26/06/2020

COVID-19 Shutdowns Will Give Wildlife Only Short-Term Relief From Climate Change And Other Threats

The Conversation | 

Wildflowers proliferating in overgrown roadsides during the coronavirus pandemic are providing habitat for pollinators. (Shutterstock)

Authors
  • PhD Student in Conservation Biology, University of Ottawa
  • Jeremy KerrResearch Chair in Macroecology and Conservation, Professor of Biology, Chair of Department of Biology, University of Ottawa
  • Senior research fellow, Centre for Biodiversity and Environment, University College London   
There had to be a silver lining to the nearly universal lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic. One of the small benefits has been a temporarily lighter human footprint in many ecosystems.

Wildlife sightings are increasing, air quality is improving and carbon emissions are dropping. While these glimmers of positivity cannot come close to eclipsing the tragic human cost of the coronavirus, many are now asking what the pandemic will mean for wildlife around the globe.

Global carbon dioxide emissions for 2020 are expected to fall by up to eight per cent due to shutdowns, although the resumption of global activity could increase emissions and offset some of these gains. While this is a significant reduction in our expected emissions, it’s far from enough to turn the tide on climate change’s impacts on biodiversity.

Climate change can’t be stopped by COVID-19. This past April and May were both tied for the warmest on record, and if this trend continues then June will be the 426th month in a row where global average temperatures are above the 20th-century average. This serves as a strong reminder that even if we stop all carbon emissions today, we will still be fighting to reduce emissions and sequester carbon for a long time. The stakes are dangerously high.

Lessons from the bees

We’ve known for a while that bumblebees and many other species have been declining over recent decades. Finding the driver of these declines is especially important for a group of pollinators that performs irreplaceable ecosystem and agriculture services.

Recently, we showed that there is strong evidence that climate change has played a role in the declines of bumblebees across North America and Europe. In this new work, we found a mechanism that links climate change to these pollinator declines: climate chaos.

Bombus ternarius, the tricoloured bumblebee, seen on Manitoulin Island, Ont. (Peter Soroye)

The most common way to describe climate change is as the progressive rise in temperature, observed over decades, following the growth in atmospheric carbon concentrations, mostly due to human activities. Although gradual temperature changes can pose deadly threats, the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events seems to be rising sharply as the greenhouse effect grows. Heatwaves, for example, are both longer and hotter.

As Hamlet noted, “ay, there’s the rub.”

Wildlife can tolerate some degree of warming, either by finding ways to move away from risky weather or evolutionary adaptation. But it’s much more difficult for species to tolerate increasingly chaotic extremes in weather such as prolonged drought and heat waves, or tropical storms.

100 years of bumblebee data

For bumblebee species, we could predict local extinction and colonization of new areas by estimating whether recent climate change had subjected species to temperatures beyond any they are known to have tolerated in the past.

Through a series of tests with a dataset including over 100 years of bumblebee observations, we found that species have disappeared in places where temperature spiked above what they could tolerate. Species across North America and Europe are consistently being pushed to the edges of these limits during the year, much more often than they ever were for most of the 20th century. Increasing intensity of land use — including increased pesticide use — also harms bees, but these effects are distinct from the dangerous signal of climate chaos.

Average annual temperatures (map) and monthly extremes (shown in the right-hand inset with year in red compared to a baseline period in grey) have been increasing across North America and Europe from 1975-2015, resulting in declines for the bumblebees (estimated average annual decline for a species shown in left-hand inset)

While our recent study focused on bees, increasing extremes from climate change should, in principle, affect other species in the same way. If this is the case, then the increasing temperature or precipitation extremes above (or below) the limits of what species can tolerate could rapidly and abruptly begin reshaping ecosystems around the globe by as early as 2030.

Necessary responses

Although we’ll feel the effect of climate change for decades, it’s necessary to address its causes now while we still have reasonable prospects of mitigating its worst impacts. Strategies like maintaining sheltered micro-habitats to provide shade or cover, and keeping a diversity of habitats in a landscape can help reduce exposure of species to extreme weather.

Perhaps, humanity’s lighter touch during the pandemic of 2020 will mean more species can traverse landscapes or make it through another hot year in landscapes that are a little less disturbed. For instance, the profusion of wildflowers in unmaintained roadside verges could create a large amount of nesting and foraging habitat for pollinators if left for the whole year.

