12/07/2018

From Stinky Seaweed To Sick Fish, World's Warming Oceans Threaten Livelihoods

Reuters Thin Lei Win

Climate change will reduce the productivity of fisheries in the world's exclusive economic zones by up to 12 percent by 2050
A man walks past a dead fish as sea water rises during high tide at Kali Adem port in Jakarta, Indonesia, January 3, 2018. REUTERS/Beawiharta
ROME - From a rise in aquatic diseases to a "massive" invasion of stinking seaweed that stops fishing boats going out to sea, the warming of the world's oceans is affecting the livelihoods of millions - and experts say it is going to get worse.
Changes in water temperature, acidity and circulation patterns combined with rising sea levels will increasingly impact communities that live off the ocean, according to new analysis from the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
In Zanzibar, plant diseases are already destroying seaweed, a key export and a crucial source of income for women in the Indian Ocean archipelago.
Meanwhile fishermen in the Caribbean have seen their catch plummet and costs rise due to a record invasion of sargassum, a brown, stinking seaweed, linked to ocean warming.
"The sargassum is a new phenomenon, unprecedented and massive in its scale," said Milton Haughton, executive director of the Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism intergovernmental agency, on the sidelines of a week-long FAO forum in Rome.
"It prevents boats from going out. When it stays on the coastal harbour areas, it rots, decays, depletes the oxygen in the water and releases toxic substances and the fish dies," he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
The research by the FAO and 100 collaborating scientists shows climate change will reduce the productivity of fisheries in the world's exclusive economic zones (EEZs) by up to 12 percent by 2050.
An EEZ is a 200-mile area around a country's territorial waters which it has special rights to exploit.
The analysis shows the fall in productivity in EEZs could range from less than 3 percent to 12 percent, with significant regional fluctuations.
The biggest decreases are expected in tropical countries, mostly in the South Pacific, and some regions could even see an increase in potential catch.
In Fiji, a South Pacific island nation whose EEZ is 70 times larger than its land mass and whose citizens consume more than 35 kg (77 pounds) of fish per person a year, the impact is prompting a rethink of food production and consumption.
"The obvious worry is food for our people. So what we're trying to do right now is to move to aquaculture," said Netani Tavaga, an official from Fiji's Ministry of Fisheries.
"We also have to change the eating habits of the Pacific islanders, like Sunday is fish day. Maybe we need to start thinking about transitioning to other food sources," he said, adding Fiji is now producing prawns, tilapia and other species.
Yet aquaculture is also vulnerable to climate change - the analysis said extreme weather events such as floods and storms could lead to losses in production and infrastructure, while reduced rainfall will increase competition for fresh water.
The analysis said a fall in catches was not inevitable, but actions such as curbing pollution and destructive fishing would be crucial.
CFRM's Haughton hopes cooperation, science and technology will help fishing communities adapt to changes in the Caribbean waters, including dealing with the seaweed menace.
"At the same time, we're having large quantities of other fish we're not used to," he said. "So everything is changing, and that in itself is a problem because you don't know what's happening and you can't plan."

Links

Church Of England Votes To Withdraw Funds From Companies That Contribute To Climate Change

The IndependentJosh Gabbatiss

'Today's vote by the Church of England Synod shows the bell is tolling for the fossil fuel era'
Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has acknowledged the enormous threat posed to humanity by climate change. (Jack Taylor/Getty Images)
The Church of England has voted to withdraw investment from companies that are not pulling their weight in the fight against climate change.
Following a motion that passed with almost universal approval, the Church will sever ties with firms that do not meet the terms of the Paris climate agreement by 2023.
The General Synod – the decision-making body for the entire Church – said it broadly supported the current investment strategy, which is based on engaging with companies rather than removing investment.
However, an amendment put forward by Canon Giles Goddard of the Church’s environmental working group asked that the investing bodies assessed all companies’ progress in five years’ time.
At this point, bodies such as the Church pensions board will disinvest from any that are still not complying.
A spokesperson for the Church of England said: “Synod’s vote makes clear that the Church must play a leading role and exercise its moral leadership on the urgent issue of climate change.


Nicola Sturgeon mocks Donald Trump over climate change ahead of UK visit

“Today’s decision, including the amendment by Giles Goddard, will allow us to continue to push for real change in the oil and gas sector and use engagement, our voting rights and rights to file shareholder resolutions to drive the change we want to see.
The motion was passed in its amended form by 347 members of the Synod, with only four against and three abstentions.
Despite this widespread approval, the Synod was keen to emphasise the role the Church could have in influencing companies for the better ties were not cut.
David Walker, Bishop of Manchester and deputy chair of the Church Commissioners, said during the debate: “Unilateral, wholescale disinvestment from fossil fuel producers in 2020, or beginning in 2020 based on assessments in 2020, would leave our strategy, and influence, in tatters.”
"It would not spur companies on to change further and faster. It would do the exact opposite; it would take the pressure off them. Now is not the moment to do that."
A group of emperor penguins face a crack in the sea ice, near McMurdo Station, Antarctica Kira Morris

The vote came after the former archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, wrote a piece for the Telegraph questioning whether such engagement with high-polluting companies was having any effect.
However, the vote was welcomed by observers who were pleased to see a strict timeline for big polluters such as oil and gas companies to “fundamentally change their business models”.
“Today's vote by the Church of England Synod shows the bell is tolling for the fossil fuel era,” said Christian Aid’s head of UK advocacy, Tom Viita.
“As archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby said last week, climate change is the great existential threat of our times, and today the church has backed up his words with a clear decision to pull its investments from fossil fuel companies that don't quickly align themselves with the Paris climate change agreement.”

Links