13/01/2018

Act Now To Protect Millions From Floods — Study

Deutsche Welle - Ruby Russell

Scientists say millions more are at risk of flooding over the decades to come based on climate change already in the pipeline. In order to survive, the time to adapt is now.
Peru suffered devastating flooding in March, displacing hundreds of thousands of people
 When we think of climate catastrophes, flooding is pretty high on the list of nightmare scenarios. But it's not just rising sea levels that are threatening communities with inundation: New research shows that ever more of us are at risk from rivers bursting their banks.
As the global temperature rises, water evaporates into the air, humidity increases, clouds form — and what goes up must come down. It's among the laws of physics: Warmer air holds more moisture, meaning bigger clouds that can travel further, resulting in even more extreme storms.
Since the mid-1980s, climate scientists have recorded a 20 percent increase in record-breaking rainfall around the world — with devastating consequences.
In 2017, flooding across India, Bangladesh and Nepal affected 40 million people, and more than 1,200 died. In flooding in Sierra Leone, more than 1,100 people perished. As Peru recorded 10 times the normal level of rainfall, hundreds of thousands of people were displaced and at least 70 killed.
To round out the inventory of flooding's impact for last year, lives were also lost to flooding in China, the Philippines, Italy, and Vietnam, among other locations.
And 2018 has carried the trend forward. This week, at least 17 people were killed as dramatic storms swept California. Roads looked like rivers and homes were destroyed.

Predicting disaster
But according to scientists at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Research (PIK) in Germany, this is just the beginning. Around the world, many millions of people who have so far stayed safe and dry will face flooding unless action is taken to protect them, the researchers say.
In a bid to quantify the problem, PIK researchers created computer models based on existing data from rivers around the world to predict how important increased flood protection will become over the coming two decades.
"The findings should be a warning to decision-makers," one of the report's authors, Anders Levermann, said in a press release. "If they choose to ignore the issue, sadly enough, disaster will come. Doing nothing will be dangerous."
PIK found the areas that need to adapt most are in Indonesia — where the National Disaster Mitigation Agency reported 787 floods last year — along with India, Africa, the United States and even Western Europe, including the United Kingdom, France and Germany.
Authorities in these countries will need to build dikes, improve flood management systems, put new building regulations in place or even relocate entire communities, the study says.
Flooding in Jakarta last year. The PIK study ranked Indonesia among countries with the greatest need for adaptation
Rich countries also at risk
"More than half of the United States must at least double its protection level within the next two decades if they want to avoid a dramatic increase in river flood risks," the study's lead author, Sven Willen, said.
Sabine Minninger of nongovernmental organization Bread for the World said she hoped the report would serve as a wake-up call to United States President Donald Trump, who has withdrawn his country's support for climate change adaptation.
"The report comes at just the right moment to show that climate change doesn't know borders," said Minninger. "No one is immune to its impacts."
The study found that richer countries with higher levels of protection would have to invest a lot to maintain their current levels of protection.
The number of North Americans threatened by the worst 10 percent of flooding will increase from 100,000 to 1 million, the study said.
"With respect to climate change adaptation, not just poor countries but also rich countries, like Germany where we are sitting, have much to do," Leverman told DW.
The report comes in the wake of intense flooding on the Rhine River, as a result of heavy rainfall.
Floods sweep across Germany: Life on the edge
The rise in water levels is not only a threat to urban areas but also to low-lying fields and nature. The habitat of animals is just as much in jeopardy as that of humans, with floods sometimes resulting in irreparable damages to the eco-system. With climate change causing natural catastrophes more frequently, even the most developed countries can be caught off-guard when disaster strikes. Sertan Sanderson 
Millions more at risk
In Germany, where the overflow of rivers this past week across the country halted boat traffic, inundating streets and monuments, 700,000 people could be at risk from flooding in the next two decades.
But compared to figures for other the risks of European countries, that isn't even so bad. The study found that number of Brits threatened by flooding will increase 28-fold. In France, a 15-fold increase is predicted.
In South America, the number of people threatened by flooding is expected to rise from 6 million to 12 million, in Africa from 25 to 34 million, and in Asia from 70 to 156 million.
And these estimates do not take population growth or increasing urbanization into account — the final numbers could be substantially higher.
Minninger said those most affected by floods today are those in the poorest parts of the world who already struggle to survive. They need to adapt not just to the future risk predicted by PIK, but also to protect people from the very real climate change impacts they are already suffering.
"If even the richest countries need to double their protection, why aren't they providing finance for the rest of the world to adapt?" Minninger said.
The Addicks Resevoir reached capacity during Hurricane Harvey, flooding west Houston
Far-reaching impacts
For the world's poorest people, the dangers of rivers overflowing can go way beyond the immediate inundation of homes and destruction of infrastructure.
"Flood events were the main cause of internal displacement in 2008 to 2015," Sven Harmeling of international aid group Care told DW, saying there was no guarantee they would ever be able to return home as many poor people lack clear legal rights to their land.
Outbreak of disease is an immediate risk, but there are also longer-term health impacts, including psychological.
"Flood catastrophes may tear apart families and separate children from their parents," Harmeling said. "Sometimes thousands of children are acutely malnourished over weeks, which may have long-term adverse health consequences."
Floods can have long-lasting damaging effects, also on infrastructure
More money for adaptation
Yet Minninger said countries like the US could learn from poorer parts of the world, which are already dealing with dangerous new climatic conditions.
"In communities have no resources to protect themselves, for example in the Bangladeshi delta which are regularly flooded, concepts of community-based disaster prevention and management are applied and working very well — the people have learned to protect themselves with joint community-based efforts, for example in building dams," she said.
Environmental and development groups say not nearly enough progress is being made on raising the funds promised for adaptation by the Paris Agreement.
And unless we speed up measures to slow down global warming, the bill to prepare for the worst will keep going up.
2017 Devastating effects of climate change: Deadly combination
Armed conflicts are pushing millions of people to leave their homes or live in terribly precarious situations — and climate change is making it worse. A lack of natural resources increases the risk of conflict and makes life even harder for refugees. South Sudanese families, for instance, are escaping to neighboring countries like Uganda and Kenya — countries already suffering from drought.


