25/07/2018

The World Is Hot, On Fire, And Flooding. Climate Change Is Here.

Grist

Angelos Tzortzinis / AFP / Getty Images
The worst ravages of climate change are on display around the world.
Wildfires have ripped through towns in Greece, floods have submerged parts of Laos, and heat waves have overwhelmed Japan. These are striking examples of climate change playing out in its deadliest forms, and they’re making  the term “natural disaster” an outdated concept.
People in Greece were jumping into the Aegean to escape advancing wildfires, according to a report in the New York Times. More than 70 are confirmed dead so far, and some scenes are horrific.
“Greece is going through an unspeakable tragedy,” said Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, in a televised address to declare three days of national mourning.
This is already Greece’s hottest year on record. Although the last few weeks have been mild and wet, it’s nearly certain that warm weather has played a role in drying out forests throughout Europe, where the number of fires this year is 43 percent above normal. Longer summers, more intense drought, and higher temperatures are all linked to greater fire risk.
We’ve known enough about meteorology to link extreme events to their increased likelihood as they are happening for years now. Recent advances in extreme weather attribution can often tell us exactly how much.
Ample evidence links worsening fires with human activity. Greece and much of the Mediterranean region is projected to turn into desert over the next several decades, and there are signs that this shift has already begun. As the region’s native trees die off and urban areas expand into neglected forests, firefighting resources are becoming woefully overmatched. Regardless of ignition source — arson or lightning or human carelessness — massive wildfires will become more common as droughts intensify and heat waves get more common. Extreme winds, like those blamed for fanning the flames this week in Greece and during megafires in Portugal last year, can make an already dire situation uncontrollable.
It’s the hottest month of one of the hottest years in the history of human civilization, and unusual wildfires are sprouting up all over the map. Sweden has called for emergency assistance from the rest of the European Union to help battle massive wildfires burning north of the Arctic Circle. Across the western United States, 50 major wildfires are burning in parts of 14 states, fueled by severe drought. The wildfires burning in Siberia earlier this month sent smoke plumes from across the Arctic all the way to New England, four thousand miles away. Last year, big wildfires burned in Greenland for the first time in recorded history.
And then there are the rains. In Laos, after days of downpours, a hydropower dam that was under construction collapsed on Tuesday. Hundreds of people have been reported missing. Higher global temperatures increase the evaporation rate, putting more water vapor in the atmosphere and making extreme downpours more common.
In recent weeks, high temperature records have been set on nearly every continent. On Monday, Japan had its hottest temperature in recorded history — 106 degrees Fahrenheit — just days after one of the worst flooding disasters the country has ever seen.
Algeria has recorded the highest reliably measured temperature in Africa, 124 degrees Fahrenheit. In late June, the temperature never dropped below 108 degrees Fahrenheit in Oman — the highest overnight low temperature anywhere in the world.
Even in normally temperate places the air has been sweltering: Temperatures approaching 100 degrees Fahrenheit hit parts of Canada, overwhelming hospitals in Montreal — where another heat wave is imminent this week.
According to calculations from climate scientist Gavin Schmidt, this year will likely be the world’s fourth warmest year on record globally, behind 2015, 2016, and 2017. With another El NiƱo on the way, next year could be even hotter.
All over the world, heatwaves are getting longer and more intense, the most well-documented and deadliest consequence of our failure to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Links

South Australia On Track To Meet 75% Renewables Target Liberals Promised To Scrap

