07/11/2020

(AU) Victoria Plans 300mw Tesla Battery To Help Stabilise Grid As Renewables Increase

The Guardian

New battery near Geelong would be one of the biggest in the world, and is due to come on stream for next summer

The Tesla installation at Hornsdale in South Australia. Victoria’s proposeed new battery near Geelong will be twice the size, at 300 megawatts.

One of the largest lithium-ion batteries in the world is planned for Victoria after the renewable energy company Neoen won a contract to build it near the regional city of Geelong.

If constructed as promised, the battery will have a power capacity of 300 megawatts and a storage capacity of 450 megawatt-hours, making it more than twice the size of the battery at Hornsdale, South Australia, which was the biggest in the world when it began operating in 2017.

Like the Hornsdale facility, the Geelong battery will be built using Tesla equipment. The Victorian energy and climate change minister, Lily D’Ambrosio, said it would be installed near Moorabool Terminal Station and would be ready for the 2021-22 summer.

It is expected to store enough energy to run about 500,000 homes for half an hour.

It has been scaled back since it was first flagged in April when it was expected to be 600MW and cost $300m. While among the largest batteries in the world, it is smaller than batteries planned in California and New York.

D’Ambrosio said it would improve the reliability of the power grid as ageing coal-fired power stations became less reliable and the state increased its reliance on wind and solar power. The Andrews government aims to source 40% of the state’s electricity from renewable energy by 2025, and 50% by 2030.

“By securing one of the biggest batteries in the world Victoria is taking a decisive step away from coal-fired power and embracing new technologies that will unlock more renewable energy than ever before,” she said.

She said consumers would pay for the use of the battery through their power bills, but suggested it would lead to a reduction in wholesale energy prices so that Victorians were charged less for electricity.

Independent analysis found that Victorians would receive $2 in benefits for every $1 invested in the battery, she said. Energy consultancy Aurecon found the Hornsdale Power Reserve saved consumers $116m in 2019.

Neoen won the right to build the Victorian battery through a tender run by the Australian Energy Market Operator. Its contract, which runs until 2032, requires the battery to fill the breach if there is an unexpected network outage. It will also provide network services needed to support variable renewable energy, such as fast frequency control. The tender process was initiated by the Victorian government.

The Victorian Greens welcomed the announcement, saying it was part of what it had proposed under its “green new deal” plan. But the acting leader, Ellen Sandell, said the battery should have been publicly owned and the state needed to plan to move away from coal.

“Now the government needs to go one step further and actually admit we need to get off coal in Victoria,” Sandell said.

The conservation group Environment Victoria said it was a “game-changer for Victoria’s transition from old coal-burning power stations to clean energy”.

“This big battery gets us halfway to the storage target we need to prepare for the closure of Yallourn [coal] power station,” the group’s chief executive, Jonathan La Nauze, said.

The state opposition said it was “committed to supporting a considered clean energy transition” but argued the government had not made the case for the project to be at Geelong. The Coalition energy spokesman, Ryan Smith, said it had called in June for a battery to be based further west, at Mortlake near the state’s main renewable energy production zone.

“If it is located at Labor’s proposed site, too much energy from renewables projects will be lost in the transmission to the battery storage,” Smith said.

There are expected to be 80 jobs during construction of the battery, but just six full-time permanent positions once it is built.

The introduction of another large battery into the grid will further chip away at the extent to which it relies on gas-fired power for “dispatchable” generation that can be called on to support variable renewable energy.

Aemo has estimated the national grid is likely to need between six and 19 gigawatts of dispatchable power by 2040 as the system is increasingly dominated by solar and wind. It found renewable energy may at times provide nearly 90% of electricity by 2035, the amount of gas-fired power would fall as pumped hydro and batteries came online and there was no place for new coal-fired generation.

Despite this, the Morrison government says new gas-fired power is essential for the stability of the grid as ageing coal plants close.

The market operator’s chief executive, Audrey Zibelman, said Neoen’s proposal was “a significantly more cost competitive and attractive market response than other recent major battery developments in Australia”.

A portion of the battery’s capacity will be reserved to increase electricity supply over an interconnector cable between Victoria and New South Wales.

