17/02/2017

Abbott/Turnbull Policy On Climate Change And Energy Caused Current Mess

Independent AustraliaJohn Menadue

Alan Kohler and The Great Coal Hoax. (Image via @australian)
Malcolm Turnbull and the Liberal Party have only their own kack-handed efforts to blame for blackouts by failing to come up with a responsible solution to energy security. Can't be all that hard, says John Menadue.
LET'S BE clear, the Coalition and particularly the Liberal Party and Malcolm Turnbull are responsible for the current mess and impasse on electricity prices and reliability and supply. This is the result of years of policy and political failure. We are now seeing the dreadful consequences.
Pleading by the Business Council and others for bipartisanship on energy policy is a political cover for their past and very politically partisan support of the Coalition on energy policy such as an Emissions Trading Scheme and a carbon price.
In 2006, John Howard asked Peter Shergold, the Head of PM & C, to examine the most effective ways to reduce carbon emissions. Peter Shergold advised that an ETS was necessary. There was no progress.
Then the first Rudd government, following discussion papers, introduced its Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in 2009. Unfortunately the legislation was rejected in the Senate because of the combined opposition of the Coalition and the Greens. By then the Coalition was at the peak of its climate change denial and the Greens said that the CPRS was not good enough. Disappointingly, Kevin Rudd decided not to take the issue to a double dissolution. After the disappointment of Copenhagen he lost his "mojo".
IMAGE
There is no doubt in my mind, however, that if the CPRS had been agreed, the issue of global warming and carbon pollution would have been almost done and settled. Or at least we had the beginnings of good policy.
But worse was to follow. Malcolm Turnbull supported CPRS because we thought he believed in its importance as a market mechanism to put a price on carbon and let the market influence investment decisions. Unfortunately, many Coalition members, including Tony Abbott, disagreed with him and Malcolm Turnbull was defeated by one vote in the Liberal Party in 2009.
After the 2010 election, the Gillard Government proposed a carbon tax which I still believe is sensible policy. But the carbon tax let loose a scare campaign by Tony Abbott and his business and media supporters that we have not seen the like of before. Tony Abbott won the 2013 election quite handsomely with a dishonest campaign of opposition to the carbon tax and scant regard for the damage that climate change was already causing in Australia.
IMAGE
Restored to the leadership of the Liberal Party in September 2015, and as Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull has been crab-walking away from climate change and related policies as fast as he can in order to placate the right-wing climate change deniers in his own party. He blamed the SA government for blackouts which had very little to do with renewables, but were due to the collapse of the pylons. He continually talks about blackouts in SA but in NSW with a state Liberal government he refers merely to "power shedding". There certainly have been substantial electricity price increases in SA but the price increases have been much greater in Queensland which is very dependent upon coal-fired generators. Almost all the media, including the ABC. have been complicit in not exposing the PM’s false claims.
'Almost all the media, including the ABC, have been complicit in not exposing the PM’s false claims'
Malcolm Turnbull has abandoned almost all those things that we thought he believed in. In a difficult situation he cannot be relied on. He is not there when we need him.
He installs solar panels and a battery in his own private residence, yet attacks state premiers in their commitment to renewable energy.
For years there have been cries for a stable and predictable environment on climate and energy policies in order that wise and efficient business decisions could be made. It didn’t happen. We were warned about a system crisis. We now have one as our record hot summer unfolds.
In his journal, The Constant Investor, under the heading 'The Great Coal Hoax', Alan Kohler sheeted blame very directly to the Coalition and Malcolm Turnbull. He said:
Those crises have now arrived in the form of blackouts, and they are not caused by too much renewable energy… it’s due to a lack of investment, in turn due to a lack of policy certainty and clarity.
This is entirely the Liberal Party’s fault — not just Malcolm Turnbull’s, although he is a rather pathetic figure now. If he didn’t go along with the hoax, he’d be sacked and another PM would.
By taking the low road in 2009 instead of the high road, and deciding to mislead Australians about the true cost of energy, the Liberal Party condemned the country to a decade of confusion and stasis on energy policy.
That reached a nadir of absurdity last week with the Treasurer’s coal stunt.
The rest of Australia’s leaders, in particular the CEOs of our largest companies, should declare now that enough is enough, and pull these idiots into line.
See also Quentin Dempster in The New Daily on Tony Abbott’s role in Australia’s energy crisis.

