18/10/2016

Climate Change Will Change How We Grow Food

National Geographic - Daniel Stone

The world's leading agriculture organization sounds an urgent alarm as temperatures climb and water use is expected to rise.
Farmers worldwide are entering a period of increasing uncertainty as climate change compromises food production in areas already sensitive to food insecurity, a new report from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization cautions. And the group predicted to be most affected will be women.
The annual report by the FAO, the top global collector of data on global food and farming trends, ties together poverty, hunger, and climate change to persuade governments to adopt policy changes that will protect farmers of the future. The 2016 edition of The State of Food and Agriculture urges countries to help their farmers rely less on natural resources and to find ways to use water and fertilizer more efficiently.
"We need to make major changes in the way we produce food and manage agricultural systems," says Rob Vos, director of agricultural economics for the Food and Agriculture Organization. "Climate change is already affecting many parts of the world, particularly in Africa and many tropical areas. If we don't make the systems involved in agriculture more resilient, food security will be in jeopardy."
2016 data showing countries most vulnerable to food insecurity due to climate change. MAP BY FAO
All farmers will be affected by global changes, but the FAO says the impact on women will be the most dramatic. Female farmers account for 43 percent of agricultural workers in developing countries, yet they face substantial disadvantages compared to men, including disproportionally high demands on their time to run a home, paltry access to agricultural tools and methods, and limitations in the credit markets that allow others to remain nimble in the face of environmental changes. Women worldwide tended to invest less money in things that might make their farms more productive.
"The obstacles that confront women farmers mean that they achieve lower yields than their male counterparts," an FAO dossier on Women and Agriculture reported in 2011, the last time the organization comprehensively studied female farmers. "Yet women are as good at farming as men. Solid empirical evidence shows that if women farmers used the same level of resources as men on the land they farm, they would achieve the same yield levels."
Researchers point to particular risk for countries the UN describes as "developing"—those with little access to the farming technology that makes climate change a less daunting foe in wealthier countries. But it warns that warming temperatures and less predictable rainfall are expected to hurt agriculture on every continent. (For more on how this affects African nations, see How African Farmers Face a Warming Climate.)
In North America, yields of major crops, including corn and soybeans, will decline modestly through 2050, followed by a steeper decline by 2100, the report says. The stress of higher heat and reduced quality of forage for livestock is projected to reduce milk quality. South America may see higher wheat and soybean productivity, thanks to higher temperatures, but increased salinity will yield more desert zones in parts of Brazil and Chile that now support a good deal of those countries’ crops.
Scientists expect areas in Europe and Asia to benefit from thawing polar regions that will open new arable land, yet higher temperatures will increase demand for water and cause substantial drop-offs in rice yields over large areas of these continents. Likewise, in Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific Islands, farmers will face extended seasons of heavy rain and parching drought.
The continent most at risk is Africa, largely a result of fragmented food systems, high poverty, and government instability. Progress that several countries have made on food security and crop diversity may be undone when those crops, such as maize and rice, are unsuited for a warmer world, and when farmers don't have the money or resources to make investments in new seeds, farming methods, or equipment.
Amid the report's urgent warnings and cautionary suggestions is also some good news. FAO officials say that India and Kenya as examples of countries making the right moves. Both countries are at high risk for climate disaster, but the Indian government has implemented policies to help its farmers diversify their farm production, as well as directly empowered women. In one community project in the Indian state of Maharashtra, builders installed new sources of drinking water and firewood, which reduced the amount of time women spent collecting both.
The worst-case scenarios of climate change could erode much of this progress, however, causing India and Kenya's agricultural sectors to slide back into "developing" status. Officials use this fact to underscore the urgency of instituting smart agriculture practices immediately.
No  country will be inoculated from the harsh impacts of climate change. Every place on Earth trying to feed a growing population an increasingly diverse diet—which is to say, every country—will find significant challenges posed by warming temperatures, even if changes turn out to be modest.
The United States will face its share of challenges. But it is one of the best equipped nations for agricultural adaptation considering its widespread availability of seeds, technology, and weather monitoring systems. A 2015 study from Carnegie Mellon University found that for the U.S. to grow more fruits and vegetables over the next several decades, it would need to increase its energy use by 38 percent, its water by 10 percent. This would also result in an increase in greenhouse gas emissions by six percent.
On top of adapting to climate change, farmers will also face new demands to to meet changing nutrition standards, while at the same time reducing environmental impact of their activities. Individual farmers can do their part, but the lasting solution, FAO officials say, will come from governments. “There are a number of compounding factors that come together," says Vos. "If those factors can be addressed all together, they can drive big changes for everyone."

