06/09/2016

10 Images Show What Coastal Cities Will Look Like After Sea Levels Rise

TakePart - Taylor Hill

A new study finds that even if we slow rising temperatures now, we could still be in for higher seas. Sea-level rise is coming. Even if we keep global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above historic norms—the benchmark for avoiding catastrophic climate warming—we may still see oceans creep four feet farther inland by 2100 and rise 20 feet by as soon as 2200.
That's according to a new study published in the July issue of Science. Researchers looked at three decades' worth of data on ice-cap oxygen levels, then analyzed it to determine how varying amounts of CO2 in the modern-day atmosphere lined up with atmospheric CO2 and sea levels in the prehistoric past.
CO2 levels were last at today's concentration—roughly 400 parts per million and rising—about 120,000 years ago, according to the researchers. Back then, the average global temperature was around 1 to 2 degrees higher than it is now, and the sea level was about 20 feet higher.
If you're not a climate scientist, it can be hard to imagine what these numbers mean for the real world. So the research group Climate Central, working with artist Nickolay Lamm, decided to show what U.S. coastal cities can expect if we keep burning oil, coal, and gas at current rates.
Ben Strauss of Climate Central used the organization's peer-reviewed research data and methods to calculate how 25 feet of sea-level rise would be likely to affect various coastlines, based on their tidal conditions. Then Lamm created images that offer a ground-level view of what losing 440,000 square miles of land along global coastlines—home to 375 million people—looks like.
"While 25 feet is not the same as six meters, or about 20 feet, 20 feet is the 'lower' limit the paper puts on expected sea-level rise from 2 degrees Celsius of warming," Strauss said.

So, Why Should You Care?
Even if we cut greenhouse gas emissions significantly, sea levels are expected to rise between one and four feet by 2100, owing to climatic changes already underway. Experts believe they will continue rising for centuries to come. But we can affect how much they do by slashing global carbon pollution in the next few decades. That would help make this a problem we can handle instead of one that overwhelms us.
Here are 10 images that compare how some coastal communities in the U.S. look today with what they may look like with 25 feet of sea-level rise.

All images courtesy Climate Central 

Venice Beach Boardwalk, Venice Beach, California—Before

Venice Beach Boardwalk, Venice Beach, California—After

AT&T Park, San Francisco—Before

AT&T Park, San Francisco—After

Back Bay, Boston—Before

Back Bay, Boston—After

Ocean Drive, Miami—Before

Ocean Drive, Miami—After

Citadel Military College, Charleston, South Carolina—Before

Citadel Military College, Charleston, South Carolina—After

San Diego Convention Center, San Diego—Before

San Diego Convention Center, San Diego—After

Statue of Liberty, New York City—Before

Statue of Liberty, New York City—After

Washington Monument, Washington, D.C.—Before

Washington Monument, Washington, D.C.—After

Crissy Field, San Francisco—Before

Crissy Field, San Francisco—After

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts—Before

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts—After
Links

Soaring Ocean Temperature Is 'Greatest Hidden Challenge Of Our Generation'

The Guardian

IUCN report warns that 'truly staggering' rate of warming is changing the behaviour of marine species, reducing fishing zones and spreading disease
The scale of warming in the ocean is 'truly staggering', the report warns. Photograph: Ralph Lee Hopkins/Alamy
The soaring temperature of the oceans is the "greatest hidden challenge of our generation" that is altering the make-up of marine species, shrinking fishing areas and starting to spread disease to humans, according to the most comprehensive analysis yet of ocean warming.
The oceans have already sucked up an enormous amount of heat due to escalating greenhouse gas emissions, affecting marine species from microbes to whales, according to an International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) report involving the work of 80 scientists from a dozen countries.
The profound changes underway in the oceans are starting to impact people, the report states. "Due to a domino effect, key human sectors are at threat, especially fisheries, aquaculture, coastal risk management, health and coastal tourism."
Dan Laffoley, IUCN marine adviser and one of the report's lead authors, said: "What we are seeing now is running well ahead of what we can cope with. The overall outlook is pretty gloomy.
"We perhaps haven't realised the gross effect we are having on the oceans, we don't appreciate what they do for us. We are locking ourselves into a future where a lot of the poorer people in the world will miss out."
The scale of warming in the ocean, which covers around 70% of the planet, is "truly staggering", the report states. The upper few metres of ocean have warmed by around 0.13C a decade since the start of the 20th century, with a 1-4C increase in global ocean warming by the end of this century.

