07/02/2017

Meet El Niño’s Cranky Uncle That Could Send Global Warming Into Hyperdrive

The Conversation |  |  |  |  | 

Firefighters fight forest fire in Indonesia, triggered in part by El Nino. EPA/RONY MUHARRMAN
You’ve probably heard about El Niño, the climate system that brings dry and often hotter weather to Australia over summer.
You might also know that climate change is likely to intensify drought conditions, which is one of the reasons climate scientists keep talking about the desperate need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and the damaging consequences if we don’t.
El Niño is driven by changes in the Pacific Ocean, and shifts around with its opposite, La Niña, every 2-7 years, in a cycle known as the El Niño Southern Oscillation or ENSO.
But that’s only part of the story. There’s another important piece of nature’s puzzle in the Pacific Ocean that isn’t often discussed.
It’s called the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation, or IPO, a name coined by a study which examined how Australia’s rainfall, temperature, river flow and crop yields changed over decades.
Since El Niño means “the boy” in Spanish, and La Niña “the girl”, we could call the warm phase of the IPO “El Tío” (the uncle) and the negative phase “La Tía” (the auntie).
These erratic relatives are hard to predict. El Tío and La Tía phases have been compared to a stumbling drunk. And honestly, can anyone predict what a drunk uncle will say at a family gathering?

What is El Tío?
Like ENSO, the IPO is related to the movement of warm water around the Pacific Ocean. Begrudgingly, it shifts its enormous backside around the great Pacific bathtub every 10-30 years, much longer than the 2-7 years of ENSO.
The IPO’s pattern is similar to ENSO, which has led climate scientists to think that the two are strongly linked. But the IPO operates on much longer timescales.
We don’t yet have conclusive knowledge of whether the IPO is a specific climate mechanism, and there is a strong school of thought which proposes that it is a combination of several different mechanisms in the ocean and the atmosphere.
Despite these mysteries, we know that the IPO had an influence on the global warming “hiatus” - the apparent slowdown in global temperature increases over the early 2000s.

Global temperatures are on the up, but the IPO affects the rate of warming. Author provided, data from NOAA, adapted from England et al. (2014) Nat. Clim. Change
Temperamental relatives
When it comes to global temperatures we know that our greenhouse gas emissions since the industrial revolution are the primary driver of the strong warming of the planet. But how do El Tío and La Tía affect our weather and climate from year to year and decade to decade?
Superimposed on top of the familiar long-term rise in global temperatures are some natural bumps in the road. When you’re hiking up a massive mountain, there are a few dips and hills along the way.
Several recent studies have shown that the IPO phases, El Tío and La Tía, have a temporary warming and cooling influence on the planet.
Rainfall around the world is also affected by El Tío and La Tía, including impacts such as floods and drought in the United States, China, Australia and New Zealand.
In the negative phase of the IPO (La Tía) the surface temperatures of the Pacific Ocean are cooler than usual near the equator and warmer than usual away from the equator.
Since about the year 2000, some of the excess heat trapped by greenhouse gases has been getting buried in the deep Pacific Ocean, leading to a slowdown in global warming over about the last 15 years. It appears as though we have a kind auntie, La Tía perhaps, who has been cushioning the blow of global warming. For the time being, anyway.
The flip side of our kind auntie is our bad-tempered uncle, El Tío. He is partly responsible for periods of accelerated warming, like the period from the late 1970s to the late 1990s.
The IPO has been in its “kind auntie” phase for well over a decade now. But the IPO could be about to flip over to El Tío. If that happens, it is not good news for global temperatures – they will accelerate upwards.

Models getting better
One of the challenges to climate science is to understand how the next decade, and the next couple of decades, will unravel. The people who look after our water and our environment want to know things like how fast our planet will warm in the next 10 years, and whether we will have major droughts and floods.
To do this we can use computer models of Earth’s climate. In our recently published paper in Environmental Research Letters, we evaluated how well a large number of models from around the world simulate the IPO. We found that the models do surprisingly well on some points, but don’t quite simulate the same degree of slow movement (the stubborn behaviour) of El Tío and La Tía that we observe in the real world.
But some climate models are better at simulating El Tío and La Tía. This is useful because it points the way to better models that could be used to understand the next few decades of El Tío, La Tía and climate change.
However, more work needs to be done to predict the next shift in the IPO and climate change. This is the topic of a new set of experiments that are going to be part the next round of climate model comparisons.
With further model development and new observations of the deep ocean available since 2005, scientists will be able to more easily answer some of these important questions.
Whatever the case, cranky old El Tío is waiting just around the corner. His big stick is poised, ready to give us a massive hiding: a swift rise in global temperatures over the coming decades.
And like a big smack, that would be no laughing matter.

Links

Sweden Pledges To Cut All Greenhouse Gas Emissions By 2045

The IndependentChloe Farand

Climate minister urges European Union to take lead on climate change as fears Donald Trump will pull out of Paris Agreement
Swedish Environment Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Isabella Lovin signs a referral of Swedish climate law, binding all future governments to net zero emissions by 2045 at the ministry in Stockholm. AFP
Sweden has committed to completely phase out greenhouse gas emissions by 2045 and called for all countries - including the US - to “step up and fulfil the Paris Agreement”. 
In one of the most ambitious emissions plans published by a developed nation, the Swedish government has reaffirmed the urgency of tackling climate change, ignoring uncertainties about global policies under Donald Trump’s administration.
"Our target is to be an entirely fossil-fuel-free welfare state," said Climate Minister Isabella Lovin.