Links

Here Are All The Ways Climate Change Presents A Threat To National Security

Pacific Standard

Donald Trump's decision to omit climate change from his National Defense Authorization Act caused quite a stir.

President Donald Trump speaks before signing the National Defense Authorization Act, on December 12th, 2017, in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Over 100 bipartisan members of the House of Representatives urged President Donald Trump to reconsider the omission of climate change as a national security threat in his 2018 National Defense Authorization Act.
In the letter, sent on Thursday, the members called Trump's omission "a significant step backwards" in recognizing the "geopolitical threat" of climate change.
The Trump administration's stance marks a significant divergence from the Obama White House, which in 2013 created a Climate Action Plan in an effort to curb rising emissions levels. Evidence continues to mount that climate change not only exists, but is having a detrimental effect on public health, the environment, and world economies.
In their letter, the House members wrote that fluctuating and erratic temperatures have affected communities worldwide, along with eroding beaches and pieces of land chipped away by rising sea levels. "Landscape military installations and our communities are increasingly at risk of devastation," they wrote. "Climate change is indeed a direct threat to America's national security and to the stability of the world at large."
With the Trump administration ushering in an era of climate skepticism (and in some cases climate denial), the White House has significantly loosened policies and legislation addressing the environmental impact of climate change, leaving citizens and communities even more vulnerable to the inevitable consequences of pollution.
Here are just a few ramifications and growing potential climate-change threats already on their way:
  • Potential health risks are estimated to rise significantly due to higher temperatures and complications of natural disasters. An estimated additional 250,000 people will die every year between 2030 and 2050 as a result of these health risks, according to the World Health Organization.
  • Climate change-induced malnutrition could affect nearly half a million adults globally by 2050 due to food and nutrition scarcity.
  • The economies of the states in the South, Midwest, and mid-Atlantic are expected to suffer from predicted gross domestic product losses of up to 28 percent due to greenhouse-gas emissions effects on field production.
  • Women and girls in developing regions may be impacted more from global warming than men and boys, due to social and economic inequalities.
  • A potential decline in profit for marine fisheries globally, which have been estimated to support the livelihoods of 10 to 12 percent of the world's population.
  • Islands, inhabited by hundreds of residents, such as the Tangier Islands in the Chesapeake bay, could be entirely consumed by rising sea levels by 2050, or sooner.
  • Even minor climate change-caused flooding leads to road closures, plumbing failure and other significant daily disruptions.
  • Rising climate disruption could bring about new global poverty, possibly resulting in an "additional 100 million people living in extreme poverty by 2030."
  • Species' failure to adapt to human-caused environmental changes will result in extinction and many species' disappearance. Other species, such as birds in North America and sea animals, will change habitats over the next several decades.
  • Entirely new climates and weather patterns introduced to ecosystems will cause a shuffling of biodiversity and animal communities.
The effects of climate change are not myths. In fact, the consequences of climate change are already in motion.