The ocean has absorbed more than 90% of the extra heat created by human activity. If the same amount of heat that has been buried in the upper 2km of the ocean had gone into the atmosphere, the surface of the Earth would have warmed by a devastating 36C, rather than 1C, over the past century.
At some point, the report says, warming waters could unlock billions of tonnes of frozen methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, from the seabed and cook the surface of the planet. This could occur even if emissions are drastically cut, due to the lag time between emitting greenhouse gases and their visible consequences.
Warming is already causing fish, seabirds, sea turtles, jellyfish and other species to change their behaviour and habitat, it says. Species are fleeing to the cooler poles, away from the equator, at a rate that is up to five times faster than the shifts seen by species on land.
Even in the north Atlantic, fish will move northwards by nearly 30km per decade until 2050 in search of suitable temperatures, with shifts already documented for pilchard, anchovy, mackerel and herring.
The warming is having its greatest impact upon the building blocks of life in the seas, such as phytoplankton, zooplankton and krill. Changes in abundance and reproduction are, in turn, feeding their way up the food chain, with some fish pushed out of their preferred range and others diminished by invasive arrivals.
With more than 550 types of marine fishes and invertebrates already considered threatened, ocean warming will exacerbate the declines of some species, the report also found.
The movement of fish will create winners and losers among the 4.3 billion people in the world who rely heavily upon fish for sustenance. In south-east Asia, harvests from fisheries could drop by nearly a third by 2050 if emissions are not severely curtailed. Global production from capture fisheries has already levelled off at 90m tonnes a year, mainly due to overfishing, at a time when millions more tonnes will need to be caught to feed a human population expected to grow to 9 billion by 2050.
Humans are also set to suffer from the spread of disease as the ocean continues to heat up. The IUCN report found there is growing evidence of vibrio bacterial disease, which can cause cholera, and harmful algal bloom species that can cause food poisoning. People are also being affected by more severe, if not more numerous, hurricanes due to the extra energy in the ocean and atmosphere.
Coral reefs, which support around a quarter of all marine species, are suffering from episodes of bleaching that have included three-fold in the past 30 years. This bleaching occurs when prolonged high temperatures cause coral to expel its symbiotic algae, causing it to whiten and ultimately die, such as the mass mortality that has gripped the Great Barrier Reef.
Ocean acidification, where rising carbon dioxide absorption increases the acidity of the water, is making it harder for animals such as crabs, shrimps and clams to form their calcium carbonate shells.
The IUCN report recommends expanding protected areas of the ocean and, above all, reduce the amount of heat-trapping gases pumped into the atmosphere.
"The only way to preserve the rich diversity of marine life, and to safeguard the protection and resources the ocean provides us with, is to cut greenhouse gas emissions rapidly and substantially," said Inger Andersen, director general of the IUCN.

Links

Mega-Study on Oceans Predicts Super-Storms, Massive Life Loss

Haaretz - Ruth Schuster

Fish and marine mammals are already moving north as sea temperature rises: 'We were astounded by the scale of ocean warming effects on entire ecosystems,' scientists write.
Gentoo penguins stand on rocks near the Chilean station Bernardo O'Higgins, Antarctica, January 22, 2015. Natacha Pisarenko, AP
Climate change is no longer controversial. Nor is ocean warming. The tropical belt has been expanding, and don't be distracted by fluctuations or Republicans. Moreover, you can find out what else is in store now that a group of 80 scientists from 12 nations has described how the warming of our seas has, and will, affect our lives.
The phenomenon of warming oceans has been somewhat obscured by random fluctuations and our yearning to pretend this isn't happening. But it is. The mean global temperature of the ocean is expected to increase by 1 to 4 degrees by the year 2100, according to the mega-study "Explaining ocean warming: Causes, scale, effects and consequences," compiled by the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
"We were astounded by the scale and extent of ocean warming effects on entire ecosystems made clear by this report," says the coeditor of the 460-page report, Dan Laffoley.

