25/12/2018

Australia Heatwave To Break Christmas Weather Records With Temperatures Up To 47c Forecast

The Guardian

Temperatures to reach up to 12C above average in some parts of Australia, with authorities issuing fire warnings
Heatwave: the Christmas weather forecast is for high temperatures across southern Australia. Photograph: Paul Miller/AAP
A heatwave will hit most of Australia this week that will push Christmas temperatures in some areas to as much as 12C above the December average before breaking monthly records later in the week.
Victorian authorities have issued health alerts for parts of the state and fire warnings are in place for several other states including Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania.
The Kimberley region of Western Australia is the one location that could break heat records on Christmas Day, with the town of Fitzroy Crossing expecting a maximum of 47C, breaking the previous annual record of 46.5C, which was set earlier this month.
Inland areas of South Australia will have temperatures in the low-to-mid 40s and Adelaide is forecast to reach 41C on Thursday.
Parts of Victoria are forecast to reach temperatures above 40C towards the end of the week, with Mildura in the state’s north-west expecting a top of 46C on Sunday.
The heatwave is expected to intensify across a large swathe of Australia later this week. Photograph: Bureau of Meteorology
Generally, for Christmas Day across southern Australia we’re looking at temperatures 6C to 12C above average for the daily maximum,” said Sarah Fitton, an extreme weather meteorologist at the Bureau of Meteorology.“It’s a little bit cooler for Tasmania and southern Victoria for Christmas Day, but still above average for this time of year.”
Coastal Queensland is the only region experiencing below-average temperatures for this time of year.
Temperatures across southern and central Australia and New South Wales will increase from Boxing Day and into the new year period.
The Victorian health department has issued a health alert for the Mallee, north central, north-east and northern country (which takes in towns such as Bendigo and Shepparton) and Wimmera districts effective from Thursday.
“The forecast conditions may cause an increase in heat-related illnesses in the community,” the department said and warned people older than 65, children and babies, pregnant women and people with medical conditions were most at risk.
On Monday afternoon the SA Ambulance Service issued a similar warning for the Christmas period and said they had extra doctors, paramedics, nurses and call centre staff working because of the forecast conditions.
In Sydney, temperatures are forecast to reach 34C in city areas on Sunday, 38C in Parramatta and 41C in Penrith and Richmond.
Areas around Adelaide and Melbourne will have milder temperatures around Boxing Day before the heat kicks in again.
Fitton said the heatwave was the result of hot air building up to west of the country where there hadn’t much monsoonal activity that would usually be expected this time of year.
“The heat’s building up and the skies are clear so there’s no cold fronts coming through,” she said.

Links

2018: The 8 Biggest Moments In Climate Change



To say that 2018 has been a huge year in climate change would be an understatement. From climate change-fuelled extreme weather – record-breaking heat, dangerous bushfires, severe drought – to political action (and inaction), both internationally and home on Australian soil; to climate leaders popping up in surprising places – there’s been no shortage of memorable events in the climate change space.



Here are the Climate Council’s eight biggest moments in climate change for 2018, in order of appearance:

1. It was a hot, hot summer.
Fresh off the back of a sweltering 2017 (the third hottest year on record), 2018 brought with it some scorching summer days. Records were smashed – with Penrith taking top spot as the hottest place on earth just seven days into the new year – and summer going down as the second-hottest on record.

Giphy

But it wasn’t just summer that brought scorching weather. Persistent summer-like heat set numerous records throughout April, with 9 April going down as Australia’s hottest April day on record (April 8th had already broken the previous record!). Adelaide experienced its hottest three days in a row and several other locations set temperature records as well. Overall, the month was the second hottest April on record across Australia, and the driest in 21 years.

2. Our beloved Great Barrier Reef scored some much-needed federal funding – but not where it counts.
With climate change driving a massive increase in marine heatwaves, and following the back-to-back bleaching events of 2016 and 2017, it was crystal clear that swift action needed to be taken to protect one of Australia’s most treasured natural icons. Unfortunately, a series of federal funding announcements, including an almost $500 million grant, did little to address the main driver of these unprecedented bleaching events: climate change.