Links

Climate Change: Another Record Coming That We Don't Want To Break

The Age - Editorial

When the Australian Research Council awarded its funding plans in mid-2017, one recipient of the highly competitive seven-year grants was the Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes.
While building on the work of the previous Climate System Science centre, the new hub represents more than a name change.
The death of half of the Great Barrier Reef's corals during two summers – according to preliminary estimates – probably failed to interrupt barbecue banter for most Australians. Photo: AAP
The centre – grouping leading scientists from the Australian National University, Monash, Melbourne, and Tasmania universities – is the first in the world "with an unambiguous focus on the science behind climate extremes", according to its director, Professor Andy Pitman.
The Turnbull government and particularly Simon Birmingham, as the responsible minister, deserve credit for increasing the centre's capacity by 10 per cent over its predecessor – presumably against the views of a rump within the Coalition that denies climate change is a serious threat.
The hub's aim is to understand better the physics behind extremes and to improve predictions.
Such forecasts will be useful for incoming weather but also for showing how extremes will play out in a climate that continues to warm primarily because of rising emissions of greenhouse gases caused by human activity.
In recent months, Australians have had more than a few bursts of unusual heat to remind them why extremes matter.
In November, Victoria and Tasmania were baked in a late-spring heatwave that delivered a record 12 days above 30 degrees for Melburnians that month.
Last weekend brought a relatively short spike in temperatures for most of south-eastern Australia. Yet the temperature still managed to hit 47.3 degrees in Sydney's Penrith, near the foothills of the Blue Mountains.
Indeed, Penrith's maximum was hotter than anywhere recorded in 2017 in Western Australia or the Northern Territory. It rivalled Birdsville's 47.4 degrees, which marked Queensland's hottest location for the year.
Such events tend to be masked by the averages – as important as they are for tracking how Australia and the world continue to warm at a rate at the high end of climate models.
Just as extremes shouldn't be ignored, nor should the annual reckonings.
In coming weeks, the World Meteorological Organisation (will probably declare 2017 as the second or third-warmest year on record. The records go back to the final decades of the 19th century.
For Australia, the Bureau of Meteorology this week declared 2017 trailed only 2013 and 2005 as the country's hottest year for mean temperatures. Taking maximums, only 2013 was hotter.
Globally, no year on record has been hotter than 2017 without the boost of an El Nino in the Pacific
The yearly readings serve as an important reminder of the background creep of climate change that humans may not notice but nature cannot ignore.
As Australian scientists highlighted this month, there has been a fivefold increase in the likelihood of coral bleaching since the 1980s.
Neutral conditions in the Pacific – neither an El Nino nor its opposite, La Nina – are now warmer than an El Nino three decades or so ago, they found.
But while the death of half of the Great Barrier Reef's corals during two summers – according to preliminary estimates – probably failed to interrupt the barbecue banter for most Australians, extreme heat events may grab our attention.
As demonstrated in the early-2018 heatwave, services we take for granted, such as electricity, are vulnerable even in a climate that has warmed in Australia – and globally – by 1 degree since the industrial era began.
No wonder, then, that scientists are ramping up efforts to understand what will happen to extremes with the next degree of warming that our past emissions have all but locked in. And, of course, the risks from any further heating we foolishly experiment with.

Links

A Month In, Tesla’s SA Battery Is Surpassing Expectations

The Conversation

A month into operation, the Tesla lithium-ion battery at Neoen wind farm in Hornsdale, South Australia is already providing essential grid services. REUTERS/Sonali Paul
It’s just over one month since the Hornsdale power reserve was officially opened in South Australia. The excitement surrounding the project has generated acres of media interest, both locally and abroad.
The aspect that has generated the most interest is the battery’s rapid response time in smoothing out several major energy outages that have occurred since it was installed.
Following the early success of the SA model, Victoria has also secured an agreement to get its own Tesla battery built near the town of Stawell. Victoria’s government will be tracking the Hornsdale battery’s early performance with interest.

