04/10/2019

The ACT Is Set To Run On 100 Per Cent Net Renewable Energy. What Does That Mean?

Sydney Morning HeraldNick Bonyhady

The Australian Capital Territory has accomplished an Australian first. Is it now covered in wind farms and solar panels? And are other states following?
ACT Minister for Climate Change and Sustainability Shane Rattenbury at Crookwell 2 wind farm. Credit: Sitthixay Ditthavong
It's the first Australian jurisdiction to legalise medicinal cannabis, the first to enshrine animals rights such as freedom of movement in law and now, as of October, it is set to be the first major place outside Europe to transition to 100 per cent net renewable energy.
Spring has been busy in the Australian Capital Territory.
What about that 100 per cent renewables gong? It's an impressive statement at a time when there is still widespread debate about how Australia should tackle climate change and federal energy policy has produced an impasse that helped see off Malcolm Turnbull twice as Liberal leader.
But if it conjures an image of the national capital overrun with solar panels and a windmill in every back yard, the reality is very different and much more complex.
So what does "100 per cent net renewables" mean? Will it help fight climate change? And will be all soon be following suit?

What does "100 per cent net renewable energy" mean?
Let's break it down. The renewable energy part is fairly simple: it refers to energy that is naturally replenished and does not run out. The 100 per cent means that there is enough of it to meet Canberra's energy needs. It's the net where things get complicated.
If it was a gross target that Canberra had met, it would indeed be running entirely on energy from wind and solar farms. That would require better transmission lines to the ACT, more local generation and huge batteries to make up for varying power output from renewable sources.
By contrast, a net target means the ACT has bought an amount of renewable energy equal to what it needs from suppliers around the country but, because the ACT is connected to the national grid, the energy it actually uses comes from power stations all over the country.
Federal Energy Minister Angus Taylor, a critic of the ACT's scheme, says "93.6 per cent of the ACT’s electricity comes from the NSW grid, which continues to be dependent on coal and gas". According to the Department of the Environment and Energy, "coal and gas account for about 85 per cent of electricity generation" nationally.
But while the ACT is still powered mostly by coal and gas, the renewable energy it has bought is being used in place of coal and gas by consumers in other parts of the country. In short, the ACT and its suppliers are putting the same amount of renewable energy into the national grid as the total amount of energy used in the ACT by homes and businesses.
Shane Rattenbury, the ACT's minister for climate change, likens what the ACT is doing to depositing money in a bank and withdrawing it from an ATM. "You don't receive the same note you deposited but you still have $100," Mr Rattenbury says.

Where does all that renewable power come from?
The ACT is known for its national cultural institutions, a man-made lake and good odds of sighting a prominent politician at the local IGA but not for generating power. While there are some small solar farms on the outskirts of Canberra, most of the ACT's renewable power is generated outside the territory.


There are three ways the ACT has secured renewable power:
  • About 77 per cent comes from large-scale contracts the ACT has signed directly with renewable, primarily wind, producers in Victoria, NSW and South Australia.
  • Another 21 per cent is what the ACT has bought from renewable energy producers operating within the National Energy Target, a Commonwealth scheme to encourage the production of more renewable energy.
  • Households in the ACT with rooftop solar contribute the remaining 2 per cent.
Source: ACT Government
Does it matter?
Electricity accounts for more of Australia's emissions than any other source, at about a third of the country's total, figures from the federal Department of the Environment and Energy show. However, only about 0.2 per cent of national emissions from all sources come from the ACT.
That suggests the ACT's accomplishment will have a minimal impact on national greenhouse gas emissions alone.
But it is part of a broader story. Hugh Saddler, an honorary associate professor at the ANU who also works in the renewable sector, says having guaranteed government demand lets renewable developers access cheap financing to build more wind and solar farms.
And he says that, with the federal large-scale renewable energy target for 2020 nearing fulfilment, government investment is becoming more important for the sector.

