, including a 200MW solar PV facility located near Port Augusta airport.
Richard McIndoe is the former head of Energy Australia, which owns the Yallourn power station, and has since emerged as the executive chairman of a new company called Edge Electrons, which developing new technology, such as voltage control, that is helping businesses and households save on electricity bills.


Solar, battery storage and energy efficiency are the new big ticket items in the transition of global energy systems to low-carbon technologies. All three technologies attack the very basis of the business model built up for half a century around brown coal, which revolved around "base-load" generation and ever increasing demand.
In their previous roles, Concannon and McIndoe's companies had fought ferociously against any policy changes that might have given assistance to solar and energy efficiency, which take away demand from brown coal generators and undercut their earnings.
Both companies argued forcefully against the various emissions trading schemes, against the renewable energy target, and against energy efficiency incentives. At times, they took this argument to extremes: McIndoe even warned that the "lights would go out" if carbon was priced. Concannon also warned of supply shortages, and in one speech warned that the renewable energy target would jack up wholesale prices "25-fold."
Instead, the opposite has happened and Australia now has too much capacity; although, ironically, it is now proving almost impossible to dislodge brown coal from the system, particularly the big Latrobe Valley generators that these men ran.
Engie last week did suggest that "closure" of Hazelwood was a possibility, but this has more to do with the global reputation of Engie, and its biggest shareholder, the French government, than energy economics.
One brown coal generator that could no longer compete in the modern market – thanks to the enormous wind and solar capacity in its local grid – was the Northern plant in Port Augusta, South Australia.
Concannon's new venture, Reach Solar, is proposing a big solar plant to at least partially replace that capacity. In February, Concannon and other executives made a presentation to the Port Augusta council, outlining plans for a 30MW solar PV plant near the Port Augusta airport, which could grow into a 200MW facility.


In its presentation, which can be viewed here, Concannon's team said Port Augusta was a great location for solar, thanks to its excellent solar radiation, available land and high voltage transmission lines.
Tony Concannon
They also said Reach Solar had a number of agreements with battery storage developers, including Tesla Energy. They said storage was important, for providing firm capacity on cloudy days, and for mitigating against peak demand charges.
The $320 million solar project is not the only one being proposed in the area. As RenewEconomy revealed last week, Indian energy group Adani, which is trying to develop the controversial Carmichael mega coal mine in Queensland's Galilee Basin, is also proposing 400MW of rooftop solar projects in the region.
DP Energy is proposing a big 375MW wind-solar hybrid project, while US company SolarReserve is proposing a 110MW solar storage and molten salt storage facility, which would be the first of its type in Australia.
McIndoe, last September, announced the creation of a new start-up called Edge Electrons that he promised would "shake-up the energy industry and help customers save money."
The new company – "the brainchild of McIndoe and successful electronics entrepreneur Neal Stewart" – offers voltage regulation and correction technologies that can cut electricity bills for homes and businesses by 15 per cent, by ensuring that they use less power.
Richard McIndoe
Edge Electrons said it also engaged with a number of key strategic partners, including new homebuilders, smart meter manufacturers, energy efficient lighting providers, and solar panel and energy storage manufactures.
"What the last year has shown me is that the potential for technology to disrupt the traditional industry is huge," McIndoe told the AFR in an interview last year. "It is as big in the electricity industry as it is in any other. I don't think people have recognised that in the past.
"We have this convergence of high technology, software and electronics with customers who want something different, and the added incentive of wanting to do something for the environment."

