Renew Economy - Giles Parkinson
Australia’s
first battery storage “gigafactory” is likely to be built in Darwin,
with a new consortium planing to establish a large-scale lithium-ion
manufacturing plant by the end of 2018.
Energy Renaissance, a
company backed by engineering group UGL (now owned by CIMIC) says the
first phase of the $100 million plant will create four distinct
production lines, and will target niche utility and industrial scale
markets in Australia and Asia.
Energy Renaissance is partnering with US battery storage company 24M,
and is said to have the enthusiastic support, if not the financial
backing, of the new Labor government, which also has a 50 per cent
renewable energy target by 2030.
“Renaissance One” – as it will be known – is one of at least two
“gigafactory” proposals for Australia, with the Boston Energy consortium
led by former Macquarie Group property guru Bill Moss looking at a much larger 15GWh production line in Townsville.
It also comes on the same day that a 5MW battery storage installation was announced for Alice Springs, where Vector
Energy won a tender for LG Chem batteries that will allow a significant
increase in solar capacity in the city, already with the highest
penetration in the country.
Renaissance
Energy managing director Brian Craighead said Australia was a logical
place to build a gigafactory, given its obvious demand for battery
storage, its abundant resources of lithium, cobalt and graphite, and its
proximity to Asia markets.
“Australia is the only country that you could throw a wall around and
still have all the materials you need – cobalt and graphite and lithium
– for battery storage,” Craighead told RenewEconomy in an interview.
Battery storage is expected to be a huge market in Australia, with
the likes of the CSIRO predicting more than 90GWh of battery storage,
much of it “behind the meter” by households and businesses, but also
partnered with large scale renewables and in grids.
Large arrays are already being planned for large-scale solar plants across the country. Lyon Group has announced projects
totalling 1GW of battery storage to accompany its planned solar
installations, to help with grid security, offset network upgrades,
smoothing out solar power and shifting loads.
The factory has been more than two years in the planning. Chair Su McCluskey, the
former head of Regional Australia, stood down in 2015 to “pursue other
opportunities” and this turns out to be one of them. UGL has a 10 per
cent stake, while the remaining owners, including McCluskey and
Craighead, are private.
Craighead said the factory will focus on the utility, industrial,
defence, telco, mining, and off-grid sectors – and not the household
market. Around 70 per cent of production will be targeted for export.
The
technology – semi-solid lithium-ion – will be designed specifically to
take into account the warmer climate in Australia and Asia. Its target
market means container-style installations full of batteries, and
temperature control is the key and air-conditioners a significant draw
on resources.
“Batteries in Australia are still pretty expensive. And although the
cost per kWh is coming down due to the scale of manufacturing, most of
the chemistries have an operating window of around 25°C. So you need air
conditioning to keep temperatures down, and that’s a significant
parasitic load.”
The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based 24M describes its manufacturing
process as significantly more efficient than conventional lithium-ion
products.
“The simple truth is that lithium-ion batteries are made the wrong way,” it says on its website.
“The process is cumbersome. It’s wasteful. It’s woefully inefficient.
24M’s novel manufacturing process strips out the waste, speeds
production and reduces the overall footprint to slash today’s
lithium-ion battery costs by 50% and accelerate its adoption.”
Craighead expects to have up to seven different production lines
producing niche products – all of around 150MWh each. He expects four
such lines to be in place by the opening late next year.
He says Darwin was chosen over other port cities, such as Newcastle,
Geelong and Gladstone, because of the availability of raw materials, the
proximity to Asia markets, the local engineering expertise and the
support of the government.
The size of the plant is dwarfed by the 50GWh Tesla gigafactory
currently being completed in Nevada, but that factory has a guaranteed
market for Tesla electric vehicles and its Powerpack and Powerwall
products.
“Energy storage is the key to the future,” he says. “There are times
when pumped hydro works perfectly, time for hybrid plants, and times for
battery storage. Stored energy makes so many things possible that
weren’t possible before.”
Links
01/07/2017
China In Climate Driver’s Seat After Trump Rejects Paris
The Conversation - James Miller*
With President Donald Trump's withdrawal of the United States from
the Paris climate change accords, it's now clear to the world that action on climate change will rest increasingly in the hands of China, not America or the European Union.
Given the global nature of the climate crisis, the decisions that China's leaders make over the next decade will have a profound impact around the world. Shockingly, as sea levels rise, the fate of America's coastal cities, from Palm Beach to Boston, will increasingly be determined in Beijing, not Washington, D.C. One can only imagine Trump sitting like King Canute on a lawn chair at Mar-A-Lago as it slowly disappears beneath the sea.