Forecast: Fewer whales, more storms and Zika
The effects of ocean warming already here, and likely future ones include more and stronger super-storms, and the decimation of maritime life as we know it. Experts also expect parasite-borne diseases like malaria and Zika to explode, as pathogens from bacteria to toxic algae proliferate in the warmer clime: Actually, that is already happening.
In fact, all these changes are happening fast. Half of the increase in the mean global ocean temperature since 1865 happened in the last 20 years, according to a January 2016 paper in Nature Climate Change. Moreover, the "warming signal" is reaching deeper into the ocean, wrote the head researcher, Peter Gleckler of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California.
Even the low-emissions scenario (which is considered unlikely) will profoundly affect marine life, from micro-organisms like plankton to marine mammals like whales and polar bears, according to the report. The big mammals, from whales to walruses, are considered to be especially vulnerable to temperature change.
Why whales? They can just swim away, can't they? Yes, well, "Many whale species are highly migratory and this may put them particularly at risk as they face changes to the multiple environments occupied during their migrations," the IUCN scientists explain. And add: "The problem is that we know ocean warming is driving change in the ocean – this is well documented – but the consequences of these changes decades down the line are far from clear."
Rare species of Hawaiian coral being used to create a seed bank grows in a tank at a coral nursery in Honolulu, February 2016. Caleb Jones / AP
One consequence that does seem clear is that coral, actually a sensitive animal, is all but doomed, which is bad news for coastal populations: "Despite covering less than 0.1 percent of the sea floor area, coral reefs provide … habitat for over 25 percent of marine fish species," states the report, adding that the latest models predict ocean warming causing annual coral bleaching at almost all reefs by 2050. Coral doesn't like changes in water temperature, depth or acidity, either, and the water is growing not only warmer, but more acid.

Forecast: Jellyfish under northern lights
Forecasting is for the birds. But the likelihood of climate change bringing down hailstones the size of eggs is not small, while the likelihood that it will bring a rain of fairy godmothers can be deemed remote. The likely bottom-line scenario is that ocean warming will bring about catastrophes for which mankind is "completely unprepared," as Inger Andersen, director-general of the IUCN, put it, pleading that greenhouse gas emissions be cut "rapidly and substantially." Otherwise?
"The value of our relationship with the ocean sometimes seems difficult to cost, but is the ultimate relationship that enables life to exist on Earth," says the report. It is time to stop sticking our heads into the ever-hotter sand.
The climbing mean temperature of oceanic waters is already driving species from the microscopic plankton to jellyfish, turtles and seabirds northward, by up to 10 degrees of latitude. Breeding by coastal animals and birds is also being impaired.
The island nation of Japan, for instance, has intensely studied the rising water sea surface temperature and its correlation with the rising incidence, severity and density of jellyfish blooms. Part of the jellyfishes' northward move is ascribed to natural fluctuations, and part to anthropomorphic influences.

Present: Under siege in the Med
Japan isn't alone in experiencing changes in its waters. Temperatures in the shallow Mediterranean Sea, the "miniaturized ocean" on which Israel depends, have been rising especially dramatically since the 1980s, says the report by IUCN. The all-but-enclosed Mediterranean is, therefore, a great model for how climate change affects marine life and biodiversity.
Warming is bad for cold-water lovers: For one, Mediterranean sea fans are all but history. However, the warmth is marvelous for certain creatures: Indeed, hundreds of tropical species – including jellyfish arriving via the Suez Canal, for instance – have been gaining a fin-hold in the Mediterranean ecological cul-de-sac, spurring Israeli oceanographer Bella Galil to call it "a sea under siege." Scientists count at least eight alien species of jellies in the Mediterranean, including the harmless but huge Rhopilema nomadica that has become entirely too familiar to Israeli bathers – and power stations.
A mosquito control inspector places chemicals into a storm sewer in Miami Beach, Fl., where the Zika virus has been detected, Sept. 2, 2016. Alan Diaz / AP
By changing fish habitats, leading susceptible species to move to cooler waters, warming oceans are affecting fish stocks. Unless you're into jellyfish soup, ultimately catches in the tropics are expected to be reduced, the researchers write.
In some places, such as the East Africa coastal waters and the western Indian Ocean, on top of overfishing and destructive fishing techniques, the warming has decimated the coral reefs on which the local fish depend. In Southeast Asia, marine harvests are expected to fall by 10 to 30 percent by 2050 relative to 1970-2000, because of changing fish demographics (that's under the high "business as usual" greenhouse gas-emission scenario), the IUCN report predicts.
Tropical and polar fish are especially vulnerable to climate change because they're less tolerant of shifts in environmental temperature. The tropics have become hot spots of ocean warming-driven local extinctions, and if the fish survive at all – they tend to be smaller.
As the scientists note, adverse effects are far likelier than new opportunities. The same applies to seabirds: There are those that will migrate north, but only to a certain degree. Climate change is blamed for decimating emperor penguin populations, which fell 50 percent because of reduced sea ice; rockhopper penguins at Campbell Island declined by 96 percent as sea temperature increased; ivory gull numbers fell 70 percent for the same reasons; Arctic skua breeding numbers in Scotland declined by 74 percent from 1986 to 2011. "Some populations may redistribute polewards, but scope for redistribution is limited," the paper states.

