05/08/2020

While We Fixate On Coronavirus, Earth Is Hurtling Towards A Catastrophe Worse Than The Dinosaur Extinction

The Conversation

Pixabay

Andrew Glikson is an Earth and paleo-climate scientist at the Australian National University.
At several points in the history of our planet, increasing amounts of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have caused extreme global warming, prompting the majority of species on Earth to die out.

In the past, these events were triggered by a huge volcanic eruption or asteroid impact. Now, Earth is heading for another mass extinction – and human activity is to blame.

I am an Earth and Paleo-climate scientist and have researched the relationships between asteroid impacts, volcanism, climate changes and mass extinctions of species.

My research suggests the current growth rate of carbon dioxide emissions is faster than those which triggered two previous mass extinctions, including the event that wiped out the dinosaurs.

The world’s gaze may be focused on COVID-19 right now. But the risks to nature from human-made global warming – and the imperative to act – remain clear.

The current rate of CO2 emissions is a major event in the recorded history of Earth. EPA

Past mass extinctions

Many species can adapt to slow, or even moderate, environmental changes. But Earth’s history shows that extreme shifts in the climate can cause many species to become extinct.

For example, about 66 million years ago an asteroid hit Earth. The subsequent smashed rocks and widespread fires released massive amounts of carbon dioxide over about 10,000 years. Global temperatures soared, sea levels rose and oceans became acidic. About 80% of species, including the dinosaurs, were wiped out.

And about 55 million years ago, global temperatures spiked again, over 100,000 years or so. The cause of this event, known as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, is not entirely clear. One theory, known as the “methane burp” hypothesis, posits that a massive volcanic eruption triggered the sudden release of methane from ocean sediments, making oceans more acidic and killing off many species.

So is life on Earth now headed for the same fate?

Comparing greenhouse gas levels

Before industrial times began at the end of the 18th century, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere sat at around 300 parts per million. This means that for every one million molecules of gas in the atmosphere, 300 were carbon dioxide.

In February this year, atmospheric carbon dioxide reached 414.1 parts per million. Total greenhouse gas level – carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide combined – reached almost 500 parts per million of carbon dioxide-equivalent.

Author provided/The Conversation, CC BY-ND

Carbon dioxide is now pouring into the atmosphere at a rate of two to three parts per million each year.

Using carbon records stored in fossils and organic matter, I have determined that current carbon emissions constitute an extreme event in the recorded history of Earth.

My research has demonstrated that annual carbon dioxide emissions are now faster than after both the asteroid impact that eradicated the dinosaurs (about 0.18 parts per million CO2 per year), and the thermal maximum 55 million years ago (about 0.11 parts per million CO2 per year).

An asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs 66 million years ago. Shutterstock

The next mass extinction has begun

Current atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide are not yet at the levels seen 55 million and 65 million years ago. But the massive influx of carbon dioxide means the climate is changing faster than many plant and animal species can adapt.

A major United Nations report released last year warned around one million animal and plant species were threatened with extinction. Climate change was listed as one of five key drivers.

The report said the distributions of 47% of land-based flightless mammals, and almost 25% of threatened birds, may already have been negatively affected by climate change.

Many researchers fear the climate system is approaching a tipping point - a threshold beyond which rapid and irreversible changes will occur. This will create a cascade of devastating effects.

There are already signs tipping points have been reached. For example, rising Arctic temperatures have led to major ice melt, and weakened the Arctic jet stream – a powerful band of westerly winds.

A diagram showing the weakening Arctic jet stream, and subsequent movements of warm and cold air. NASA

This allows north-moving warm air to cross the polar boundary, and cold fronts emanating from the poles to intrude south into Siberia, Europe and Canada.

A shift in climate zones is also causing the tropics to expand and migrate toward the poles, at a rate of about 56 to 111 kilometres per decade. The tracks of tropical and extra-tropical cyclones are likewise shifting toward the poles. Australia is highly vulnerable to this shift.

