24/11/2017

South Australia And ACT Outvoted On National Energy Guarantee

The Guardian

Government secures agreement to continue work on its proposed mechanism without direct comparison with alternative schemes
SA’s Jay Weatherill and the ACT were one vote short of a majority over the energy guarantee. Photograph: Mark Brake/AAP
The government has secured agreement for further work to be carried out on the national energy guarantee despite resistance from South Australia and the ACT.
As flagged by Guardian Australia on Thursday, some of the Labor states wanted a detailed comparison with alternatives such as the chief scientist’s clean energy target and an emissions intensity trading scheme.
But at a meeting of energy ministers in Hobart on Friday the commonwealth, New South Wales, Victoria and Tasmania said further work should be undertaken without the side-by-side comparisons.
Jay Weatherill’s South Australian government and the ACT wanted the direct comparisons, but were outvoted. Queensland was not present at Friday’s meeting because the state is in caretaker mode ahead of Saturday’s state election. Western Australia and the Northern Territory were not represented as they are not part of the national electricity market.
The Turnbull government’s proposed national energy guarantee, unveiled last month, would impose new reliability and emissions reduction guarantees on energy retailers and large energy users from 2020.
A review of the national electricity market by Australia’s chief scientist, Alan Finkel, recommended a clean energy target for the electricity sector – but that recommendation was dumped by the government largely because of opposition within the Coalition.
Friday’s meeting agreed that the Energy Security Board would undertake work on the national energy guarantee only as directed by the energy ministers’ council within the Council of Australian Governments, with the detail of the scheme to be considered next April.
The meeting considering the nuts and bolts of the guarantee will therefore happen after the state election in South Australia, which is due in March. The Weatherill government has led the resistance to the guarantee on the basis the policy is not sufficiently friendly to renewables.
After Friday’s meeting, the South Australian energy minister, Tom Koutsantonis, told reporters that he and the ACT’s energy minister, Shane Rattenbury, had simply sought proof the national energy guarantee was the best policy option.
“We sought proof ... and they refused,” Koutsantonis said. He said the government’s refusal to benchmark the policy against viable alternatives indicated there was something to hide.
“Why are we choosing the third best option?”
Koutsantonis said South Australia and the ACT would proceed with their own modelling providing the direct comparison sought at the meeting.
Rattenbury said he was frustrated by the commonwealth’s position. “It is clear that the jurisdictions are lining up to push the national energy guarantee through, and we will need to work hard to make sure that the rules are designed in a way that does not freeze out renewables, and does not lock in coal.
“We need to make sure that does not happen.”
Koutsantonis said there was a schism in the energy council between coal states and states that wanted “to move forward with a real solution”.

Links

'Worst Fears': States Prepare To Highlight The Negatives In Turnbull's Energy Plan

Fairfax - Peter Hannam

The Turnbull government's national energy guarantee is set for a rocky reception when energy ministers meet in Hobart, with one state declaring new modelling confirmed its "worst fears", and another saying it was "deeply disappointing".
Federal Environment and Energy minister Josh Frydenberg will front the dinner on Thursday night and is expected to release a paper during Friday's talks that has yet to be shared with state and territory counterparts.


Which is Australia's most renewable state?
With states taking the lead in the renewable energy push, a report by the Climate Council puts each state's efforts against one another.

The federal government provided a summary of its modelling for the energy guarantee on Wednesday, claiming wholesale prices would be as much as 23 per cent lower than business usual under the dual "guarantee" to cut emissions while improving reliability of the nation's ailing electricity grid.
South Australia Energy Minister Tom Koutsantonis indicated his state would reject the plan, which needs consensus from all parties to proceed. For historical reasons, changes to the National Electricity Market also need to pass the SA parliament.
The energy guarantee modelling released so far "confirms my worst fears", Mr Koutsantonis told reporters, adding the scheme "is designed to guarantee more coal".
Of particular concern to South Australia's Labor government is that the scheme would bolster the clout of the big "gentailers", AGL and Origin Energy, which dominate generation and retailing in the state.
"We need to smash their monopoly power into a thousand pieces, not entrench it," he said, adding any future consolidation would "quite frankly [be] a disaster".
Victoria was more circumspect, as the Labor government there continues to analyse the information provided by Canberra.
A spokesman for Lily D'Ambrosio, Victoria's Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change, said the state was again "deeply disappointed" in the manner the energy guarantee modelling was "announced without consultation with the states".
Sunrise or sunset for coal-fired power: NEG would extend the life of aging fossil fuel plants. Photo: AP
"Josh Frydenberg is more interested in briefing newspapers than COAG partners," the spokesman said.
"We won't commit to a political fix for Malcolm Turnbull - we will deliver an energy policy that ensures Victorian families and businesses get the affordable, reliable and clean energy they deserve."
The NEG is designed to aging coal plants in operation longer. Photo: AAP
Mr Frydenberg was unavailable to comment.

'Unanswered questions'
One senior state official told Fairfax Media the federal government's handling of the energy issue continued to flout any standard of policy process.
"We don't know where it's going to go," the official said, adding, "what is the curve as far as emissions go?"
The federal government is supposed to release its review of climate policies before the end of 2017.
Queensland's Energy Minister Mark Bailey, meanwhile said the NEG as proposed "still has too many unanswered questions - the impact on jobs in our booming renewables industry and how Queenslander's bills will be affected".
"We have concerns that bill savings for Queenslanders could be much less than $120 [per year], which is an average across the NEM," he said​. "While any savings from the NEG wouldn't flow for two years, our Affordable Energy Plan will deliver savings from 1 January 2018."
Queensland will be represented at the Hobart talks by a senior bureaucrat, ahead of Saturday's state elections.

'Thought bubble'
Hopes of a bipartisan federal agreement on the energy guarantee also appear to be fading, with Labor's climate spokesman Mark Butler saying the modelling released for the government's "latest energy policy thought bubble confirms their attack on renewable energy will continue".
"The modelling shows the NEG will crush investment in solar PV with no additional solar – including rooftop – expected until 2028," Mr Butler said.
The renewable energy mix is only expected to reach 36 per cent by 2030, Mr Butler said, a mere 0.5 per cent increase above already committed investment every year over the 2020s.
In exchange, the best the modelling could offer in terms of price savings amid rocketing power bills was the equivalent of $2.30 a week in three years' time, he said.
Don Harwon, NSW's Energy Minister, declined to comment ahead of the Hobart gathering, a spokesman said.

Links