01/05/2017

Australians Could Save $100bn On Electricity 'If Government Had Clear Policy'

The Guardian

Energy transmission industry ramps up call for market mechanism and says clear regulation could lead to zero net emissions by 2050
The Australian energy market is in the middle of a profound transformation, according to a new report from Energy Networks Australia. Photograph: Paul Miller/AAP
Australia’s electricity and gas transmission industry has intensified a call for a market mechanism to drive orderly transformation in the energy sector, warning a lack of clear regulation will result in higher prices for consumers and a less secure grid.
Energy Networks Australia (ENA) says clear policy settings could ultimately save Australian energy customers $100bn, and allow a smooth transition, where large-scale variable renewable energy can be integrated securely, creating the prospect of Australia’s electricity sector achieving zero net carbon emissions by 2050.
A new roadmap from the ENA to be released on Friday says the energy market is in the middle of a profound transformation that will only intensify over the next two decades.
Modelling produced for the report suggests that by 2050, up to 45% of Australia’s electricity supply could be provided by millions of distributed, privately owned generators, in homes and businesses.
The report notes the trend towards decentralisation of power generation creates “profound adaptation challenges for the system’s architecture, stability and efficiency given it was originally designed for almost 100% of generation at the transmission end of the system”.
The report’s estimated $100bn in cost savings is a function of governments rolling out nationally consistent policies that would encourage the two parts of the system to work harmoniously together – the current poles and wires of the national market, and the virtual grids in homes and businesses.
Allowing efficient co-optimisation would prevent overinvestment in poles and wires.
The ENA’s chief executive, John Bradley, said with stable policy settings, networks could buy grid support from customers instead of building their own infrastructure.
The rise of distributed energy between now and 2050 will coincide with decarbonisation in the national grid.
The report suggests by 2030, around 40% of generation could come from renewable technologies in Victoria and Western Australia, with an increasing share in New South Wales and Queensland as coal generators are retired.
The report points out that Queensland alone will boast solar generation capacity almost as large as its current coal-fired generation capacity by 2030.
The chief energy economist at the CSIRO, Paul Graham, who collaborated on the report, said the east coast grid would probably require the equivalent of 25 new large-scale solar or windfarms being built in just five years.
But the report points out that the massive technological transformation is rolling out in a policy vacuum.
“There is currently no enduring, clear long-term climate policy. There is also a lack of integration between electricity sector planning processes and climate policy,” the ENA report says.
It notes barriers to efficient decarbonisation “will be exacerbated if distributed energy resources are not utilised to support system balancing, facilitated by network optimisation systems”.
The release of the roadmap follows the publication of a draft version last December just before the Coalition decided to rule out an emissions-intensity scheme for the electricity sector after a brief internal revolt.
The ENA’s new report continues to argue that an emission-intensity baseline and credit scheme for the electricity sector, and “technology-neutral” carbon policy, would allow the transition to low-emissions power sources at least cost to households.
It says an intensity scheme or an “alternative policy of similar merit” should be rolled out by 2020, and the government should pursue “review opportunities to introduce an economy-wide carbon pricing mechanism” by 2026.
Bradley says the intense transformation required in the electricity sector will only be possible if the industry agrees on a clear roadmap, and with “stable and enduring carbon policy to support investment”.A range of influential organisations have told the current Finkel review of the national electricity market the Turnbull government needs to put a price on carbon or adopt a market mechanism to drive emissions reduction.
A string of peak bodies have used the review to call for the adoption of a market mechanism, including the National Farmers’ Federation, the Investor Group on Climate Change and the Business Council of Australia, which explicitly called for an emissions intensity scheme.
The current industry consensus around carbon pricing is a major turnaround in a very short period of time.
Three years ago some of the same groups urged the parliament to get out of the way so that Tony Abbott could repeal the Gillard government’s “carbon tax”.