Links

Canada's Energy Superpower Status Threatened As World Shifts Off Fossil Fuel, Federal Think-Tank Warns

CBC News - Robson Fletcher

'Significant disruptions' forecast in 10 to 15 years as cost of renewables, energy storage plummet
At left, an oil pumpjack in operation. At right, the Shams 1 concentrated solar power plant in Abu Dhabi. A federal government think-tank is projecting a fairly rapid shift toward renewables.
At left, an oil pumpjack in operation. At right, the Shams 1 concentrated solar power plant in Abu Dhabi. A federal government think-tank is projecting a fairly rapid shift toward renewables. (Left: Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg, Right: EPA)
Canada's status as an "energy superpower" is under threat because the global dominance of fossil fuels could wane faster than previously believed, according to a draft report from a federal government think-tank obtained by CBC News.
"It is increasingly plausible to foresee a future in which cheap renewable electricity becomes the world's primary power source and fossil fuels are relegated to a minority status," reads the conclusion of the 32-page document, produced by Policy Horizons Canada.
The little-known government organization provides medium-term policy advice to the federal bureaucracy, specializing in forecasts that peer a decade or two into the future.
The document was obtained by CBC News under an access to information request and shared with two experts — one in Alberta, one in British Columbia — who study the energy industry.
Both experts described its forecasts for global energy markets as more or less in line with what a growing number of analysts believe.
"It's absolutely not pie in the sky," said Michal Moore from the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy. "These folks are being realistic — they may not be popular, but they're being realistic."
Marty Reed, CEO of Evok Innovations — a Vancouver-based cleantech fund created through a $100-million partnership with Cenovus and Suncor — had a similar take after reading the draft report.
"You could nit-pick a couple of items," he said. "But at a high level, I would say the vast, vast majority of what they wrote is not even controversial, it's very well accepted."

Caution advised in long-term pipeline investments
Given the time frames of a decade or more in the report's forecasts, its language is couched heavily in "ifs" and "coulds."
Its overall conclusion, however, urges caution when it comes to long-term investments in pipelines and other oil and gas infrastructure.
Such investments "could be at high risk of becoming economically unviable as prices in renewable electricity further decline," it warns.
"At a minimum, this plausible future would suggest that governments ensure that the risks of further investments in oil and gas infrastructure be borne by private interests rather than taxpayers," the report reads.

Renewables to become cheaper than fossil fuels
At the core of the report's forecasts is a growing number of indicators that suggest growth in the world's demand for electricity — particularly renewable-based electricity — will outpace other energy types, while the costs of its production and storage fall faster than previously believed.
The demand is expected to be driven largely by the emerging and rapidly urbanizing middle class in developing countries.
Wind and solar systems have the advantage of being "highly scalable and distributable," the report states, making them appealing for communities of virtually any size, with or without an existing electrical grid.
Policy Horizons Draft Report
As a result, emerging economies in Latin America and Africa may follow a different development path than the West and "leap-frog" directly to renewables as a primary energy source in a relatively short timeframe.
"Although any individual country may lack the optimal conditions for every type of renewable electricity, all countries are likely to have at least one or more options to produce electricity from renewables that will be cost comparative or cheaper than generation by fossil fuels," the report reads.
Reed said that trend is already beginning in some parts of the world.
"We just saw Saudi Arabia award a major solar contract at three cents a kilowatt hour. We just saw Mexico do the same thing … at five cents a kilowatt hour," he said.
"You can't bring on a new coal plant or natural gas plant at that price. You sure can't build a new Site C hydro dam at that price."

Timeline for renewable shift not clear, but trend 'inevitable,' says Marty Reed

Electric cars to become 'fully competitive'

Batteries and other forms of energy storage technology are also becoming cheaper and more capable, according to the report, making electricity a more versatile option for residential and commercial use — as well as for transportation.
The report states Tesla Motors has been producing lithium-ion batteries for both cars and homes at a cost of roughly $300 US per kWh, a price point the International Energy Agency previously predicted wouldn't be possible until the year 2020.
"Battery manufacturers in Asia are building battery factories at similar scales to Tesla's Gigafactory that will triple battery production by 2020," the report continues.
"These economies of scale are expected to further reduce the cost of batteries to $150 US per kWh by 2020. At this price point, electric vehicles will become fully competitive with those powered by internal combustion engines."
Tesla Marty Reed
From his vantage point, Reed said the shift in the automotive market is already apparent and the pace of change is only likely to accelerate.
"You're seeing literally hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars being invested by the automakers into electric vehicles," he said.
"The Chevy Bolt came out this year and it's got a 200-mile [320 km] range at a price point below $40,000. Tesla is the No. 1 selling luxury vehicle in the world now. This is happening."

