07/06/2017

More Than 700 Species Facing Extinction Are Being Hit By Climate Change

The IndependentIan Johnston

Humans’ closest relatives, the primates, are among those worst affected because their tropical habitats have had a stable climate for thousands of years
Eastern lowland gorillas are among the primates threatened with extinction. Rex
More than 700 mammals and birds currently threatened with extinction already appear to have been adversely affected by climate change, according to a major review of scientific studies.
Primates and marsupials are believed to have the most individual species suffering as a result of global warming, according to a paper in the journal Nature Climate Change.
Only two groups of mammals, rodents and insect-eaters, are thought to have benefited. This is partly because they have fast breeding rates, tend not to be specialists suited to a particular habitat, and often live in burrows which provide insulation against changes in the weather.
The figures are much higher than previously thought, making up 47 per cent of land mammals and 23 per cent of the birds on the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of species threatened with extinction.
According to the list itself, just seven per cent of the mammals and four per cent of the birds are described as being threatened by “climate change and severe weather”.
The researchers developed a model to compare the animals’ weight and other characteristics with changes in the climate, such as the temperature.
“Using this model, we estimated that 47 per cent of terrestrial [non-flying] threatened mammals (out of 873 species) and 23.4 per cent of threatened birds (out of 1,272 species) may have already been negatively impacted by climate change in at least part of their distribution,” the article in Nature Climate Change said.
“Our results suggest that populations of large numbers of threatened species are likely to be already affected by climate change, and that conservation managers, planners and policy makers must take this into account in efforts to safeguard the future of biodiversity.”
Primates and marsupials are more at risk than other animals partly because they have lived mostly in tropical parts of the world which have had a stable climate for thousands of years.
“Many of these [animals] have evolved to live within restricted environmental tolerances and are likely to be most affected by rapid changes and extreme events,” the paper added.
“In addition, primates and elephants are characterised by very slow reproductive rates that reduce their ability to adapt to rapid changes in environmental conditions.”
One reason why climate change is causing a problem for animals is changes in the distribution of plants.
“In areas with reduced precipitation and/or temperature seasonality, it is likely that plant species may have narrower climatic tolerances, and therefore that these areas may have already experienced vegetation changes with consequential loss of habitat for animals living there,” the paper said.
“A more specialised diet was also associated with greater probability of negative responses in mammals.
“Our findings are in agreement with previous studies on the predictors of general extinction risk, in which species with narrower diet breadths were associated with lower ability to exploit resources and adapt to new environmental conditions and selective pressures.”
Birds living in the world’s cold mountain regions appear to be particularly at risk.
“Populations of species living at high altitudes and in colder places have fewer opportunities to move towards cooler areas or upslope to avoid increasing temperatures, and hence may have increased extinction risk,” the paper said.
Another problem is that higher temperatures are inducing birds to lay eggs earlier.
“For animals living in these environments the effects of temperature changes may have been exacerbated, potentially leading to disruption in synchronisation between the timing of chick-feeding and peak food availability,” the paper said.
“A more specialised diet was also associated with greater probability of negative responses in mammals.
“Our findings are in agreement with previous studies on the predictors of general extinction risk, in which species with narrower diet breadths were associated with lower ability to exploit resources and adapt to new environmental conditions and selective pressures.”
Birds living in the world’s cold mountain regions appear to be particularly at risk.
“Populations of species living at high altitudes and in colder places have fewer opportunities to move towards cooler areas or upslope to avoid increasing temperatures, and hence may have increased extinction risk,” the paper said.
Another problem is that higher temperatures are inducing birds to lay eggs earlier.
“For animals living in these environments the effects of temperature changes may have been exacerbated, potentially leading to disruption in synchronisation between the timing of chick-feeding and peak food availability,” the paper said.

Links

Adani Announces 'Green Light' For Carmichael Mega Coal Mine

Fairfax

Australia's biggest ever coal mine will go ahead, according to Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, whose company has made the final investment decision to "green light" the controversial Carmichael project.
In a statement released by the company on Tuesday morning, Adani said it had signed letters of award for design, construction, operations, supply of materials and professional services, with Downer Mining chosen to build and operate the Carmichael mine located in Queensland's Galilee Basin.