Drought in the Golan
Here's another pretty sure forecast: more rain and storms, if not necessarily where we'd like them. Per degree of global warming, the number of severe hurricanes increases by around 25 to 30 percent, according to the report. Some scientists even expect the frequency of El Nino to increase.
Warming oceans are central to this trend, because more water evaporates from them, and must come down in the form of precipitation. One result has been increased rainfall in mid-latitudes and monsoon areas, and less rain in some subtropical regions. The Indian subcontinent in particular has been slammed by changes in ages-old monsoon patterns.
But life isn't fair and food production, including in North America, is under stress from extreme drought.
Then there's the danger of massive amounts of methane escaping from defrosting "prisons" on the seabed and far north. Methane is a greenhouse gas, and a massive release of it would just accelerate global warming, likely making super-storms all the more frequent and intense.
Can't anything be done? The only way to slow this process – it cannot be simply halted in its tracks any more – is to immediately decarbonize modern society. Stop using oil. Period. And meanwhile?
In the Middle East, the rainy season is winter. Last winter was relatively wet in Israel's arid south, and dry as a bone in the usually wetter Golan Heights. This winter is expected to be so rain-less, in the north and the south, that even though Israel obtains much of its water through desalination, some hydrologists warn that the levels in the freshwater Lake Kinneret and coastal aquifers could sink to dangerous new lows. It's also supposed to be hotter than usual, at least the first half of the winter. The second half is predicted to be colder. And dry as a bone.

Links

'We’re Not Going Anywhere,' Say Climate Change Authority Dissenters

The Guardian - Graham Readfearn

Authority's recommendations will 'sanction further delay' with 'serious consequences' for Australia, minority report says
The dissenters' chief accusation is that the Climate Change Authority has ignored the realities of the Paris agreement, which calls for all countries to work together to keep global warming 'well below 2C'. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/Reuters
Despite its brevity, the dissenting report from two members of the government's supposedly independent Climate Change Authority has landed with a dull and uncompromising thud.
Last week the CCA published its report advising the government what it should and shouldn't do in the wake of the Paris climate agreement. In short, the report recommended the government keep the chief pillars of its current policies, but make a few tweaks here and there.
But it emerged that two members of the 10-strong authority would not be endorsing the report, namely Clive Hamilton, professor of public ethics at Charles Sturt University, and David Karoly, professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Melbourne.
Now Hamilton and Karoly have published their dissenting report, which has already been dismissed by the energy and environment minister, Josh Frydenberg.
David Karoly and Clive Hamilton have refused to endorse the Climate Change Authority's report. Photograph: Alan Porritt/AAP
The authority's chair, Wendy Craik, has also issued a clarification under the heading "misleading report", saying Hamilton and Karoly's effort was "not released or endorsed by the authority, and has no status as an authority report".
The CCA's report is pinned to the government's current target to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 26% to 28% by 2030, based on their levels in 2005. That's the target the Australian government took to the Paris climate talks, despite the authority previously suggesting the target should be between 40% and 60%.
Hamilton and Karoly's dissenting report says:
Treating our 'Paris commitment' as if it were only the 26-28% target and not the commitment to hold warming to well below 2C is convenient for the current government's domestic agenda, but it contradicts the nation's international legal obligations and national interest in avoiding dangerous climate change.
Previous CCA reports have been marked by their efforts to stay true to the challenge of bringing the policy and the science together.
Hamilton and Karoly's chief accusation is that the authority has ignored the realities of the Paris agreement, which calls for all countries to work together to keep global warming "well below 2C" and eventually shoot for 1.5C.
The pair's report says:
We believe that the effect of the majority report will be to sanction further delay and a slow pace of action with serious consequences for the nation. Those consequences include one or both of: very severe and costly emission cuts in the mid to-late 2020s; or, repudiation of Australia's international commitments and free riding on the efforts of the rest of the world. The latter would weaken global momentum for an effective response to climate change and harm the nation diplomatically.
What's more, Hamilton and Karoly have suggested the authority has effectively ignored its previous recommendations based on a "carbon budget" approach. This "budget" has suggested Australia must not emit more than 10.1bn tonnes of greenhouse gases between 2013 and 2050.
Hamilton and Karoly say that under the CCA's latest recommendations, more than 90% of that budget will already be used up by the year 2030.
I spoke to Hamilton and asked why he thought the authority had apparently shifted away from its previous advocacy for more rapid cuts and stricter targets. He wouldn't comment.
So was he intending to stay at the authority? He told me:
We're still members and we're not going anywhere. It has been suggested that we might resign. We are not resigning and we're there until out five-year terms expire in July next year. We have an important contribution to make within the terms of the authority's act.
Hamilton said he had started to become concerned about the direction of the authority's latest report "two or three months ago":
I crossed a point where I thought that [the report] goes too far to try to accommodate political circumstances – or an assessment of the political circumstances.
He told me the CCA was modelled on Britain's Climate Change Committee and had two key functions – "expertise in its advice" and "independence from government interference or dictation". He said:
I think that all that an independent authority like the Climate Change Authority can do is to attempt to adhere to that. Of course, no one can be purist and everyone wants their report to have an influence rather than get dusty on shelves, but you can go too far and be too clever by half and second guess the political process. And of course, you can just get it wrong.
Hamilton said he thought the authority had had a positive impact on policy debates.
Despite its recommendations on targets being largely ignored by the previous government, the authority had helped "set a credible benchmark" against which policy proposals could be judged. He added:
In the public domain, it's had a big impact. It's had a big influence in the parliament and with the wider public. It is operating in such a poisonous political space that all it can do in my view to retain its authority is to stick to the principles in its act and make its recommendations on the evidence that we have.
Links

