22/12/2018

Are Carbon Emissions Coming Down In Australia?

RMIT ABC Fact Check - Sushi Das | Ellen McCutchan

Former Howard government minister Amanda Vanstone says that emissions are coming down in Australia. (ABC News)
The claim

During a recent episode of the ABC's Q&A program, former Liberal minister Amanda Vanstone claimed "emissions are coming down" in Australia.
Her comment came a few days before a major UN climate summit, COP24, held in Katowice, Poland.
Other panellists on Q&A contradicted Ms Vanstone, saying emissions were rising. This prompted many viewers of the program to call on RMIT ABC Fact Check to investigate Ms Vanstone's claim.

The verdict
Ms Vanstone's claim is misleading.
Latest federal government figures suggest that although greenhouse gas emissions have fallen over the past 10 years, emissions started trending upwards again about four years ago.
The upturn, since 2014, has coincided with the Abbott government's removal of the carbon tax.
Also, while emissions from electricity production have been falling, the decrease has been outweighed over the past four years by rising emissions in other sectors of the economy, such as transport, where emissions are associated with increased LNG production for export.
Emissions can be measured in different ways: for example, as total emissions or emissions per capita or per GDP.
In the past year, Australia's total emissions have been rising. But emissions per capita or per dollar of real GDP have been falling, mainly due to Australia's rapid population growth.
However, it is worth noting that Australia's progress in cutting emissions under its international obligations (the Paris Agreement) is measured by changes in total emissions rather than by other measures.
As one expert put it: "The atmosphere doesn't care how many people are contributing to emissions; it's the total quantity of emissions that matters."

The context
Ms Vanstone made her claim during a discussion on Q&A about a protest by Australian schoolchildren titled 'Strike 4 Climate Action'.
She was speaking about the climate policies of Australia's two major political parties, and in the broader context of greenhouse gas emissions and their impact on the environment, as perceived by young people.
Emissions in the transport sector have increased over the long term. (AAP Image: Melanie Foster)
Ms Vanstone did not specify which kind of emissions she was talking about. Nor whether she was referring to simple totals or ratios.
Fact Check invited her to clarify this. She said she had not been expecting to talk about emissions: "I can't tell you that I had a particular tight construct in my head at the time," she said.
"I think I was just making a general remark about emissions generally over a long period of time."
Fact Check considers it reasonable to assume that her claim refers to Australia's total greenhouse gas emissions over the past 10 years — the length of time examined by the Government's most recent report on emissions.

What others are saying
Ms Vanstone is not alone in claiming emissions in Australia are decreasing, though other speakers have been more specific.
Liberal senator Linda Reynolds, also on Q&A, said carbon emissions per capita and by GDP were at their lowest levels in 28 years.
The electricity sector has seen emissions decreased in the year to September 2018. (ABC News: Jane Cowan)
Federal Environment Minister Melissa Price also highlighted this low in a press release announcing the Government's latest quarterly emissions data.
Nonetheless, she acknowledged that total emissions had risen over the year to June 2018.
Others have also pointed to the rise in total emissions.
Labor senator Lisa Singh, another of the recent Q&A panelists, argued that "emissions have continued to go up since 2011".
And on ABC radio the same week, Richie Merzian, the climate and energy director for think tank the Australia Institute said: "For the last four years, Australia's greenhouse gas emissions have been increasing."

Measuring emissions
The Australian Department of the Environment and Energy collects and publishes a series of reports and databases, known as the National Greenhouse Accounts.
The accounts track greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 onwards, and fulfil Australia's international reporting obligations under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and Kyoto Protocol.
Quarterly reports, released as part of the accounts, track total emissions as well as emissions by sector, per capita and per GDP.
The latest report, released three days before Ms Vanstone's Q&A appearance, provides estimates of Australia's national inventory of greenhouse gas emissions up to the June quarter of 2018.
The report examines emissions produced by eight sectors: electricity, stationary energy, transport, fugitive emissions (for example, leakages), industrial processes and product use, agriculture, waste, and land use, land use change and forestry.

Emissions from electricity production are falling
The report shows emissions in the electricity sector have fallen by 3.6 per cent in the year to September 2018.
This was driven by a 13 per cent reduction in brown coal supply and a corresponding 14 per cent increase in supply derived from renewable sources, it says.
But emissions from other sectors, such as transport, have been rising.
Hugh Saddler, an honorary associate professor at ANU's Crawford School of Public Policy, told Fact Check:
"Significant increases in emissions from petroleum and diesel consumption in transport, and gas consumption associated with LNG, have outweighed the decrease in emissions from the electricity sector."
What's going on with total emissions?
Over the year to June 2018, Australia's total greenhouse gas emissions rose in each quarter, according to the report.
Specifically, seasonally adjusted total emissions rose 1.3 per cent in the June quarter and by 0.6 per cent in the year to June 2018.
While emissions have fluctuated over the past four years, they have been trending upwards since late 2014, as the graph below shows. The data shows emissions have risen 5 per cent over this time.
Emissions touched their lowest point in March 2013, but have since rebounded to 2011 levels.
Under the Paris Climate Agreement, Australia has committed to a reduction in total greenhouse gas emissions of between 26 per cent and 28 per cent on 2005 levels by 2030.
According to the national greenhouse audit, total emissions are down 11.7 per cent on 2005 (the Paris Agreement base year) and 7.5 per cent since 1990 (the base year for Kyoto Protocol calculations). Why are people saying emissions are falling?
As shown above, total greenhouse emissions when measured quarterly over the past year, or by trend data over the past four years, have been rising.
So, why are some people arguing that emissions are going down?
Because, when emissions are measured per capita or per dollar of GDP, they are lower. This is because Australia is experiencing rapid population growth.
The Department of the Environment and Energy highlights this fall in both the preface to its latest quarterly greenhouse report and on its website.
The report states that emissions per capita and the emissions intensity of the Australian economy were at their lowest levels in 28 years, falling 37 per cent and 60 per cent respectively since 1990.