Challenges — and innovations — with 'vast storage'
One criticism Moore had of the report was what he described as a tendency to "gloss over" challenges that still exist with renewable energy on a large scale.
"They just act as though the more renewable energy you build, the more people will use, and the more fossil fuel we'll take offline, and we'll all be better off — and it just doesn't work that way," the U of C professor said.
"Renewable technologies are not substitutable for fossil technologies one-to-one."
Due to the intermittent output from solar panels and wind turbines, making a major shift to renewables would require "vast, vast storage technology," Moore said, which adds to the cost and viability of such a change.
Reed, however, said there are various ways to tackle the problem, and solutions go beyond merely building better batteries.
"You certainly need an energy-dense battery if you want to have a car, but for electrification of the grid, you actually don't need energy-dense batteries," he said. "What you need are low-cost energy storage systems that meet the needs of whatever system you're trying to build."
As one recent example, he pointed to the Advanced Rail Energy Storage (ARES) project now underway in Nevada.


While a battery uses chemicals to store energy, ARES uses gravity.
The idea involves a network of rail lines built on a grade. On the tracks sit a fleet of train cars carrying heavy loads of rocks and gravel. The cars have electric motors and are connected to an electrical grid powered by wind turbines and solar panels.
When there is a surplus of energy from the grid, the train cars drive up the tracks. When the solar and wind output diminishes, the cars roll back down the hill, their electric motors acting as generators and supplementing the electrical output.
"It's remarkably simple, inexpensive, and meets the needs," Reed said of the technology.

Oil could lose 'commodity status'
All of this doesn't add up to the end of fossil fuels, according to the report, but it does suggest Canada should rethink the value and applicability of its natural resources as "demand for oil could peak sooner and decline faster than expected."
One of the more extreme scenarios the report considers is a world in which the supply of fossil fuels exceeds demand for an extended period of time, which the authors say could lead to a loss of "commodity status" for oil, coal and natural gas.
"Rather than being price-takers from suppliers, consumer countries could become price-makers on different sources of oil as suppliers adjust pricing to maintain share of a diminishing and more discriminating marketplace," the report states.
"Embodied carbon in the production of the fuel will likely be the first discriminator to be widely adopted."
In other words, fossil fuels that produce more greenhouse gases in the extraction process may fetch a lower price, as buyers become willing to pay a premium for lower-emission grades.
This scenario was one point in the report that both Moore and Reed found implausible.
"I think that was a bit of a stretch," said Reed.
"I see no evidence to support this notion that it'll be bifurcated by environmental criteria. Consumer behaviour doesn't lend itself this way."
Moore said he can't see that "happening any time soon," as no market mechanism exists to attach these kinds of attributes to fossil fuels.

New minerals to be of strategic value
Moore did agree with the report's forecast that oil will begin to be supplanted by natural resources of even higher value.
Those include lithium, rare earth metals and other key minerals required to produce batteries, photovoltaic cells and electric motors.
Rare Earths Michal Moore
The document notes Canada is lacking in such minerals, while Bolivia, Argentina and Chile hold some of the largest lithium reserves, and China and Brazil have nearly 60 per cent of the known reserves of rare earth metals.
The report even warns of the potential emergence of new cartels that could manipulate the market price of these valuable minerals.
"You're likely to see some pretty big battles fought over rare earths," said Moore, who noted Canada may have undiscovered reserves of its own.