Unmet And Underfunded – Report Finds Australia Failing Pacific On Climate

Oxfam Australia



Australia is lagging behind other developed nations and has failed to increase its contributions to international climate finance as our neighbours in the Pacific face a fight for survival, international aid agency Oxfam said today.
Releasing independent research into the adequacy and effectiveness of climate finance, Oxfam Chief Executive Dr Helen Szoke said Australia could and must do more to support Pacific island countries in their enormous challenge of adapting to the devastating and escalating impacts of climate change.
Dr Szoke said the report, which makes more than 50 recommendations for urgent action in 11 strategic areas, came ahead of this week’s meeting of Pacific Island Forum Leaders in Micronesia, where climate change was expected to be on the agenda.
She said while Pacific islands were taking a leading role in addressing the realities, Australia had failed to increase its contribution to international climate finance in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement. Australia had to work with governments and civil society across the region to ensure vulnerable communities could access the support they needed.
“Overall, the responsibility of Australia to contribute to the climate financing needs of their Pacific island neighbours remains unmet and underfunded,” Dr Szoke said.
“In coming decades, big numbers of Pacific people – in some cases entire nations – could be forced from their homes and lose their livelihoods in the face of an escalation in climate related impacts.
“As a wealthy nation and one of the biggest countries in the region, Australia has a particular responsibility to support its vulnerable neighbours in the Pacific.”
While Australia had been proactive in assisting Pacific island countries to access the Green Climate Fund, it had not increased its average annual contribution of $200 million to international climate finance since 2010.
“Australia’s contribution is weak compared to other developed nations, which have increased their spending on climate finance,” she said. “What’s more, our contributions are now being drawn from an aid budget which has been slashed to a historic low of 23 cents in every $100.
“Oxfam is calling for Australia’s total public and private annual contribution to climate finance to reach at least $3.2 billion in less than four years.”
Dr Szoke said Pacific island countries still face significant challenges accessing available funding. The report’s recommendations include simplifying access to the Green Climate Fund, ensuring women and young people have a stronger voice in programs, and supporting new sources of funding such as taxes on international transport emissions.
“Access to climate finance is a matter of global justice – those who have contributed the least to the causes of climate change are typically the most vulnerable to its impacts and have the least resources to respond,” Dr Szoke said.

Links