The Guardian - Adam Morton

Liberal energy minister, who inherited policy criticised as a mix of ‘ideology and idiocy’, says he’ll ensure it does not come at too high a price 
Dan van Holst Pellekaan says South Australia must transition towards renewable energy. Photograph: Kelly Barnes/AAP
South Australia’s energy minister says the state is on track to have 75% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2025 – the target set by the former Labor premier Jay Weatherill and once rejected by his Liberal government.
And Dan van Holst Pellekaan pledged to ensure it does not come at too high a price.
The Liberal party was highly critical of Weatherill’s target when it was announced during this year’s South Australian election campaign, with the then state opposition leader, Steven Marshall, pledging to scrap it and the federal energy minister, Josh Frydenberg, likening the then premier to a clean energy addicted gambler “doubling down to chase his losses”. Prime minister Malcolm Turnbull had earlier described Weatherill’s renewable energy policy as “ideology and idiocy in equal measure”.
But several expert analyses have found the state is likely to meet or nearly meet the aspirational target, which was not tied to a policy mechanism. The Australian Energy Market Operator has projected South Australia would have 73% renewable power by 2020/21 while consultants Green Energy Markets found it could reach 74% by 2025 without any additional policies being introduced.
The South Australian energy and mining minister, Dan van Holst Pellekaan, said that was also his understanding. “That’s what the reports I’ve read are saying,” he said. “We need to harness it properly so consumers aren’t paying too high a price along the way.”
Van Holst Pellekaan has responsibility for shaping the future of energy in a state that already gets about half its electricity from variable sources such as wind and solar – a situation that Weatherill described in 2015 as “a big international experiment”. The new minister has inherited some of Labor’s proposed solutions, including a giant lithium-ion battery, a 20-year power purchase contract to underwrite a solar thermal plant with built-in storage and a “virtual power plant” of solar and batteries across public housing sites.
We must transition away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy ... And we need to do it sensibly.
Dan van Holst Pellekaan
He assumed the energy portfolio in March amid intense debate over the future of the national electricity market, which connects the four eastern states and South Australia. Frydenberg is attempting to design the government’s national energy guarantee policy so that it can win backing from the states, the Coalition party room and federal parliament. Labor wants it to allow a future government to ramp up the proposed 2030 emissions target for the electricity grid of a 26% cut below 2005 levels. Some federal Coalition members want taxpayers to support or underwrite new or existing coal-fired power plants.
Speaking in his electorate office in Port Augusta, home to the state’s coal power until the last plant closed in 2016, and now with up to 13 clean energy at varying stages of development including the solar thermal project, van Holst Pellekaan said the shift from coal to more clean energy in South Australia had been messier than it needed to be, but was inevitable.
“We must transition away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy,” he said. “There’s no doubt about it. And we need to do it sensibly.”
He said he believed the former ALP government had made a mistake in not paying Alinta Energy the $24m it had requested to keep the Northern coal plant at Port Augusta open for another three years while more renewable energy was built as it would have avoided “an enormous amount of pain” in local job losses and a spike in the wholesale electricity price.
“Many of my friends who are incredibly strong proponents of renewable energy disagree with me,” he said. “They say, ‘No mate, just shut it as soon as possible. Who cares what the price is?’ The ‘Who cares what the price is?’ part is where I differ.”
The Bungala solar power plant in South Australia. Photograph: the Guardian
“For us, I think a three-year phase-in [of replacing coal] would have been fine. Nationally, maybe we’re looking at a 10- or-20-year phase-in. I’m comfortable there’s no more coal-fired electricity in South Australia – very comfortable – we just should have made the transition better.”
Van Holst Pellekaan said gas-fired electricity, a fossil fuel with lower emissions than coal, would have a slower decline, predicting it would take “a couple of decades”. Rather than traditional baseload gas that runs constantly, he said the focus would be on peaking gas plants – fast-start generators that sit idle until needed at times of peak demand – to fill the gaps around renewable energy.
He agreed with the federal government that policy should be “broadly technologically neutral” but said it needed to place a value on three goals – keeping consumer costs down, delivering non-polluting technology and improved efficiency within the national market. “That steers you towards large-scale renewables with large-scale storage and an underlying security that comes from peaking gas plants,” he said.
South Australia is also backing small-scale storage. Under a deal signed by Labor, the government is installing a “virtual power plant” – initially 1,100 solar panels and Tesla batteries in public housing backed by a $30m loan from taxpayers.
Van Holst Pellekaan announced last week an initial trial had been a success, increasing supply and the reliability of the network and lowering cost at times of peak demand. He said delivering Labor’s full promise of 50,000 public housing systems depended on private-sector financing and Tesla and the government signing off on the final program design.
The Labor scheme will sit alongside a Liberal-pledged $100m plan to subsidise batteries at 40,000 private homes. Details are promised in coming months.
Van Holst Pellekaan said his focus in energy was helping consumers, including by making tools available to help those who chose to juggle their electricity use to reduce their bills.
“If a family says ‘I don’t care if it’s the most expensive electricity of the day, I’m going to use it between 5pm and 9pm because that’s what I want in my household’, OK, that’s their choice,” he said. “But if another family says, ‘I can skew things a bit earlier, or a bit later, and I can get a bit cheaper electricity’, good, that’s their choice.”
He stressed the importance of improved connection between the states, particularly a long-mooted link between South Australia and New South Wales, to improve grid efficiency and reliability. The transmission company ElectraNet has recommended a $1.5b interconnector between South Australia’s mid-north and Wagga Wagga.
Van Holst Pellekaan, a National Basketball League player in the 1980s with the Hobart Devils, said South Australia’s energy policies were in line with recent advice from the Australia Energy Market Operator and the competition and consumer watchdog.
The former released a forecast that found renewable electricity backed by storage and gas would be the lowest cost replacement for coal, and that early departures from the grid should be avoided to ensure an orderly transition.