Sweden is amazing at recycling

"We see that the advantages of a climate-smart society are so huge, both when it comes to health, job creation and also security. Being dependent on fossil fuels and gas from Russia is not what we need now,” she added.
All parties but the far-right Sweden Democrats party agreed to pass the law in the coming month, which will oblige the government to set tougher goals to cut fossil fuel emissions every four years until the 2045 cut-off date.
Plans also include a 70 per cent cut to emissions in the domestic transport sector by 2030.
The Government said the target would require domestic emissions to be cut by at least 85 per cent and the remaining emissions would be offset by planting trees or by sustainable investments abroad.
The law is expected to enter into force as early as 2018.
Britain has committed to cut its emissions by 57 per cent by 2032 but so far, the government is nowhere near on track to meet its goal and the latest report predicts the target would be missed by the equivalent of all the greenhouse gases currently produced by industry.
The image of Ms Lovin signing the emissions order appeared to be a reference to this image of Mr Trump, surrounded by men, signing an executive order hitting foreign NGOs that help women have abortions (Getty)
The Independent previously revealed the Government’s Emissions Reduction Plan, which was supposed to be published in March after being delayed twice, will no longer be made public by that deadline.
Activist group Client Earth is now considering legal action against the Government over its failure to come up with a plan to dramatically reduced fossil fuels and meet its target.
Meanwhile, Sweden's Prime Minister Stefan Lofven criticised climate sceptics inside the Trump administration as “worrying”, since the US’ greenhouse gas emissions would affect everyone. He warned all countries need to "step up and fulfil the Paris Agreement."
Mr Trump previously called climate change a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese, and there are suggestions he will pull out of the legally-binding Paris Agreement.
Climate minister Ms Lovin urged European countries to take the lead in tackling climate change now “the US is not there anymore to lead".
She warned climate sceptics were “really gaining power in the world” and that Sweden wanted to set an example of continued action to its international pledges.
Last year in Paris, nearly 200 countries agreed to limit temperature rise above 1990s industrial levels by 2C and work towards a 1.5C target. 
The EU has set a target of an 80 to 95 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
Meanwhile, China is "investing billions and billions of dollars in solar (...) it's a game changer. Those that are still wanting to invest in fossil fuels will be ultimately the losers,” Ms Lovin warned.

Links

Scope 2017 Survey: Economists Say Action On Carbon Is Vital, Or Say Nothing At All

Fairfax

There is no consensus. Economists either believe it is vital that Australia becomes a low-carbon intensity economy, or that the issue is so unimportant – or perhaps that it is so politically divisive – that they choose not to volunteer an opinion.
Asked about the importance of reducing the country's carbon footprint and how best to do it, more than half of 27 economists from industry, consultancy, academia and finance questioned for the annual BusinessDay Scope survey agreed it was a must.

Lower growth, less revenue
Leading Australian economists are more pessimistic about the Australian economy than the official Treasury position. Peter Martin explains.

Another 10 left the question blank. Whether this indicates a lack of interest or the contentious nature of climate change policy is unclear.
But none of those who did answer made the case that cleaning up the economy did not matter. They overwhelmingly said action should be swift and include a market-based carbon pricing scheme.
No support was offered for the Coalition government's "direct action" approach to cutting emissions, which does not require businesses or consumers to pay the cost of emissions.Richard Robinson, of BIS Shrapnel, said with global temperatures rising faster than expected it was better for Australia to have effective policies to gradually reduce carbon intensity than to face sudden large adjustments later.
This may mean moving faster than other countries, including the US.
Ai Group's Julie Toth said market mechanisms should be used to meet national commitments to substantially cut emissions. Photo: Jonathan Carroll
Robinson backed the abolished carbon price scheme introduced under the Gillard Labor government as a good model, with the caveat that the price had been too high due to the Greens' influence.
"[It] provided large and necessary discounts to energy-intensive exporters and also to some less trade-exposed producers ... and used some of the proceeds to fund renewables projects," he said.
He said it was also vital to support the use of gas-fired power as a transition fuel from coal to renewables through the eastern states' adoption of a "gas reservation" policy.
Market Economics' Stephen Koukoulas, a former adviser to Julia Gillard, answered with "an overwhelming yes".
He said a price on carbon was fundamental to underpin the shift, and there was a "decent case" for helping the renewable energy industry through direct assistance or regulation.
Nicki Hutley, of Urbis Consulting, said the advice to the government by Ross Garnaut nearly a decade ago laid out the need to act clearly. "It is disheartening that the current government is failing to act on this advice," she said.
David Bassanese, of BetaShares, said it was important Australia acted, but it should not move ahead of other countries. He favoured the introduction of specific measures targeting the electricity and transport sectors.
Industry Super's Stephen Anthony said the goal of a lower carbon intensity energy mix was within reach, but warned against imposing a carbon price that acted as a high and variable tariff on Australian goods. If advancing technology alone could not deliver a lower carbon intensity he favoured a GST-style carbon impost on consumption.
But Julie Toth, of the Australian Industry Group, said domestic and international market mechanisms, including carbon credits, should be used to meet national commitments to substantially cut emissions by 2030 and reach zero emissions in the longer term.
"Success will require public policies that are nationally co-ordinated, integrated with energy policy, and endure with broad political support," she said.
"The electricity sector is only part of the picture, but has the most urgent need for a clear policy framework to underpin investment."
Respected independent economist Saul Eslake was succinct. "Yes – and the best way to do it is by putting a price on carbon emissions," he said.
Steve Keen, of London's Kingston University, made what – we think – was a similar point about the importance of climate action, albeit less conventionally.
"Nah mate! Wassa matta, dontcha own a pair of budgie smugglers?" he wrote.
"It's all a conspiracy by Marxists anyway to undermine the Ostralyan way of life – you know, burning stuff and damn well enjoying it rather than whingeing.
"A bit a coal never hurt anyone, matter of fact it tastes even better than a raw onion!"

Links