How big a step is this?
The ACT is not the first state or country to go 100 per cent net renewable. A report by the Australia Institute, a progressive think tank, notes that regions in Spain, Austria and Germany have done the same. The rural German district of Rhein-Hunsrück was the first of the current wave, in 2012.
Several other countries are also already reliant on renewable power, including Ethiopia, which uses hydro power, as does Iceland in conjunction with geothermal power generation. But Dan Cass, who wrote the Australia Institute report, says those countries' transitions "predate climate challenges and recent renewable development".
The ACT's transition to renewable energy, Mr Rattenbury says, shows how cities, regions and countries "can roll out renewables in a cost-effective way … getting the best deal for consumers".
Iceland has been running on renewables for years – its water comes out of the ground piping hot. Credit: Alamy
What difference does it make to Canberrans' hip pockets?
The ACT government initially estimated that achieving its renewable energy target would cost households at most $5.50 per week next year before later declining.
But the actual cost might be different because the ACT buys most of its renewable power at fixed prices. When the actual power it uses from the grid is cheaper than the fixed price, it pays the renewable provider the difference. When the grid power is more expensive – on a hot summer day, for example – the renewable provider compensates the ACT.
Associate Professor Bruce Mountain, director of the Victoria Energy Policy Centre, says he would be unsurprised if customers in the ACT were currently paying substantially less than $5.50 because market power prices are so high.
Hornsdale wind farm in South Australia.
How did the ACT reach its target?
The ACT legislated a 100 per cent renewable target in 2016, with the goal of hitting it by 2020. It then conducted a series of reverse auctions for renewable power. In a reverse auction, the cheapest bid (in addition to other criteria) rather than the most expensive, wins.
The last of the renewable energy supplies contracted under that process, at the Hornsdale wind farm in South Australia, commences in October, meaning the ACT will achieve its goal as planned.

Are other states following the ACT's lead?
There was wide variation in how much renewable energy each state generated last year, according to a report by the Clean Energy Council, a renewable energy industry body.
Tasmania produced the most renewable energy as a share of production and raw amount but NSW generated the second-highest raw amount, despite being lower in percentage terms. Associate Professor Mountain says, "Of the new wind and solar clean energy sources, in absolute amounts, Queensland, NSW and Victoria will be neck and neck by 2022."


But generation is different to consumption, which is where the ACT claims its 100 per cent net renewable crown. On consumption, the states all have different targets.  
  • A Tasmanian government spokeswoman says the state, which has plentiful wind and hydro power, was "on target to deliver full self-sufficiency in renewables by 2022".
  • Queensland has a 50 per cent renewable energy by 2030.
  • Victoria has a 40 per cent target by 2025 but is exploring how to match Queensland's. It has used reverse auctions similar to those pioneered in Australia by the ACT.
  • A South Australian government spokeswoman says the state intends to be 100 per cent net renewable by "early in the 2030s".
  • New South Wales does not have a renewable energy target but supports the Commonwealth's target and a net zero emissions target across its economy by 2050.
  • Western Australia also has no renewable energy target but Energy Minister Bill Johnston says the state's "aspiration is net zero emissions by 2050".
Spokespeople for the states say their respective governments are investing in a range of renewable energy and infrastructure projects.
Net zero emissions take into account all emissions, rather than only those caused by generating power, but states with general zero emissions targets will still need to increase their use of renewable power to meet their targets.

Where is the ACT going from here?
Going renewable isn't an end in itself. The goal is to reduce emissions overall and the ACT also has a zero emissions target, set for 2045.
As the ACT has little agriculture, natural resource refinement or manufacturing, it is trying to reduce emissions from another source: natural gas.
The government's plan to phase out natural gas use has proved controversial, as it will require switching everything from buses to household heaters and stove tops to electricity.
At the same time, the ACT's population, and therefore power usage, is growing, so the government has announced another round of reverse auctions to buy more renewable power.

How will this affect the grid?
With blackouts in South Australia and some renewable providers struggling to find space on transmission lines to get their power to consumers, it is no secret the Australian electricity grid is struggling.
Associate Professor Mountain says the grid was built for a period in which "each state has historically had its fossil-fuel coal basins and most transmission capacity has been from there."
With renewable energy spread out around the country, "we need to build infrastructure for generation that is not where it has historically been," he says.
If all states were to follow the ACT without improving power infrastructure, the grid would be unable to cope. The ACT's Shane Rattenbury says he is aware of the risk.
"We need to build a grid that can cope with the energy of the future not the energy of the past."

Links

Communicating Climate Change, For A Change

Pro Bono News - Gabrielle Chamberland

Gabrielle Chamberland from Ellis Jones shares eight ways to talk about climate change that can help you stay motivated and prompt others into action. 