Climate Council


3. The Federal Government’s signature energy policy failed to get off the ground – but local, state and territory governments stepped up to save the day.
The woefully inadequate National Energy Guarantee (NEG), failed to secure the state and territory government support it needed – and it was totally scrapped upon the ousting of PM Malcolm Turnbull. The Australian public was left in the lurch with no credible climate and energy policy.
Thankfully, state and territory governments, led by Tasmania, ACT and SA, picked up the pace in this year’s renewable energy race.

Giphy

And local governments across the country demonstrated their strong commitment to climate action, with the Climate Council’s Cities Power Partnership crossing the 100 member councils mark. The Partnership is now the largest local government program for climate action in the country.

4. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released a landmark report, highlighting the need to accelerate global climate change action.
The IPCC, the most authoritative international body on climate science, released its special report on climate change, examining the difference between a 1.5˚C and a 2˚C warmed world (read the Climate Council’s localised rundown here).
The report underlined that cutting greenhouse gas pollution to the level required to keep warming below 1.5˚C, would require far-reaching transitions in energy, land, infrastructure and industry. It’s a formidable challenge, but the solutions are available and are both technologically and economically feasible.
Considering global temperatures have already warmed 1˚C since mass industrialisation, 1.5˚C looms large. And the IPCC’s assessment has made clear just what’s at stake if we surpass it, with worsening extreme weather events like heatwaves, droughts, bushfires and flooding already being felt.

Flickr user John Westrock

In the wake of the landmark IPCC scientific report, people are sitting up and taking notice, but we need more action from international leaders. And unfortunately, the Australian Federal Government has so far failed to deliver a credible climate policy in response, while our emissions have continued to rise for the past four years. Despite misleading statements from the Federal Government, Australia is not on track to meet its greenhouse gas pollution reduction target of 26-28% by 2030 (below 2005 levels).

5. There was little relief for farmers and rural communities, who endured devastating drought conditions across much of eastern Australia, which were exacerbated by climate change.
Low rainfall from late autumn through early spring worsened drought conditions across eastern Australia. This led to 100% of NSW being declared in drought in August, and following, the driest September on record for the nation as a whole.
2018 has also been very warm, compounding the effects of low rainfall. To date, maximum temperatures for 2018 have been the second-hottest on record, while New South Wales has experienced its hottest January-November on record.

Climate Council

6. Unprecedented conditions added fuel to bushfires.
In 2018, disastrous bushfires roared through much of the country. In March, devastating bushfires ripped through Tathra on the southeast coast of New South Wales, damaging or utterly destroying dozens of properties. In April, bushfires broke out in southwest Sydney, and in several NSW local government areas the bushfire danger period was declared in winter – the earliest on record.
Around 1,000 fires burned in Queensland in August alone, and in November, record-breaking heat fuelled severe fires in the east of the state, decimating tropical rainforests and burning as far north as Cairns. And in the US, the most deadly and destructive wildfires in California’s history ravaged the northern parts of the state. All these events have been influenced by climate change from the burning of coal, oil and gas.

BoM Satview

7. Future generations made their voices heard.
In November, thousands of schoolkids across Australia went on strike to protest federal inaction on climate change and stand up for their futures. And at the UN climate talks in Poland (COP24), 15-year-old Swedish climate activist and fellow school striker, Greta Thunberg, instructed world leaders to get their acts together by “focusing on what needs to be done, instead of what is politically possible”.
Young voices offered fresh perspectives – and a glimmer of hope – amidst Australian Federal Government inaction and, more broadly, challenging international climate negotiations.

Climate Council

8. In early December, the former heart of Poland’s coal industry played host to the most important international climate talks since Paris.
Hosted in Katowice, Poland, the 24th Conference of the Parties (COP24) brought nations together to negotiate international commitments on climate action, including standardising timelines for emissions data reporting and checking countries are on track to meet their agreed commitments.
The international event was widely heralded as the biggest climate talks since the Paris Climate Agreement of 2015. But a small handful of stubborn fossil fuel powerhouses seemed keen to delay action. And embarrassingly, Australia was awarded the wooden spoon for “Fossil of the Day”, as a result of our poor track record on greenhouse gas emissions, which continue to go up.

Climate Council

While the talks resulted in an agreed “rulebook” for cutting emissions and ensuring compliance, some decisions, such as the mechanisms of an emissions trading scheme and the issue of ratcheting up climate ambition, have been delayed.
But although 2018 has had its challenges, momentum on climate action is building as we head into the new year.

