21/10/2018

Climate Change Is Exacerbating World Conflicts, Says Red Cross President

The Guardian

‘It’s obvious some of the violence we are observing … is directly linked to climate change,’ says Peter Maurer
President of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Peter Maurer says mass migration can leads to tensions with local communities. Photograph: Florent Vergnes/AFP/Getty Images 
Climate change is already exacerbating domestic and international conflicts, and governments must take steps to ensure it does not get worse, the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross has said.
Peter Maurer told Guardian Australia it was already making an impact and humanitarian organisations were having to factor it into their work far earlier than they were expecting.
“In many parts of the world where we work it’s not a distant engagement,” he said.
“When I think about our engagement in sub-Saharan Africa, in Somalia, in other places of the world, I see that climate change has already had a massive impact on population movement, on fertility of land. It’s moving the border between pastoralist and agriculturalist.”
Maurer, who was in Australia to speak about the changing nature of modern conflict, said concern about the impact of climate change in the Pacific was “enormous”.
He said changing rainfall patterns change the fertility of land and push populations, who may have settled and subsisted in one area for centuries, to migrate.
“It’s very obvious that some of the violence that we are observing … is directly linked to the impact of climate change and changing rainfall patterns.”
Earlier this month the United Nation’s climate panel, the IPCC, gave the world just 12 years to make the drastic but necessary changes. Its report said emissions had to be cut by 45% before 2030 if warming was to be restricted to 1.5C.
At 1.5C, 10 million fewer people would be affected by rising sea levels, and the proportion of the world’s population exposed to water stress could be 50% lower.
A 2016 study, which examined three decades of data, determined that a 1C rise in temperatures in a country reliant on agriculture correlated with a 5% increase in migration to other countries.
“When [populations] start to migrate in big numbers it leads to tensions between the migrating communities and the local communities. This is very visible in contexts like the Central African Republic, like Mali and other places,” said Maurer.
He said it was up to governments, not humanitarians, to develop the policies needed to deal with the “root causes” of climate change.
“As a humanitarian I am used to political decisions … never [being] as fast as we hope for them, or as generous or as big, but it’s encouraging an increasing number are recognising the importance of the issue and are taking steps to reduce the impact of climate change on our habitat – the Paris Agreement is an important step forward,” he said.
“For us we hope the international community will soon enough take necessary steps, so at the end of the day they won’t have to pay by increasing humanitarian impacts which, again, we already see in other conflicts.”
Donald Trump said little about the IPCC report, having already pledged to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement.
This made things difficult for everyone else, Ola Elvestuen, Norway’s environment minister, said last month, but still called for countries to transition away from fossil fuels, embrace electric cars and halt deforestation.
The Australian government largely dismissed the IPCC report and its recommendations – which included the rapid phase out of coal – as well as the pleas of Pacific Island nations.
Australia has no formal energy or climate change policy, and the Coalition government at one point flagged pulling out of the Paris Agreement.
MPs and ministers maintain that Australia is on track to meet emissions reductions targets, despite official government figures on emissions suggesting Australia will not, according to current projections.
On Sunday Australia’s treasurer and former energy minister, Josh Frydenberg, rejected the suggestion it should get his government rethink its policies. He said the government did not intend to “reduce emissions at the expense of people’s power bills”.
Anote Tong, the former president of Kiribati, was in Australia this week advocating for action.
“It’s not about the marginal rise in price or reduction in price of energy, it’s about lives, it’s about the future,” he told Guardian Australia.
Maurer said there were now more people displaced than ever before, approaching 70m across the globe. Two thirds are displaced internally, and most of those who fled would go to a neighbouring country.
“At the end of the day there is no single policy that allows in any satisfactory way a response to these issues, but there are multiple things which can be done,” he said.

