10/06/2020

(AU) 'Mass Mortality Event' Devastates Sydney's Coastal Ecosystems

Sydney Morning Herald - Peter Hannam

Marine ecosystems along a stretch of Sydney's coastline from the Hawkesbury River down to Botany Bay and beyond have been devastated by a combination of drought, bushfire debris and severe storms in recent months.

Researchers for The Abyss Project, a commercial and scientific group of divers, say the coast and estuaries have suffered a "mass mortality event", potentially the worst in decades. Hard-hit aquatic species range from soldier crabs to urchins, soft sponges and coral-like bryozoa invertebrates.

Nathalie Simmonds (left), head of marine science at The Abyss Project, examines dead invertebrates with project co-founder Carl Fallon near an inshore Sydney Reef. They immediately returned them to where they had been located. Credit: Kate Geraghty

Carl Fallon, a co-founder of the 12-year old project that monitors aquatic health near Sydney, said it was "a once-in-a-generation event" to have a dry spell followed by fires and then storms from February onwards.

Invertebrate species down to as deep as eight metres appear to have heavily affected by a sequence of changed water quality and conditions.

Salinity in shallow estuaries rose as freshwater inflows dropped with the drought, and then the bushfires brought additional nitrogen and phosphorous - including from fire retardants - that spurred cyanobacteria growth. The big storms provided the final blow for much of the aquatic life, Mr Fallon said.

Deeper than about eight metres or in areas where waters more easily mix, such as much of Sydney Harbour, sea life continues largely unaffected, he said.

Carl Fallon, co-founder of The Abyss Project and Sea Dragon Diving Co., examines conditions near the inshore reef. Credit: Kate Geraghty

The Abyss Project's report, scheduled to be made public on Monday, estimated the loss of so-called foundational species would likely cause "feedback loops occurring throughout the entire ecosystem".

Some species are recovering faster than others, with potentially long-lasting impacts.

At places such as Monterey in Botany Bay, highly varied species previously found attached to nets and other submerged objects had begun to be replaced by an unidentified algal species.

"They are all completely gone except for this one algae that has literally covered everything," Mr Fallon said.

David Booth, a marine ecologist at University of Technology Sydney, said poor water quality and then coronavirus pandemic restrictions had limited the ability of scientists to examine the impact of "this chemical event".

To lose kelp from many areas and also urchins - normally "two opposing forces" - was very unusual, Dr Booth said. Kelp is typically resilient while urchins "are pretty good at hunkering down" but both were hammered.

Effects on fish may take a while to show up. For instance, some grazing species may fare better than others depending on the mix of plant species that return.

A photograph taken on the foreshore of Kurnell after the big storm event, showing mass piles of exoskeletons of invertebrates deposited on the shore. Credit:The Abyss Project

The Abyss Project's report noted that "climate change will see an increase in the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events", but also worse droughts and bushfires.

"[O]ur observational and scientific data will provide a baseline for future researchers to enable these coastal environments to be protected for future generations," it said.

Professor Booth said those increasing climate stresses in the future could "just decouple everything" in the marine ecosystems around Sydney and beyond.

In wake of the recent destruction of aquatic life, the Berejiklian government should revisit plans for a Sydney Marine Park, he said.

The government ditched the plan in September 2018 - six months out from last year's state elections - even before the public consultation period had closed after complaints from anglers and others.

"It shouldn't have dropped off the agenda," Professor Booth said, adding the originally proposed marine park comprised 17 “sanctuary zones” covering just 2.4 per cent of the waters around Sydney.

Links
  • Estuaries warming and acidifying because of climate change, study finds
  • The early warning system being developed to shore up Australia's beaches
  • NSW Proposed Marine Sites (pdf)
  • Extreme Weather Caused By Climate Change Has Damaged 45% Of Australia’s Coastal Habitat
  • Sydney's Marine Life Turning Troppo As Coral, Other Species Head South
  • New Study Finds Climate Change Threatens Marine Protected Areas
  • Climate Change Could Drive Coastal Food Webs To Collapse
  • Temperate Insects As Vulnerable To Climate Change As Tropical Species

    Phys.org - Uppsala University

    Credit: CC0 Public Domain

    In previous research, it has been assumed that insects in temperate regions would cope well with or even benefit from a warmer climate.

    Not so, according to researchers from the Universities of Uppsala and Lund in Sweden and Oviedo, Spain, in a new study.

    The earlier models failed to take into account the fact that insects in temperate habitats are inactive for much of the year.

    The research group's study, published in the journal Scientific Reports, presents new knowledge about the potential effects of global warming on insect populations. The results show that insects may be more threatened by than previous estimates have indicated.

    "Insects in might be as threatened by climate change as those in the tropics," says Uppsala University professor Frank Johansson.

    The researchers found new, disturbing patterns in a modified analysis of a previously used dataset on insects' critical temperature limits and their survival. Their conclusion is that temperate insects might be just as sensitive to climate change as tropical ones.

    The previous studies showed that tropical insects are severely threatened by climate change since they already live very close to their optimal temperature and 'critical thermal maximum.' However, the scientists responsible for those previous studies also assumed that temperate insects live far below their own optimal and maximum temperatures, and might therefore benefit from climate change.

    The problem is that the earlier studies used mean annual temperatures for all their estimates. In so doing, they failed to consider that the vast majority of insects in temperate latitudes remain inactive in cold periods—that is, for much of the year.

