16/09/2020

(AU) Critics Say Scott Morrison's New Power Plan Is A Recipe For 'Gas-Fuelled Climate Collapse'

SBS - Tom Stayner

Mr Morrison declared gas and coal must remain critical parts of the nation's energy mix and promised Australia would meet its climate change targets in a "canter".

Prime Minister Scott Morrison at a press conference at Parliament House in Canberra. Source: AAP

Prime Minister Scott Morrison has outlined his vision for a gas-led recovery to the coronavirus crisis, declaring Australia needs more investment in gas supplies to push down power prices.

The federal government says the push would improve energy affordability amid an economic recession, assist in job creation and support families and businesses.

Mr Morrison said gas and coal remained critical to meeting the nation’s growing energy demands and supporting economic recovery, in a speech delivered in New South Wales's Newcastle region.

“To ensure affordable, reliable power we need the market to deliver 1,000 megawatts of new dispatchable capacity,” he said.

“If the energy companies choose to step up and make these investments to create that capacity – great. We will step back. If not my government will step up and we will fill the gap.”

But the government’s focus on gas has drawn the ire of environmentalists, desperate to see a shift away from fossil fuels and instead calling for a green-recovery to the crisis. 

"We must fight Scott Morrison's plans for gas-fuelled climate collapse," Australian Greens leader Adam Bandt said.

The government asserts the extra power is needed to replace that will be lost from the Liddell power station when it closes down in 2023.

The prime minister is giving power giants seven months to come up with a plan to meet the demand before the government steps in.

This includes promising to build a gas power plant in the NSW Hunter Valley if the private sector does not step in.

The three-step plan outlined by Mr Morrison includes firstly driving down energy prices, getting “more gas, more often and more reliable” into the energy system and increasing the nation’s sovereign fuel reserves.

The government’s plan focuses on dispatchable power - electricity generation that can be turned off and on when necessary.

“You cannot talk about electricity generation and ignore coal,” he said.

“Coal will continue to play an important part of our economy for decades to come.”

He also wants to fast-track interconnectors and build more gas pipelines to ensure electricity can be moved around the east coast.

“That means efficiently connecting major sources of gas supply with customer hubs where there is significant demand,” he said.

Mr Morrison also said the government remained committed to investing in renewable energy.

“Cheaper renewables not only helps us to get our emissions reduction targets by 2030, which we remain committed to ... but they also hold a promise of further declines in energy costs,” he said.

The prime minister said he is confident the government would meet its ambition to reduce emissions by at least 26 per cent by 2030 on 2005 levels in a “canter”.

Labor's energy spokesman Mark Butler has raised scepticism about the coalition's gas plan was heavy on spin and light on substance, arguing it was not ambitious or fast enough.

"It's hard to see where you get a single job from this announcement in the time frame that we need, in the deepest recession in almost a century," he said.

"Unless of course you are employed to write a plan or a review or a voluntary, industry-led code of conduct."

The government’s COVID committee - advising on the nation’s recovery to the pandemic – asked the government to consider underwriting new investment in gas pipelines as one of its recommendations.

Mr Morrison said the long-term goal of the government’s plan was the creation of a “transparent and competitive Australian gas hub on the east coast.”

Links

(AU) Scott Morrison's Power Plan Is Nothing But A Gas-Fuelled Calamity

The Guardian

The Coalition has royally stuffed up energy policy when Australia should be moving to fuels of the future

Scott Morrison’s current position on energy is a creaking anachronism dressed up as a deep insight. Photograph: Dan Himbrechts/AAP

It really is remarkable, to have lived through the bushfire season at the start of this year, and emerge from that as a political leader stronger in your conviction that the answer is locking in more fossil fuels, for longer.

Mind-boggling, in truth.

But this is the point we’ve now arrived at. Scott Morrison’s gas-led recovery right now remains more like a plan for a plan than a concrete set of propositions. But that will change in the October budget, and the prime minister used a speech on Tuesday to make sure everybody understood that’s where he was heading.

Let’s be clear about why we have arrived here. We are here because Morrison’s corporate advisers, with backgrounds in the fossil fuel industry, are pushing for precisely this outcome.

The prime minister was refreshingly clear in his attribution on Tuesday. A key voice, he said, had been Andrew Liveris, a former Dow Chemical executive and current Saudi Aramco board member, who “sat down with me at Kirribilli” and said if “you want to change manufacturing in this country, you’ve got to deal with gas”.

Quelle surprise.

The second reason we’ve arrived at gas being great for humanity (apart from the need to project that the government has a plan for economic development post-Covid) is that when it comes to Australia’s toxic climate change politics, the Liberal party needs to creep very slowly away from coal without causing an internal conflagration.

In order to creep away from coal slowly (at a price of pumping yet more taxpayer money into carbon capture and storage – a technology that has somehow managed to be the next big thing at our expense for about 30 years) gas will be branded as the bridge to Australia’s low-emissions future.

Morrison will seek to be all things in all regions.

In the non-urban electorates where the Coalition is courting blue-collar votes to keep Labor out of government, the government will be fossil fuels to the eyeballs – the full-throated champions of workers in traditional industries. In the cities, in the safe seats, where the Liberals lost votes because of their wrecking on climate change, the Coalition will be the responsible government setting up the transition to renewables, with gas the firming agent.

Just before we move on, let’s deal with the argument that gas is the transition fuel of choice. That particular epiphany might have been relevant in a policy sense a decade or more ago. For those of us who have been cursed to cover this soul-eroding public policy car crash for as long as I have, it really begs the question why the Coalition repealed the carbon price back in 2013.

The carbon price (falsely badged a tax by Tony Abbott) was legislated to drive that precise transition, with gas the likely transition fuel. While we should all give the government a big hearty clap for finally catching up, Morrison’s current position is a creaking anachronism dressed up as a deep insight.

