16/01/2017

Early Skirmishes Point To A War Over Renewable Energy Lasting Well Into 2017

Fairfax - Peter Hannam

Just before last year's federal elections, Jay Weatherill, the South Australian premier, was ruminating about what it would take to finally get attention paid to the nation's looming energy crunch.
Would it be the closure of the brown coal-fired Hazelwood power station, which accounted for a fifth of Victoria's power and a supplier to SA when the wind didn't blow? Or perhaps the shutdown of the ageing Portland aluminium smelter – a huge consumer of electricity adjacent to his state?
Wind farms supply more than 40 per cent of South Australia's electricity and have become a political hotspot.
"It may be those sorts of events that might precipitate that discussion," Weatherill told Fairfax Media in his parliamentary office in Adelaide.
The Premier wasn't to know that within months, a series of mishaps would thrust energy – and in particular, his state's relative dependence on renewable sources such as wind and solar – into the spotlight.
The events included a massive September storm that spawned at least seven tornadoes and knocked out a key transmission line, triggering a "system black" power outage for all of SA. And just days before the tempest, Fairfax revealed Hazelwood's French owner Engie would close the 1600-megawatt plant by April 2017, news that sent wholesale power prices surging.
Trenches are now being dug for what looms as a political battle that will probably last through 2017.On one side lie the Turnbull government, fossil fuel suppliers and right-wing pundits, who say the priority has to be affordable and reliable power.
On the other, Labor and the Greens and clean-energy backers who argue ageing coal-fired power stations need to prepare for an orderly if not accelerated exit to meet Australia's commitments agreed in the Paris climate treaty.
The Hazelwood power station in Victoria is to close by the end of March 2017. Photo: Eddie Jim
Josh Frydenberg, environment and energy minister, ended holidays early on Thursday to rail against states for curbing unconventional gas exploration, which also feeds into higher electricity prices. That's especially true in SA where gas provides all the power that's not from wind or the sun.
He took particular aim at Queensland, where the Labor government under Annastacia Palaszczuk is aiming for a 50 per cent share of renewable by 2030, up from 4.4 per cent in 2015.
"It's going to dramatically send their prices up," Frydenberg told Macquarie Radio on Thursday. "It will inevitably lead to a reduction in the amount of coal-fired power."

'Hard right'
Frydenberg's Labor counterpart, Mark Butler, though, says the Coalition's energy policy was "being dictated by the hard right of the party with the likes of Tony Abbott and Cory Bernardi".
"The culture-war element starts to blind people to pretty clear policy," he says, noting three-quarters of Australia's fleet of power stations were operating beyond the end of their design life and needed to be replaced.
"The Turnbull government leaves a policy vacuum at the federal level, the states will fill the void," he says.
Federal Labor remains committed to a 50 per cent renewable share by 2030, he said, noting the Turnbull government has no target beyond 2020 nor is a target among the terms of reference for its 2017 climate policy review.
For her part, Lily D'Ambrosio, Victoria's energy minister, batted off criticism that her government's policies caused Hazelwood to close.
 "Victorians expect us to work together to take this action [on an orderly exit of coal-fired power] - but it seems like the Commonwealth is more interested in taking political pot shots," D'Ambrosio told Fairfax.
"It's time Josh Frydenberg showed some backbone and stood up to the extreme elements within the Liberal Party by supporting more renewable energy."
Abbott, as if on cue, weighed into the renewables debate on Saturday, declaring that the Turnbull government's "first move this year should be to introduce legislation to protect existing renewable generation but to remove all further mandatory use requirements".
"Despite the reduction that my government secured to the renewable energy target, Australia is still supposed almost to double renewable energy supplies over the next four years," he wrote in a News column. "If it goes ahead, it will be the death knell for the heavy ­industries of Whyalla and Port Pirie in South Australia and will ­almost certainly destroy the aluminium industry everywhere."