    When more biological details about the various insect species, and only the months in which the species are active, are entered in the models, the new estimates show that in temperate insects' habitats, too, the temperatures are close to the insects' optimal and critical maximum.

    This is because the average temperature for the months when the insects are active clearly exceeds the mean year-round temperature. Temperate insects are thus as vulnerable as tropical species to temperature increases.

    When the temperature is close to ' optimal or critical upper limit, there is a great risk of their numbers declining. The decreases in would also affect humans, since many insect species provide ecosystem services, such as pollination of fruit, vegetables and other plants we eat.

    Links

    (AU) Top Super Funds Increasingly Vote Down Climate Resolutions

    Sydney Morning HeraldCharlotte Grieve

    Eight major super funds have been criticised for voting against the majority of shareholder proposals on climate change at recent annual general meetings despite being members of an investor group pushing for companies to take action on climate risks.

    AMP, AustralianSuper and First State Super are among the funds singled out in a report by the Australian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR) for voting down more than half the climate-related shareholder proposals over the past three years.

    "The issue here is – is there a difference between what funds are telling their members and what they’re actually doing? If they’re saying they’re active owners and their voting behaviour says something different, that is a real concern," ACCR's climate director Dan Gocher said.

    The Australian Centre for Corporate Responsibility's research found super fund support for climate proposals had fallen last year. Credit : Wolter Peeters, The Age

    The Investor Group on Climate Change represents institutional investors that collectively manage more than $2 trillion and chief executive Emma Herd said shareholder resolutions are just one tool, alongside divestment and board-level pressure, used to drive corporate action on climate change.

    Investors are increasingly using their voting power to put emissions reductions targets on the agenda at annual general meetings. Woodside Petroleum was hit with a record-breaking investor push in April to slash emissions and link executive pay to reduction targets. In the same month, more than 43 per cent of shareholders at oil and gas giant Santos's AGM defied the board in a vote to set harder targets on carbon reductions.

    Shareholder resolutions are non-binding in Australia, although chief executive of the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors Louise Davidson said directors take protest votes seriously. "If you see those big votes on the day, they do lead to changes in behaviour," she said.

    The ACCR report examines publicly available voting records of Australia's 50 largest super funds that control a total of $1.8 trillion in assets. It found overall support for climate resolutions in 2019 was down, with AMP, MTAA and Media Super all supporting less than 10 per cent of proposals through the year.

    "It's pathetic, really. It really suggests they are not paying attention. If they are just following advice, perhaps they should be looking at the quality of this advice," Mr Gocher said.

    Institutional investors often rely on advice from proxy firms to guide voting decisions and Mr Gocher said in some cases, the funds simply agree with board recommendations.

    "The super fund industry generally has gotten so big, so they need to be more accountable. For these funds that are controlling tens of billions of dollars to not have a view or express that view is poor."

    At BHP's annual meeting last year, AustralianSuper, Unisuper and Mercer were the only three funds to vote against a resolution that asked the mining giant to exit memberships of lobby groups considered to undermine the Paris Agreement goals, according to the report.

    AustralianSuper's environmental, social and governance director Andrew Gray said the fund had engaged with BHP on the proposal and decided involvement with industry groups such as the Minerals Council was necessary to encourage emissions reductions.

    VicSuper was among four funds that supported more than 70 per cent of all climate-related proposals last year, including demanding Rio Tinto release a plan to transition away from fossil fuels. It also pushed insurer QBE for greater transparency on climate risks.

     This is in contrast to First State Super, which voted against 67 per cent of resolutions last year, according to the ACCR report. First State Super and VicSuper will merge at the end of this month to become the second-largest super fund in the country with about $120 billion in funds under management.

    The two funds clashed over Origin Energy's disclosure of coal-related public health risks, with VicSuper voting for more disclosure and First State voting against.

    A spokesperson speaking on behalf of the two funds said the merged groups would use First State Super's responsible investment policy but recent changes meant there would be greater alignment on voting.

    "Whilst both funds had different voting and engagement policies and procedures in place, we share very similar objectives and are absolutely committed to the important role that responsible investment plays in helping shape better outcomes for all our stakeholder."

    Unisuper, another member of IGCC, voted against more than half the climate-related shareholder proposals between 2017 and 2019. It comes as its sustainable fund has been criticised for holding a major stake in Rio Tinto following outrage over the blasting of a 46,000-year-old Aboriginal rock shelter site in Western Australia.

    A UniSuper spokeswoman said it had been discussing climate change with Australian companies for the past decade and considered shareholder proposals where material risks associated with climate change were not disclosed.

    Ms Davidson said measuring the number of shareholder resolutions approved by super funds was not indicative of their commitment to climate change as some proposals lacked merit.

    "Shareholder resolutions are quite a blunt instrument and in our view sometimes failure to support a shareholder resolution is because the resolution itself isn't too good," Ms Davidson said. "I genuinely believe super funds are more focused now on climate change than they ever have before and that is leading to change at companies.

    "Sometimes it is slower than everyone would like but at the same time change is happening."

    An AMP spokeswoman said the wealth manager held more than 80 company engagement meetings in 2019 over ESG issues, many about climate change and that it abstained from voting on resolutions that advocate for constitutional changes at companies.

    "There is no doubt that shareholder concerns around climate change are on the rise, both in Australia and abroad. We look forward to continuing our constructive engagement with companies as to how, collectively, we can meet these expectations into the future," the spokeswoman said.

    Links