Links

Wentworth Won't Prompt Climate Rethink, Says Frydenberg

The Guardian

Josh Frydenberg with Liberal candidate for Wentworth Dave Sharma. Lack of action on climate change was cited by 28% of voters as to why they switched their vote. Photograph: Dan Himbrechts/AAP 
Josh Frydenberg has played down the need for a significant shift in the Morrison government’s stance on climate change before the next federal election after the strong protest vote in the seat of Wentworth.
The treasurer and former energy and environment minister Josh Frydenberg told Sky News on Sunday people in Sydney’s eastern suburbs were concerned about climate change, but he said the government did not intend to “reduce emissions at the expense of people’s power bills”.
He said the backlash in Wentworth was driven more by the anger of local voters about Malcolm Turnbull’s removal from office two months ago than about frustration with a lack of climate action.
Frydenberg said the government had met previous emissions reduction targets and declared Australia would “beat our future targets” – despite official government figures on emissions suggesting Australia will not meet the Paris target on current projections, and the lack of a settled policy roadmap to curb pollution.
Scott Morrison backed Frydenberg’s signal in a press conference later on Sunday morning. “On climate policy, we have got that right,” the prime minister said.
While the level of community concern would vary in communities across the country, an exit poll funded by progressive thinktank the Australia Institute after people in Wentworth cast their votes on Saturday suggests climate change was a significant factor in the poor result for the Liberals.
The exit poll of 1,049 respondents indicated 78% of the sample nominated climate change as having some influence on their vote in the contest, with 47% saying it had a lot of influence on their vote, and 33% nominating climate change as the most important issue.
The poll backs Frydenberg’s primary contention that the number one issue for former Liberal voters switching to Phelps was the leadership coup against Turnbull, with 44% nominating that – but it also shows climate change was the second biggest issue on 28%, a result that would be replicated in other inner-metropolitan seats.
The activist group GetUp was active on climate change during the Wentworth battle.
“People have been knocking down our door desperate to do anything to send the out-of-touch Liberals a message that ignoring climate change is both dangerous and unforgivable,” said GetUp campaign director Miriam Lyons.
She said unless the Liberals reconsidered their current policy settings “not even its safest seat is safe”.
When conservatives moved against his leadership in late September, Turnbull attempted to appease his internal enemies by dumping the emissions reduction component of the national energy guarantee – a policy that sought to combine emissions reduction with an obligation on energy retailers to supply sufficient quantities of dispatchable power to ensure grid stability.
Morrison has formally dumped the policy since taking the prime ministership, meaning there is no emissions reduction policy for electricity mapped out to 2030, and the government also proposes to wind down the renewable energy target after 2020.
Despite mulling the options throughout this parliamentary term, the government has not been able to move forward with new emissions standards for vehicles because of internal opposition within the Coalition.
The government has signalled it might seek to boost its climate credentials by increasing funding for the near-moribund emissions reduction fund – a policy which the Coalition was transitioning away from when it worked up the Neg – but the outlook is not yet clear.

Links

Why Do Climate Change Discussions Ignore Boomers?

ForbesOdile Robotti

Credit: Getty Royalty Free
The landmark report issued last week by the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,  the international body for assessing climate change, warns that our planet will reach catastrophic levels of global warming, capable of provoking extreme drought, wildfires and floods, as early as 2030 unless action is taken.
In order to turn this ship around, we’ll need all hands on deck. Yet an important group is missing from these urgent conversations: older people.

Older People and Climate Change: Almost an Afterthought
Last month, the UN met to review the Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 (set in 2015 by the UN to steer the world toward ending poverty and hunger and pursuing better health without sacrificing the health of the earth). Among 17 goals and 169 targets, older people are acknowledged only twice — and marginally, almost as an afterthought. The issue of aging is not mentioned once. This omission is not an outlier, but rather reflects a more general neglect of this group when discussing the future.
This is a mistake.
Globally, the 60+ population, already a “continent” of a billion people, is the fastest growing age group. In 2030, the target year for the Sustainable Development Goals, the number of older people in the world is projected to hit 1.4 billion. By 2050, it will have reached 2.1 billion, with all major areas of the world except Africa (aging rapidly, but starting from lower levels) having nearly a quarter or more of their populations aged 60 or over.
Extended lifetime is no longer a first world luxury. By 2050, 75% of the world population over the age of 60 will be in developing countries. Despite these impressive numbers, in our map of the future, they are a submerged continent.

Adding Extra Years to Midlife
Aging has deeply changed in the last 50 years, but our view of it lags behind. Since 1970, approximately 10 to 15 years of life have been gained and, even more importantly, these are, on average, years of good health (unfortunately there is high inequality in health outcomes). To be clearer, these “extra years” — thanks to progress in medicine and modern lifestyles — have not been added at the end of our lives, but rather in the middle. The 60s and 70s are the new 50s, as you can read on birthday cards. This new phase in our lives is an extension, not a reduction, of adulthood.
Older people can be a resource for society and already are strongly contributing to sustainable development and poverty eradication. They are often the ones who care for the sick and the children, and who work or use their savings to support extended families.

Older Adults: The Only Natural Resource That's Increasing
This group could do more to help preserve the planet.
Older Americans take global warming 14% less seriously than millennials, according to Gallup. But rather than dismissing them as set in their ways, we should try to involve them more. As Laura Carstensen, director of the Stanford Center for Longevity, has pointed out, older adults are the only natural resource that is increasing on our planet.
Even so, their contribution, especially in developed countries, appears undervalued. The current narrative makes us think of older adults as the problem and neglects that they are part of the solution, and could be even more so.
To be sure, the absence of a mention to aging in the Sustainable Development Goals (and, previously, in the Millennial Goals) does not mean that the world community ignores aging. Within the UN, the Stakeholder Group on Aging, The Madrid International Plan of Action on Aging and the Open-Ended Working Group on the Rights of Older Persons are all active on these topics. The World Health Organization is focused on “healthy aging.”

Assuming Boomers Don't Care About the Future
However, when it comes to debates about the future, older people almost disappear. The underlying assumption is that it does not concern them, which becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
The point is about giving older people full recognition in a world still designed for the young and, paradoxically, that values youth more than ever. Age discrimination is rampant, particularly in hiring and especially against women. More often than ever, applicants over 50 feel the need to hide their age or make it less obvious to remain relevant and be considered, particularly in professional settings.
The saying “the future belongs to the young” is anachronistic in the age of the 100-year-life and should be ditched. Older people should be part of the conversation to ensure that their specific needs are met, but also because the planet needs all the help it can get.

Links