Since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, global trade liberalization has made China the factory of the world, bringing wealth to corporate America and lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.
But as China rode the trade winds of globalization to become the world's second largest economy, its coal-fired power stations and lower environmental standards combined to produce searing smog that now reduces life expectancy by up to 5.5 years in the country's industrial north. The rapid increase in fossil fuels also propelled China to become the world's leading emitter of greenhouse gases, the chief cause of global warming.
China morphing into clean energy champ
The good news is that China is in the midst of engineering a massive transition to an "ecological civilization," one that transcends Western industrial modernity and emphasizes clean energy, sustainable cities and circular economies.
China's 13th five-year plan (2015-2020) envisions bringing the country's installed solar capacity to 140 gigawatts to help cut greenhouse gas emissions. Its plan for rapid urbanization is also being accompanied by the development of over 200 new eco-cities that are already functioning as test labs for urban planners.
China's economic rise and its environmental challenges are also being accompanied by an equally important third factor: the increasing significance of China's traditional culture and religion in its social and political discourse. Most significant here is the positioning of Confucius as the patriarch par excellence of Chinese culture, and a bulwark against liberal Western values.
Confucian values emphasize filial piety, deference to authority and
the priority of family relationships over the individual. President Xi
Jinping has deftly deployed these values in his anti-corruption drive.
As China assumes the leadership of the global environmental movement, the question that arises now is how future climate change language and policy will be increasingly shaped by Chinese, not Western, values.
Over 2,000 years ago, China's rulers embarked on two spectacular engineering projects. The better known of the two is the Great Wall, a vast and costly fortification against the barbarians of the north.
Walls or water? China opting for water
The second, lesser known, is the Dujiangyan irrigation system in Sichuan province, a UNESCO world heritage site. Still in use today, it uses a system of weirs and levees to regulate the spring floods along the Min river and provide water to over 5,300 square kilometres of land, producing some of China's most fertile agricultural land.
When I interviewed local officials during my fieldwork in China, they lauded it as a marvel of Daoist engineering for harnessing nature's power instead of working against it.
The choice between walls and water is an apt metaphor for the decisions facing world leaders today. Trump campaigned on a wall with Mexico. President Xi, meantime, has strengthened China's great firewall, which limits the choices and freedoms of Chinese citizens. While China's leaders feared America's power, it was only natural that they should seek to limit its influence.
But in the end, as China's rulers discovered, walls ultimately crumble, while the power of water is eternal. The Dujiangyan irrigation system continues to this day and is an essential component in China's food security system.
As China's Daoist philosophers wrote more than 2,000 years ago: "Nothing in the world is as soft and weak as water. But when attacking the hard and strong nothing can conquer so easily." In the end, nature wins.
*James Miller is the author of China's Green Religion: Daoism and the Quest for a Sustainable Future (New York: Columbia University Press)
Links
Protesters gather outside the White House in Washington D.C. after President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw the Unites States from the Paris climate change accord. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) |
Given the global nature of the climate crisis, the decisions that China's leaders make over the next decade will have a profound impact around the world. Shockingly, as sea levels rise, the fate of America's coastal cities, from Palm Beach to Boston, will increasingly be determined in Beijing, not Washington, D.C. One can only imagine Trump sitting like King Canute on a lawn chair at Mar-A-Lago as it slowly disappears beneath the sea.
Since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, global trade liberalization has made China the factory of the world, bringing wealth to corporate America and lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.
But as China rode the trade winds of globalization to become the world's second largest economy, its coal-fired power stations and lower environmental standards combined to produce searing smog that now reduces life expectancy by up to 5.5 years in the country's industrial north. The rapid increase in fossil fuels also propelled China to become the world's leading emitter of greenhouse gases, the chief cause of global warming.
China morphing into clean energy champ
The good news is that China is in the midst of engineering a massive transition to an "ecological civilization," one that transcends Western industrial modernity and emphasizes clean energy, sustainable cities and circular economies.
China's 13th five-year plan (2015-2020) envisions bringing the country's installed solar capacity to 140 gigawatts to help cut greenhouse gas emissions. Its plan for rapid urbanization is also being accompanied by the development of over 200 new eco-cities that are already functioning as test labs for urban planners.
China's economic rise and its environmental challenges are also being accompanied by an equally important third factor: the increasing significance of China's traditional culture and religion in its social and political discourse. Most significant here is the positioning of Confucius as the patriarch par excellence of Chinese culture, and a bulwark against liberal Western values.