The latter made recommendations to reform the national energy market, including potentially underwriting new plants designed to serve large industrial users to ensure they can be funded and built – a proposal energy insiders understand was influenced by South Australian policies.

Links
Sanjeev Gupta: Coal power is no longer cheaper – and we'll prove it
Life after coal: the South Australian city leading the way

Mary Robinson Launches New Feminist Fight Against Climate Change

The Guardian

Former Irish president’s initiative kicks off with podcasts pairing her with comedian Maeve Higgins
Mary Robinson (left), former president of Ireland, and comedian Maeve Higgins. Photograph: Ruth Medjber
Women around the world who are leading the fight against climate damage are to be highlighted by Mary Robinson, former president of Ireland and UN high commissioner, in the hopes of building a new global movement that will create “a feminist solution for climate change”.
Perhaps more revolutionary still, the new initiative is light-hearted in tone, optimistic in outlook and presents positive stories in what the originators hope will be seen as a fun way.
Called Mothers of Invention, the initiative will kick off with a series of podcasts showcasing the work of grassroots climate activists at a local level, as well as globally resonant initiatives such as the legal challenges under way in numerous jurisdictions to force governments to adhere to the Paris agreement goals. Scientists and politicians feature alongside farmers and indigenous community leaders from Europe, the US and Australia to India, Kenya, South Africa and Peru.
The podcast is a first for Robinson, who has focused on climate justice for the last 15 years through her charity, the Mary Robinson Foundation – Climate Justice, and as one of the Elders group, after seeing at first-hand as UN commissioner for human rights the danger that global warming presents to women whose lives are already precarious.
“Climate change is a manmade problem that requires a feminist solution,” she said ahead of the podcast launch. “What we are hoping to do is create a movement. Climate change is not gender-neutral – it affects women far more. So this is not about climate change, it is about climate justice.”
The movement, she added, would grow organically from the women who feature and the women who join in: “It will be happening in an unstructured way, which is all the better, because we are not prescribing what a feminist solution should look like, we are listening – we want women to tell us what they want. That to me is more interesting.”
Robinson has paired with Maeve Higgins, an Irish-born comedian based in New York and self-styled “sidekick”. They jointly introduce their female guests through a series of informal conversations larded with backchat and jokes – an unusual way of presenting the often gloomy subject of climate damage, Higgins admits, but one she hopes will reach people more effectively than the standard models of climate communication and male-dominated discourse.
“There is a lot of doom and gloom – this is not like that,” Higgins said. “This is for people like myself who feel stuck, knowing there are actions they should be taking but paralysed by despondency. The capitalist patriarchy is not going to solve this. We need to.”
The internet provides the means to reach women all over the world, she said: “This is democratic, this is available to as many people as possible.”
The series will bring in issues of colonialism, racism, poverty, migration and social justice and how these are bound up with feminism and the effects of climate change, and will include related environmental issues such as plastic pollution.
Podcasts are new departure for Robinson. “This is taking me way beyond my comfort zone,” she said. But “I’m willing to go there – I am so urgent about the fact that we need to do more.”
The first five episodes in the series, which is funded by philanthropic foundations, focus on women, but Robinson promised the initiative would not exclude men’s voices. “We will include men in the future,” she said, “but we have started with women, who have found it hard to be heard. A feminist solution to climate change involves everyone.”

Links

Electricity Plan Would All But Hit Emissions Goal Before It Starts

Fairfax - Peter Hannam

The Turnbull government’s National Energy Guarantee - the centrepiece of its climate change and electricity policy - would help cut an average household’s power bills by $50 in its first year but do little to cut carbon emissions over the decade to 2030.
The final design report, produced by the Energy Security Board and sent to state governments this week, projects an emissions target that would be 97 per cent fulfilled before the NEG policy starts in 2021, leaving it with little work to do.
National energy policy will be decided in the next week, with ramifications potentially lasting decades. Photo: Paul Jones
The study found that power prices will drop sharply, with or without the NEG policy in place, before starting to rise again towards 2030.
Electricity bill savings
Forecast average retail bill saving relative to 2017-18
Source: ACIL Allen consulting
Households connected to the National Electricity Market - serving about 80 per cent of Australians - will save "around $550 a year" over the decade, compared with 2017-18, the paper said.
That estimate assumes network costs - the largest contributor to higher power bills over the past decade - are unchanged. About $150 of the annual household savings are "directly attributable" to the NEG.
The Turnbull government has touted the policy as delivering lower power prices and increased reliability of the grid, while also meeting a 26 per cent reduction in 2005-level greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.
The Environment and Energy Minister, Josh Frydenberg, said the policy would “deliver a more affordable and reliable energy system and has the backing of business, industry and community groups”.
“We think that 26 per cent target is right. It’s a pro-rata contribution out of the electricity sector as part of our overall Paris Agreement,” Mr Frydenberg said, adding the government would release its final paper on the emissions obligation before the COAG Energy Council next meets on August 10.