Mine games
You would think Adani would have given up on Australia's biggest coal mine by now. Artist: Matt Davidson

But the Stop Adani Alliance, made up of 20 environment groups, immediately called the Adani announcement a "con" because the company has been unable to secure the finance it needs to actually start mining.
There was no detail in Adani's statement on Tuesday about finance.
The Adani mine would be one of the world's largest.  Photo: Darren Pateman
Stop Adani Alliance spokesman Geoff Cousins, who is also president of the Australian Conservation Foundation, said it was "groundhog day" because the company had announced other "investment decisions" over the past six years.
"Adani is yet to lure any financial institutions willing to bankroll the project, which is proving hugely unpopular with the Australian public. Without this support and public subsidies, the heavily leveraged balance sheet of Adani Enterprises leaves no internal capacity to fund this $5 billion project proposal," Mr Cousins said.
"If the federal government hands Adani $1 billion of public money for this destructive mine that will destroy our reef, we will consider all avenues, including legal action, to stop it."
Construction of the mine, which could eventually entail six open cut pits and five underground mines over an area 30 kilometres long, has been bitterly opposed by the coalition of environment groups who say it makes a mockery of global efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
The company has said it plans to mine 2.3 billion tonnes of coal over the mine's 60 year lifespan.
Mr Adani said: "This is an historic day for Adani, an historic day for regional Queensland, and an historic day for Indian investment in Australia.
"This is the largest single investment by an Indian corporation in Australia, and I believe others will follow with investments and trade deals.
"We have been challenged by activists in the courts, in inner city streets, and even outside banks that have not even been approached to finance the project. We are still facing activists. But we are committed to this project."

Links

Josh Frydenberg Hits The Phones To Keep Government MPs In Line Over Climate, Paris Deal

Fairfax - James Massola

Environment and Energy Minister Josh Frydenberg has hit the phones to the Coalition backbench to calm growing concerns about the federal government's climate change review, and to stress the need for Australia to remain in the Paris agreement.
The calls were made after Fairfax Media last week revealed at least five government MPs wanted a possible re-think of Australia's commitment to the deal to reduce carbon emissions, after US President Donald Trump announced his country would quit the deal.
Trump's climate call
US President Donald Trump has withdrawn America from the Paris climate change agreement, but Australia will not follow according to the energy minister.

The move by Mr Frydenberg, who is allied with the conservative wing of the Coalition and who has been charged with overseeing reviews of the electricity sector and climate policy, underscores growing concern at the highest levels of the Turnbull government about new fissures opening up over the contentious policy area.
Malcolm Turnbull lost his job as opposition leader back in 2009 after a rebellion over climate policy led by Tony Abbott and the Prime Minister is keenly aware of just how sensitive climate policy remains inside the Coalition.
Minister for Environment and Energy Josh Frydenberg is calling backbenchers to shore up support for climate policy. Photo: Alex Ellinghausen
Fairfax Media understands that at least six MPs in the Liberal party's conservative wing - Eric Abetz, Andrew Hastie, Tony Pasin, Craig Kelly, Ian MacDonald and junior minister Angus Taylor - have been called by Mr Frydenberg over climate policy and the Finkel review.
In those calls, Mr Frydenberg has stressed the need for the government to remain unified over climate policy. This reminder has been understood in the context of the 2009 implosion.
He has also argued the importance of sending a market-based signal, through climate policy settings, to the electricity market to spur new investment.
Crucially, the minister also promised that keeping downward pressure on electricity prices for households and business remains a top priority for him, and for the government, as new policies are developed.
One MP borrowed a line from P.G. Wodehouse and said that on climate policy, conservative MPs "if not actually disgruntled, [are] far from being gruntled".
"Josh has an acute antenna, particularly for people in the conservative wing. He knows he has to carry the moderates and the conservatives with him on this policy."
​Another MP said that Mr Turnbull was "playing with fire" on climate policy.
"Two of the policy principles on which he compromised to buy the leadership were swallowing his pride on Direct Action, and on the plebiscite for same-sex marriage plebiscite. If he goes back on either, this would cause major concerns in the party room."
The MPs contacted by Mr Frydenberg praised his efforts to keep them in the tent but added that they were watching to see whether so-called clean coal, for example, would be allowed under the low emissions target (LET).
Chief scientist Alan Finkel's review of the electricity sector is due to be released at the Council of Australian Governments meeting in Hobart on Friday and will inform a climate policy review due by end of the year.
The review is expected to recommend a new LET, in line with a recommendation in a Climate Change Authority report, as a second-best policy option because the federal government has ruled out an Emissions Intensity Scheme (EIS), which is a form of carbon pricing.
A LET operates in a similar way to the Renewable Energy Target and would require more electricity be supplied from –depending on its design – renewables, carbon capture and storage coal fire power and highly efficient gas plants.
Deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce, a climate change sceptic, has indicated he believed the LET could be the way forward to allow the development of next generation coal-fired power stations as well as renewable energy.
Business Council chief executive Jennifer Westacott said it was abundantly clear that "doing nothing" doesn't work.
"A properly constructed LET, designed in consultation with industry and customers, could be an effective solution to deliver secure, reliable and affordable electricity while also assisting us to meet our emission reduction targets," she said.
The progressive Australia Institute's executive director, Ben Oquist, said: "A well-designed low emissions target could be the basis for the needed integration  of climate and energy policy in Australia".

Links