30/09/2016

Climate Change Stealing Rain From Australia By Shifting Winds Towards Antarctica

Fairfax - Clare Sibthorpe

When much of southeast Australia faced abnormally hot and dry weather last summer, forecasters put it down to a high-pressure system blocking clouds from forming. But rising greenhouse gases were also to blame, researchers have found.
Human-caused climate change is robbing crucial rain from southern parts of Australia by shifting Southern Ocean westerly winds towards Antarctica, according to a new study. Photo: supplied
An ice core in a drill that researchers used to study the climate of Antarctica. Photo: supplied
A new study by the ANU and 16 other institutions revealed human-caused climate change is already harming parts of Australia by robbing vital rain and pushing south westerly winds towards Antarctica.
The ANU's lead researcher associate professor Nerilie Abram said the hijacking of rain combined with 2015 being Australia's fifth-warmest year on record and 2016 on track to be the hottest was an ominous mix.
"The findings confirm that climate change is already having an impact on parts of Australia."
When looking at rainfall in southeast Australia, particularly the ACT and NSW, Professor Abram said it was important to consider other weather events such as El Nino phenomenons, which cause hot and dry conditions.
"But certainly in terms of the very long heat wave we saw in February and March, that was associated with the very strong winds heading south towards Antarctica," she said.
Professor Abram said the study, published in Nature Climate Change, showed southwest Australia was hurting the most from the change, where it had lost one fifth of its rainfall since the 1970s.

Humans have caused climate change for 180 years.

But she said more research was needed to understand the long term impacts on that region and the rest of Australia.
"Antarctica and the Southern Ocean experience extreme fluctuations in climate year to year," she said.
"What this research shows shows us is that we need to keep putting money into research to find out how Antarctica's climate is being affected because it directly affects our lives in Australia."
A 2015 study between CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology found climate change would hit Australia harder than other countries, predicting a rise in temperature of more than five degrees within 80 years.
They forecast reduced rain in southern Australia over the next few decades as well as harsher fire seasons for southern and eastern parts of the country.
This August, Germany-based researchers Climate Analytics found the difference between 1.5 and 2 degrees of warming – the two goals included in the Paris climate deal – would be much greater in terms of extreme events and disasters than previously believed.
It found that within just 10 - 20 years, southern Australia would face heatwaves on average 13 days longer at 1.5 degrees and 20 days longer at 2 degrees, while dry spells would be 3.5 days longer at 1.5 degrees and six days at 2 degrees.

Links

Can You Spot The Reason South Australia Doesn’t Have Power?

BuzzFeed | 

Around 75,000 homes in South Australia were left without power overnight, after huge storms smashed through the state. Photos emerged of the transmission towers bent and twisted by the weather.
Facebook: aaron.lee.baxter
Despite the images of towers turned into licorice, people quickly blamed the fact that South Australia gets 40% of its energy from renewables. Prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said SA's blackout was a "real wake-up call" about renewable energy, One Nation was blaming Labor and the Greens for the blackout and senator Nick Xenophon called the situation a "disgrace" and said he wants an independent inquiry into renewable energy. The storm was the worst South Australia has experienced in more than 50 years and while renewable energy became the cool thing to blame, here's another photo of a transmission tower looking like a cow eating in a paddock.
facebook.com
Many critics of South Australia's energy market seized on a Grattan Institute report published earlier this week that suggested the state's speed in shifting to renewables could "threaten" the power supply.
BuzzFeed News spoke to the author of the report, Tony Wood, on Thursday. He laughed when asked whether South Australia's renewable energy was to blame for the statewide blackout.
"Unless there's something I've missed, [yesterday has] got nothing to do with renewable energy, it's got everything to do with wild weather," said Wood.
Wood pointed to the fact 22 transmission towers were felled during the storm, littering South Australia's usually picturesque countryside with dozens of metal carcasses.
"You can have a coal powered power station in Port Augusta producing power, but it wouldn't have mattered if the power lines go down," he said.
"If that happens you can't get the power to the people."
The Climate Council's John Connor has also been aggressive in pushing back on people blaming renewable energy, calling it "irresponsible and misleading".
"Blaming this extraordinary outage on the state's renewable energy generators, as some people jumped to do well before any facts were known, is both irresponsible and misleading," said Connor.

Links

Officials Admit No Modelling Shows How Australia Will Meet Paris Climate Pledge

The Guardian

Environment officials tell parliamentary inquiry there is no modelling on how current policies will affect emissions beyond 2020, or when emissions will peak
Australia has no climate modelling showing when its greenhouse gas emissions will peak, government officials have said. Photograph: Stefan Postles/EPA
Government officials have acknowledged that Australia's 2030 greenhouse gas emissions reductions pledged at Paris in 2015 were made without any modelling to show whether existing policies could achieve those targets.
They also admitted the government did not have any modelling revealing when Australia's emissions would peak.
The admissions, made in a parliamentary committee under questioning from Labor Senator for New South Wales Jenny McAllister, fly in the face of advice from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, telling the government it had "existing legislation, policies and measures to enable it to achieve" the the reductions.
They also follow a string of independent modelling exercises showing current policies will not achieve the emissions reductions committed to in Paris. Last week energy advisory firm RepuTex released modelling showing Australia's emissions wouldn't fall much at all between now and 2030, under current policies.
When asked about whether Australia would meet targets laid out in the Paris agreement, Patrick Suckling, the Australian ambassador for the environment, responded that the government had said it would meet those targets and its track record showed it met internationally agreed targets.
"On the basis of past performance, where we've met and exceeded Kyoto 1 and Kyoto 2, that's the track record," Suckling said.
When pushed on the issue by the committee, Suckling referred further questions to Brad Archer from the international climate change and energy innovation division in the Department of Environment and Energy.
Under extended questioning, Archer pointed to various analyses of individual policies but wasn't able cite any modelling that would have informed government if the current set of policies would achieve the 2030 targets.
He said the government was paying polluters to pollute less under the Emissions Reduction Fund. "So we can take into account what is being achieved under the Emissions Reduction Fund." But he couldn't identify any analysis that looked at the overall impact of current policies.
Archer said: "It's not the case that we have modelling capacity available on-tap to continually undertake analyses." At another point he added: "There are inherent challenges in making projections over long periods of time."
Kushla Munro from the international branch of the Department of Environment and Energy later told the committee that the government's "latest emissions projections go to 2020" and that 2030 projections were being prepared.
When asked by McAllister when Australia's emissions would peak, Archer said "that's a very interesting question," and that modelling done so far didn't include analysis of current policies.
McAllister told Guardian Australia the Turnbull government needed to "own up and admit that their climate policies just aren't credible".
"These officials have confirmed Australia's worst kept secret – that the Turnbull government has no idea how it will meet our 2030 emission reduction targets," she said.
"They can't say when Australia's emissions will peak and begin to decline, and they wouldn't confirm that the government's current policy settings will see us meet the target without adjustment."

Links