Links

Solar Delivers Cheapest Electricity ‘Ever, Anywhere, By Any Technology’

Think ProgressDr Joe Romm

Half the price of coal!
Chile exceeded 1000 Megawatts of solar this year. CREDIT: ACERA.
Chile has just contracted for the cheapest unsubsidized power plant in the world, Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) reports.
In last week’s energy auction, Chile accepted a bid from Spanish developer Solarpack Corp. Tecnologica for 120 megawatts of solar at the stunning price of $29.10 per megawatt-hour (2.91 cents per kilowatt-hour or kwh). This beats the 2.99 cents/kwh bid Dubai received recently for 800 megawatts. For context, the average residential price for electricity in the United States is 12 cents per kilowatt-hour.
“Solar power delivers cheapest unsubsidised electricity ever, anywhere, by any technology,” BNEF Chair Michael Liebreich said on Twitter after this contract was announced.
Carlos Finat, head of the Chilean Renewable Energies Association (ACERA) told Bloomberg that the auction is “a strong warning sign that the energy business continues on the transition path to renewable power and that companies should adapt quickly to this transition process.” Indeed, in the same auction, the price of coal power was nearly twice as high!
Grid-connected solar power on Chile has quadrupled since 2013. Total installed capacity exceeded 1,000 megawatts this year — the most by far in South America. Another 2,000 megawatts is under construction, and there are over 11,000 megawatts that are “RCA Approved” (i.e. have environmental permits).

Chile is aided by the fact that its Atacama desert is “the region with the highest solar radiation on the planet,” according to the Inter-American Development Bank. So much solar is being built in the high-altitude desert that Northern Chile can’t use it all, and the government is rushing to build new transmission lines.
Chile is part of a global trend where solar energy has doubled seven times since 2000. In the U.S. alone, it has grown 100-fold in the past decade thanks to a sharp drop in prices that has brought the cost of solar (with subsidies) to under four cents a kilowatt hour in many places, as I detailed last month.
The future for solar could not be sunnier.

Links

Mass-Produced, Printable Solar Cells Enter Market And Could Change Everything

MindsAlternative World News Network

Australian solar power experts making up the Victorian Organic Solar Cell Consortium have developed and begun to market solar cells that are created with a 3D printer.
The group,  consisting of scientists from the CSIRO, the University of Melbourne and Monash University have been working on the technology for over seven years and have figured out a way to cheaply print the panels onto plastic, including smart-phones and laptops, enabling self charging electronics.  They are also able to print directly on to walls and windows using an opaque solar film and claim that they can line a skyscraper with panels, making it totally electrically self sufficient.
"We print them onto plastic in more or less the same way we print our plastic banknotes," said Fiona Scholes, senior research scientist at CSIRO. "Connecting our solar panels is as simple as connecting a battery. It’s very cheap. The way in which it looks and works is quite different to conventional silicon rooftop solar."
The next step is to create a solar spray coating to enhance the power of the panel.  "We would like to improve the efficiency of solar panels - we need to develop solar inks to generate more energy from sunlight,” said Scholes. "We are confident we can push the technology further in the years to come."