Uncharted future climate territory

Research released in 2016 showed just what a massive impact humans are having on the planet. It said while the Earth might naturally have entered the next ice age in about 20,000 years’ time, the heating produced by carbon dioxide would result in a period of super-tropical conditions, delaying the next ice age to about 50,000 years from now.

During this period, chaotic high-energy stormy conditions would prevail over much of the Earth. My research suggests humans are likely to survive best in sub-polar regions and sheltered mountain valleys, where cooler conditions would allow flora and fauna to persist.

Earth’s next mass extinction is avoidable – if carbon dioxide emissions are dramatically curbed and we develop and deploy technologies to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. But on the current trajectory, human activity threatens to make large parts of the Earth uninhabitable - a planetary tragedy of our own making.

Links

(AU) Leadership On Climate Needed: CSIRO Report

Canberra Times - Katie Burgess

There needed to be a coordinated, system-wide approach to dealing with climate change in Australia, according to the CSIRO. Picture: Dion Georgopoulos

Australia's national science agency has called for leadership on climate change, amid concerns the public -and the public service - do not fully understand the risks it posed.

In a technical report about the 2019-20 bushfires commissioned by Prime Minister Scott Morrison, the CSIRO warned climate and disaster risks were growing across Australia.

The report, tendered to the Royal Commission into National Natural Disaster Arrangements on Monday, described many of the risks as systemic which required "coordinated, system-wide responses beyond emergency and disaster management to address".

"There is growing demand - from society and the financial services and disaster management sectors in particular - for coordinated action across all economic sectors, government portfolios and levels of decision making to mitigate climate and disaster risks, build resilience and adapt to change," CSIRO said.

"There are opportunities for a more harmonised, coordinated and collective approach which are hampered by under-developed, fragmented or uncoordinated awareness, understanding, and approaches to 'systemic risk' assessment and management in Australia."

However the high levels of "contestation and disinformation" about climate change meant there were "low levels of public understanding" of the causes and effects of climate and disaster risks.

There was also no common view among government departments regarding the common drivers of disasters.

"Government agencies tend to go through their own processes of defining problems and suggesting solutions," CSIRO said.

There was also no mandate or incentives to look at the broader, systemic risks associated with climate change within government.

"The existing remits of most organisations are limited to issues manifesting within their sector, portfolio or jurisdiction," the report said.

"For example, drought and climate-related disaster are manifestations of the same set of climate-related drivers yet are dealt with separately by different agencies and sectors."

CSIRO called for leadership across all levels of government and society to make climate change and disaster risk reduction "mainstream" and help Australians understand the relevance of responding to the changing climate.

The agency also urged government to embed climate and disaster resilience as a national priority, making it the responsibility of all agencies and portfolios and making it central in any economic development and investment decision.

Critically, CSIRO called on government to invest in research to help bridge some of the knowledge gaps around climate change and natural disasters.

While multiple studies had concluded human-induced climate change had increased the risk of serious bushfires, there needed to be more research into how it impacted, droughts, damaging hail and tropical cyclones.

"This is primarily due to limitations in data, high natural variability and the challenges of simulating such events in models," the CSIRO said.

For example, while it is possible climate change is increasing the risk of large hail, scientists were not certain of this because of the limited period of observation and the inability of models to fully simulate future hail events.

The report comes after a Senate inquiry into the fires last week heard Australia was no longer a leader in climate change research.

"Research on climate change has plummeted over the last decade," Australian National University Climate Change Institute director Mark Howden said.

"This is not a minor reduction. This is a major reduction. And it's taken us in many ways from being a global leader in terms of the various dimensions of climate change work ... and put us way behind the the leaders of in that area."

Links

Explainer: Man-Made Climate Change, Is It Real Or Fake?

CNA

An Indian boatman walks amid boats on the dried bed of a lake at Nalsarovar Bird Sanctuary. (Photo: AFP/Sam Panthaky)



Associate Professor Koh Tieh Yong is a climate scientist at the Singapore University of Social Sciences.
The Australian bushfires from September last year to early February are proof to many people that man-made or “anthropogenic” climate change is real and threatening.