Generation and Consumption
Over the full month of December, the Hornsdale power reserve generated 2.42 gigawatt-hours of energy, and consumed 3.06GWh.
Since there are losses associated with energy storage, it is a net consumer of energy. This is often described in terms of “round trip efficiency”, a measure of the energy out to the energy in. In this case, the round trip efficiency appears to be roughly 80%.
The figure below shows the input and output from the battery over the month. As can be seen, on several occasions the battery has generated as much as 100MW of power, and consumed 70MW of power. The regular operation of battery moves between generating 30MW and consuming 30MW of power.
Generation and consumption of the Hornsdale Power Reserve over the month of December 2018. Author provided [data from AEMO]
As can be seen, the the generation and consumption pattern is rather “noisy”, and doesn’t really appear to have a pattern at all. This is true even on a daily basis, as can be seen below. This is related to services provided by the battery.
Generation and consumption of the Hornsdale Power Reserve on the 6th of Jan 2018. Author provided [data from AEMO]
Frequency Control Ancillary Services
There are eight different Frequency Control Ancillary Services (FCAS) markets in the National Electricity Market (NEM). These can be put into two broad categories: contingency services and regulation services.

Contingency services
Contingency services essentially stabilise the system when something unexpected occurs. This are called credible contingencies. The tripping (isolation from the grid) of large generator is one example.
When such unexpected events occur, supply and demand are no longer balanced, and the frequency of the power system moves away from the normal operating range. This happens on a very short timescale. The contingency services ensure that the system is brought back into balance and that the frequency is returned to normal within 5 minutes.
In the NEM there are three separate timescales over which these contingency services should be delivered: 6 seconds, 60 seconds, and 5 minutes. As the service may have to increase or decrease the frequency, there is thus a total of six contingency markets (three that raise frequency in the timescales above, and three that reduce it).
This is usually done by rapidly increasing or decreasing output from a generator (or battery in this case), or rapidly reducing or increasing load. This response is triggered at the power station by the change in frequency.
Tesla’s lithium-ion battery in South Australia has provided essential grid services on many occasions throughout December, according to the Australian Energy Market Operator. Reuters
To do this, generators (or loads) have some of their capacity “enabled” in the FCAS market. This essentially means that a proportion of its capacity is set aside, and available to respond if the frequency changes. Providers get paid for for the amount of megawatts they have enabled in the FCAS market.
This is one of the services that the Hornsdale Power Reserve has been providing. The figure below shows how the Hornsdale Power Reserve responded to one incident on power outage, when one of the units at Loy Yang A tripped on December 14, 2017.
The Hornsdale Power Reserve responding to a drop in system frequency. Author provide [data from AEMO]


Regulation services
The regulation services are a bit different. Similar to the contingency services, they help maintain the frequency in the normal operating range. And like contingency, regulation may have to raise or lower the frequency, and as such there are two regulation markets.
However, unlike contingency services, which essentially wait for an unexpected change in frequency, the response is governed by a control signal, sent from the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO).
In essence, AEMO controls the throttle, monitors the system frequency, and sends a control signal out at a 4-second interval. This control signal alters the output of the generator such that the supply and demand balanced is maintained.
This is one of the main services that the battery has been providing. As can be seen, the output of the battery closely follows the amount of capacity it has enabled in the regulation market.
Output of Horndale Power Reserve compared with enablement in the regulation raise FCAS market. Author provided [data from AEMO]
More batteries to come
Not to be outdone by it’s neighbouring state, the Victorian government has also recently secured an agreement for its own Tesla battery. This agreement, in conjunction with a wind farm near the town of Stawell, should see a battery providing similar services in Victoria.
This battery may also provide additional benefits to the grid. The project is located in a part of the transmission network that AEMO has indicated may need augmentation in the future. This project might illustrate the benefits the batteries can provide in strengthening the transmission network.
It still early days for the Hornsdale Power Reserve, but it’s clear that it has been busy performing essential services and doing so at impressive speeds. Importantly, it has provided regular frequency control ancillary services – not simply shifting electricity around.
With the costs and need for frequency control service increasing in recent years, the boost to supply through the Hornsdale power reserve is good news for consumers, and a timely addition to Australia’s energy market.