The growing number of gardens that are appearing as people spend more time at home could provide a similar benefit. As with reductions in emissions, continuing these practices long after lockdowns end will be the deciding factor in whether they make a difference for pollinators and other wildlife.

In some places, species and ecosystems are bouncing back, although this is not true everywhere: as economies suffer, poachers are killing protected wildlife.

The glimmers of hope will never make the incalculable human toll of a global pandemic worthwhile, nor its economic costs. Yet, hope remains a vital tool to motivate action to address climate change.

Climate change isn’t locked down and it isn’t practising social distancing. It is accelerating the erosion of the planet’s life support systems and the decline of species that humanity would be hard pressed to do without. Concerted global action can make dangerous situations better, whether it’s a pandemic or the climate crisis.

Links

NASA Images Show Extreme Heat And Fires Raging Across Siberia

Newsweek


Video Shows Fires Raging Across The Earth In 2019

NASA's Earth Observatory has released maps and images providing insights into the extraordinary heat that has affected Siberia this year, and the wildfires that are currently raging across the region.

Siberian towns at high latitudes have been experiencing abnormally high temperatures in recent weeks. In fact, a scorching heat wave in the east of the vast Russian region has already produced what may be the hottest temperature ever recorded in the entire Arctic circle.

On Saturday, June 20, the mercury in the small town of Verkhoyansk, 3,000 miles east of Moscow, reached 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit, according to Russian weather data, which has yet to be verified.

"This event seems very anomalous in the last hundred years or so," NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies Director Gavin Schmidt said in a statement.Verkhoyansk experiences some of the coldest temperatures on Earth during the winter. In fact, the mercury plunged to nearly 60 degrees Fahrenheit below zero in November, 2019.

But while large portions of Siberia are no stranger to hot summers, Verkhoyansk itself, which is located around six miles north of the Arctic circle, rarely sees temperatures above around 70 degrees Fahrenheit.

Nevertheless, the forecast for the rest of the week in Verkhoyansk is showing temperatures in the high 80s and low-to-mid 90s—roughly 20 degrees Fahrenheit higher than the average high in late June, The Moscow Times reported.

According to the Copernicus Climate Change Service, May was unusually mild in Siberia, with temperatures up to 18 degrees above average recorded in some western parts of the region. In addition, the whole of winter and spring in this area experienced repeated periods of higher-than-average surface air temperatures, particularly from January onwards.

To further illustrate the unusual heat across Siberia this year, the NASA map below—based on data collected by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument on the agency's Aqua satellite—shows land surface temperature anomalies from March 19 to June 20, 2020. The red areas are locations that were hotter than average for the same period from 2003-2018, while blue areas were colder than average.

A map showing land surface temperature anomalies from March 19 to June 20, 2020. The red areas are locations that were hotter than average for the same period from 2003-2018, while blue areas were colder than average. NASA

Furthermore, Russia as a whole experienced its warmest winter in 130 years, The Times reported. And the average heat in Russia from January to May was so high that it roughly matches what climate models predict for the year 2100 if current warming trends continue, according to CBS News meteorologist Jeff Berardelli.

Experts say the extreme heat seen in Verkhoyansk can be explained by a vast high pressure system that is sending the mercury soaring across eastern Siberia, where the town is located.

However, human-driven climate change is causing the Arctic to warm more than two times faster than the average for the rest of the planet. And while heat waves are not new in Siberia, this warming is causing them to become more severe and frequent, Sergey Semenov, from the Yu. A. Izrael Institute of Global Climate and Ecology, Russia, told The Times.

Freja Vamborg, Senior Scientist at the Copernicus Climate Change Service, said that although the planet as a whole is warming, this process is not taking place at the same rate everywhere.

"Western Siberia stands out as a region that shows more of a warming trend with higher variations in temperature. This means that, to some extent, large temperature anomalies are not unexpected. However, what is unusual in this case is how long the warmer-than-average anomalies have persisted for," she said.

The extreme heat in Siberia has provided the perfect conditions for wildfires in the region's forests and shrub ecosystems, with the number of blazes detected in the Russian Far East among the highest observed in any year since 2003—even though it is still early in the fire season—according to data collected by NASA and NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) satellites.

Extreme heat waves can melt layers of permafrost, exposing long-frozen, carbon-rich deposits in some areas that are the perfect fuel for fires. The natural-color satellite image below shows the smoke being emitted by several fires in Russia's Sakha region.

A satellite image captured on June 23, 2020 showing the smoke produced wildfires in the Sakha region of Russian Siberia.