Links

Westpac's Anti-Coal Stance Exposes A Coalition Out Of Sync With Business And Public On Climate

Fairfax - Mark Kenny

Obviously Westpac's public 'un-friending' of new coal - for which you can read Adani's Carmichael coal mine in the Galiliee Basin - is a body blow for a project whose backers are thinning by the day.
Westpac is the last of the big four Australian banks to bin Adani's publicly toxic prospectus.

Government 'should get smashed': Jones
The government using taxpayers' dollars to support the Adani coal mine is the kind of policy that will see it "smashed in an election", says 2GB's Alan Jones.

All are unmoved by the lure of ongoing coal profits, especially if it comes with ties to a venture that has become a byword for climate change denial.
Adani will continue to seek other financiers - including extraordinarily, the Australian taxpayer from whom it is telling Indian backers, it remains eligible for a $1 billion loan. This is despite the Northern Australia Infrastructure Fund rules, which appear to render it ineligible.
With or without that welfare, the business case for new coal generally and the Adani mine in particular, looks to be ebbing. Fast.
Westpac's decision is an environmental declaration of intent. But it is a coldly commercial one also that recognises what the Australian government defiantly rejects: coal's day has passed.
Resources and Northern Australia Minister Matt Canavan hit out strongly at the bank, suggesting it had succumbed to the inner-city politics of Sydney rather than the employment needs of the sunshine state. Remarkably, Canavan - cabinet minister - even advocated a boycott, counselling potential customers to back a bank that backs Queensland's interests.
Doubtless there would be many Queenslanders upset by the Adani venture, not least the thousands already employed around the Great Barrier Reef.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull meets with India's Adani Group founder and chairman Gautam Adani in New Delhi earlier this month. Photo: Mick Tsikas
Besides, Westpac is hardly going out on a limb. Try going to the AGL website. One of the nation's biggest energy companies has announced a new campaign to end its association with coal entirely: "The reasons for getting out of coal are all around us" its homepage proclaims.
Privately, Malcolm Turnbull must surely be hoping the Adani thing just goes away.
Resources Minister Matthew Canavan has suggested Queenslanders avoid banking with Westpac after the bank ruled out lending to Adani. Photo: Alex Ellinghausen
The PM may be a progressive rationalist at heart but in his head there are other realities to balance. Party room realities like Tony Abbott, Peter Dutton, and the Nationals, whose head-in-the-sand record on climate change has left farmers so exposed that even the National Farmers Federation now proposes a carbon price.
Paul Keating once described Turnbull as a cherry on a compost heap. The trouble with compost heaps is they tend to be stationary. This issue is anything but, and if you want proof, just follow the money.
Brian Hartzer, chief executive officer of Westpac. Photo: Bloomberg

Links

Donald Trump's 100 Days In Office Marked By Climate Change Protests

ABC News - AP/Reuters


Anti-Trump protestors gather outside the White House to mark 100 days of the Trump Presidency (ABC News)

Key points:
  • An estimated 15,000 people turned out in Washington DC, Chicago, Boston and LA — (view the photos)
  • Some marches drew big-name attendees including Leonardo DiCaprio and Al Gore
  • Mr Trump will skip the annual White House Correspondents' Dinner in Washington
As US President Donald Trump marks his 100th day in the White House, thousands of people have turned out in cities across the country to protest against his climate change policies.
Mr Trump said earlier he had brought "profound change", adding "the first 100 days of my administration has been just about the most successful in our country's history".
"It's a false standard, 100 days, but I have to tell you, I don't think anybody has done what we've been able to do in 100 days, so we're very happy," he said.
Mr Trump is the least popular president at this stage of his term since polling began, Washington Post-ABC News, RealClearPolitics and FiveThirtyEight polls have all found.
About 15,000 people gathered for the afternoon march from the lawn of the US Capitol to the White House, according to an estimate by a Reuters reporter, coinciding with the end of the traditional "honeymoon" period for a new president.
Carrying signs emblazoned with slogans such as "Imagine a world free of climate change", and "Planet over profits", demonstrators on Saturday (local time) said they were angered by the prospect of Mr Trump carrying through on his vow to roll back protections put in place by his predecessors.