IMAGE
Links

The Coal War: Inside The Fight Against Adani's Plans To Build Australia'S Biggest Coal Mine

Fairfax - Nick McKenzie | Richard Baker | Peter Ker

It's the fight that has become a proxy war between forces for and against the coal industry in Australia and it's entering its fiercest round.
Indian conglomerate Adani's plans to build Australia's biggest coal mine have been heralded by the federal and Queensland governments as a boon for local jobs and the economy.
Abbot Point in Queensland, a proposed terminal for coal produced at Adani's Carmichael mine. 
But environmentalists are adamant the mine is a ticking time bomb that may imperil the Galilee Basin and Great Barrier Reef, as well as serving as an up-yours to the Paris climate change accord.
The battle will escalate this week when its opponents launch a campaign targeting 13 marginal federal Coalition seats and at least three Queensland state seats.
This comes as new details emerge about Adani's chequered history in India, where the conglomerate and its subsidiaries have come under fire from environmental courts.

The mine
The $22 billion mega mine Adani plans to build in Carmichael, Queensland will have six open-cut pits and several underground mines.
Coal will be extracted from the mine site west of Rockhampton and transported 400 kilometres by rail to the Abbot Point Terminal, south of Townsville.
It will be processed offshore, before being shipped to energy-hungry India. The federal government is considering granting Adani a $1 billion concessional loan to help build the railway line to the Abbot Point Terminal but the mine's opponents consider the loan a key battleground in the war against the coal project.


ABC spreading fake news: Canavan
Nationals MP Matt Canavan has had a bizarre spray on radio, accusing the ABC of reporting fake news over the Adani coal mine.

Killing the mine 
The anti-mine campaign is no empty threat. It has a $1 million war chest, nine full-time staff including polling and social media experts, hundreds of volunteers and is being run by left-leaning activist group GetUp.
While the anti-Adani movement wants to ensure the firm isn't granted the $1 billion loan, its end game is to kill off the project.
The Australian Conservation Foundation, the Australian Youth Climate Coalition and 350.org rally in Melbourne against the coal mine. Photo: Wayne Taylor
"We will win," says businessman turned environmental crusader Geoff Cousins.
This week, the Australian Conservation Foundation, a host of NGOs and GetUp will launch a campaign targeting 13 marginal coalition seats in Queensland, NSW and Victoria.
Abbot Point is surrounded by wetlands and coral reefs. 
The campaign will employ cutting-edge and traditional tactics. Voters will be contacted by telephone, advertising and a social media blitz. GetUp's campaigning is said to have contributed to the loss of several coalition seats during the 2016 election and the group is hoping to force Resources Minister Matt Canavan to ditch the proposed $1 billion concessional loan.
"We're aiming to make 50,000 calls into these seats over the next three months, and have conversations with at least the number of people that is equal to that MP's margin in votes. For example it would take just 532 votes to change the outcome of the seat of Forde in Queensland," says GetUp's Miriam Lyons.
Adani's proposed mine and rail lines. 
The mine opponents will also lobby Westpac bank to join a host of other financial institutions in ruling out funding the $22 billion project, while continuing to use the courts to frustrate the government and Adani's ambitions.
Adani believes it has become a proxy for the nation's coal industry in a campaign that has seen calls from one environmental group to get activists to infiltrate the firm by posing as job seekers.
"This is the most regulated project in the history of Australia and we are yet to push a shovel in the ground and get one ounce of coal. If they kill us, they will move on to other companies," an Adani insider says.

The political pay-off
In cities such as Townsville, heaving with Australian soldiers, and the sweltering, sprawling country town of Rockhampton, the mine is mostly seen as a godsend.
"I have come under fire from those opposed to coal for my vocal support of this project, but I won't take a backward step," Rockhampton Mayor Margaret Strelow recently said.
The Queensland Labor government faces an election in 2018 and, short on major infrastructure projects, hopes the mine and resulting jobs will see it returned to office.
Adani and the Queensland government say the project will deliver an employment bonanza, creating thousands of jobs during the construction phase. This will level off to 1500 or so employees when the mine is fully operational.
Pauline Hanson has backed the mine, subject to assurances around water management and the use of foreign labour, while local LNP member George Christensen supports both the mine and the subsidy.
The Minerals Council of Australia's CEO Brendan Pearson says the anti-mine campaign amounts to "futile grandstanding" that will only delay job and business opportunities for thousands of Australians.
"It is patently clear that the Adani mine will proceed and that is a good thing for regional communities in Central and Northern Queensland," he said.
Federal LNP members are also barracking for the mine.
One senior federal minister told Fairfax Media that regardless of opposition by "zealots", the Carmichael coal project is likely to receive the $1 billion concessional loan from the government.
But the minister also privately acknowledges that subsidising a firm controlled by a controversial Indian billionaire is not without its problems.