While almost two-thirds of Australians believe climate change is a “critical threat”, we are still far from delivering the change we need to avoid a climate catastrophe. Why is probably a more difficult question to answer than how. How can we stay motivated, and keep others engaged and motivated to act as well?
Scaring people about climate change has not necessarily led to action. Social psychology and behaviour change theory point to some better techniques which can benefit campaigns, communications and community engagement to promote individual and collective action.
Underpinned by some recent work developed by the Australian Psychological Society, here are eight ways to talk about climate change, in ways more people are likely to listen to.

Inspire positive visions
Messages of hope are more likely to drive action than messages of distress, as we tend to ignore negative communications to avoid feeling low. When talking about climate change, make sure to incorporate positive narratives, such as the opportunity to live in a healthier environment, to have meaningful careers, and to better connect with community if we change.

Build bridges between climate change values and your audience’s values
Values such as “caring for others”, “empathy”, “cooperation”, and “innovation”, are linked to climate change values. When we are shown that our values will express themselves if we adopt sustainable behaviours, we are more likely to adopt this behaviour. For example, ask your audience to care and show empathy for wildlife, climate refugees and their kids (if they have demonstrated values of “caring for others”, “empathy”). Ask them to cooperate with others by participating in the sharing economy (“cooperation”), or to innovate by entering the next engineering competition benefiting marine life (“innovation”). Know their values and how to talk about them.

Create and use social norms
We all want to feel accepted by the groups we belong to or aspire to belong to. This means we are likely to adopt the behaviours our social groups value, to fit in. You can drive behaviour change by communicating a pro-environmental behaviour as something that people like your audience, or that your audience aspires to be, are already doing. Talk about the doings of local leaders and respected public figures, build partnerships with the social groups your audience follows and encourage them to share their pro-environmental behaviours or ask your audience to talk about theirs on social media.

Make action easy and local
Since we tend to be time-poor these days, we need behaviour change to be as easy as possible for us to do it. So, break it down for your audience and give them the tools to make a valuable change easily. Our feelings of responsibility for the environment are also greatest at the neighbourhood level. Whenever possible, talk about how a change in behaviour will drive positive change in someone’s own community or neighbourhood.

Give feedback
We’re more likely to keep going if we feel proud and energised. Provide regular positive feedback to your audience and communicate the change they’ve generated. Tell them how they can improve their behaviour given results to date and show them how they’re doing in comparison to others tackling the same behaviour change challenge.

Acknowledge feelings
When we feel distressed about climate change, we may choose not to engage with climate change communications to avoid feeling low. To relieve these feelings, be honest with your audience and tell them you’re feeling the same. It’s okay to share sad news, express frustration, and rejoice in triumph. This can help people feel connected to your cause and to you. They will be more likely to acknowledge their feelings and take positive steps to tackle climate change.

Bring people outdoors
Most of us now live in cities, which means we are more likely to feel disconnected from nature than we used to. However, a strong relationship with nature tends to give rise to environmentally responsible behaviour. So, encourage your audience to get outdoors and experience nature. You can organise outdoor events for your cause, and make your audience feel more connected to nature.

The time to act is now: use it
For a long time, we’ve tended to push back acting on climate change because the threat felt too distant. But these days, we’re definitely starting to feel the effects of climate change. We feel the hotter days, hear about bushfires, have seen corals disappear. While this is all sad news, crisis motivates people to act. So, speak up about what’s happening locally, now, and let your audience know how to act.

Final thoughts
Our climate change buddy has been around for a long time, along with deeply anchored psychological responses to climate change communications and strong barriers to change. This is why we need targeted communications strategies to generate behaviour change.
Know who you’re talking to, and choose words, facts, stories, and visuals carefully to drive change. Together, let’s not breakdown the climate, let’s breakdown behaviours.

