16/10/2019

'Grand Symbolic Gesture': Attempt To Declare A Climate Emergency Fails In Parliament

Sydney Morning HeraldRob Harris | AAP

Federal Parliament has voted down an attempt to declare a "climate emergency", with the Morrison government blocking a "grand symbolic gesture" from the Greens, Labor and the crossbench.
Victorian Greens MP Adam Bandt brought on a vote in the lower house on Tuesday, buoyed Labor's announcement it would back the push.
A climate change rally sets up outside Parliament House on Tuesday. Credit: Lukas Coch
Federal Energy and Emissions Reduction Minister Angus Taylor slammed the actions of the opposition, saying it was "symbolism" and not practical.
Opposition's climate spokesman Mark Butler told colleagues during a caucus meeting on Tuesday morning he would lodge a motion for debate in Parliament declaring the climate emergency, as an internal rift over its future policy settings divides the party following its May election loss.
Mr Taylor said the "emotive language" was ignoring the practical needs of every day Australians.
"Labor is making a huge song and dance about declaring a climate emergency, but refuses to commit to a single policy in this area from the last election," he said.
Labor MP Mark Butler and Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese. Credit: Alex Ellinghausen
"Labor's hollow symbolism will not deliver a single tonne of emissions reduction ... by contrast this government is taking meaningful actions."
Following fierce debate late on Monday night at separate factional caucus meetings over comments from frontbencher Joel Fitzgibbon last week, Labor leader Anthony Albanese said the party would decide its targets and policy "in accordance with the science".
Seeking to shift attention to what he said was a failing of the Morrison government to achieve a reduction in emission levels, Mr Albanese said: "Our job, as the opposition, is to hold the government to account and we'll continue to do just that."
"We're not the government. News flash, news flash. We're not the government. They are," Mr Albanese said.
Mr Butler told Parliament the window was closing on "our generation's ability, our unique ability, to meet our responsibility to future generations."
"Today we should try to unite as a parliament about why we should be doing something about climate change and why it is so urgent," he said.
Mr Bandt pointed to the United Nations report saying the world was not on track to limit global warming to less than 1.5 degrees.
"Nothing is more urgent than acting when people's lives and livelihoods are under threat," he said.
"We are experiencing record drought, some of our communities have been told to expect they may run out of water in coming months, parts of Australia have been on fire barely two weeks into winter."
Greens MP Adam Bandt brought on a motions to declare a climate emergency on Tuesday. Credit: Alex Ellinghausen
It is clear we do not have global warming under control."
Labor caucus also agreed on Tuesday to push for amendments to the government's "big stick" legislation which would give it the power to break-up energy companies who engaged in anti-competitive behaviour.
The opposition had previously opposed the legislation but agreed if it could win an amendment on partial privatisation sections of the laws it was willing to waive it through Parliament.
When questioned as to whether it was a "backflip", Mr Albanese said: "No, it's not. This is very different legislation".
"The fact is that the privatisation issue was the major issue that was a sticking point. There were others as well and they've been worked through and there were other amendments that we will insist on in terms of the legislation".

Links

MUNGO MACCALLUM: Albanese And The Inconvenient Climate-Change Deal-Breaker

Independent Australia - Mungo MacCallum

Cartoon by Mark David / @MDavidCartoons
As they sweat on the results of the long drawn out post mortem over Labor’s loss in the unlosable election, the warlords are already staking out their own positions.
The feeling seems to be that since a protracted series of blame games are inevitable, a least they can make a pretence of moving forward, even though they are in fact moving backwards.
And nowhere is the retreat more retrograde and dispiriting than the demand that the party of progress should abandon its long term targets on climate change and succumb, yet again, to the Government’s manifestly inadequate agenda.
Such right-wing luminaries as Member for Hunter Joel Fitzgibbon and Deputy Opposition Leader Richard Marles are now suggesting that capitulation would help things along in Queensland and Western Australia. Their rationale appears to be that the Labor votes were down in both and since the two are traditionally designated as the mining states, forgetting about emissions would bring the punters flocking back to the fold.
The logic is patently absurd. While Labor mishandled the Adani issue and Bob Brown’s quixotic caravan of protest did not help, the real problems in Queensland were Clive Palmer, Pauline Hanson and the monopolised Murdoch media — none of whom would have moved a nanometre if Labor’s target for emissions reduction was 45 per cent, 28 per cent or zero.
But hey, you have to blame something and it sure as hell isn’t going to be us. So the so-called policy relies essentially on self-preservation — a mixture of timidity and perversity.
If it were to be implemented it is not clear how it would play out, but the lessons from history is not promising. And not even ancient history — it is only a little over ten years ago that former PM Kevin Rudd walked away from what he once called the "great moral challenge of our times" and put his own ambitious plans for climate change on the backburner.
Dumping what was seen as a core belief – a principal point of difference between Labor and the Coalition – caused a slump in his Government’s support and the resulting polls, both public and private, provided the excuse the recalcitrant faction bosses needed to replace him, leading to all the instability and vendettas that followed.
The heavies of Sussex Street and beyond were not interested in climate change — their idea of a moral challenge is grabbing the last dim sum from a long lunch in Chinatown. But the rank and file and the swinging voters saw Rudd’s defection from the cause a betrayal, not only because most of them believed in it, but because it showed that when the pressure was put on him, he was just another political opportunist — one who preferred expediency to principle.
And this is precisely the risk Albanese is already accused of — that he stands for nothing, that he is driven by the polls and the focus groups, and thus is not worth supporting. He has got away with caution and moderation to date, but climate change is the big one; and will become more urgent as the extreme weather and the passionate politics become more intense.
If self-preservation is really involved, he needs, this time, to hold firm. It may be a long way to the next election, but tapping the mat on this one could be irreparable.
Links