A grubby past
The Adani Group is a diversified conglomerate headed by billionaire Gautam Adani, one of India's wealthiest magnates and a man who has cultivated powerful friends, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Mr Adani recently met Malcolm Turnbull, whose renewed support for coal (Treasurer Scott Morrison brandished a lump of coal in federal parliament last week) is at the heart of the Coalition's claim that Labor's renewable energy policy will lead to a surge in power prices and imperil energy security.
The power and reach of the Adani Group is legendary in India. But the group's subsidiaries have also faced allegations of involvement in fraud and corruption, environmental destruction and labour exploitation.
A recent ABC investigation into the conglomerate focused on ongoing investigations by Indian authorities, widely reported by the local media, into alleged money laundering and tax fraud by Adani subsidiaries.
The federal resources minister described the ABC report as 'fake news' and said the allegations were untested.
But official Indian tribunals and watchdogs have landed punches on a number of Adani firms, including:
  • an August 2016 finding previously unreported in Australia by the Indian National Green Tribunal- an environmental court- which found Adani partly responsible for failing to clean up after an oil and coal spill caused by an unseaworthy ship that ran aground off the coast of Mumbai in 2011. The ship had been chartered by Adani and was carrying the firm's coal and fuel; and 
  • in January 2016, the same tribunal fined an Adani subsidiary $4.8 million after finding it had caused environmental destruction while undertaking works at a fishing village in the Indian port city of Surat.
A report released by lawyers from Environmental Justice Australia documents these and other alleged Adani misdeeds in India, including an illegal iron ore mining and export operation and an environmental disaster at the Mundra port.
Mr Canavan believes Adani has "been exposed to unfair scrutiny" and criticisms of the firm carry "xenophobic undertones."
"There have been some high-profile incidents by Australian mining and resources companies recently, some instances that are quite dire. But it seems to be, because they [Adani] are Indian or because they want to develop a new coal basin, they are exposed to a different standard."
Mr Canavan insists Australia has the regulatory checks and balances to keep Adani in line. For example, there are dozens of criteria for Adani to meet in order to meet and maintain its government approval.
And for all the doomsday warnings about Adani coal ships navigating the Great Barrier Reef, a company insider says such predictions overlook the fact that other vessels carrying the quarry of other big miners have for years been making a similar journey to little, if any, protest.
Queensland has exported more than 200 million tonnes of coal per year in recent times (more than triple the volume Adani plans to export) and the majority of that goes through the reef.
But a businessman who knows how corporate Australia operates, former Optus CEO, Geoff Cousins, is dismissive of the protections proffered by the federal government and Adani. Mr Cousins, a former adviser to prime minister John Howard and current Australian Conservation Foundation chairman, notes that "major projects get a wide variety of conditions attached to them and state and federal  governments hide behind those conditions. But when you go to see if anyone checked on those conditions or whether they were met, the record is generally appalling."

Where will the coal go
The coal Adani wants to mine is bound for India's power plants, including those the company owns. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is championing renewable energy in line with the aims of last year's Paris Agreement (looking increasingly shaky in the wake of Donald Tump's election. At the same time, India is also seeking to ramp up its own coal production in line with its ambitious aim to become self sufficient in its production of coal.
The mine's proponents say if India's power stations are denied Australian coal, they will be forced to use a dirtier local alternative, with greater emissions. This claim addresses the argument that the burning of Carmichael coal will undermine efforts to combat climate change. As with most claims connected to the mine, this is fiercely contested, including by the progressive Australia Institute, who argue the Galilee Basin's coal is dirtier than that in other Australian mines. They also contest the mine's trumpeted job figures.
Ultimately, the fight about Adani's Carmichael project is about the wisdom of building a massive new coal mine as the world moves towards less polluting sources of energy. The issue of climate change is the ultimate political fault line on which environmentalists believe the fight against Adani must be waged.
Mr Canavan says it's all about jobs and economic opportunity. And while the competing battlegrounds aren't mutually exclusive, there will only be one victor.

Links

Coal Will Kill More People Than World War II. Why Do Our Ministers Joke About It?

