22/06/2017

Australia Warned It Has Radically Underestimated Climate Change Security Threat

The Guardian

Senate inquiry starts as report into political, military and humanitarian risks of climate change across Asia Pacific released
Fijian girl walks over flooded land in her village. Photograph: chameleonseye/Getty Images
As the Senate launches an inquiry into the national security ramifications of climate change, a new report has warned global warming will cause increasingly regular and severe humanitarian crises across the Asia-Pacific.
Disaster Alley, written by the Breakthrough Centre for Climate Restoration, forecasts climate change could potentially displace tens of millions from swamped cities, drive fragile states to failure, cause intractable political instability, and spark military conflict.
Report co-author Ian Dunlop argues Australia’s political and corporate leaders, by refusing to accept the need for urgent climate action now, are “putting the Australian community in extreme danger”.
“Global warming will drive increasingly severe humanitarian crises, forced migration, political instability and conflict. The Asia Pacific region, including Australia, is considered to be ‘disaster alley’ where some of the worst impacts will be experienced,” the report, released this morning, says.
“Australia’s political, bureaucratic and corporate leaders are abrogating their fiduciary responsibilities to safeguard the people and their future wellbeing. They are ill-prepared for the real risks of climate change at home and abroad.”
On Friday, the Senate passed a motion for an inquiry into the threats and long-term risks posed by climate change to national and international security, and Australia’s readiness to mitigate and respond to climate-related crises in our region.
Dunlop, a former chairman of the Australian Coal Association and chief executive of the Australian Institute of Company Directors, told the Guardian the security impacts of climate change were not far-distant future concerns, but happening now.
The ongoing Syrian civil war – which has killed 450,000 and forced an estimated 5.5 million people to flee the country over six years of conflict – is attributed, in significant part, to an extended drought, exacerbated by climate change, that left millions without food or livelihoods.
“Once these effects start, then they unfold right the way through the system as an accelerant,” Dunlop said. “Natural disasters lead to social pressures, to increasing conflicts, competing claims for scarce resources. These fuel extremist positions, which could be religious, tribal, or political, which can lead to mass migrations. We are going to see a lot of people start moving, in our region especially, and to think we stop that by finessing things like ‘stop the boats’, is frankly naive.”
Dunlop said the global nature of the climate change challenge should force countries to cooperate.
“Climate change has to become seen as a reason for far greater levels of global cooperation than we’ve seen before. If we don’t see it that way, then we’re going to be in big trouble. This problem is bigger than any of us, it’s bigger than any nation state, any political party.
“We’re going to be steamrolled by this stuff unless we take serious action now.”
The security implications of climate change have been identified by thinktanks, governments, and militaries across the world.
A decade ago, Alan Dupont and Graeme Pearman wrote for the Lowy Institute that the security threat posed by climate change had been largely ignored and seriously underestimated.
In 2013 the commander of US Pacific Command, Admiral Samuel Locklear, said the greatest long-term threat in the Asia-Pacific was not military ambitions of another state, or the threat of nuclear weapons, but climate change.
In 2015, the US Department of Defense commissioned a report, examining the security implications of disrupted climate, and current secretary of defense, Jim Mattis, has said climate change is a clear and current threat to US troops.
Australia’s 2016 defence white paper said climate change would contribute to state fragility, which it identified as one of the six key drivers that will “shape the development of Australia’s security environment to 2035”.
“Climate change will be a major challenge for countries in Australia’s immediate region. Climate change will see higher temperatures, increased sea-level rise and will increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events. These effects will exacerbate the challenges of population growth and environmental degradation, and will contribute to food shortages and undermine economic development.”
“Instability in our immediate region could have strategic consequences for Australia should it lead to increasing influence by actors from outside the region with interests inimical to ours. It is crucial that Australia help support the development of national resilience in the region to reduce the likelihood of instability.”
The Senate inquiry into the national security threats of climate change will report in December. But the issue remains politically charged.
Greens senator Scott Ludlam, in putting the motion before the Senate said the government had failed to apprehend the global security risk posed by climate change.
“As one of the highest per-capita emitters on the planet, Australia must play a constructive role as our region responds to climate change. The government won’t listen to the scientists, and it won’t listen to the renewable energy sector. Maybe it will listen to defence and security experts and the personnel on the frontline.”
But assistant minister to the prime minister, Senator James McGrath, said the inquiry was unnecessary.
He told the Senate a defence climate security adviser had been established within the office of the vice chief of the defence force group. As well, an environmental planning and advisory cell has been established within headquarters joint operations command, and defence is represented at the government’s disaster and climate resilience reference group.