Jason Blackeye via Unsplash

2019 is a Federal election year in Australia – and it’s shaping up to be a crucial moment for climate change. Based on exit polling, almost 80% of voters in this year’s Wentworth by-election were influenced somewhat by climate change in casting their vote, proving that climate change can, and will be an election-deciding issue.

Giphy

And Australian households are taking renewable energy into their own hands, with over two million Aussie houses now bedecked with solar panels. Australian businesses are getting on board, too, cutting costs and pollution in the process. And the price of renewables continues to slide, with new wind and solar now cheaper than existing coal power generation.
As we head into 2019, it’s an opportune time to pause, take a breath, and ask: what do we want the coming year to look like? How we choose to answer that question could determine our course for years, decades, even centuries to come.

Links

These 13 Words Defined Our Overheating Planet In 2018

Grist - Kate Yoder

Grist / Amelia Bates

Every December, dictionary editors hunt through all the words in our growing lexicon to pluck out the ones that best capture the spirit of the fading year.
The top choices from 2017 (feminism, complicit) neglected the environment. One dictionary editor at the time lamented the lack of new or revived words to describe our changing planet, though I managed to track down quite a few a year ago.
In 2018, the tables started to turn. Oxford Dictionaries picked toxic, a word that describes poisons in our air and water. Collins Dictionary chose single-use, a term for disposable plastic products “whose unchecked proliferation are blamed for damaging the environment.” And Dictionary.com’s misinformation, though it’s getting a lot of use in recent years, also captures the falsehoods spread about climate change.
The year now coming to a close was filled with environmental chaos. Wildfires ripped through the West, destroying towns and filling big cities with smoke. Hurricanes slammed into North Carolina and Florida. A slew of scientific reports warned us that the worst was yet to come; alas, the president still spouted climate denial on Twitter.
In a warming world rife with changes, it makes sense that our vocabulary shifted, too. Words took on new meanings (hothouse), obscure jargon launched into the news (bombogenesis), and brand-new terms were coined (smokestorm). We kept tabs and collected the ones that defined our planet in 2018. You won’t find these in any standard dictionary yet, but perhaps some will pop up in their pages soon.

Bombogenesis (n.) The process by which a cyclone rapidly intensifies as it experiences a drop in atmospheric pressure.
Nature didn’t waste any time with its New Year’s resolution to bring us terrible weather. January kicked off with a bomb cyclone, a winter storm that brought wicked-cold, blizzard conditions to the East Coast. That, in turn, introduced the masses to the obscure meteorological term bombogenesis. And thanks to climate change messing with our weather, you can expect more bitter nor’easters like this one soon.
Keith Bedford / The Boston Globe via Getty Images
Carbon “fee” (n.) A price on fossil fuels to cut down on carbon dioxide emissions.
Not a carbon tax, exactly. A proposed carbon fee grabbed national attention this year with a ballot measure in Washington state. The backers of Initiative 1631 were adamant that it was a carbon fee. The difference between fee and tax? Revenue from a general tax goes toward whatever the legislature decides; a fee ensures that funds go straight to a designated purpose. Opponents called I-1631 a tax anyway, oil companies spent a record-breaking $31 million to sink it, and voters rejected the measure in November to the heartbreak of climate activists everywhere.

Cleanwashing (n.) The classification of polluting energy sources as “renewable.”
Tired: Greenwashing. Wired: Cleanwashing. Grist delved into the complicated definition of renewable this year and found that your state might have a dirty energy secret. Burning garbage, tires, and chicken poop all count as renewable energy in Maryland, Ohio, and North Carolina, respectively. It’s the very definition of cleanwashing, a term coined in a Food and Water Watch report in July.

Climate gentrification (n.) The process by which the wealthy move to areas with lower risks from climate change, sometimes displacing low-income residents.
From Florida to Arizona, climate change is driving real estate markets. In Miami, for instance, a Harvard study found that properties at higher elevations were increasing in value. Residents of crazy-hot Phoenix are departing for cooler cities in Arizona like Flagstaff, driving up property prices. “A pattern of climate-driven gentrification is taking hold across the U.S., as those who are able to retreat from floods, storms, heatwaves, and wildfires shift to safer areas,” wrote the Guardian’s Oliver Milman in September.
The Miami Beach coastline. Joe Raedle / Getty Images
Day Zero (n.) The day when taps run dry because of water shortages.
If this sounds like the title of a cli-fi horror flick, well, it kind of is. In January, officials in Cape Town, South Africa, began counting down the days until water ran out for the 4 million people who live there. Conservation measures helped the drought-stricken city stave off Day Zero, but the new phrase is sure to stick around as long as dwindling water supplies remain a pressing concern. The Guardian reported in April that the next “‘Day Zero’ water crisis” could happen in Morocco, India, Iraq, or Spain, where reservoirs are shrinking fast.