Fairfax - Julian Cribb*

While the numbers are not yet in on Australia's latest heatwave summer – one of the worst in our history – between 1100 and 1500 people will have died from heat stress. That's been the average of recent years.
When Treasurer Scott Morrison jovially informed the House of Representatives "Mr Speaker, this is coal. Don't be afraid! Don't be scared! It won't hurt you," he was, according to all reputable scientific and medical studies worldwide, misleading the Parliament.
Scott Morrison with his pet coal in Parliament. Photo: Alex Ellinghausen
By mid-century, the effects of worldwide burning of coal and oil in heating the climate to new extremes will claim more than 50,000 Australian lives per decade, a toll nearly double that of World War II.
And that doesn't include the 12.6 million human lives lost globally every year (a quarter of all deaths), according to the World Health Organisation, from "air, water and soil pollution, chemical exposures, climate change, and ultraviolet radiation", all of which are a consequence of human use of fossil fuels. The main sources of those toxins are, indisputably, the coal and petrochemical industries.
To pretend, as do Morrison and Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce, that this is all a great joke shows a cynical and contemptible disregard for the sufferings and painful deaths of thousands of Australians from exposure to the effects of fossil fuels. Understanding of the toxicity of burnt fossil hydrocarbons has been around since the 19th-century industrial revolution. The climatic effect of fossil fuels has been accepted universally by world climate and weather authorities since the mid-1970s – almost half a century ago.
Yet certain Australian politicians and leaders still pretend they are ignorant of facts that are known to everyone else. And they jeer at Australians with the common sense not to want to die from them.
As eastern Australia sweltered through the recent 40 to 47-degree heatwave and elderly people who couldn't afford to switch on their air conditioners for fear of the power bills suffered and died, floods and bushfires related to the same climatic disturbance claimed further victims.
The Australian Climate Institute warned politicians a decade ago that the death toll from heat stress alone was then about 1100 in the five cities of Perth, Adelaide, Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. Nationally, the number is now probably 1500 to 2000 a year – but no national records are kept, perhaps for obvious reasons.


'Clean coal' makes a comeback
New technology means coal will play a role in electricity generation long into the future, says Malcolm Turnbull. Courtesy ABC News 24.


The institute said at the time: "With no action to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, Australia is projected to warm by between 0.4 to 2.0 degrees by 2030 and 1.0 to 6.0 degrees by 2070. This warming trend is expected to drive large increases in the frequency, intensity and duration of extreme temperature events. For example, by 2030, the yearly average number of days above 35 degrees could increase from 17 to 19-29 in Adelaide and from 9 to 10-16 in Melbourne."
According to more recent projections – such as, for example, those of Professor Peng Bi of Adelaide University – annual heat-related deaths in the capital cities are predicted to climb to an average of 2400 a year in the 2020s and 5300 a year in the 2050s. And that's just in the capital cities.
Added to deaths from fire, flood, cyclone and pollution-related conditions such as cancer and lung diseases, fossil fuels will be far and away the predominant factor in the early deaths of Australians by mid-century. Not a single family will be unaffected by their influence.
It's hard to avoid the conclusion that the Abbott/Turnbull governments' policy – promoting the use and export of coal, trying to discourage its replacement by clean renewables and foot-dragging on climate remediation measures – has dreadful consequences in the short, medium and long term for individuals and families.
We want to know the road toll – but not the fuel toll.
Directly and indirectly, these policies will contribute to the loss of far more Australians than did the combined policies of the Hitler/Hirohito governments in the 1940s (27,000). They will cost many thousands more Australian lives than terrorism. Yet ministers treat them as a jest.
While it's true Australia's emissions, from fossil-fuel burning, mining and exports, are a small percentage of world emissions, they nevertheless contribute meaningfully to a situation that, unchecked, could see the planet heat by 5 to 6 degrees by 2100. If the frozen methane deposits in the Arctic and ocean are released, then warming may exceed 10 degrees, beyond which large animals, including humans, will struggle to exist.
With such temperatures and climatic extremes, it will become impossible to maintain world food production from agriculture. Hundreds of millions of refugees will flood the planet. According to the US Pentagon, there is a high risk of international conflict, even nuclear war, in such conditions.
These are the rational, evidence-based truths that politicians like Morrison and Joyce gleefully ignore in their enthusiasm for coal. Indeed, Joyce is advocating a course likely to ruin his party's main long-term constituency: farmers.
Australians rightly regard deaths from motor accidents, suicide, domestic violence, preventable disease, war, drugs and other causes as tragic, unjustifiable, unacceptable and unnecessary. Yet there is a curious national silence, a wilful blindness, about the far larger toll of preventable death from coal and oil. We want to know the road toll – but not the fuel toll. This national ignorance encouraged by dishonest claims that they "won't hurt you".
Yes, they will. Coal and oil will hurt you worse than almost anything else in your life. They will reap your family, and maybe you, too.
When there are clean, safe, healthy substitute readily available – renewables, biofuels, green chemistry – sensible Australians will turn their back on the untruths and the propaganda, and vote only for politicians whose policies do not knowingly encompass our early death.

*Julian Cribb is a Canberra science writer and author. His latest book is Surviving the 21st Century (2017).

Links