Links

If Finkel Review Isn't Dead It's Going To Take A Miracle To Revive It

Fairfax - Peter Hannam

Much like the Pythonesque parrot, Alan Finkel's independent review into the future security of Australia's electricity market is looking very peaky.
Tuesday's Coalition party room meeting decided that all but one of the Chief Scientist's 50-odd recommendations was uncontroversial.
The light on the hill? Australia's energy and climate policies remain at odds Photo: AP
That almost sounds like our energy crisis might be averted. Consumers and businesses alike are staring at soaring gas and electricity prices, and the prospect of blackouts when summer roars back - if not sooner.
Unfortunately, the sole issue that failed to get Coalition approval happens to be the point of the whole Finkel review.
That's his recommendation that Australia set a "clean energy target" (CET) to give certainty and confidence to investors and the public, exhausted by the decade-long war over climate policy.
Josh Frydenberg, the Environment and Energy Minister, was putting a brave face on the result on Wednesday morning, suggesting the CET remains an "important recommendation", and it is not yet dead.
"There will be a lot more discussions with stakeholders and colleagues in the weeks and months ahead," he said.
Get the latest news and updates emailed straight to your inbox.
By submitting your email you are agreeing to Fairfax Media's terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"We're not going to rush this decision; it's too important for the country."
Alan Finkel's review looks likely to be set aside on its key recommendation. Photo: Alex Ellinghausen
But Frydenberg has been here before.
In December, when Finkel's preliminary review recommended an emissions intensity scheme among the options to escape the policy maze, Frydenberg agreed that it should be under consideration.
However, it needed a few of the party's rightwingers to arc up for Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull to cave in and rule that idea out forever.
Frydenberg was left literally to twist in the breeze as he fronted journalists on a windy Hobart wharf.
This time around, it's taken a more drawn-out exercise - including the formal release of Finkel's report 12 days ago in the Tasmanian capital and months of hard slog - to arrive at the same result.
Who believes that opposition inside the Coalition to a clean energy target is likely to recede in "weeks and months ahead"?
Not with the entire Murdoch commentariat opposed, and the Minerals Council now promoting a reverse auction process that would suspiciously and miraculously make coal-fired power suddenly "investable".
Turnbull and Frydenberg notably failed to rule out a reverse auction on Tuesday.
Tony Wood, energy guru at the Grattan Institute, said the government has to make it clear that reverse auctions would not be an alternative, but - at most - a complement, to the Finkel review.
Without doing so, the whole emissions reduction part of the equation looks set to be jettisoned.
The point of the Finkel review was to find a way through the "minefield" - as even the Chief Scientist has called it - that could bolster the security of the electricity sector.
Investors who will bankroll the new plant needed to keep the lights on, know that the necessary certainty to stump up the cash will elude them so long as energy and climate policies are at odds at both the state and federal level, and between the major parties.
The test of whether energy and climate policy are aligned remains Labor's yardstick, and whether a bipartisan truce is possible that could settle investment conditions for longer than the next election.
Labor insiders at both state and federal level say the clean energy target was the centrepiece of Finkel's review, and without it, the entire architecture crumbles.
Mark Butler, Labor's climate spokesman, made the same view public on Wednesday: "The latest announcement by the Prime Minister undermines any CET, increases rather than eliminates investment uncertainty in the sector, and will lead to higher power prices, less reliability and more carbon pollution."
Finkel, himself, was putting on a brave face, telling a National Press Club lunch that it was "remarkable" that most of his recommendations had got the Coalition's nod. He did not regard the CET "to be on life support".
While Wood is hopeful the review is not a dead duck - "there's still some waddle there" - he accepts the politics provide a grim prognosis that good policy can yet emerge.
Indeed, Coalition MPs know that whatever happens this year or next on the investment front, consumers aren't likely to see much, if any, relief.
Instead, voters will be wondering who to blame for the nearly 20 per cent increases in electricity prices now arriving in their mailboxes (except for Victorians when the blows will land from January 1).
Nevermind the challenge that will remain by the year's end. How can Australia's carbon emissions be bent to get anywhere near the 26-28 per cent reduction on 2005 levels by 2030?
When offered a way out of a minefield mostly of their own making, who will be surprised if the government decides to go after "Electricity Bill" Shorten for failing to sign up to whatever scheme can get through the Coalition party room no matter if industry widely rejects it?
That's much easier than coming up with a durable energy policy.
It also makes it easier to follow US President Donald Trump's route of pulling Australia out of the Paris agreement. That parrot isn't looking too chirpy either.