Firenado (n.) A twister of flames. Fire + tornado.
2018 was an especially hellish year for wildfires: In November, at least 86 people were killed in the Camp Fire, the deadliest blaze in California’s history. Wildfires across the West brought some weird phenomena with them, including firenadoes and smokestorms (see below). During the Carr Fire this summer, one such twister packed 143-mph winds, equivalent to an EF-3 tornado, one likely to cause severe damage.
David McNew / Getty Images
Green New Deal (n.) An emerging environmental platform aimed at boosting jobs while taking on climate change.
Progressive politics has a new rallying cry. The Green New Deal, backed by Representative-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and 2020 presidential hopefuls like Senator Cory Booker, promises to boost the economy and help the planet simultaneously. So far it’s still in the outline stage, but it’s based on President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, the package of programs (Civilian Conservation Corps, Public Works Administration, and much else) that helped pull the U.S. out of the Great Depression. A new poll shows that 64 percent of registered Republicans and 92 percent of Democrats would support a Green New Deal, so it’s a sure bet that you’ll be hearing more about it in the new year.

Hothouse (adj.) A doomsday scenario in which climate change pushes the planet into a hot, hellish equilibrium.
Greenhouse effect? That’s so 10 years ago. Try hothouse instead. “Our analysis suggests that the Earth System may be approaching a planetary threshold that could lock in a continuing rapid pathway toward much hotter conditions — Hothouse Earth,” wrote a team of scientists in a well-circulated study published in August. Imagine that our world was hotter than anything seen in the past 1.2 million years, with no ice sheets and no Amazon rainforest, and you get the picture. As it happens, hothouse traces back to the 1400s as a shorthand for steam baths and brothels.

New abnormal (n.) The state of unpredictability and danger brought on by climate change.
The new normal tends to appear in headlines after disasters like hurricanes and wildfires. Some climate scientists disapprove of the phrase, which they say suggests that this crazy, climate-changed world we’re living in is somehow … normal. (It’s a little more complicated than that, as I learned from talking to lexicographer Kory Stamper.) As criticism of the phrase has spread, people have started to switch it up. For instance, this summer California Governor Jerry Brown referred to the devastating wildfires in his state as “the new normal.” By November, Brown was saying “the new abnormal.”
John MacDougall / AFP / Getty Images
Planet B (n.) The imaginary backup planet we’ll move to when Planet A (Earth) becomes uninhabitable.
“There is no Planet B,” read the signs of marching protesters who hoped to defend science after Donald Trump’s inauguration. That line has since made its way into international politics. After a painfully awkward visit to the White House in April, France’s President Emmanuel Macron slipped it into a speech about Trump’s plan to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement. “By polluting the oceans, not mitigating CO2 emissions, and destroying our biodiversity, we are killing our planet,” he said. “Let us face it. There is no Planet B.”

Secret science (n.) Science based on data that isn’t public.
Remember Scott Pruitt? It feels like two years ago when the then-EPA administrator, lover of fancy lotions and expensive pens and first-class flights, finally resigned. (It happened in July.) Three months before that, Pruitt had introduced a policy to increase, erm, “transparency” and end “secret science” (a pet phrase of Lamar Smith, a Republican representative from Texas). The rule would have stopped EPA regulators from using decades of research about the damage air pollution and pesticides cause to public health. It’s now on hold, but the acting EPA administrator, Andrew Wheeler, told the Hill he plans to move forward to “finalize” the rule next year.