Links

(UK) (AU) Net-Zero Emissions Drive Puts Australian Industry On Notice

Sydney Morning Herald - Llewelyn Hughes

Author
Llewelyn Hughes is associate dean for research at the College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, and an associate professor at the ANU's Crawford School of Public Policy.
The pressure on Australia is indisputable. In a Tuesday night call, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson reportedly called on Scott Morrison to "act boldly" on climate change and stressed the need for ambitious targets to reach net-zero carbon emissions. 

But closer to home this week there was a strong indication the government will have to move quickly to take advantage of the energy transition being embraced elsewhere.

A pile of coal for export at Newcastle this month ... for how long will those markets last? Bloomberg





Major trading partner Japan has struggled to overcome the malaise in climate policy that set in after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster. Carbon emissions have slowly fallen since 2013, thanks in part to growth in renewable power generation. Almost a decade after the accident, most nuclear units remain shuttered, and restarts remain contentious. A new pipeline of coal plants has been under development.

But in his first speech to Parliament this week, Japan’s new Prime Minister, Yoshihide Suga, announced Japan would aim to achieve a net-zero carbon emissions target by 2050. It has huge implications for Australia as well as Japan.

The announcement underlines that major importers of Australia’s energy commodities are beginning to leave us behind. In 2019 Japan imported $9.6 billion (13 per cent) of Australia’s thermal coal. Suga’s declaration signals thermal coal exports to Japan have already peaked.

A critical question is what role natural gas will play in Japan’s future in the electricity sector and in heating. In 2019 Japan imported 22 per cent of Australia’s natural gas. But to get to net-zero emissions, gas will have to play a substantially lower role in its electricity sector, and a reduced role in heating.

It is crucial that Australia begins to recognise the implications of this announcement.

While mid-century seems a long way off, Japan's move will have immediate bite. A 2050 net-zero target already sends a strong policy signal that investing in new coal generation, for example, will not pay. And it shows Japan’s business community has shifted in favour of energy transition after years of prevarication. This means there is little chance that Japan will reverse course.

Japan’s cabinet is also required to review its mid-term energy policy settings every three years, and the next review must occur by the middle of next year. Work began within government last month on designing the new policy settings, and the 2030 power generation targets to be released next year are going to need to reflect this aggressive new goal.

Japanese industry already has plans to develop 10 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030 and Japan’s former power utilities, trading companies and others are investing heavily in the area.

In his speech, Prime Minister Suga highlighted the importance of technological innovation. Japan – supported by government investment in research and development – has long been a technology provider to the world, through hybrid and electric vehicles, lithium ion batteries, energy-efficient products and advanced boilers and turbines.

In particular, Suga noted next-generation solar cells and carbon capture and use. But Japan is also investing heavily in hydrogen and associated vectors such as ammonia. Expect billions of yen of public and private research and development funding to supercharge Japan’s efforts across these areas.

Suga also specifically referred to fundamentally transforming coal policy. In some areas of Japan, coal plants are already operating less because of increased renewables integration. We can now expect cancellations of coal plants in the planning stage.

Earlier this month JERA, one of Japan’s largest owner of thermal coal plants, announced it would replace retiring older-generation coal plants with a mix of renewables and battery storage. It is also experimenting with the co-burning of green ammonia in its coal. Together this means new energy capacity will not be a new coal pipeline.

Australia is well placed to benefit from Japan’s energy transition. We are already positioning as a key exporter of low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia to Japan.

Japan’s green innovation drive means there are also opportunities for joint collaboration in research and development. We have a lot to share with Japan about integrating renewable electricity into competitive electricity systems. And, with the right policy settings, Australians will benefit from lower-cost and better-performing products – such as electric vehicles – that Japan will export.

It is no surprise Suga’s announcement was made with such fanfare so soon after China’s declaration that it would seek to achieve net-zero emissions by 2060. While Japan faces enormous challenges to reach its 2050 target, its new leader has made clear that his nation is serious about energy transition. Federal and state governments in Australia should work to identify how we can ride the wave.

(USA) (AU) Biden Says The US Will Rejoin The Paris Climate Agreement In 77 Days. Then Australia Will Really Feel The Heat

The Conversation

AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

Author
Dr Christian Downie is an Australian Research Council DECRA Fellow (2018-2021) in the School of Regulation and Global Governance at The Australian National University. He was previously a Vice Chancellor’s Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of New South Wales.
When the US formally left the Paris climate agreement, Joe Biden tweeted that “in exactly 77 days, a Biden Administration will rejoin it”.

