28/03/2017

Plans For Coal-Fired Power Plants Drop By Almost Half In 2016

BBC - Matt McGrath

This new Chinese coal-fired plant opened in January but many more have been put on hold. Getty Images
Twenty-sixteen saw a "dramatic" decline in the number of coal-fired power stations in pre-construction globally.
The authors of a new study say there was a 48% fall in planned coal units, with a 62% drop in construction starts.
The report, from several green campaign groups, claims changing policies and economic conditions in China and India were behind the decline.
However, the coal industry argues the fuel will remain essential to economic growth in Asia for decades to come.

Rapid swing
Between 2006 and 2016, India and China together accounted for 85% of the coal plants built around the world.
But according to the Boom and Bust 2017 report, put together by Greenpeace, the Sierra Club and CoalSwarm, there has been a huge swing away from coal in these two countries in just 12 months.
The study says that questions over finance are threatening coal plants in India. Getty Images 
The main causes of the decline are the imposition of restrictive measures by China's central government - with the equivalent of 600 coal-fired units being put on hold until at least 2020.
The Indian go-slow was prompted, according to the authors, by the reluctance of banks to provide funds. Work at 13 locations is currently not going ahead.
However, there have also been significant retirements of coal plants in Europe and the US over the past two years, with roughly 120 large units being taken out of commission.
"This has been a messy year, and an unusual one," said Ted Nace, director of CoalSwarm.
"It's not normal to see construction frozen at scores of locations, but central authorities in China and bankers in India have come to recognize overbuilding of coal plants as a major waste of resources.
"However abrupt, the shift from fossil fuels to clean sources in the power sector is a positive one for health, climate security, and jobs. And by all indications, the shift is unstoppable."
The study comes as other groups analyse the potential for investments in coal to become stranded assets if governments continue to restrict CO2 emissions. The International Energy Agency (IEA) says that hundreds of billions of dollars could be at risk.
"The decline in new coal plants in Asian countries is truly dramatic, and shows how a perfect storm of factors is simply making coal a bad investment," said Paul Massara, now of North Star Solar but a former CEO of RWE npower.
Investments in solar power in India have soared in recent years. Getty Images 
"Growing awareness of the air pollution problems coal causes, the impact of policies to tackle climate change, and the rapid growth and cost-competitiveness of renewable sources of energy, along with emerging battery technologies, are making new coal plants redundant before they are even built," he said.
However, the World Coal Association vehemently disagrees. It says the complexity of large infrastructure projects means that until they break ground, it's no surprise if they don't go ahead.
"Yes, China, is reducing the number of coal-stations but not because it's transitioning away from coal. Instead, the new dynamics is a signal of a more developed economy," said Benjamin Sporton.
"Contrary to the picture being portrayed by certain quarters, China's climate pledge suggests that coal will continue to be central to its energy solutions, albeit through efficiencies including the use of new coal technologies.
"In India's case, it's simply not true that renewables are displacing coal. The International Energy Agency has said that India's coal demand will see the biggest growth over next five years with an annual average growth rate of 5% by 2021.
"For these countries, excluding coal from the energy mix is not an option; it is essential for economic growth and critical in securing energy access."
According to the authors of the study, the slowdown brings the possibility of keeping global warming under 2 degrees C since pre-industrial times "within feasible reach."
However, the study says that much more progress needs to be made to reduce the number of coal-fired plants under development in Vietnam, Indonesia, Turkey, Japan and elsewhere.

Links

In The Battle For The Planet's Climate Future, Australia's Adani Mine Is The Line In The Sand

