01/07/2017

Battery Storage “Gigafactory” Planned For Darwin For 2018

Renew Economy - Giles Parkinson


Australia’s first battery storage “gigafactory” is likely to be built in Darwin, with a new consortium planing to establish a large-scale lithium-ion manufacturing plant by the end of 2018.
Energy Renaissance, a company backed by engineering group UGL (now owned by CIMIC) says the first phase of the $100 million plant will create four distinct production lines, and will target niche utility and industrial scale markets in Australia and Asia.
Energy Renaissance is partnering with US battery storage company 24M, and is said to have the enthusiastic support, if not the financial backing, of the new Labor government, which also has a 50 per cent renewable energy target by 2030.
“Renaissance One” – as it will be known – is one of at least two “gigafactory” proposals for Australia, with the Boston Energy consortium led by former Macquarie Group property guru Bill Moss looking at a much larger 15GWh production line in Townsville.
It also comes on the same day that a 5MW battery storage installation was announced for Alice Springs, where Vector Energy won a tender for LG Chem batteries that will allow a significant increase in solar capacity in the city, already with the highest penetration in the country.
Renaissance Energy managing director Brian Craighead  said Australia was a logical place to build a gigafactory, given its obvious demand for battery storage, its abundant resources of lithium, cobalt and graphite, and its proximity to Asia markets.
“Australia is the only country that you could throw a wall around and still have all the materials you need – cobalt and graphite and lithium – for battery storage,” Craighead told RenewEconomy in an interview.
Battery storage is expected to be a huge market in Australia, with the likes of the CSIRO predicting more than 90GWh of battery storage, much of it “behind the meter” by households and businesses, but also partnered with large scale renewables and in grids.
Large arrays are already being planned for large-scale solar plants across the country. Lyon Group has announced projects totalling 1GW of battery storage to accompany its planned solar installations, to help with grid security, offset network upgrades, smoothing out solar power and shifting loads.
The factory has been more than two years in the planning. Chair Su McCluskey, the former head of Regional Australia, stood down in 2015 to “pursue other opportunities” and this turns out to be one of them. UGL has a 10 per cent stake, while the remaining owners, including McCluskey and Craighead, are private.
Craighead said the factory will focus on the utility, industrial, defence, telco, mining, and off-grid sectors – and not the household market. Around 70 per cent of production will be targeted for export.
The technology – semi-solid lithium-ion – will be designed specifically to take into account the warmer climate in Australia and Asia. Its target market means container-style installations full of batteries, and temperature control is the key and air-conditioners a significant draw on resources.
“Batteries in Australia are still pretty expensive. And although the cost per kWh is coming down due to the scale of manufacturing, most of the chemistries have an operating window of around 25°C. So you need air conditioning to keep temperatures down, and that’s a significant parasitic load.”
The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based 24M describes its manufacturing process as significantly more efficient than conventional lithium-ion products.
“The simple truth is that lithium-ion batteries are made the wrong way,” it says on its website.
“The process is cumbersome. It’s wasteful. It’s woefully inefficient. 24M’s novel manufacturing process strips out the waste, speeds production and reduces the overall footprint to slash today’s lithium-ion battery costs by 50% and accelerate its adoption.”
Craighead expects to have up to seven different production lines producing niche products – all of around 150MWh each. He expects four such lines to be in place by the opening late next year.
He says Darwin was chosen over other port cities, such as Newcastle, Geelong and Gladstone, because of the availability of raw materials, the proximity to Asia markets, the local engineering expertise and the support of the government.
The size of the plant is dwarfed by the 50GWh Tesla gigafactory currently being completed in Nevada, but that factory has a guaranteed market for Tesla electric vehicles and its Powerpack and Powerwall products.
“Energy storage is the key to the future,” he says. “There are times when pumped hydro works perfectly, time for hybrid plants, and times for battery storage. Stored energy makes so many things possible that weren’t possible before.”

Links

China In Climate Driver’s Seat After Trump Rejects Paris

The Conversation*

Protesters gather outside the White House in Washington D.C. after President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw the Unites States from the Paris climate change accord. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
With President Donald Trump's withdrawal of the United States from the Paris climate change accords, it's now clear to the world that action on climate change will rest increasingly in the hands of China, not America or the European Union.
Given the global nature of the climate crisis, the decisions that China's leaders make over the next decade will have a profound impact around the world. Shockingly, as sea levels rise, the fate of America's coastal cities, from Palm Beach to Boston, will increasingly be determined in Beijing, not Washington, D.C. One can only imagine Trump sitting like King Canute on a lawn chair at Mar-A-Lago as it slowly disappears beneath the sea.
Since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, global trade liberalization has made China the factory of the world, bringing wealth to corporate America and lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.
But as China rode the trade winds of globalization to become the world's second largest economy, its coal-fired power stations and lower environmental standards combined to produce searing smog that now reduces life expectancy by up to 5.5 years in the country's industrial north. The rapid increase in fossil fuels also propelled China to become the world's leading emitter of greenhouse gases, the chief cause of global warming.