Smokestorm (n.) A sudden onset of high concentrations of smoke that affects daily life.
You’ve heard of snowstorms and thunderstorms, so why not a smokestorm? This summer, wildfires filled cities up and down the West Coast with cinder-filled smoke as thick as fog. That hazardous air is actually the deadliest public health threat from wildfires. When the tiny, ashy particles get into people’s lungs or blood vessels, they can lead to asthma or heart disease. Cliff Mass, a University of Washington atmospheric science professor who has been criticized for his views on climate change, coined the term in a blog post this summer to raise awareness about the dangers of smoky air.
Artur Widak / NurPhoto via Getty Images
Zero Hour (n.) The breaking point at which decisive climate action must be taken.
Time’s up! Zero hour, the time when a planned military operation is scheduled to begin, has taken on a new meaning. In 2017, a young climate activist named Jamie Margolin (15 years old at the time) founded an organization named after the concept. And in July, Zero Hour launched a climate march led by young people of color on the National Mall. “We want youth talking to politicians, lobbying, going to town halls,” Margolin told Grist for a documentary about her work. “We’re still a bunch of broke high schoolers, but we have so much more than we did last year.”

Links

Ten Charts Show How The World Is Progressing On Clean Energy

Carbon Brief - Iain Staffell

Wind turbines line the horizon behind Bada Bagh in Rajasthan, India. Credit: Prisma by Dukas Presseagentur GmbH / Alamy Stock Photo
Dr Iain Staffell is a senior lecturer in sustainable energy at Imperial College London’s Centre for Environmental Policy. He leads the Electric Insights project reporting interactive real-time and quarterly summary information on the UK’s electricity mix.
Rapid progress towards clean energy is needed to meet the global ambition to limit warming to no more than 1.5C above pre-industrial temperatures.
But how are countries doing so far? In our Energy Revolution Global Outlook report, written with colleagues at Imperial College London and E4tech – and published by Drax – we rank progress in 25 major world economies.
Our report provides a league table of their efforts to clean up electricity generation, switch from oil to electric vehicles, deploy carbon capture and storage, eliminate fossil fuel subsidies and tackle energy efficiency.
The ten charts below compare these 25 countries today and their progress over the last decade.

Progress on clean electricity
Electricity has been the fastest sector of the economy to decarbonise as countries move away from coal and embrace low-cost renewables. Yet the average carbon intensity of electricity worldwide has fallen only 7% in the last decade to 450 grams of CO2 per kilowatt hour (gCO2/kWh).
The chart below maps the carbon intensity of electricity generation around the world and ranks the 25 major economies covered by our report. These countries include the G7 group of rich nations along with Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (the “BRICS”) and others. These countries account for 80% of global population, 77% of global GDP and 73% of the world’s CO2 emissions.
Individual countries range from having virtually zero-carbon electricity (in the Nordics, France and New Zealand, left-hand columns in the lower chart) up to near-total reliance on coal (in South Africa and Poland, on the far right).
The carbon intensity of electricity generation during 2017, in grams of CO2 per kWh. The map includes all countries for which data is available. The bar chart ranks 25 major economies including all G7 and BRICS countries. Bar widths represent the amount of electricity consumed in each country, with a minimum width so that smaller countries are still visible. Source: Drax 2018.
Countries across Europe and North America have almost unanimously reduced the carbon intensity of their electricity over the last decade. They have done this by reducing their reliance on coal and increasing their share of renewables, as well as by reducing electricity demand in many cases.
On the other hand, several large Asian countries – Japan, South Korea, India, Indonesia – increased their carbon intensity as they now rely more heavily on coal. China is one of the only Asian countries to be cleaning up its power system, having reduced carbon intensity by one-sixth this decade. The US is also progressing faster than most, behind only the UK and Denmark as in the chart, below.
The change in carbon intensity of electricity generation over the last decade, in grams of CO2 per kWh. Shades of blue and green indicate reductions while yellows and reds are increases. Source: Drax 2018.
One of the main drivers in cleaning up power systems worldwide is the rise of renewable energy. In absolute terms, China is the clear leader, having both one third of the world’s installed wind capacity and one third of installed solar.
China’s near-130 gigawatt (GW) solar capacity is roughly equal to the next three largest countries put together: Japan, Germany and the US. For wind capacity, other notable high-fliers include fourth-ranked India and Poland in twelfth, which has a larger wind capacity than Denmark, as shown in the chart, below.
The installed capacity of wind power at the end of 2017, in gigawatts (GW). Source: Drax 2018.
However, on a per-capita basis, Denmark has the most wind, with 1,000 watts of capacity per person, and Germany the most solar at 500 watts per person.