But for some Australians involved in the coal-mining industry, the fires seemed to mainly be a natural catastrophe: Australia has had bushfires, even serious ones, since time immemorial and so there is no reason to put the blame on the exploitation of fossil fuels.

So, is anthropogenic climate change real? Or is it be a matter of personal opinion?

Scientists say Australia's fire seasons are beginning earlier and burning with more ferocious intensity due to climate change. (Photo: AFP/Saeed Khan)

Big History Of Climate Change

Let us start with a simpler question: has the climate really changed?

The weather varies from day to day and season to season. These changes tend to reverse so that the environment never strays far from a stable, mean condition. This stable condition is what we refer to conceptually as the climate.

Climate refers to both the physical and chemical state of the environment. It characterises not just the air but also the land, sea and ice on the planet. Therefore, a change in climate is a fundamental shift in the environment, unlike changes in weather, which is shorter term.

Since the late 19th century, instruments documenting the average temperature of the Earth’s surface show that the temperature has gone up by about 1 degree Celsius.

Over the same period, the global mean sea level has climbed by nearly one-quarter metre at an increasing pace. This is because oceans expand thermally and because ice-caps and glaciers melt and flow into the sea.

The chemical composition of the air is also a telling marker for our changing climate: carbon dioxide concentration has risen from around 290 ppmv (parts per million by volume) in 1880 to 400 ppmv in 2020.

Today’s elevated level of carbon dioxide is alarming because ancient air bubbles trapped in Antarctica’s ice reveal that the level never exceeded 300 ppmv for the past 800,000 years. The big history of climate change has arrived.

How Does Climate Change Affect Us?

When the climate warms, extreme hot, dry weather becomes more severe and last longer, thus increasing the occurrence of forest fires that destroy life and property. This is what happened in Australia’s case.

A view of Singapore's skyline around Marina Bay on Sep 23, 2019, amid the ongoing haze.

Smoke from widespread fires creates haze which irritates the eyes and exacerbates respiratory illnesses. A regional haze episode can last for weeks to months.

Meanwhile, unreliable water supply from rain catchment compels cities to rely more on costly desalination and water reclamation technologies. Just recall the dry spell in Singapore from July to September last year.

As the sea level rises, agriculture in low-lying river deltas takes a hit: the Mekong delta has suffered from seawater seeping into precious paddy fields.

As food prices tend to rise whenever food production falls, a populous, rice-importing nation like Indonesia is vulnerable to rice production cut-backs in Vietnam.

There are many other examples that illustrate how climate change impacts negatively our lives and the economy. But the consequences go beyond human society as ecosystems are sensitive to environmental changes too.

Warmer seas have bleached coral from the Great Barrier Reef in Southwest Pacific to the Maldives in Indian Ocean, for instance.

Understanding The Root Cause

Nowadays, many climate change sceptics no longer deny the reality of climate change. However, they argue that climate change is due to natural causes like an increase in the Sun’s radiation.

So how do we know that the scientists are right when they say that climate change is mainly caused by emissions of greenhouse gases?

Greenhouse gas emissions are now the fastest-growing contributor to ecological overshoot. (Photo: AFP)

​​​​​The science of how greenhouse gases lead to global warming is no mystery: a greenhouse gas (GHG) is an atmospheric constituent that is effective in absorbing and emitting infrared radiation - a kind of light that has a longer wavelength than is visible to our eyes.

Water vapour, carbon dioxide and methane are the three most abundant naturally occurring GHGs. The Earth’s surface emits mainly infrared light upwards which is mostly absorbed by GHGs.

Then GHGs re-emit the infrared light, some eventually escaping upward into space while the rest goes back downward. The Earth’s surface re-absorbs the downward infrared light converting some of it into heat.

This radiative transfer naturally keeps the Earth warm enough for life to exist.