The US announced its intention to withdraw from the agreement back in 2017. But the agreement’s complex rules meant formal notification could only be sent to the United Nations last year, followed by a 12-month notice period — hence the long wait.

While diplomacy via Twitter looks here to stay, global climate politics is about to be upended — and the impacts will be felt at home in Australia if Biden delivers on his plans.

Biden’s position on climate change

Under a Biden administration, the US will have the most progressive position on climate change in the nation’s history. Biden has already laid out a US$2 trillion clean energy and infrastructure plan, a commitment to rejoin the Paris agreement and a goal of net-zero emissions by 2050.

As Biden said back in July when he announced the plan:

If I have the honour of being elected president, we’re not just going to tinker around the edges. We’re going to make historic investments that will seize the opportunity, meet this moment in history.

And his plan is historic. It aims to achieve a power sector that’s free from carbon pollution by 2035 — in a country with the largest reserves of coal on the planet.

Biden also aims to revitalise the US auto industry and become a leader in electric vehicles, and to upgrade four million buildings and two million homes over four years to meet new energy efficiency standards.

Can he do it under a divided Congress?

While the votes are still being counted — as they should (can any Australian believe we actually need to say this?) — it seems likely the Democrats will control the presidency and the House, but not the Senate.

This means Biden will be able to re-join the Paris agreement, which does not require Senate ratification. But any attempt to legislate a carbon price will be blocked in the Senate, as it was when then-President Barack Obama introduced the Waxman-Markey bill in 2010.

In any case, there’s no reason to think a carbon price is a silver bullet, given the window to act on climate change is closing fast.

What’s needed are ambitious targets and mandates for the power sector, transport sector and manufacturing sector, backed up with billions in government investment.

Fortunately, this is precisely what Biden is promising to do. And he can do it without the Senate by using the executive powers of the US government to implement a raft of new regulatory measures.

Take the transport sector as an example. His plan aims to set “ambitious fuel economy standards” for cars, set a goal that all American-built buses be zero emissions by 2030, and use public money to build half a million electric vehicle charging stations. Most of these actions can be put in place through regulations that don’t require congressional approval.

Donald Trump announced the US would withdraw from the Paris Agreement in 2017. AP Photo/Evan Vucci

And with Trump out of the White House, California will be free to achieve its target that all new cars be zero emissions by 2035, which the Trump administration had impeded.

If that sounds far-fetched, given Australia is the only OECD country that still doesn’t have fuel efficiency standards for cars, keep in mind China promised to do the same thing as California last week.

What does this mean for Australia?

For the last four years, the Trump administration has been a boon for successive Australian governments as they have torn up climate policies and failed to implement new ones.

Rather than witnessing our principal ally rebuke us on home soil, as Obama did at the University of Queensland in 2014, Prime Minister Scott Morrison has instead benefited from a cosy relationship with a US president who regularly dismisses decades of climate science, as he does medical science. And people are dying as a result.


Obama on climate change at the University of Queensland.

For Australia, the ambitious climate policies of a Biden administration means in every international negotiation our diplomats turn up to, climate change will not only be top of the agenda, but we will likely face constant criticism.

Indeed, fireside chats in the White House will come with new expectations that Australia significantly increases its ambitions under the Paris agreement. Committing to a net zero emissions target will be just the first.

The real kicker, however, will be Biden’s trade agenda, which supports carbon tariffs on imports that produce considerable carbon pollution. The US is still Australia’s third-largest trading partner after China and Japan — who, by the way, have just announced net zero emissions targets themselves.

A Biden presidency would pressure the Morrison government to adopt more ambitious climate policies. AAP Image/Mick Tsikas

Should the US start hitting Australian goods with a carbon fee at the border, you can bet Australian business won’t be happy, and Morrison may begin to re-think his domestic climate calculus.

And what political science tells us is if international pressure doesn’t shift a country’s position on climate change, domestic pressure certainly will.

With Biden now in the White House, it’s not just global climate politics that will be turned on its head. Australia’s failure to implement a serious domestic climate and energy policy could have profound costs.

Costs, mind you, that are easily avoidable if Australia acts on climate change, and does so now.

Links