Energy prices rise
What is certain is that energy bills are on the rise – although the causes are highly debated.
The closure of Hazelwood alone is likely to raise annual power bills by $30-$200 during the three years to 2018-19 across the eastern states that make up the National Electricity Market, the Australian Electricity Market Operator said late last year. That amounts to an increase of 2-10 per cent.
For NSW, a typical bill that in 2015-16 was $1403 before GST, will rise 9.8 per cent in 2016-17. This rise will slow to an average 3.9 per cent for the following two years, AEMO predicts.
In Victoria, a typical residential bill in 2015-16 was $1358 before GST, and can be expected to rise 0.7 per cent this year. Market offer prices should rise 8.4 per cent in 2017-18 but drop 1.3 per cent the following year, AEMO said.
Bruce Mountain, an energy economist with CME Australia, says rising energy prices will prompt more people to add solar panels and also batteries as prices continue to tumble – much faster than regulators predict.
Tesla's new 13.5-kilowatt-hour Powerwall 2, costing about $8800 before installation, already offers a lower battery price than AEMO had predicted for 2040, he says
An average household in Adelaide, where power prices have doubled in the past eight years to be among the highest in Australia, would now be better off with panels and storage.
While panels alone typically slash demand for electricity from the grid by a third, adding a battery will reduce grid purchases by about 95 per cent, he said.

'Existential threat'
Dylan McConnell, a research fellow at the Melbourne Energy Institute, notes AEMO is predicting 15.5 gigawatts of coal-fired power plants  will be shut by 2030. That's about half of such stations and equivalent to 10 Hazelwoods.
Importantly, AEMO is betting 12GW of new gas-fired power will come on stream "assuming no alternative technologies come to fruition", Mr McConnell said.
However, the open-cycle gas plants that can provide peaking power to complement variable suppliers such as wind and solar farms "face an existential threat from batteries", he said.
The problem for gas is made worse by the current high price in Australia as supplies get exported, doubling cost for local consumers as international rather than domestic prices now apply.
"You know the price of wind in 25 years' time but with gas, you don't know the price six months out," Mr McConnell said.
Matthew Warren, chief executive of the Australian Energy Council, which represents major generators and retailers, says it is unlikely Australia will see another coal-fired power station built "unless there are major technological developments".
"From the industry's perspective, the key is consistent and integrated, national energy and emission reduction policy," Warren said.
 "This is not about good guys versus bad guys, [but] about reducing emissions at the lowest cost without compromising reliability," he said.
Without clear signals, investors won't have the confidence to invest the billions needed to bring new, more efficient capacity online.

RET challenges
Bloomberg New Energy Finance underscored the scale of the challenge even meeting the 2020 Renewable Energy Target of supplying 33,000 gigawatt-hours from clean energy annually from 2020.
Last year, investment in large scale renewables under the RET bounced back from a meagre $US10 million in 2014 and 2015 after the Abbott government's review of the sector threw it into a panic. In 2016, it recovered to $US1.1 billion ($1.45 billion).
 "However it is still well below the $US2.9 billion per annum now needed to satisfy the notional 20 per cent target by 2020," Bloomberg said.
Greens energy spokesman Adam Bandt says the Coalition will be tempted to stir up fears of rising electricity prices "in the hope that they can repeat 2013", when Tony Abbott swept to power in part because of the carbon tax issue.
"They'll try to beat the electricity bill drums but the prices are going up on their watch," he says.
Tennant Reed, national policy adviser to the Australian Industry Group, doubts the renewable energy issue will become as fraught as the carbon tax debate.
 "I don't think there's the same degree of political uniformity on renewable energy as there developed on carbon pricing," Reed said, adding it's a lot more concrete an issue, especially for those panels on their roofs.
There's also a wide recognition that it's an important issue to resolve, not least because renewables will play "a gigantic part of the future energy system", he said.

Links

Very Soon, We'll Have Blown The World's Entire Carbon Budget

Fast CompanyAdele Peters

By one calculation, we have a little more than a year left to do something drastic with our carbon emissions before we lock in a future of drastic climate change.
Photo: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center/Flickr
As of now—by one calculation—the world has one year to stop pumping CO2 into the atmosphere if we want to stop climate change at 1.5 degrees Celsius of warming, the aim of the Paris climate agreement.
A carbon countdown clock from researchers at the Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change does the math, estimating the time left at current emission levels. Even with a higher limit of two degrees of warming and the most optimistic projections, we still only have about 23 years to fully transition to a carbon-free economy.