Donald Trump says the first 100 days are 'just the beginning' for new US prosperity. (ABC News)

"We're going to rise up and let them know that we're sick and tired of seeing our children die of asthma," Reverend Leo Woodberry of Florence, South Carolina, said.
"We're sick and tired of seeing people with cancer because of coal ash ponds. We're sick and tired of seeing sea-level rise."
The Trump administration is considering withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, which more than 190 countries including the United States signed in hopes of curbing global warming.
Mr Trump has also proposed deep cuts for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
As marchers took to the street, the EPA website underwent a makeover to reflect the views of the Trump administration.
In January, EPA sources told Reuters that administration officials had asked the agency to take down the climate change page — which included links to scientific research, data and trends related to the causes and effects of climate change.
In his campaign, Mr Trump called climate change a hoax. Last month he kept a promise to the coal industry by undoing climate change rules put in place by his predecessor Barack Obama.
Hundreds gathered in Boston to mark Mr Trump's first 100 days in office by protesting his agenda so far. (AP: Michael Dwyer)
In Boston, a crowd gathered in public park in downtown. Marchers carried signs with slogans such as "Dump Trump".
Some of the marches drew big-name attendees, including former vice-president Al Gore and actor Leonardo DiCaprio in the nation's capital and Vermont senator Bernie Sanders at a Montpelier event.
"Honoured to join Indigenous leaders and native peoples as they fight for climate justice," DiCaprio tweeted.
In Augusta, Maine, protesters outside the statehouse said they wanted to draw attention to the damage climate change can cause marginalised communities.
A demonstration stretched for several blocks in downtown Tampa, Florida, where marchers said they were concerned about the threat rising seas pose to the city.
In a break from tradition, Mr Trump will skip tonight's annual White House Correspondent's dinner and is expected to hold a campaign-style rally in Pennsylvania.
"Looking forward to RALLY in the Great State of Pennsylvania tonight ... big crowd, big energy!" he tweeted.
Saturday's march was part of an effort to build support for candidates with strong environmental records in the run-up to next year's midterm elections and the 2020 presidential race, organisers said.
"We're using this as a tactic to advance the strategy of building enough power to win on climate over the course of the long haul," national coordinator Paul Getsos said.
Why do we care about 100 days?
Since Mr Trump's inauguration on January 20, there have been national protests focused on issues ranging from abortion rights to immigration and science policy.
Myron Ebell, a climate change sceptic at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian think tank, said the march would have little impact on the administration.
"The real decisions are made in this country in elections, and we have now a president and a House and a Senate that are determined to pursue a pro-energy agenda," he said.
Mr Trump's representatives had no immediate comment on the protest.

People protest come rain or shine
Denver

Protesters turned out in Denver, Colorado, despite the chilly weather. (AP: Brennan Linsley)
Los Angeles
Demonstrators took to the Pacific Coast highway in the Wilmington neighbourhood of Los Angeles, California. (Reuters: Andrew Cullen)
Chicago
Demonstrators in Chicago march against Mr Trump's climate policies and his actions during his first 100 days in office. (AP: Nam Y Huh)
Jessica Fujan chants during a "100 Days of Failure" protest and march in Chicago. (AP: Nam Y Huh)
New York City
A police officer separates a face-off between a Trump supporter and one of the organisers of a "100 days of Failure" protest in New York City. (AP: Mary Altaffer)
Boston
People gathered in droves on Boston Common in Boston. (AP: Michael Dwyer)
Washington DC
Demonstrators wearing paper mache heads representing Mr Trump and the planet Earth walk by the White House. (AP: Pablo Martinez Mosivais)
Participants walk along Pennsylvania Ave., in front of the White House in Washington DC. (AP: Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Links