Links

Climate Explained: What Each Of Us Can Do To Reduce Our Carbon Footprint

The Conversation

As an individual, what is the single, most important thing I can do in the face of climate change?
Eating less meat is one change many of us can make to reduce our contribution to climate change.
www.shutterstock.com, CC BY-ND

Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz

The most important individual climate action will depend on each person’s particular circumstances, but each of us can make some changes to reduce our own carbon footprint and to support others to do the same.
Generally, there are four lifestyle choices that can make a major difference: eat less or no meat, forego air travel, go electric or ditch your car, and have fewer children.
In New Zealand, half of our greenhouse gas emissions come from agriculture. This is more than all transport, power generation and manufacturing industries combined. Clearly the single biggest change an individual can make is therefore to reduce meat and dairy consumption. A shift from animal to plant-sourced protein would give us a 37% better chance of keeping temperature rise under 2℃ and an almost 50% better chance of staying below 1.5℃ - the targets of the Paris agreement.
Best of all, this can be done right now, at whatever level you can manage, and there are many people taking this step.
One aspect that is often overlooked is that carnivorous pets (mainly dogs, cats) consume lots of meat, with all the associated impacts described above. A recent US study concluded that dog and cat ownership is responsible for nearly one third of the environmental impacts associated with animal production (land use, water, fossil fuels). So ideally, if you’re getting a new pet, go for something herbivorous.

Buy locally, eat seasonally
Buy local produce, whether it’s food grown locally or goods manufactured locally rather than imported from overseas. Goods that are transported around the world by sea account for 3.3% of global carbon dioxide emissions and 33% of all trade-related emissions from fossil fuel combustion, so reducing our dependence on imports makes a big difference to our overall carbon footprint.
Car use is a problem, because we all enjoy the personal mobility cars provide. But it comes with an excessively high carbon cost. Using public transport where possible is of course preferable, but for some the lack of personal freedom is a big disadvantage, as well as the sometimes less than perfect transit networks that exist in many parts of the country.
One alternative for many people looking to commute short distances might be an e-bike, but think of it as an alternative to your car rather than a replacement for your bike. For those looking to replace their car, buying a hybrid or full electric model would be the best thing from an emissions perspective, even if the production of the cars themselves isn’t entirely without environmental problems.
New Zealand’s network of electric vehicle (EV) chargers is growing rapidly, but generally speaking it is easiest to charge at home if you’re doing daily commutes. This becomes economical if you have an electricity supplier offering a special low rate for EV charging.
On the subject of electricity, an easy and quick way to reduce your carbon footprint is to switch to a supplier that generates electricity only from renewable sources. In New Zealand, we have an abundance of renewable options, from solar, wind and hydro.

Plant trees
Planting trees requires having some space, but if you have land available, planting trees is a great way to invest in longer-term carbon sequestration. There is a lot of variability between species, but as a rule of thumb, a tree that lives to 40 or 50 years will have taken up about a ton of carbon dioxide.
Air travel is, for many of us, an essential part of our work. There is some progress in the field of aviation emissions reductions, but it is still a long way off. In the short term we have to find alternatives, whether that is in the form of teleconferencing or, if travel is essential, carbon offsetting schemes (although this is far from a perfect solution unfortunately).
Vote for climate-aware politicians and council representatives. These are the people who have the power to implement changes beyond the scope of individual actions. Make your voice heard through voting, and by contributing to discussion and consultation processes.
Community initiatives such as tree planting or shared gardens, or just maintaining wild spaces are ideal for carbon sequestration. This isn’t just because of the plants these spaces accommodate, but also because of the soil. Globally, soil holds two to three times more carbon than the atmosphere, but the ability of soil to retain this depends on it being managed well. Generally speaking, the longer and more densely planted an area of soil is, the better it will sequester carbon.

How to cope
One of the frustrations is the realisation that climate change is not something that can be left to politicians to deal with on our behalf. The urgency is simply too great. The responsibility has been implicitly devolved to the individual, without any prior consent.
But individual actions are massively important in two ways. First, they have an immediate impact on our total carbon footprint, without any of the inertia of political machinations. Secondly, by adopting and advocating for low-carbon life choices, individuals are sending a clear message to political leaders that a growing proportion of the voting population will favour policies that are aligned with similar priorities.
It is of course hard to stand your ground and stick with new lifestyle choices when you feel surrounded by people who choose not to change, or worse, actively mock and criticise. This is normal human psychology. People subconsciously tend to feel attacked if they see someone else making a so-called ethical or moral choice, as if they themselves are being judged, or criticised.
In the context of climate change, the science is so overwhelmingly clear, and the current and future impacts so manifestly important, that not to acknowledge this in a meaningful manner either reflects a lack of understanding or awareness, or is simply selfish. Rather than taking issue with those members of society, a more positive approach that can help you cope with the feeling of marginalisation is to actively seek out like-minded people.

Links