Links

Climate Change Is Triggering A Migrant Crisis In Vietnam

The Conversation | 

Tonkinphotography/Shutterstock.com

The Vietnamese Mekong Delta is one of Earth’s most agriculturally productive regions and is of global importance for its exports of rice, shrimp, and fruit. The 18m inhabitants of this low-lying river delta are also some of the world’s most vulnerable to climate change. Over the last ten years around 1.7m people have migrated out of its vast expanse of fields, rivers and canals while only 700,000 have arrived.
On a global level migration to urban areas remains as high as ever: one person in every 200 moves from rural areas to the city every year. Against this backdrop it is difficult to attribute migration to individual causes, not least because it can be challenging to find people who have left a region in order to ask why they went and because every local context is unique. But the high net rate of migration away from Mekong Delta provinces is more than double the national average, and even higher in its most climate-vulnerable areas. This implies that there is something else – probably climate-related – going on here.
The Mekong delta. Alex Chapman
In 2013 we visited An Thạnh Đông commune in Sóc Trăng Province aiming to collect survey data on agricultural yields. We soon realised that virtually no farmers of An Thạnh Đông had any yields to report. The commune had lost its entire sugarcane crop after unexpectedly high levels of salt water seeped into the soil and killed the plants. Those without a safety net were living in poverty. Over the following weeks hundreds of smallholders, many of whom had farmed the delta for generations, would tell us that things were changing and their livelihoods would soon be untenable.
In 2015-2016 disaster struck with the worst drought in a century. This caused salt water to intrude over 80km inland and destroyed at least 160,000ha of crops. In Kiên Giang (pop. 1.7m), one of the worst affected provinces, the local net migration rate jumped and in the year that followed around one resident in every 100 left.
One relatively low profile article by Vietnamese academics may be a vital piece of the puzzle. The study, by Oanh Le Thi Kim and Truong Le Minh of Van Lang University, suggests that climate change is the dominant factor in the decisions of 14.5% of migrants leaving the Mekong Delta. If this figure is correct, climate change is forcing 24,000 people to leave the region every year. And it’s worth pointing out the largest factor in individual decisions to leave the Delta was found to be the desire to escape poverty. As climate change has a growing and complex relationship with poverty, 14.5% may even be an underestimate.


There are a host of climate-linked drivers behind migration in the Delta. Some homes have quite literally fallen into the sea as the coast has eroded in the Southwestern portion of the delta – in some places 100m of coastal belt has been lost in a year. Hundreds of thousands of households are affected by the intrusion of salt water as the sea rises and only some are able to switch their livelihoods to salt-water tolerant commodities. Others have been affected by the increased incidence of drought, a trend which can be attributed in part to climate change, but also to upstream dam construction.
Governments and communities in developing countries around the world have already begun taking action to manage climate change impacts through adaptation. Our recent research in Vietnam flags a warning about how this is being done. We show that a further group of people are being forced to migrate from the Mekong due to decisions originally taken to protect them from the climate. Thousands of kilometres of dykes, many over four metres high, now criss-cross the delta. They were built principally to protect people and crops from flooding, but those same dykes have fundamentally altered the ecosystem. The poor and the landless can no longer find fish to eat and sell, and the dykes prevent free nutrients being carried onto paddies by the flood.
Harvesting rice. Phuong D. Nguyen / Shutterstock.com 
All this demonstrates that climate change threatens to exacerbate the existing trends of economic migration. One large scale study of migration in deltas has found that climate factors such as extreme floods, cyclones, erosion and land degradation play a role in making natural resource-based livelihoods more tenuous, further encouraging inhabitants to migrate.
To date, traditional approaches to achieving economic growth have not served the most vulnerable in the same way they have served those living in relative wealth. This was demonstrated most dramatically by the revelation that the number of undernourished people on earth rose by 38m last year – a shift for which climate change is partly responsible. This took place despite global GDP growth of 2.4%.
It is with these failures in mind that society must prepare an equitable and sustainable response to climate change and what seems a looming migrant crisis.

Links