As China assumes the leadership of the global environmental movement, the question that arises now is how future climate change language and policy will be increasingly shaped by Chinese, not Western, values.
Over 2,000 years ago, China's rulers embarked on two spectacular engineering projects. The better known of the two is the Great Wall, a vast and costly fortification against the barbarians of the north.
Walls or water? China opting for water
The second, lesser known, is the Dujiangyan irrigation system in Sichuan province, a UNESCO world heritage site. Still in use today, it uses a system of weirs and levees to regulate the spring floods along the Min river and provide water to over 5,300 square kilometres of land, producing some of China's most fertile agricultural land.
When I interviewed local officials during my fieldwork in China, they lauded it as a marvel of Daoist engineering for harnessing nature's power instead of working against it.
The choice between walls and water is an apt metaphor for the decisions facing world leaders today. Trump campaigned on a wall with Mexico. President Xi, meantime, has strengthened China's great firewall, which limits the choices and freedoms of Chinese citizens. While China's leaders feared America's power, it was only natural that they should seek to limit its influence.
But in the end, as China's rulers discovered, walls ultimately crumble, while the power of water is eternal. The Dujiangyan irrigation system continues to this day and is an essential component in China's food security system.
As China's Daoist philosophers wrote more than 2,000 years ago: "Nothing in the world is as soft and weak as water. But when attacking the hard and strong nothing can conquer so easily." In the end, nature wins.
*James Miller is the author of China's Green Religion: Daoism and the Quest for a Sustainable Future (New York: Columbia University Press)
Links
Climate Kids To Get Their Day In Court Against The Trump Administration
ThinkProgress - Natasha Geiling
The kids will be in court on February 5, 2018, to take on the federal government.
The 21
youth plaintiffs suing the federal government over climate change will
have their day in court, with a date for the trial now officially set for February 5, 2018.
"Despite incessant efforts by government and industry to prevent our case from moving forward, the date is set for trial," Alex Loznak, a 20-year old plaintiff from Oregon, said in a press statement.
"Having seen some of the most damning evidence to be presented at trial, I am confident that our claims will prevail."
The case is the first to use a theory known as atmospheric trust law, which argues that the federal government, through actions like fossil fuel subsidies, has actively undermined the youth's right to a livable climate.
Atmospheric trust law is based on an old legal doctrine that holds that the federal government must preserve certainly commonly held elements, like shorelines and waterways, for public use.
Applying public trust to the atmosphere, the plaintiffs argue that the government must also take steps to preserve the atmosphere from rampant greenhouse gas pollution.
The
trial will take place in Eugene, Oregon, before U.S. District Court
Justge Ann Aiken.
Aiken was the judge who ruled the case could move forward to begin with, finding in November that the plaintiffs could reasonably argue that they were likely to suffer personal damages if the United States did not take action to rein in carbon emissions.
In January, as President Donald Trump took office, the plaintiffs added him to the lawsuit.
They have argued that the action has taken on new importance in the face of an administration that blatantly denies climate change.
As head of the federal government, former President Barack Obama had been named in the original case.
Following the plaintiff's adding Trump as a defendant, the Trump administration — joined by representatives from the fossil fuel industry — appealed Aiken's November ruling, arguing that the plaintiffs lacked standing. Aiken denied that appeal in June, but the Trump administration subsequently filed an extraordinary petition, known as a writ of mandamus, asking the higher Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn Aiken's decision even before the case went to trial. The Ninth Circuit is still considering that appeal.
In a separate motion, three fossil fuel industry representatives — the American Petroleum Institute (API), the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), and the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) — that had joined the case as intervenors on behalf of the defendant applied to withdraw from the case.
The motions to withdraw were filed right before a crucial deadline for discovery, including disclosing to the court their position on the science behind climate change.
"Over 18 months ago, these fossil fuel associations went to incredible lengths to become defendants so that they could shut down this case," Julia Olson, co-lead counsel for plaintiffs and executive director of Our Children's Trust, the Oregon-based nonprofit supporting the lawsuit, said.
"They failed, and youth prevailed. Now these youth and the top climate experts on the planet can go to trial against the Trump Administration."
The
21 youth plaintiffs — ranging in age from nine to 21 — are not the only
kids using the courts to compel action on climate change.
In Minnesota, a group of young adults applied to intervene in the state's regulatory process for Enbridge's Line 3 pipeline, arguing that climate change poses unique threats to them because they will grow up in a climate-changed world, meaning they will have to contend with things like more extreme storms and ocean acidification.