Speed Bump Jokers

ABC - Media Watch
Kerri-Anne Kennerley not the first to suggest climate protestors be run over.

Media Watch: Speed Bump Jokers
Transcript

PAUL MURRAY: They’re sooks, they’ll keep going on, they’re giant toddlers who think, ‘as long as I keep asking for it eventually daddy will give it to me’. Well I can tell you what the result is, as this parent who has a toddler — go to your room.
- Paul Murray Live, Sky News, 7 October, 2019
Hello, I’m Paul Barry, welcome to Media Watch.
And that was Sky’s Paul Murray doing his own toddler impersonation as he spat the dummy at the Extinction Rebellion protesters who clogged up Australia’s capital cities last week.
And on Nine’s A Current Affair, sympathy for the activists was also in short supply:
SALLY: It’s not fair. It’s not fair at all. 
PROTESTERS: What do we want? Climate justice! When do we want it?
REID BUTLER: It’s chaos in the name of progress.
SALLY: Dad passed away 10 months ago and mum passed away on Sunday at home in that building …
I just want to get to the home so I can start organising all the clean up … 
- A Current Affair, Channel Nine, 7 October, 2019
So never mind the climate. What to do about those protesters? 
Luckily, Studio 10’s Kerri-Anne Kennerley had a couple of ideas: 
KERRI-ANNE KENNERLEY:  Personally, I’d leave them all super-glued to wherever they do it.
 … and you just put little witches’ hats around them or use them as a speed bump.
- Studio 10, Channel Ten, 9 October, 2019
And if running them over was a little extreme, Kerri-Anne had a back up plan:
KERRI-ANNE KENNERLEY: Put ‘em in jail and forget to feed them.
- Studio 10, Channel Ten, 9 October, 2019
So was there outrage at her comments?
Well, enough of a noise for Studio 10’s Sarah Harris to come back to it later to hose it all down:
SARAH HARRIS: … KAK you’re in trouble.
KERRI-ANNE KENNERLEY: What did I do?
SARAH HARRIS: Well, you are leading some of the news websites at the moment. There you are. ‘KAK says use protesters as a speedbump.’
You obviously weren’t inciting violence ...
KERRI-ANNE KENNERLEY: Oh heavens no!
SARAH HARRIS: … you were speaking in hyperbole. It’s a joke.
- Studio 10, Channel Ten, 9 October, 2019
Yes, run them over. What a joke. Except it’s hardly funny. And not the first time she’s made it.
A week before, on Studio 10, she said exactly the same thing, but nobody noticed:  
KERRI-ANNE KENNERLEY: … you know the ones that super-glue themselves to the road or to Canberra? I think they just leave them super-glued there and use them as speed bumps.
SARAH HARRIS: Oh Kerri-Anne! You can’t say that! 
KERRI-ANNE KENNERLEY: No, eventually they’ll get them off. 
- Studio 10, Channel Ten, 1 October, 2019
But Kerri-Anne’s not the only one with a wonderful sense of humour, because back in July viewers on Sky News were cracking up at the same suggestion from 2GB weekend host Paul Kidd:
PAUL B. KIDD: Actually, the first car over them would be bumpy and the next one would be a bit bumpy, but they’d be, they’d be flat after about six cars.
- Credlin, Sky News, 30 July 2019
And he was just re-telling the joke that Sky news host Peta Credlin had made so hilariously the month before:
PETA CREDLIN: Super-glued to the road, holding up all of this traffic. I would have run a car over the top of them. I wouldn’t have gone around them ...
- Credlin, Sky News, 18 June, 2019
And that same day on Sky’s Paul Murray Live, Mark Latham had offered a similar solution, but with a slightly different punchline: 
MARK LATHAM: … do we still have steam rollers?
PAUL MURRAY: Maybe.
MARK LATHAM: I’d like to roll one right down that road …
- Paul Murray Live, Sky News, 18 June, 2019
I think it’s time they got some new material and perhaps stopped making jokes about killing protesters. Because some nutter out there might just take them up on it. 

Links