"Once we have exhausted the carbon budget, every ton of CO2 that is released by cars, buildings, or industrial plants would need to be compensated during the 21st century by removing the CO2 from the atmosphere again," says Fabian Löhe, a spokesperson for the Mercator researchers. "Generating such 'negative emissions' is even more challenging, and we do not know today at which scale we might be able to do that. Hence, the clock shows that time is running out: It is not enough to act sometime in the future, but it is necessary to implement more ambitious climate policies already in the very short-term."
Moving to a clean economy obviously requires massive change. Despite the massive growth of renewable energy, most energy still comes from fossil fuels. China, which is moving aggressively to shut down coal plants and spending an unprecedented $361 billion on renewable energy over the next few years, will still get half of its power from nonrenewable sources in 2020. Most heat is fossil-powered. Most transportation runs on gas. Building the infrastructure needed to change that in a year (or a little over four years, if you look at the optimistic projections for staying under 1.5 degrees) would take a level of action that isn't happening now.
"Many experts see a growing dissonance between the increasing ambitions of climate policy and the lack of success in achieving sustained emission reductions today," says Löhe. "So far, there is no track record for reducing emissions globally. Instead, greenhouse gas emissions have been rising at a faster pace during the last decade than previously—despite growing awareness and political action across the globe."
Researchers have found that the commitments that countries made in the Paris agreement don't go far enough to keep warming under 1.5 degrees—or even under 2 degrees.

"While countries were able to agree upon adequate long-term climate policy targets, they have not been able to match these long-term ambitions with appropriate short-term actions," says Löhe. "In fact, short-term emission reduction commitments by countries so far—the so-called nationally determined contributions (NDCs)—will only slow the growth in global greenhouse gas emissions rather than starting an era of substantial and sustained emission reductions."
That half-degree makes a difference; the flooding and droughts and other extreme weather that are already becoming more common will get worse at 1.5 degrees, and likely far worse at 2 degrees. It's possible that Arctic sea ice might survive with "only" 1.5 degrees of warming. Some parts of the Persian Gulf that would be uninhabitable after 2 degrees of warming might still be tolerable at 1.5 degrees.
The International Governmental Panel on Climate Change, the UN group that produces comprehensive reports on climate change, won't publish its report on 1.5 degrees of warming—and how to avoid it—until 2018, likely after the carbon budget has been blown. Even to stay under 2 degrees of warming, the world needs to act much more quickly.
"It is crucial that countries jointly raise the short-term ambition of climate policy by ratcheting up their respective [commitments made in Paris] through concrete policies and credible implementation plans for additional emission reductions," Löhe says. "To successfully manage the transition toward a carbon neutral world economy, it is crucial to steer investments in the right direction. This will at some point require a price on carbon, either through a tax or a functioning emissions trading system."


Links

Why Teenage Hip-Hop Artist And Climate Change Warrior Xiuhtezcatl Martinez Is Suing The US Government