Links

NSW's Bullish Coal Export Plan Defies The Global Market Realities

Sydney Morning Herald - Simon Nicholas

Simon Nicholas is an energy analyst at the Institute of Energy, Economics and Financial Analysis, which advocates for a sustainable economy.
The NSW government’s new strategic statement on coal exploration and mining has been unveiled, just as COVID-19 accelerates the energy transition away from fossil fuels.

The statement optimistically maintains that global demand for thermal coal will only drop by one-tenth by 2050.

Furthermore, the government is expecting that Australian thermal coal exports will be protected from falling shipments to Japan, China and South Korea by rising demand from India.

The Berejiklian government sees a bright future for the coal export market.
This view contrasts strongly with that of India’s Central Electricity Authority and the Indian government. The CEA projects that renewable energy will make up 51 per cent of total generation capacity by 2030, by which time coal-fired power will have reduced to 33 per cent. And the Indian government clearly wants that fuelled by domestic coal, not imported.

Significantly reduced demand for coal amid the COVID-19 economic downturn has mobilised the Indian government to step up its efforts to reduce dependence on thermal coal imports.

This move to protect Indian coal mining workers has apparently come straight from the top – Prime Minister Narendra Modi – and does not appear to bode well for the future of Adani’s Carmichael mine here in Australia. State-owned Coal India, the world’s largest coal miner, has been mandated by the government to replace at least 100 million tonnes of coal imports in fiscal year 2020-21.

India has tried this before, but this time may well be different. As is happening globally, power demand in India has declined dramatically since the start of its COVID-19 lockdown and this drop has been worn by its coal-fired power stations. India is not a major destination for NSW thermal coal and it’s starting to look increasingly likely that it never will be.

And it’s not only nations that are beginning to turn away from seaborne thermal coal. In an unfortunate piece of timing for the NSW government, the unveiling of its statement on coal came the day after it was reported that major miner BHP has hired investment bank JP Morgan to sell its last Australian thermal coal mine in the Hunter Valley.

BHP doesn’t seem to see much of a future for thermal coal amid growing pressure on fossil fuel exposure from shareholders and regulators. Other major global mining companies are making their move. Anglo American has said it wants to divest its thermal coal mines in South Africa while South32 is in the process of selling its mines. Rio Tinto has already exited all coal mining already.

COVID-19 now appears to be accelerating the rate at which some companies transition from fossil fuels including coal. This has been evidenced most starkly by oil and gas producer BP’s decision to write off  $US17.5bn ($25.5 billion) of assets on the assumption that COVID-19 will accelerate the shift away from fossil fuels.

Similarly, Italy’s Enel – one of the largest operators of coal-fired power plants in Europe – is planning to accelerate the closure of its coal-generation assets in the expectation that the worsening economics of coal power will persist beyond the pandemic.

Companies that mine and consume coal are also having increasing difficulty caused by a reluctance by banks and insurers to finance the industry. Recent additions to the list of financiers leaving thermal coal behind include major Japanese banks such as Mizuho and Sumitomo-Mitsui. Japan is Australia’s largest thermal coal export destination and the moves by its major banks should come as a warning sign to Australian governments and coal exporters.

Meanwhile, in May the South Korean government unveiled a US$62 billion “New Deal” designed to refocus its post-coronavirus economy. The plan is based on two pillars – a “Digital New Deal” and a “Green New Deal” with the latter intended to move the nation away from coal-fired power and towards renewable energy.

South Korea was Australia’s third-largest thermal coal export destination in 2019 and its approach to post-coronavirus economic recovery is in stark contrast to the NSW government’s attitude that the coal industry will have a key role in any economic bounce-back after the pandemic.

The strategic statement on coal comes only one day after it was revealed that NSW’s first renewable energy zone has received a “phenomenal” response, attracting registrations of interest for 27 gigawatts of proposals valued at $A38 billion.

If that wasn’t enough to make the direction of global power markets clear, the NSW government doesn’t have to look much further afield. Last week the South Australian government announced a new energy plan to ensure the state reaches net 100 per cent renewable energy by 2030.

COVID-19 isn’t slowing the energy technology transition away from fossil fuels – if anything it is accelerating it. Acceptance of this inevitability in Australia will lead to appropriate post-coronavirus energy investment, which will both lower power prices and support jobs. A refusal to do so, and continued focus on industries of the past, cannot provide the recovery that Australian workers are going to need.

Links