The White House Launches a New Site to Track Climate Change

Fortune - Reuters

Cities like Miami (pictured) will now have access to real-time climate change data thanks to a new website powered by the White House. Photograph by Joe Raedle—Getty Images 

The first of its kind.
A new website powered by the White House and partners including Google GOOGL -0.12% and Microsoft MSFT -0.67% , aims to pull real-time climate data from NASA satellites and other sources for planners preparing for the effects of climate change, its founders said on Thursday.
It is the first partnership of its kind to gather in a single place climate projections and figures for decision-makers previously faced with a dearth of information, according to the World Resources Institute (WRI), one of the partners.
The website, PrepData, will process data from NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the U.S. Department of Interior, among other sources.
While raw climate data is often too technical for policy-making, PrepData will translate it into easy-to-use information, the U.S.-based environmental group WRI said in a statement.
John Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, said the project comes as communities worldwide face rising seas, more severe droughts, and other climate-related extreme weather.
Last December, 195 nations agreed to try to hold world temperature rise to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, with an aim of 1.5 degrees Celsius. The Paris agreement was ratified by the United States earlier this month.
"Emissions reductions alone are … not a sufficient response to the climate crisis," said Holdren at a launch of the website on the sidelines of the annual United Nations General Assembly in New York.
"Critical to building climate resilience is ensuring easy access to authoritative, actionable data about ongoing and projected impacts of climate change," he said.
In its current beta form, the website helps users find data relevant to their environment and visualize related risks, mapping coastal flooding or precipitation change, WRI said.
Over the next year, only four users will be able to make use of all the website's functions—California's Sonoma County, the cities of Porto Alegre in Brazil and Durban in South Africa, as well as the Climate Impacts Group at the University of Washington.
But after that it will be open to anyone, WRI said.

Links

• Enabling collective action to manage climate risks
• White House puts real-time climate data online for city planners
• White House: Launching New Public-Private Partnership and Announcing Joint Declaration on Leveraging Open Data for Climate Resilience
• White House: The President's Climate Data Initiative: Empowering America's Communities to Prepare for the Effects of Climate Change

Dutch Parliament Votes To Close Down Country's Coal Industry

The Guardian - Arthur Neslen

Non-binding vote for 55% cut in CO2 emissions will require closure of remaining five plants and ensure country meets its Paris climate commitments

Five Dutch coal-fired power stations were closed last year but the country still has another five plants in operation, three of which came online in 2015. Photograph: Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The Dutch parliament has voted for a 55% cut in CO2 emissions by 2030, which would require the closure of all the country's coal-fired power plants.
The unexpected vote on Thursday night by 77 to 72 would bring the Netherlands clearly into line with the Paris climate agreement, with some of the most ambitious climate policies in Europe.
It is not binding on the government, but the Liberal and Labour parties say they will now push for speedy implementation of the motion.
Five Dutch coal-fired power stations were closed last year but the country still has another five plants in operation. Three of these came online in 2015, and have been blamed for a 5% rise in the country's emissions last year.
The Dutch Liberal MP and vice president of the parliament, Stientje van Veldhoven, told the Guardian: "Closing down big coal plants – even if they were recently opened – is by far the most cost effective way to achieve the goals of the Paris agreement, and all countries will need to take such far-reaching measures. We cannot continue to use coal as the cheapest source of energy when it is the most expensive from a climate perspective."
A court in the Netherlands last year ordered prime minister Mark Rutte's government to cut its emissions by a quarter by 2020, citing the severity of the global warming threat which the Netherlands has recognised in international treaties.
Dennis van Berkel, legal counsel for Urgenda, the group which brought the case, described the vote as "an enormous leap for climate policy in the Netherlands". The vote also calls for a 25% emissions cut by 2020.
The country's centre-right coalition government is pursuing a twin-track response of appealing the ruling to the country's higher court, while preparing a climate package for early November.
This could include limited coal plant closures, more funding for projects involving renewable energy, carbon capture and storage, and geothermal heating.
Some environmentalists fear that the final package will involve a coalition deal that renders the parliamentary vote obsolete. The issue has been a divisive one in the Netherlands, with the Labour party, a coalition partner in Rutte's government, backing the opposition in yesterday's vote.
The Dutch environment ministry was not immediately available to comment on the vote. However, the economic minister Henk Kamp spoke out earlier this month against any mothballing of the three new plants built by EOn, RWE and Engie.
"They are the cleanest (coal plants) in Europe," he said. "We'd be crazy if we shut them."
In March, the Netherlands will elect a new government, with Geert Wilders' far-right, populist and anti-immigrant Freedom Party leading many opinion polls. Wilders has previously spoken dismissively of "the sinister green-windmill subsidy complex".
Willem Wiskerke, a spokesman for Greenpeace Netherlands said: "He is a climate denier like Donald Trump, nothing more, nothing less, a rightwing, fact-free populist who denies the climate crisis and will not put any effort into solving it."
While yesterday's coal-crushing vote is not formally binding, van Veldhoven said she was optimistic that quick action to force a decision this autumn would tip the government's hand, before next year's elections.
"It is our clear political statement so this is what they must do," she said. "It is a motion, not a law, so there is some room for manoeuvre. But having one coalition partner support it is always a good guarantee that an adopted motion will be enforced."
Following passage of any new law, EU Emissions Trading System permits would also have to be reduced, to prevent a freak surplus lowering the price of carbon allowances, van Veldhoven said.
The parliamentary vote follows a recent report by the consultancy CE Delft, which found that the cheapest way to meet the Netherlands' climate commitments would be to close one or two new coal stations. The paper, which was commissioned by Eneco, a Dutch green power company, estimated this would cost the average household €30 (£26) a year, but save them €80 a year on energy bills.
However, the Dutch government's economic ministry has tallied the bill for closing all of the country's coal plants by 2020 at €7bn. While this would have little effect on energy security and cut Holland's emissions by 31%, the CO2 savings would fall to just 9% due to a rise in coal-produced power imports, the report said.

Links

• Global investment in energy falls but renewables remain strong
• G20 reaffirms climate commitments – but dodges deadlines
• Norway pledges to become climate neutral by 2030
• Sweden should keep coal in the ground, not sell it off
• The Guardian view on the UN climate change treaty: now for some action
• World's biggest wealth fund excludes 52 coal-related groups
• Norwegian industry plans to up fossil fuel production despite Paris pledge
• Coal lobby boss says industry 'will be hated like slave-traders' after COP21

Why Is Emergency-Scale Action Necessary?

Climate Code Red


The world now faces a climate emergency. Our scientists tell us. We know it.
Slowly the political elite are realising that the current international climate policy-making paradigm is dying of failure.
 Recognition of the climate emergency is now written into the platform for the Democratic Party for the 2016 US presidential election.
So how does our scientific understanding guide as to constructing a new way of looking at the challenge, as to what is happening, what is safe, and how we should respond?
 The Victorian Climate Action Network held a workshop on these questions on 11 September 2016. The slides below were the contribution by David Spratt to the first session, which asked the question 'Why is emergency-scale action necessary?'

Slides