The Guardian

Australians must decide whether they continue to support coal or whether the future is renewable. Without a doubt, Malcolm Turnbull will be left on the losing side
‘The battle to stop the Adani mine is shaping up as the most important environmental fight ever down under, the likes of the Tar Sands battle we’ve seen in North America.’ Photograph: Dave Hunt/AAP
There is nowhere else on the planet right now where the dichotomy between two potential futures – one where we address the climate change crisis, one where we ignore this momentous threat and continue with business as usual – is playing out in such a dramatic and explosive way as Australia.
In the US, Donald Trump is decimating decades of hard-fought environmental and climate standards – it’s all 18th century all the time. But the ageing fossil fuel assets and recent “market failure” of the Australian electricity grid is pushing political leaders to all-out brawling, pitting conservative inaction against the demand for solution-focused action.
A recent wave of blackouts and near misses and the proposal of the biggest coalmine in the world – the Adani Carmichael mine in Queensland – has created tinder-dry conditions that only needed one spark to go up in flames.
The spark finally came recently, via Twitter, from renewable energy entrepreneur Elon Musk who offered to sell the batteries that would remove the last argument against renewable power.
It turned the deadlocked debate over how to fix Australia’s fossil fuel-ladenand often failing energy “market” into an open war between those backing the dying coal industry with those set on using the moment to transition to renewable energy.
Indeed, one of the icons of the ageing coal fleet, the dirtiest coal power station in the developed world – Hazelwood in Victoria – turns off its turbines this week as it shuts down. The symbols couldn’t be clearer: Musk’s batteries or Adani’s mega-mine and dirty coal power. Which one represents the future?
As you formulate the answer, remember that the war is of course playing out against a tragic backdrop: the ongoing destruction of the Great Barrier Reef that is Australia’s great natural treasure, the thing it’s been charged by the world to protect. That horror is a human-created disaster, caused directly by man-made global warming that is increasing ocean temperatures by an alarming rate.
The decision about the future is also a decision about what kind of democracy you want. As in the US, the Aussie mining industry has for decades has a disproportionate amount of power over politicians. It cares about one thing only – not the greater good, but its own perpetuation.
But now the coal industry is starting to lose its grip. And it won’t necessarily be a slow process. The fractures are running through all stratas of Australian governance: states are closing coal stations and opting for renewable energy and battery storage (a la the Musk Tweet); and companies and businesses that have traditionally been allies of the coal industry are advocating for climate policies that would essentially spell the end of coal-powered energy; individuals and communities in great numbers are breaking free of the grid.
A marooned and thoroughly isolated Malcolm Turnbull is left on the losing side advocating for an industry and a coalmine we all know he doesn’t believe in to appease a small number of rightwingers in his party so he can continue to call himself the prime minister. Without a doubt, he will be swept aside by the arc of change – he who had the chance to lead on the issue of our time but chose to give in to vested interests and the fringe of his party.
As your electricity grid fails and industry holds on to the myth of an ever-growing coal export industry, Australians must draw a line in the sand and decide whether they continue to support coal, or whether the future is renewable.
Backed against the wall, the coal lobby and Turnbull’s fossil fuel-obsessed colleagues have gambled everything on the construction of the Adani coalmine. This mine would be the largest coalmine in history and, if constructed, it would do much to push the planet beyond 2C of warming.
The politics of coal are changing and this mine is that line in the sand.
Last week a historic alliance of environmental groups representing more than 1.5 million people launched the largest climate movement in Australia’s history.
Led by Bob Brown, who I had the honour of meeting last year, the battle to stop Adani is shaping up as the most important environmental fight ever down under, the likes of the Tar Sands battle we’ve seen in North America.
People are engaged and will take action to preserve the climate, the Great Barrier Reef and the rights of the traditional owners whose land will be destroyed by this mine in ways that hasn’t before been seen.
In my many visits there, I have found Australians to be obliging and deeply passionate about protecting their unique environment. Never has the contrast between the fossil fuel present and the clean energy future been in such stark relief. I now implore all Australians to take a stand – for the sake of the world’s climate – to ensure this mine never goes ahead.

Links

The Adani Brief: What Governments And Financiers Need To Know About The Adani Group’s Record Overseas

Environmental Justice Australia - Earthjustice



The Adani Group's proposed Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project in the Galilee Basin in Queensland would, if developed, be among the largest new coal mines in the world.
In addition to destroying the traditional lands and sacred sites of the Indigenous Wangan and Jagalingou people, and unique and important species and ecosystems, burning the 60 million tons of coal the mine is projected to produce each year would measurably exacerbate climate change and ocean warming and acidification that are causing human and environmental devastation worldwide.
The associated rail infrastructure and expansion of the coal export terminal at Abbot Point Port adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area would facilitate the shipping of coal through the Reef's water from both the Carmichael Mine and other mines proposed for the Galilee Basin, increasing the risk of shipping oil spills and groundings that would further damage the Reef's already endangered ecosystem.
In addition to these threats, the Adani Brief presents evidence that raises serious concerns about the global legal compliance record of some corporate entities within the Indian-based Adani Group.
This evidence includes investigations by an Indian government intelligence agency of illegal business dealings, active involvement in large-scale illegal mineral exports, and numerous violations of Indian environmental laws that have harmed the environment and local communities.
This evidence in the Adani Brief suggests that governments and private stakeholders should give serious consideration to the possibility that if this track record continues in Australia, then supporting the Adani Group's Carmichael Mine and the Abbot Point Port may expose governments and private stakeholders to reputational and financial risks.