In any case, before I go off and scream impotently into a cupboard until I’m hoarse, let me run you through a few things, just so we are all clear about what is happening.

The policy Morrison is gesturing towards is not about setting up a rapid-fire transition to low-emissions energy and low-emissions manufacturing. Who could object to that transition? But Morrison’s plan isn’t that, it is about locking in gas for another 30 years.

Let’s be direct about what that means. It means that Australia’s climate and energy policies (both set by the same government) are directly at odds.

The climate policy says reduce emissions, and the energy policy says get more gas out of the ground. Gas causes pollution, and the process of extracting gas causes pollution. The government will counter that it produces less pollution than coal, so aren’t we enlightened? The honest answer to that question is no.

Tuesday’s speech from Morrison was pretty extraordinary in this respect. The prime minster signalled to anyone watching that the government would like more gas to be extracted, and more pipelines built to transport the gas, and more gas-fired power stations constructed.

Morrison declared if the market didn’t do what the government wanted it to do, the government would come in over the top and make sure that stuff got done. What the prime minister didn’t emphasise was that intervention would happen at taxpayer expense in one shape or form – that taxpayers would bear the risk of a set of propositions that have all the hallmarks of a boondoggle.

So to pull all these threads together, we now manage to find ourselves in this position: the Coalition repealed the carbon price, and hasn’t managed to settle a policy framework to replace it that anyone takes even remotely seriously, which has led to investment uncertainty for many years.

Given climate change isn’t waiting around patiently for the Australian government to get its act together, but manifesting uncomfortably in the lives of actual humans, that uncertainty has been accompanied by the rise of activist shareholders worried that fossil fuel companies are trading in what will become stranded assets when the world gets serious about decarbonisation. Regulatory players also now regularly warn corporates and governments about climate risk.

The Coalition has stuffed this all up royally, and the prime minister’s answer to all this is we know better: get about that gas-led recovery, or we’ll get about it for you.

This really is way-out-there stuff – but bear in mind that Morrison will also frame any opposition to his extraordinary position not as a rational response to the accumulated evidence, but as wild-eyed activism from people who have never taken a risk, never earned a dollar, never done anything other than taken to the streets with a tambourine. Bear in mind that is a schtick that has worked for the Coalition in several election contests, most recently 2019.

Also bear this in mind.

Australia has a choice. Australia could use the recovery from Covid-19 to lock in a genuine transition to the fuels of the future.

Australia could engage in a more sustainable form of energy nationalism, and job creation, because we have all the necessary attributes in this country in terms of people and resources to achieve that outcome.

Australia could choose not to wake up in a couple of decades wondering where our collective prosperity went because we continued to back the wrong horse in the face of all the evidence.

Our prime minister has a choice, and he’s making the wrong one.

Links

(NZ) New Zealand Makes Climate Reporting Compulsory

AFRJames Fernyhough

New Zealand has become the first country in the world to make climate risk reporting mandatory for banks, asset managers and insurers.

Under new legislation announced on Tuesday morning, large financial institutions would be required to report annually on governance, risk management and strategies for mitigating climate change impacts.

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Arden has made climate change policy one of her government's priorities. Getty Images

The country's Minister for Climate Change, James Shaw, said the mandatory disclosure requirements, which are based on the Task Force on Climate-Related Disclosure (TCFD) framework, would be the first of their kind in the world.

“Australia, Canada, UK, France, Japan, and the European Union are all working towards some form of climate risk reporting for companies, but New Zealand is moving ahead of them by making disclosures about climate risk mandatory across the financial system,” he said.

The requirement will apply to around 200 institutions, including banks and institutional investors with more than $NZ1 billion ($920 million) in assets, and insurers with either $1 billion in assets or annual premium income of more than $NZ250 million. The new regime requires parliamentary approval and would not come into force until 2023.

“What gets measured, gets managed – and if businesses know how climate change will impact them in the future they can change and adopt low carbon strategies. COVID-19 has highlighted how important it is that we plan for and manage systemic economic shocks – and there is no greater risk than climate change,” Mr Shaw said.

“I often tell the story of the chief executive who said to me during the passage of our Government’s Zero Carbon Bill that his young daughter had told him one evening that she no longer wanted to have children because of the climate crisis. 'What do I say to her?' he asked me.

“Today I am pleased I can say to him that businesses up and down the country will now play their part in making this world cleaner and safer – a world I am sure he is hoping will one day be home to his grandchildren.”

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has made climate change one of her government's policy priorities, last year passing the Zero Carbon Bill, which provides a legal framework to push the nation to its goal of net zero carbon dioxide emissions by 2050.

Green finance groups welcomed Tuesday's announcement.

“This requirement makes a pivotal contribution to New Zealand’s comprehensive engagement on climate change and helps New Zealand to deliver upon its commitment to the Paris agreement," said Simon O’Connor, chief executive of the Responsible Investment Association of Australasia.

"Once implemented, investors will be better able to price and value companies within the portfolios they manage, as well as realign portfolios to contribute to a lower carbon world.”

Emma Herd, chief executive of the Investor Group on Climate Change, said the Ardern government's announcement was "a crucial step".

“Ultimately all countries, including Australia, must move towards implementing a robust and investable mandatory climate risk disclosure regime to manage the systemic risk that climate change presents," she said.

While Australia is yet to mandate specific climate risk reporting, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority has told financial institutions it expects them to report on the risks under existing prudential rules. It has endorsed the use of the TCFD framework.

Australia's major banks and insurers have taken this seriously, joining forces with climate scientists to create the Climate Measurement Standards Initiative.

On Monday the CMSI published the nation's first comprehensive climate change reporting framework.

Links