'Technology neutral'
The paper said the NEG policy is ‘‘fuel- and technology-neutral and provides a clear investment signal, so the cleanest, cheapest and most reliable generation ... gets built in the right place at the right time".
However, concerns that the plan’s emissions goals are feeble are borne out by the design paper. According to modelling done for the board by ACIL Allen, a surge in renewable energy projects between now and the plan’s start in 2020 means carbon emissions are dropping faster than expected, leaving little for the sector to achieve in the entire ensuing decade."
By 2021, emissions in the [National Electricity Market] are expected to be around 24 per cent below 2005," the report said.
All up, of the 1320 million tonnes of carbon-dioxide equivalent needed to be reduced by 2030, the NEG will need to deliver just 38 million tonnes - or less than 3 per cent.
"Put another way, that's a whole 3.8 million tonnes per year on average over the 10 years," Dylan McConnell, an energy analyst at Melbourne University, said.
Fairfax Media sought comment from state and territory governments. Several declined to comment until they had considered the report.
Guy Barnett, Tasmania's Energy Minister, said his state was "Australia’s renewable energy powerhouse," adding that "a well-designed NEG can deliver significant benefits for Tasmania”.

'Fifth-best option'
One state official, though, described the NEG as "the fifth-best option over the past few years".
The Energy Security Board had "done a fair bit of work" to ensure it could be grafted on the existing electricity market.
Wholesale electricity prices would be an average 20 per cent lower over the 2020s than without the plan, the modelling showed.
NEM wholesale prices under the guarantee
Source: Energy Security Board
The report did not model a more ambitious carbon target, which consultants such as Reputex say would push prices lower.
The federal government needs all states and territory governments to approve the NEG for it to proceed. It will likely highlight the modelling's results that show lower prices in all jurisdictions than without the plan.
Projected jurisdictional wholesale price outcomes
Source: Energy Security Board
Energy mix
Mr McConnell said the modelling appeared to be at odds with the Integrated System Plan released last week by the Australian Energy Market Operator.
For instance, the paper assumed AGL's Liddell and Queensland's Gladstone coal-fired power stations drop out by 2030, but AEMO predicts the Vales Point plant in NSW will have shut by then.
Change in NEM generation capacity by fuel type without the guarantee
Note: Changes in NEM-wide capacity under ‘no policy’ modelling scenario
Source: ACIL Allen consulting
"There is practically no new renewable energy from 2020-21," Mr McConnell said.
The Victorian, Queensland and ACT renewable energy targets appear to be overlooked as well.
The rooftop solar forecast, put at about 800 megawatt a year, may also be pessimistic. Some 702 MW of new rooftop photovoltaic panels were added in the first half of 2018 alone, according to Green Energy Markets.
The projections also assume the multi-billion dollar Snowy 2.0 pumped hydro scheme is up and running by 2023-24, otherwise electricity prices would be rising sooner.
The scheme is yet to finalise a business case, nor clear a range of environmental hurdles.
Under the design, Snowy Hydro - now owned by the Commonwealth - and Hydro Tasmania would potentially earn windfall profits from their pre-1997 built plant, without adding any low-emissions generation. That amounts to a potentially huge transfer of wealth from consumers, said Bruce Mountain, head of the new Victoria Energy Policy Centre.

Links

Super Fund REST Being Sued For Not Having A Plan For Climate Change

ABC NewsMichael Slezak
Mark McVeigh wants his super fund to disclose how it's managing the risks of climate change. (ABC News: Michael Slezak)

Key points
  • Mark McVeigh is suing his super fund for failing to provide details on how it will minimise the risk of climate change
  • Super funds are legally required to pass on info that members need to make decisions about their investments
  • It's the first time a superannuation fund has been sued for not doing enough on climate change