China morphing into clean energy champ
The good news is that China is in the midst of engineering a massive transition to an "ecological civilization," one that transcends Western industrial modernity and emphasizes clean energy, sustainable cities and circular economies.
China's 13th five-year plan (2015-2020) envisions bringing the country's installed solar capacity to 140 gigawatts to help cut greenhouse gas emissions. Its plan for rapid urbanization is also being accompanied by the development of over 200 new eco-cities that are already functioning as test labs for urban planners.
China's economic rise and its environmental challenges are also being accompanied by an equally important third factor: the increasing significance of China's traditional culture and religion in its social and political discourse. Most significant here is the positioning of Confucius as the patriarch par excellence of Chinese culture, and a bulwark against liberal Western values.
A Chinese migrant worker listens to radio on his tricycle cart parked next to a Beijing billboard promoting environmental protection. (AP Photo/Andy Wong)
Confucian values emphasize filial piety, deference to authority and the priority of family relationships over the individual. President Xi Jinping has deftly deployed these values in his anti-corruption drive.
As China assumes the leadership of the global environmental movement, the question that arises now is how future climate change language and policy will be increasingly shaped by Chinese, not Western, values.
Over 2,000 years ago, China's rulers embarked on two spectacular engineering projects. The better known of the two is the Great Wall, a vast and costly fortification against the barbarians of the north.

Walls or water? China opting for water
The second, lesser known, is the Dujiangyan irrigation system in Sichuan province, a UNESCO world heritage site. Still in use today, it uses a system of weirs and levees to regulate the spring floods along the Min river and provide water to over 5,300 square kilometres of land, producing some of China's most fertile agricultural land.
When I interviewed local officials during my fieldwork in China, they lauded it as a marvel of Daoist engineering for harnessing nature's power instead of working against it.
The choice between walls and water is an apt metaphor for the decisions facing world leaders today. Trump campaigned on a wall with Mexico. President Xi, meantime, has strengthened China's great firewall, which limits the choices and freedoms of Chinese citizens. While China's leaders feared America's power, it was only natural that they should seek to limit its influence.
But in the end, as China's rulers discovered, walls ultimately crumble, while the power of water is eternal. The Dujiangyan irrigation system continues to this day and is an essential component in China's food security system.
As China's Daoist philosophers wrote more than 2,000 years ago: "Nothing in the world is as soft and weak as water. But when attacking the hard and strong nothing can conquer so easily." In the end, nature wins.

*James Miller is the author of China's Green Religion: Daoism and the Quest for a Sustainable Future (New York: Columbia University Press)

Links

Climate Kids To Get Their Day In Court Against The Trump Administration

ThinkProgressNatasha Geiling

The kids will be in court on February 5, 2018, to take on the federal government.
CREDIT: Our Children's Trust
The 21 youth plaintiffs suing the federal government over climate change will have their day in court, with a date for the trial now officially set for February 5, 2018.
"Despite incessant efforts by government and industry to prevent our case from moving forward, the date is set for trial," Alex Loznak, a 20-year old plaintiff from Oregon, said in a press statement.
"Having seen some of the most damning evidence to be presented at trial, I am confident that our claims will prevail."
The case is the first to use a theory known as atmospheric trust law, which argues that the federal government, through actions like fossil fuel subsidies, has actively undermined the youth's right to a livable climate.
Atmospheric trust law is based on an old legal doctrine that holds that the federal government must preserve certainly commonly held elements, like shorelines and waterways, for public use.
Applying public trust to the atmosphere, the plaintiffs argue that the government must also take steps to preserve the atmosphere from rampant greenhouse gas pollution.
Trump administration files Hail Mary appeal to derail youth climate lawsuit
Just one day after a district court denied an appeal, the administration tried again.
The trial will take place in Eugene, Oregon, before U.S. District Court Justge Ann Aiken.
Aiken was the judge who ruled the case could move forward to begin with, finding in November that the plaintiffs could reasonably argue that they were likely to suffer personal damages if the United States did not take action to rein in carbon emissions.
In January, as President Donald Trump took office, the plaintiffs added him to the lawsuit.
They have argued that the action has taken on new importance in the face of an administration that blatantly denies climate change.
As head of the federal government, former President Barack Obama had been named in the original case.
Following the plaintiff's adding Trump as a defendant, the Trump administration — joined by representatives from the fossil fuel industry — appealed Aiken's November ruling, arguing that the plaintiffs lacked standing. Aiken denied that appeal in June, but the Trump administration subsequently filed an extraordinary petition, known as a writ of mandamus, asking the higher Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn Aiken's decision even before the case went to trial. The Ninth Circuit is still considering that appeal.
In a separate motion, three fossil fuel industry representatives — the American Petroleum Institute (API), the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), and the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) — that had joined the case as intervenors on behalf of the defendant applied to withdraw from the case.
The motions to withdraw were filed right before a crucial deadline for discovery, including disclosing to the court their position on the science behind climate change.
"Over 18 months ago, these fossil fuel associations went to incredible lengths to become defendants so that they could shut down this case," Julia Olson, co-lead counsel for plaintiffs and executive director of Our Children's Trust, the Oregon-based nonprofit supporting the lawsuit, said.
"They failed, and youth prevailed. Now these youth and the top climate experts on the planet can go to trial against the Trump Administration."
Can This Group Of Kids Force The Government To Act On Climate Change?
The 21 youth plaintiffs — ranging in age from nine to 21 — are not the only kids using the courts to compel action on climate change.
In Minnesota, a group of young adults applied to intervene in the state's regulatory process for Enbridge's Line 3 pipeline, arguing that climate change poses unique threats to them because they will grow up in a climate-changed world, meaning they will have to contend with things like more extreme storms and ocean acidification.
Earlier this week, 28 youths in New Mexico — between the ages of four and 20 — submitted a petition to the state's Environmental Improvement Board requesting that the state begin the process of implementing a greenhouse gas emission reduction strategy.
"The law in New Mexico is clear: state government must act to protect the health, safety, comfort, economic and social well-being of New Mexicans," Andrea Rodgers, senior staff attorney with Our Children's Trust, said in a statement.
"This rulemaking process is desperately needed to ensure New Mexico fulfills its legal obligations to address climate change so that these young people get the future they deserve."

Links