But from the time of the industrialisation, humankind has burnt much coal, oil and natural gas for energy, producing excessive carbon dioxide that has accumulated to the unprecedented levels today.

Fossil-fuel mining, cattle farming and rice cultivation have also released much methane into the environment. The increased concentration of GHGs leads to greater absorption and re-emission of infrared light, causing the Earth’s surface to be excessively warm and hence the sea level to rise.

People take part in protests ahead of the upcoming G20 summit in Hamburg, Germany July 2, 2017. Placard reads "Global Warming is NOT a Myth". REUTERS/Hannibal Hanschke/Files

Refuting The Climate Sceptics

There is an important fact which refutes the sceptics’ argument that the Sun’s radiation has simply increased.

It is a little known fact that the temperature of the atmosphere does not change uniformly.

Observations made by satellites from space show that around 15 to 25 km above the Earth’s surface, in a layer of the atmosphere called the “lower stratosphere”, there has been a long-term cooling trend since the late 1970s.

The existence of global cooling refutes the climate sceptics’ simple explanation that today’s climate change is due to the Sun warming the Earth more. At the same time, this reinforces our understanding of the GHGs’ effect.

The sun sets behind an oil pump outside Saint-Fiacre, near Paris, France September 17, 2019. REUTERS/Christian Hartmann

When GHGs absorb infrared light, they re-emit the radiation both downwards and upwards. As the downward infrared light warms up the Earth’s surface, the upward infrared light simultaneously carries energy away into space.

It is the increase in escaping energy from higher GHG concentration that cools the lower stratosphere. The distinctive pattern of warming-below-and-cooling-above is the fingerprint that identifies the culpability of GHGs.

Fast-Forward To The Future

The climate has been changing for more than 100 years because of man-made GHG emissions.

Projecting into the future, if we continue our business as usual, carbon dioxide levels are expected to exceed 900 ppmv before the year 2100.

Scientists estimate that global average surface temperature will warm by about 3 to 5 degrees Celsius and global mean sea level will rise by about half to one metre over the 21st century. Changes in rainfall patterns are harder to predict but in Southeast Asia, droughts will likely worsen.

Person with an umbrella during a spell of hot weather in Singapore. (File photo: Gaya Chandramohan)

Today, Singapore’s daily temperature varies on average between 25 and 31 degrees Celsius. This spans 6 degrees Celsius.

If we fast-forward to the decade 2091 – 2100, Singapore may be confronted with the possibility that its normal night-time temperature would be as high as today’s normal day-time temperature!

By 2100, about half the land in the Mekong delta of Vietnam could be lost to seawater intrusion. The risks posed to water and food resources will be grave if we continue to emit GHGs while ignoring climate change.

Act Today, Live Better Tomorrow

The anticipation of dire consequences of anthropogenic climate change in the lifetimes of our children and grandchildren should spur us into action today in reducing GHG emissions and adapting to climate change.

There are four sets of actions that individuals can resolve to:

One, to conserve energy because most fossil fuel today is burnt to provide energy. For example, enjoying fewer hot showers and raising temperature settings in air-conditioners, or using more public transport and taking the stairs instead of the lift, all contribute to mitigate the emissions of carbon dioxide.

Two, to save water and reduce food wastage. The purification or reclamation of freshwater and the production, processing and transport of food expends energy, indirectly emitting carbon dioxide.

Moreover, when food supply matches closely food demand, less methane is released unnecessarily in food production.

Three, to avoid the use of plastics whenever possible. Plastics are mainly manufactured from petrochemicals derived from crude oil. When incinerated after disposal, plastics convert to carbon dioxide too.

Four, to pay attention to and pick out scientifically reliable information on climate change. This would foster an enlightened and responsible attitude in supporting climate action policies.

While the above actions are not going to stop climate change, because the current-day elevated levels of GHGs are already warming the Earth’s surface, they help to alleviate future impacts and ease adaptation to the new climate.

Anthropogenic climate change is real. We have to act now.

Links