'Some oil is likely to remain in the ground'
While its relative value as an energy source may diminish, the report acknowledges oil "will still be a significant component of the global energy mix, at least in the near future."
It says that "some oil is likely to remain in the ground," but opportunities still exist for Canada to extract and sell petroleum from oilsands deposits, even under the extreme scenario of the market splintering oil into grades based on its relative carbon footprint.
Actual greenhouse-gas outputs of some Canadian oil resources "are lower than international reputation would suggest," the report notes, making its viability as much a matter of marketing as technology.
Regardless of what happens in the energy sector, Reed expects oil will still be in demand for other purposes.
"Non-transportation uses of petroleum are growing quite rapidly," he said, noting Alberta may be particularly well positioned to expand into the production of specialty agriculture chemicals that are derived from oil.
Moore said everything from asphalt to plastics to paraffin wax will guarantee a market, of some type, for petroleum, for decades to come.
"We're going to need hydrocarbons for a long, long, long time into the future — just not necessarily as a primary fuel source."

Links

Six Months after Paris Accord, We’re Losing the Climate-Change Battle

MIT Technology Review - Richard Martin

A new report from the International Energy Agency includes projections for reductions in energy use and carbon dioxide emissions that could be wildly optimistic.
Emissions of greenhouse gases have slowed, for now, but the outlook for limiting climate change remains hazy.

Since the signing of the Paris climate accord in December, have we made any progress in cutting global emissions?
Let's start with the good news. Emissions in China, the world's largest producer of carbon dioxide, dropped by around 3 percent in 2015, according to preliminary government statistics, thanks largely to an economic slowdown and a dramatic decrease in the burning of coal. U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from energy consumption (which account for more than 90 percent of total emissions) also fell by nearly 3 percent from 2014 to 2015, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. And worldwide, carbon dioxide emissions in 2015 fell by 0.6 percent, according to a study in Nature Climate Change—the first time emissions have shrunk in a period of economic growth, rather than contraction.
And now, the bad news: we still have a long way to go to avoid catastrophic global warming.
A report released today by the International Energy Agency that focuses on urban energy consumption contains some encouraging projections, but a closer look at them reveals that they are wildly optimistic.
The IEA predicts total worldwide energy demand will increase between now and 2050, but with strong government action, that increase can be limited enough to slow global warming to 2 °C or less. Cities account for about two-thirds of global energy demand and 70 percent of total energy-related carbon dioxide emissions, so limiting energy use and emissions from metropolitan areas will be critical to achieving the goals of the Paris agreement. Limiting urban energy use to an increase of 20 percent (compared to a 70 percent increase that would happen if current trends continue) would be a huge factor in staying below the 2 °C threshold, the report finds. And total worldwide carbon dioxide emissions could be halved by 2050 compared to 2013 levels—nearly three-quarters of that from urban sources.
Achieving these goals would cost about $15.4 trillion between 2016 and 2050. That sounds like a lot of money, but it's less than 2 percent of cumulative world GDP over the same period.
IEA head Fatih Birol is "hopeful, but not fully confident."
They are lofty goals, projections that even IEA executive director Fatih Birol admits could be impossible to reach.
"We think we are lagging behind strongly in key technologies," says Birol, "and in the absence of a strong government push, those technologies will never be deployed into energy markets, and the chances of reaching the two-degree goal are very slim."
To be sure, the Paris agreement represents the strongest statement yet of government intentions to reduce energy use and curb carbon emissions. But as the IEA report states, those goals would require "massive changes in the energy system," and the national policies required to make those changes are not yet on the horizon.
For example, energy demand from buildings and transportation in cities would be reduced, in the IEA scenario, by 60 percent. In China alone, the number of cars, trucks, and buses is expected to increase from around 100 million today to nearly 600 million by 2050, according to a study from Argonne National Laboratory—an increase that in itself would wipe out the reductions projected by the IEA.
Overall, urban populations are expected to explode in the coming decades, reaching nearly three-quarters of the world's population by midcentury. Most of that growth will occur in the developing world (by 2025, 21 of the world's 27 megacities, with populations of 10 million or more, will be in developing countries). And studies have shown that city dwellers in the developing world tend to use more energy than their rural counterparts, not less.
The goals laid out by the IEA are not unreachable. But they will require "urgent actions by national governments and local officials so we can employ clean energy technologies much faster than we have done in the last few years," says Birol. "I am hopeful, but not fully confident."

Links