Are emissions per capita and per GDP useful measures?
Put simply, no.
Dr Saddler said focusing on emissions per capita was meaningless, since the measure used in international agreements was the more crucial total emissions.
"The atmosphere doesn't care how many people are contributing to emissions; it's the total quantity of emissions that matters," he said.
Professor David Karoly, an internationally recognised expert on climate change, said the emissions per capita was a useful measure when it allowed for country by country comparisons.
"The Australian per capita share at the moment is higher than any other developed country in the world — higher than the US. Yes, it's coming down, but it is still the highest."
Both Dr Saddler and Professor Karoly confirmed the fall in emissions per capita and GDP were due to rapid population growth in Australia.

Experts assess the claim
Professor Karoly said if Amanda Vanstone's claim was made in reference to total Australian emissions, "they are going up".
He noted that the start of the recent rebound in emissions from mid-2014 coincided with the dumping of the carbon tax by the Abbott government in July of that year.
Professor Mark Howden, the director of ANU's Climate Change Institute, told Fact Check: "I think it is correct to say that Australian emissions were coming down, but are now rising steadily."
He said an argument could be made that emissions have come down, given they are lower now than at their peak between 2005 and 2008.
"However, this is a problematic argument," he said.
"Under the current mix of policies and economic activities, emissions are clearly not coming down but instead are rising steadily."
Pep Canadell, a senior principal research scientist in the CSIRO Climate Science Centre, and the executive director of the Global Carbon Project, suggested that 1990 was a good reference year for gleaning a long-term view of changes to emissions.

"Good annual data only starts from 1990, which is the reference year of the Kyoto Protocol and why the Government started the good quality data then," Dr Canadell said.
Emissions per capita have fallen 37 per cent since 1990.
However, Dr Canadell added:
"Given Ms Vanstone's statement is present tense, I disagree [that emissions are falling]. According to the data, emissions have been going up since 2013, with ups and downs, and, if anything, accelerating recently."
Links

Australia’s Carbon Emissions Highest On Record, Data Shows

The Guardian

If emissions continue at current rate, Australia will miss Paris target by 1.1bn tonnes, Ndevr Environmental predicts
The Bluescope steel works at Port Kembla, Wollongong. Australia is still on track to miss its Paris target of a 26%-28% cut to carbon emissions on 2005 levels by 2030. The latest data show emissions are again the highest on record. Photograph: Ashley Cooper pics / Alamy/Alamy
Australia’s carbon emissions are again the highest on record, according to new data from the emissions-tracking organisation Ndevr Environmental.
Ndevr replicates the federal government’s national greenhouse gas inventory (NGGI) quarterly reports but releases them months ahead of the official data.
Data it has produced for the year up to September 2018 shows Australia is still on track to miss its Paris target of a 26%-28% cut to emissions on 2005 levels by 2030.
Matt Drum, the managing director of Ndevr, said if emissions continued at their current rate, Australia would miss the target by a cumulative 1.1bn tonnes.
When excluding unreliable land use data, Australia’s emissions for the year to September reached 558.3m tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, an all-time high.
Land use data refers to emissions from activities such as land clearing and forest management, as well as removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through activities such as reforestation.
Ndevr excludes land use data because the methodology the government uses to calculate these figures is opaque and there have been questions about whether the scale of land-clearing in Queensland is being accurately represented.


“There’s still no policy in place to ratchet them down which is why they’re increasing,” Drum said.
Electricity sector emissions were stable, but fugitive emissions, and emissions from stationary energy and transport are all still trending sharply upwards.