Links

Australia Takes Centre Stage On Global Green Climate Funds

Renew Economy

Howard Bamsey, Executive Director, $100 billion Green Climate Fund
The political rhetoric about climate and clean energy in the domestic market may suggest Australia is making huge leaps backwards, but things are looking a little different on the international arena.
Over the weekend, long-serving Canberra bureaucrat Howard Bamsey was appointed executive director of the $100 billion Green Climate Fund, one of the crucial bodies in international climate finance, and he has been given the role of steering the fund out of its troubled beginnings.
In the meantime, Australia’s biggest investment bank, Macquarie Group, is said to be one of two bidders short-listed to take control of the UK’s Green Investment Bank, a purchase that will be priced at around £4 billion ($A6.5 billion) that would thrust Macquarie centre stage in the private green finance market.
The two developments suggest that Australia is not totally immune to, or divorced from, international developments on climate change and renewables energy, which are now moving at rapid speed.
Over the weekend, a crucial agreement was reached to reduce emissions from hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) – a particularly potent greenhouse gas – by 85 per cent at the Montreal Protocol meeting held in Kigali, Rwanda.
The move, hailed by the Coalition government, is expected to knock 0.5°C off anticipated global temperature rises, and comes as Australia is rushing to ratify the Paris agreement before the next major climate talks begin in Marrakesh, Morocco, in just over two weeks.
The Paris agreement has been ratified by more than 60 countries representing more than 60 per cent of global emissions, meaning it will come into force in the next few weeks, four years earlier than anticipated when the deal was reached last December.
Australia’s ratification – if it occurs before the Marrakesh meeting – will mean that it can play a key role in talks designed about how to bring that pact into force, notably setting the platform for countries to increase their climate targets over and above those that were brought to the table in Paris.
As it is, Australia will face tough questioning over its Paris commitments before and during the Marrakesh talks, with UN parties posing a list of difficult questions over its targets and commitments, just as it did two years ago in the lead up to Paris.
It is understood that both foreign minister Julie Bishop and energy and environment minister Josh Frydenberg will attend the Marrakesh talks.
But there are other signs – apart from the appointment of Bamsey and indirectly the interest of Macquarie, that Australia may be developing one language on climate change for the international stage and another for the toxic and partisan domestic market.
While the local rhetoric has focused on “cost and security” on domestic energy policy, Turnbull last week acknowledged that Australia’s Paris climate commitment will also be a major factor.
“We need to keep the lights on. We need energy to be affordable—not the most expensive in Australia, as it is in South Australia. And we need to meet our emissions reduction target,” Turnbull said in Question Time. Analysts say that last phrase in important.
This is the missing link between the Coalition’s attack on South Australia and other Labor states renewable energy targets, and the shortfall between its own policies and its Paris commitments.
And on that point, the language around next year’s review of climate policies has also subtlety changed, moving on from a mere “sit rep” – situation report where current policies are merely assessed – to a likely review of what new policies may actually be needed to meet those Paris targets.
The appointment of Bamsey, however, suggests Australia remains kean to play a prominent role. Bamsey has been one of Australia’s leading climate change negotiators, is a former deputy secretary of the department of climate change, a former special envoy on climate change and a former head of the Australian Greenhouse Office.
He was also on the government’s task force on energy efficiency and notably said, when former prime minister Kevin Rudd signed the Kyoto Treaty in 2007, that it was like “coming up from drowning”.
The GCF is key because it will be the means through which developed countries will funnel finance to the developing world, and is one of the key mechanisms of the Paris deal. It will be Bamsey’s job to convince wealthy countries to honour their commitments,” Climate Change News reported.
So, far the fund has been provided with $US10 billion in donations, and is supposed to act as a distribution point for $100 billion a year by 2020.
But in the year since the fund began approving projects, less than one twentieth of that has been committed and just $US5.4 million has actually been disbursed, leading to concerns in Paris last year that it was dysfunctional.
Bamsey is believed to have won the position ahead of 400 other candidates. Last year, in the Conversation, he wrote that the GCF “must succeed and be seen to succeed to keep developing nations in the game. Otherwise the future of international cooperation on climate change will be in jeopardy.”
Bamsey joins another Australian, Ewen McDonald, who is co-chair of the board.
As for Macquarie, it has has been a relatively active investor in clean energy projects overseas, but renewable energy still accounts for just two per cent of the asset base of its main investment vehicle, the
The GIB was created in 2012 by the UK government to invest in UK-based green infrastructure projects and mobilise private sector capital to co-invest.
It has invested £2.7 billion, and brought together £11 billion in total investment, in offshore wind, energy efficiency, waste and bioenergy, and onshore renewables.

Links