Links

Almost No Snow, And Way Above Average Temps Australia-Wide So Far In June

Huffington PostAnthony Sharwood

Well at least the wombats are happy. mlharing via Getty Images
Winter? Technically we're in it, yes. But it's feeling a lot more like spring or autumn out there.
Australia is enjoying a super warm start to winter 2017, with temperatures well above average in all capital cities except Darwin.
The good news? It'll be a gorgeous sunny weekend ahead in 90 percent of the country. So get out there and enjoy yourself -- especially if you live in Sydney, where a shower or two may fall but sea temps are still a balmy 20 degrees.
Nice. Jason Reed / Reuters
The bad news is that large parts of southern Australia which rely on winter rainfall for agricultural reasons, or snowfall for recreational reasons, are currently struggling. Some of the anomalies have been quite worrying.
For example, June is normally the second wettest month of the year in Perth. It usually rains on average every second day. But so far in 2017, the West Australian capital has had just ONE rain day.

Tasmania has been having some super warm nights.
IMAGE
And on Tuesday this week, the Mt Hotham ski resort in Victoria had a day of 11.6 degrees, its hottest in 24 years. The average June maximum for Mt Hotham is 1.4. This exceeded that by more than 10 degrees.
IMAGE
Here's a breakdown of the capital cities for the first half (15 days) of June. As you can see, every city except Darwin has been a fair way above average. And Darwin is only 0.1 of a degree below the norm.

Sydney June average max: 17
Sydney June average max so far: 18.4
1.4 degrees warmer than usual

Melbourne June average max: 14.1
Melbourne June average max so far: 15.3
1.2 degrees warmer than usual

Brisbane June average max: 21.9
Brisbane June average max so far: 22.1
0.2 degrees warmer than usual

Adelaide June average max: 15.8
Adelaide June average max so far: 16.8
1 degree warmer than usual

Perth June average max: 19.4
Perth June average max so far: 23.3
3.9 degrees warmer than usual

Hobart June average max: 12.0
Hobart June average max so far: 14.7
2.7 degrees warmer than usual

Canberra June average max: 12.3
Canberra June average max so far: 14.0
1.7 degrees warmer than usual

Darwin June average max: 30.7
Darwin June average max so far: 30.6
0.1 degrees cooler than usual

The Bureau of Meteorology actually predicted this in its seasonal outlook issued on May 29. It forecast a drier than average June in much of southern Australia -- and dry weather tends to be warmer than wet weather, for the obvious reason of all that extra sunlight.

So is this a climate change thing?
You can never infer long term trends from a small sample of data: That's like confusing the difference between the outfit you're wearing today and your entire wardrobe.
Having said that, experts like David Karoly have found that winter weather patterns do appear to be changing in southern Australia because of the complicated effects of global warming.
One such effect is that cold Southern Ocean storms (which we call cold fronts) are veering north over the Australian mainland less often in winter -- and that's certainly how this winter has started off.
Those cold fronts in the South Ocean aren't getting anywhere near us... yet.
But it's only early winter and things could change. And for those of you who are snow lovers, the cold clear nights have at least provided great snowmaking conditions at ski resorts.

Links