Release of the report comes as the environment minister, Melissa Price, addressed global COP24 climate change talks in Katowice, Poland.
Both the Coalition government and Labor have not ruled out using controversial carryover credits from the Kyoto protocol to help meet Australia’s obligations under the Paris agreement.
Labor has promised that if it wins the election it will increase Australia’s target to 45% on 2005 levels, in line with recommendations from the independent Climate Change Authority.
Ndevr’s analysis said this would require a reduction of 197.1m tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent based on current emissions levels, which would be equal to taking 75m cars off the road for a year.
In comparison, the Coalition’s emission reduction target would require an 80.8m tonne reduction.
Breaking up Labor’s target across sectors, Ndever suggests a range of reductions will be necessary in several industries, including 61.2m tonnes from the electricity sector, 33.4m tonnes from the stationary energy sector, 23.7m tonnes from agriculture and 34.2m tonnes from transport.
“If Labor come into government we can’t afford a policy vacuum,” Drum said. “It’s looking grim. We need policy levers and we need them quickly.”
Drum said the need for action was so urgent there would be no time for a full redesign of policy if there was a change of government.
Instead, he said existing policies, such as the safeguard mechanism, should be amended.
“They need to utilise existing policy like the safeguard mechanism and tweak it so it achieves what it is intended to achieve, which is reduce emissions,” he said.
On Thursday, the Greens environment spokesperson, Sarah Hanson-Young, said Australia was using “creative emissions accounting” to try to meet its Paris targets.
“Counting Kyoto credit towards Paris cheats our environment and the rest of the world,” she said.
“Our emissions are going up, yet our environment minister is telling the world we are doing our bit to meet our Paris targets.”

Links

Australia To Miss 2030 Emissions Target By Massive Margin

FairfaxEryk Bagshaw

Australia is set to fall significantly short of its Paris climate change targets, undermining claims by the Morrison government that the economy will meet its international obligations "in a canter."
Official figures released by the Department of Environment and Energy on Friday show that on current trends Australia will only reach an emission reduction target of 7 per cent on 2005 levels by 2030, a massive 19 percentage points or two thirds of the way short of the minimum target mandated by the Paris agreement.
But the government will argue that under UN accounting rules, Australia is eligible to carry forward credit for targets it has met since 2008 - a move ruled out by Britain, Germany and New Zealand - slashing in half the emissions reductions required to meet our international obligations.
Environment Minister Melissa Price. Credit:Alex Ellinghausen
Hours after the release of the figures Prime Minister Scott Morrison confirmed the government would carry forward the credits and said the "significant progress highlights Australia is going to meet our 2030 target in a canter".
"The suite of policies our government has put in place support the environment while also delivering on our plan for a stronger economy," he said.
Up until last week, neither the Coalition nor Labor would rule out counting Australia's expected credits from beating its 2020 goal under the Kyoto Protocol against its 2030 Paris pledge.
Greens climate change spokesman Adam Bandt accused the government of "cooking the books" and shirking their environmental obligations.
"Because they can't reduce emissions, the government is resorting to dodgy accounting to meet our measly Paris targets," he said.
The new figures, released on the Friday before Christmas, show Australia is on track to beat its Kyoto commitments for 2020 by at least 240 million tonnes of carbon dioxide.
But a boom in LNG production, a population driven transport surge and an increase in beef production means it would fall short of the 2030 target by as much as 695 million tonnes on current projections.
Barring international objections to the Morrison government's decision, the UN accounting rules are expected to halve that task, with the 26 to 28 per cent target effectively turning into a 15 per cent cut on 2005 levels.
Environment Minister Melissa Price said the figures were a "great result for the environment".
"We have over-achieved on our 2020 target and are well on our way to meeting our commitment to the Paris Agreement 2030 target, all while maintaining a strong economy," she said.
The electricity sector has led the 73 million tonnes in projected reductions since the 2017 report, with an increase in demand from a growing population is expected to be met by continued growth in rooftop solar and thermal generation.
Still way off target
Australia’s 2018 emissions trends compared with 2017 projections.
Source: Department of Environment, December 2018

The reductions mean emissions from the national electricity market are on track to be 26 per cent below 2005 levels - a claim frequently made by Mr Morrison and Energy Minister Angus Taylor. Electricity only accounts for 34 per cent of Australia’s emissions, with transport and stationary energy accounting for 19 per cent and agriculture 13 per cent.
"There is no electricity emissions target in Australian or international law," said the Australian Conservation Foundation’s economics program manager, Matt Rose.
"Australia has an economy-wide 2030 goal that takes in electricity, transport, heavy industry and other sectors."
The report shows the drought affecting much of the east coast will restrict agriculture activity, leading to a short-term 1 per cent drop in emissions, mostly from fewer cows emitting methane gas.
The fall is only expected to be temporary as grain-fed cows increasingly replace pasture-based cows.
"The projections have accounted for an assumed increase in grain-fed beef cattle in feedlots due to these cattle being less susceptible to drought," the department's report said.
"Grain fed cattle are more emissions intensive, due to increased energy intake and increased concentration of manure in feedlots."
Minerals Council chief executive Tania Constable said addressing climate change required a diverse future energy mix that balances affordability, reliability and emissions reduction.
"This is why a measured response is critical to reducing greenhouse emissions in a way which does not damage the economy, destroy jobs and hurt Australian businesses and families," she said.
Environmental experts have warned that the 26 to 28 per cent reduction target still won't be enough to keep the world from warming by more than 2 degrees by the middle of the century.
Labor will take its policy of a 45 per cent reduction target on 2005 levels by 2030 to the next election.
"It is clear the Liberals are burying their heads in the sand and ignoring the vast majority of Australians who are crying out for desperate action on climate change," said Labor's climate spokesman Mark Butler.
The government claims a 45 per cent target will hurt workers and businesses.

Links