Earlier this week, 28 youths in New Mexico — between the ages of four and 20 — submitted a petition to the state's Environmental Improvement Board requesting that the state begin the process of implementing a greenhouse gas emission reduction strategy.
"The law in New Mexico is clear: state government must act to protect the health, safety, comfort, economic and social well-being of New Mexicans," Andrea Rodgers, senior staff attorney with Our Children's Trust, said in a statement.
"This rulemaking process is desperately needed to ensure New Mexico fulfills its legal obligations to address climate change so that these young people get the future they deserve."
Links
The kids will be in court on February 5, 2018, to take on the federal government.
CREDIT: Our Children's Trust |
"Despite incessant efforts by government and industry to prevent our case from moving forward, the date is set for trial," Alex Loznak, a 20-year old plaintiff from Oregon, said in a press statement.
"Having seen some of the most damning evidence to be presented at trial, I am confident that our claims will prevail."
The case is the first to use a theory known as atmospheric trust law, which argues that the federal government, through actions like fossil fuel subsidies, has actively undermined the youth's right to a livable climate.
Atmospheric trust law is based on an old legal doctrine that holds that the federal government must preserve certainly commonly held elements, like shorelines and waterways, for public use.
Applying public trust to the atmosphere, the plaintiffs argue that the government must also take steps to preserve the atmosphere from rampant greenhouse gas pollution.
Trump administration files Hail Mary appeal to derail youth climate lawsuit |
Just one day after a district court denied an appeal, the administration tried again. |
Aiken was the judge who ruled the case could move forward to begin with, finding in November that the plaintiffs could reasonably argue that they were likely to suffer personal damages if the United States did not take action to rein in carbon emissions.
In January, as President Donald Trump took office, the plaintiffs added him to the lawsuit.
They have argued that the action has taken on new importance in the face of an administration that blatantly denies climate change.
As head of the federal government, former President Barack Obama had been named in the original case.
Following the plaintiff's adding Trump as a defendant, the Trump administration — joined by representatives from the fossil fuel industry — appealed Aiken's November ruling, arguing that the plaintiffs lacked standing. Aiken denied that appeal in June, but the Trump administration subsequently filed an extraordinary petition, known as a writ of mandamus, asking the higher Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn Aiken's decision even before the case went to trial. The Ninth Circuit is still considering that appeal.
In a separate motion, three fossil fuel industry representatives — the American Petroleum Institute (API), the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), and the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) — that had joined the case as intervenors on behalf of the defendant applied to withdraw from the case.
The motions to withdraw were filed right before a crucial deadline for discovery, including disclosing to the court their position on the science behind climate change.
"Over 18 months ago, these fossil fuel associations went to incredible lengths to become defendants so that they could shut down this case," Julia Olson, co-lead counsel for plaintiffs and executive director of Our Children's Trust, the Oregon-based nonprofit supporting the lawsuit, said.
"They failed, and youth prevailed. Now these youth and the top climate experts on the planet can go to trial against the Trump Administration."
Can This Group Of Kids Force The Government To Act On Climate Change? |
In Minnesota, a group of young adults applied to intervene in the state's regulatory process for Enbridge's Line 3 pipeline, arguing that climate change poses unique threats to them because they will grow up in a climate-changed world, meaning they will have to contend with things like more extreme storms and ocean acidification.
Earlier this week, 28 youths in New Mexico — between the ages of four and 20 — submitted a petition to the state's Environmental Improvement Board requesting that the state begin the process of implementing a greenhouse gas emission reduction strategy.
"The law in New Mexico is clear: state government must act to protect the health, safety, comfort, economic and social well-being of New Mexicans," Andrea Rodgers, senior staff attorney with Our Children's Trust, said in a statement.
"This rulemaking process is desperately needed to ensure New Mexico fulfills its legal obligations to address climate change so that these young people get the future they deserve."
Links
- Can A Children's Lawsuit Force Action On Climate Change?
- Court rules that children can sue the government over climate negligence
- Children's climate lawsuit to Donald Trump: See you in court
- White House Effort To Stop Youth Climate Lawsuit Is 'Drastic And Extraordinary'
- The People Taking Trump's Secretary Of State Pick To Court Aren't Who You'd Expect
- Doctrine of Public Trust
- Will History Condemn Climate Deniers? Column
- Why The Fossil Fuel Companies Won't Defend the Government In Court On Climate