Adani Group entities in India are under investigation for corruption and illegal dealings
The Indian government's Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) is currently investigating a number of Adani Group entities, including Adani Enterprises Ltd (AEL), which is the ultimate holding company of Adani Mining Pty Ltd, the proponent of the Carmichael Mine, for illegally overvaluing imports of coal and capital equipment in order to siphon funds offshore, a practice that creates "black money."
A detailed report from a reliable media source also indicates that for more than a decade the DRI has also been investigating Adani Group entities for tax evasion and money laundering whilst trading in diamonds.
In 2011, after a three-year investigation, the ombudsman of the Indian state of Karnataka found AEL to have been actively involved in large-scale illegal export of iron ore.
The ombudsman recommended that AEL should be stripped of its rights to operate the port and banned from further business dealings with the government.
These investigations and findings of illegal activity by Adani Group entities should be of concern to potential financial supporters of the Carmichael Mine or Abbot Point Port, including the Northern Australian Infrastructure Facility, in relation to reputational and financial risks.
Best practice would likely require Australian financiers to enquire with Indian authorities as to the status of the investigations and defer the provision of finance until any pending Indian investigations are completed.

Irregularities in the ownership of Terminal 1 at Abbot Point Port may create risk uncertainties for lenders
The ultimate ownership of Adani Abbot Point Terminal Pty Ltd (AAPT), which owns and operates Terminal 1 at Abbot Point Port, is opaque, making it difficult to assess the risk profile of any security for a loan to AAPT (or any intermediate parent companies).
AAPT has reported to the Australian Securities & Investments Commission that it is ultimately owned by Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd (APSEZ), a public company that is part of the Adani Group and is listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange.
But APSEZ's most recent annual report indicates that the company has divested its stake in AAPT, and attributes ownership of AAPT to a private Singapore company that is ultimately owned by a Cayman Islands entity likely associated with the Adani family.
If APPT is owned by APSEZ, actual or potential lenders' security is tied (either overtly or by implied endorsement/connection) to an Indian publicly listed company with substantial additional assets and relatively transparent accounts.
If not, the profile of the security may change.
The risks are ultimately borne by lenders, their shareholders, others with financial interests in the lenders, and employees.

Adani Group entities have a concerning record of failing to comply with Indian environmental laws
The environmental record of Adani Group entities in India raises serious questions about those entities' commitment to environmental protection and the health and welfare of local communities, and to compliance with laws intended to assure such protection.
This should be of significant concern to governments and financiers in relation to the Adani Group's proposed Carmichael Mine, particularly in light of the integrated relationship between the Australian-based Adani Group companies and the broader Adani Group generally.
In addition to environmental compliance issues previously raised in earlier reports,1 the Adani Brief describes evidence of several other instances of non-compliance with Indian environmental laws:
+ In August 2016, the National Green Tribunal, India's specialised environmental court, fined AEL nearly AU$1 million for its role in chartering an unseaworthy ship to transport coal.
This is the same activity the Adani Group would be undertaking in shipping coal from the Carmichael Mine through the fragile Great Barrier Reef.
The tribunal found that the ship had sunk, spilling oil and over 60,000 tons of coal that destroyed mangroves and polluted beaches.
The tribunal criticised AEL's failure to clean up the spill for more than five years.
+ In January 2016, the National Green Tribunal fined Adani Hazira Port Private Ltd, a subsidiary of APSEZ, almost AU$5 million for undertaking development works at its port in Hajira, India, without an environmental permit.
The tribunal found that these works destroyed mangroves and impeded the fishing activities of local communities by interfering with their access to the river and ocean.
The tribunal criticised the company for having an "irresponsible attitude" and for failing to care about any "adverse impact [of its development] on [the] environment."
+ The Adani Group's development of a huge port and one of the world's largest coal-fired power plants at Mundra, India, has caused significant harm to the environment and local communities, resulting from numerous failures to comply with regulations and permits.
Among other things, there is evidence of large-scale destruction of mangrove forests, obstruction of creek systems and natural seawater flow, failure to protect groundwater from salinity intrusion, and possible dumping of potentially toxic fly ash in violation of the relevant environmental approval.

Adani Mining Pty Ltd failed to disclose the concerning environmental record of a company formerly managed by one of its executive officers to the Australian government
Australian laws require the government to examine the suitability of a company to operate projects, like the Carmichael Mine and the Abbot Point Port expansion, that may pose a risk of environmental or human harm.
Because a company's executives are essential to ensuring compliance with laws that protect against such harm, the laws recognise the relevance to the suitability determination of the environmental record of a company's executive officers and of companies they have managed.
In 2015, in considering whether to approve the Carmichael Mine, the Federal Environment Department asked Adani Mining Pty Ltd (the proponent of the Carmichael Mine) for the environmental history of its executive officers.
In its response, Adani Mining Pty Ltd failed to disclose that one of its directors and the CEO of the Adani Group's operations in Australia, Mr.
Jeyakumar Janakaraj, was previously an executive officer of an unrelated company when that company had caused serious water pollution in Zambia.
The company later pleaded guilty to criminal charges for the pollution and its failure to report the incident.
Because Adani Mining Pty Ltd did not disclose this information when requested, the Federal Environment Minister did not consider it when granting approval to the Carmichael Mine.

Links