Progress on clean transport
Clean electricity could move beyond homes and offices to power the way we move. Electric vehicles are rapidly coming down in price, and several countries are now legislating the demise of the internal combustion engine over the coming decades.
So far, some 4.5m electric vehicles have been sold worldwide, nearly half of which are in China, and a quarter in the US, as the chart below shows.
The number of electric vehicles on the roads (both battery and plug-in hybrid) as of September 2018. Source: Drax 2018 and EV-volumes 2018.
Several countries have reached a 2% market share for electric vehicles, meaning they make up 1 in 50 new cars sold. The rate in China is around double this, while Norway is well ahead of the pack with almost 1 in 2 vehicles sold now electric, as the lower chart below shows.
The share of electric vehicles (both battery and plug-in hybrid) within new car sales, for the 12 months to September 2018. Bar widths represent each country’s population. Source: Drax 2018 and EV-volumes 2018.
Cleaning up the transport sector does not just rely on new technologies, however, as people could travel less or using more efficient forms such as public transport. The amount of energy consumed per person on transportation varies greatly across the world, with the average American consuming 10 times more than the average Indian, as the charts below show.
The energy consumed per person for transportation of people and goods, in megawatt-hours (MWh) per person per year. Bar widths represent each country’s population. Source: Drax 2018.
Large countries where people routinely fly between cities consume the most, but China and India are rapidly catching up as incomes rise. Their transport energy consumption rose 80% and 60% per person over the last decade, respectively. This has dwarfed the modest increases in transport efficiency seen across Europe and North America, as in the chart, below.
The change in energy consumed per person for transportation of people and goods over the last decade, showing the percentage rise (reds) or fall (blues) in MWh per person per year consumed. Bar widths represent each country’s population. Source: Drax 2018.
Progress on energy efficiency
Efficiency is not only slow to improve in the transport sector. Improving the energy efficiency of buildings worldwide is urgently needed to reduce the demand for carbon-intensive heating.
Homes in most major countries are using less energy than they did a decade ago, per square metre of floor area. While some of this can be credited to improving building standards and more energy-efficient appliances, the gains may also be due to the residual effects of the global recession and the run of mild winters caused by rising global temperatures.
In some parts of the world, notably China and South Africa, improved living standards have lead to a rapid growth in household energy consumption, as the chart below shows.
The change in energy consumed for heating and powering households over the last decade, showing the percentage rise (reds) or fall (blues) in MWh per person per year consumed. Bar widths represent each country’s population. Source: Drax 2018.
Progress on fossil fuels and carbon capture
Government support for fossil fuels is a perverse feature of many economies, holding back the transition away from coal, oil and gas.
The definition of fossil fuel subsidies is widely disputed. Yet according to the definition used by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) several major fossil fuel producing nations with relatively small populations, such as Norway and Australia, provide hundreds of dollars per capita per year, as the chart below shows. On this measure, the UK also gives large subsidies.
The level of subsidies offered to fossil fuels per person in 2016, including direct expenditures by government, forgone tax revenues and other fiscal concessions. Bar widths represent each country’s population. Source: Drax 2018.
One important feature of many pathways to 1.5 or 2C is to combine hard-to-avoid uses of fossil fuels, such as in steelmaking or cement, with carbon capture and storage. Today, however, there are just 18 large-scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) facilities around the world, concentrated in six countries with major oil and coal extraction industries, as the chart below shows.
The installed capacity for carbon capture at large-scale CCS facilities as of the end of 2017, measured as kg of CO2 that can be captured per person per year. Actual level of capture may be lower, if facilities do not run at full availability. Bar widths represent each country’s population. Source: Drax 2018.
Together, these CCS facilities are capable of capturing 32 million tonnes of CO2 each year. This is less than one-tenth of one percent of the roughly 37 billion tonnes of CO2 produced each year by the world’s energy sector. If CCS does see widespread rollout over the coming decades, the potential for storing CO2 underground will not pose a barrier. The US alone could store all of the CO2 produced worldwide since the start of the industrial revolution.

Conclusion
All in all, progress towards clean energy around the world is mixed, with some countries pushing ahead on many fronts but others going backwards. Overall, our rankings show that the world’s nations are falling far short of what is needed and that progress over the next decade must be far stronger to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.

Links