The risk that your super could take a hit to its bottom line because of climate change could soon be something your fund is legally obliged to act on.
That's because 23-year-old Mark McVeigh is suing a $50 billion super fund — and if he wins, the industry will likely never be the same.
Experts say the case could force super funds to do more to protect people's savings from the impacts of climate change.
And since super funds own about a quarter of the Australian stock exchange, that could change the way business is done across the country.
Mr McVeigh graduated with an ecology degree from the University of Queensland earlier this year. He's unlikely to get hold of his super until at least 2055.
But by that time, if carbon pollution continues on its current path, the world is likely to have warmed by more than 2 degrees Celsius, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Global warming of this nature represents a risk to many businesses, and anyone who invests in them.
An increase in natural disasters alone, ignoring impacts on things like water resources and the direct effects of heat, will cost Australia an extra $20 billion every year by 2050, according to Deloitte Access Economics.
Mr McVeigh says the heart of his legal action is about making super funds transparent. (ABC News: Michael Slezak)
'There's risks to investing in companies that aren't sustainable'
Super funds are legally required to pass on information that members need to make decisions about their investments.
But nobody has ever tested whether strategies to deal with climate-related risks is information covered by that section.

Your super in 2055
  • If you're 23 today, under most circumstances you won't be able to access your super until you're at least 60 — so in 2055
  • If emissions stay on their current path, the IPCC says warming will probably exceed 2 degrees Celsius by then
  • But warming varies by location. In Australia, the CSIRO has estimated warming could be as high as 5.5C by late this century
  • Australia will experience more drought in the 2050s than it does today
  • The sea level around Australia is expected to rise by 6–19cm by 2030 (compared to the 1995 level)
  • All that will impact on the profitability of some businesses, and therefore the funds that invest in them
  • In addition, any actions the world takes to limit carbon pollution will also impact the profitability of some businesses

"There's inherent risks to investing in companies that aren't sustainable and contribute to climate change, which will be phased out [in] the next couple of decades," Mr McVeigh said.
He couldn't find any information about how his super fund, REST, was managing those risks. So in August last year, he wrote to the fund and asked.
"They haven't given any real information and they haven't supplied any real strategy or plan that they have for climate change and the risks involved," he said.
And that, according to lawyers at Environment Justice Australia (EJA), is grounds to sue.
"Mark has asked for information that he reasonably needs to make an informed decision about the management of the fund and that's what the law requires REST to give him," said EJA lawyer David Barnden, who is representing Mr McVeigh.
Mr McVeigh is suing REST for failing to provide that information, and asking the Federal Court to force the fund to release it.
It's the first time a superannuation fund has been sued for not doing enough on climate change.
"It's important for younger people to know that their money is going to be protected and people investing their money are going to do it in a way which isn't going to damage the environment, as well as their financial returns," Mr Barnden said.
"This is certainly not an environmental issue. REST invests in long-term assets such as infrastructure and this can be impacted by climate change and sea level rise.
"This is about protecting people's money and it's about what the world will look like when people can access their superannuation in 30, 40 years' time."

Court cases like this have been expected
Mr McVeigh recently graduated with an ecology degree from the University of Queensland. (ABC News: Michael Slezak)
The case could put into action strong warnings made by some of Australia's top lawyers and regulators.
In 2016, Noel Hutley SC, currently president of the Australian Bar Association, said financial risks caused by climate change would be considered by courts to be foreseeable — meaning company directors couldn't claim that they were unexpected.
Mr Hutley wrote it was "likely to be only a matter of time before we see litigation against a director who has failed to perceive, disclose or take steps in relation to a foreseeable climate-related risk that can be demonstrated to have caused harm to a company".

Climate change litigation
rising with the seas
A shift towards climate-change litigation is gathering steam as low-lying island countries, and even US cities, take aim at governments and big oil companies for failing to act proportionately on emission reductions.

And in 2017, the financial industry regulator APRA said it considered climate risks not just foreseeable, but also "material and actionable now".
This year APRA went further and revealed it was working with other regulators, including ASIC, to examine what the industry was doing to respond to climate-related financial risks, and warned that regulatory action would be considered.
Former ASIC lawyer Mark Bland, who now advises super funds, said Mr McVeigh's case could force the industry to be more open about how it managed climate risk, and that could have a big impact on investments.
"Really we've got the case of sunlight being the best disinfectant," he said.
"The impact for investment returns … is enormous and so I think this is really going to force directors, to the extent they haven't already, consider what the trustee needs to do to respond to climate change risk."
In a statement to the ABC, REST said it considered "environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in order to deliver competitive long-term investment returns for our members".
"We require our investment managers to consider a range of factors, including ESG risks, when selecting investments in their portfolios and when exercising voting rights," the statement said.
Mr McVeigh said this sort of statement wasn't adequate for him to make informed decisions about his retirement savings.
"They haven't really released any information on strategies or plans to do with climate change risk and that's basically where I started," he said.

Links