Fairfax - Andrew Masterson

In the United States in November, in a single 48-hour period, two hugely significant things happened. One of them received worldwide attention but the other, somewhat improbably, might yet turn out to be more important.
The first, of course, was the election of Donald Trump. The second, the following day, concerned prominent District Court judge Ann Aiken, who delivered a legal order that seems set to shake American and global business practice to the core.
Xiuhtezcatl Martinez is one of a group of teenagers suing the US government to force on climate change.  Photo: Earth Guardians
In the process it may just save humanity from climate change-induced catastrophe. It might also make a Colorado teenager a household name of even greater ubiquity than the President-elect's.
And that will be a hell of an achievement, not least because the name in question is Xiuhtezcatl Martinez.
Scientists rallying in San Francisco, December 2016, against what they say are unwarranted attacks by the incoming Trump administration against scientists advocating for the issue of climate change. Photo: Marcio Jose Sanchez/AP
Martinez, 16, is the public face of a group of 21 US teens who in October last year launched a court action against the American government. The case alleged that because the government was undertaking activities that cause climate change, it was therefore denying the constitutional rights of young people to life, liberty and property.
Rather than dismiss the move as a symbolic gesture, the government and various fossil fuel companies lodged strong objections to it. A year later, Judge Aiken delivered a stunning verdict: the objections were thrown out and the way opened for the group to take the US administration to trial.
There is a kind of grim humour to the outcome. In a Republican-dominated Washington DC, where evidence of global warming is routinely dismissed, why not get the job done by simply suing those at the top?
To Martinez – who is heading to Australia in February – the court victory delivered a powerful antidote to the election result.
Martinez, 16, is also a hip-hop artist. He is in Australia in February on a speaking tour. Photo: Earth Guardians
"I believe that regardless of the administration in place this law suit has serious implications," he said.
"If we win, the federal courts are going to force the US government to reduce our carbon emissions to a safe levels. We're not letting Trump slow us down."
Xiuhtezcatl Martinez has been an environmental activist most of his life. Photo: Earth Guardians
Although still in high school, Martinez is in heavy demand as a guest speaker across the US and beyond. He said that he sometimes has to deliberately remind himself to be a teenager every now and then. The problem is finding the time to do so.
"Man, it's really hard some days," he said. "Travelling a lot can be very exhausting, but I feel like at the end of the day I still have the freedom to live my life how I want. One good thing is that I've made friends all around the world, and I get a chance to catch up with them a lot because I'm on the road so much."
If we win, the federal courts are going to force the US government to reduce our carbon emissions to a safe levels. We're not letting Trump slow us down.
Xiuhtezcatl Martinez
Twelve years before he was born, his mother, Tamara Rose, founded an environmental activist group called Earth Guardians. Xiuhtezcatl (pronounced Shoo-Tez-Caht) was literally born into the climate fight. There is video footage of his six-year-old self – tiny and cute and long-haired – hammering points through a microphone at an eco-rally.
These days he still has the long hair and still uses a microphone, but his audiences have grown significantly in size and influence.
Six-year-old Xiuhtezcatl Martinez gives a speech calling on children to protect the environment. Photo: YouTube
He also has an increasingly successful career as a hip-hop artist. It's debatable whether he's more influential in that sphere or in the White House where, for the next little while at least, he still has the ear of the President.
Martinez has been a member of Barack Obama's 24-member youth council since 2013 – when he was the youngest appointee. The President also presented him with the United States Community Service Award (so we can safely assume that Obama doesn't take it personally that the niceties of US litigation mean that he is named in the climate change law suit).
In 2015, the young man was also invited to address a full session of the United Nations.
A contemporary report captured the moment:
Dressed in a donated suit, with dark hair skimming his waist, Xiuhtezcatl Martinez, the youth director of Earth Guardians, issued a brief prayer in both Spanish and the Nahuatl language. As befuddled U.N. staffers reached for headphones, seeking translation, he began an extemporaneous speech on the folly of climate dithering."I stand before you representing my entire generation," he said. "Youth are standing up all over the planet to find solutions. We are flooding the streets and now flooding the courts.""We need you to take action. We are all Indigenous to this earth."
Xiuhtezcatl Martinez, with his younger brother.  Photo: Earth Guardians
There is something admirable but slightly sad about Martinez and the growing band of teenage activists that are accreting around his name. It's a weird twist on the teenage rebellion trope. In this case, the rebellion is not against the conformity of the older generation, but its irresponsibility.
It's faintly depressing, too, that the young activists seem to hold little hope that their elders will eventually come to their senses.
"To an extent this will be lifelong for me," said Martinez. "My involvement will continue until I've built a solid enough platform, when I'll be able to take my hands off.
"Perhaps one day I'll have done my part to help inspire a movement of young people all over the place. There's a lot of work still to be done. I'm always going to be passionate about this, but I don't know whether I want to be on the front lines forever."
His trip Down Under will see him at events in Melbourne, Sydney and Auckland. While here he is determined to be a teen, at least for a little while, and get out to listen to some big fat beats.
Xiuhtezcatl Martinez is a fan of Australian hip-hop including Hilltop Hoods.
"Man I've been into Aussie hip-hop for a long time now," he said. "Spit Syndicate. Hilltop Hoods, Urthboy – I am all over the Aussie hip-hop scene!"

Xiuhtezcatl Martinez is in Melbourne on 11 February and Sydney 12 February.

Links