06/01/2021

(AU) What Is Cultural Burning?

Sydney Morning Herald - Miki Perkins

Note
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people should be aware that this article contains the images and names of people who have passed away.
Catastrophic bushfires have led to a heightened interest in Indigenous burning practices. How do Aboriginal experts use fire to care for their land?

A cool, gentle, creeping fire came to the bushland that surrounds the Tang Tang and Thunder swamps in central Victoria, north of Bendigo, in 2019.

 It burnt gently through grasslands and connected up with other fires lit on the forest floor to create a mosaic effect.

This fire was lit by Dja Dja Wurrung people, including employees of Forest Fire Management Victoria, and their non-Aboriginal colleagues. It was the first cultural burn in the area in 170 years.

It was a momentous day, says Trent Nelson, the chairperson of the Dja Dja Wurrung Clans Aboriginal Corporation. In the years since cultural burning had been used, the landscape had become degraded and "sick".

The region, which includes the towns of Daylesford, Bendigo and Boort, used to be cloaked in box-ironbark forests and woodlands but is now one of the most profoundly altered landscapes in Victoria, where agriculture, urban settlement and mining have left ecosystems fragmented.

Nelson learnt cultural burning – known as djandak wii or "country fire" – from his father, who learnt from his father before him and other elders. "We don’t make it really, really hot, we burn cool. It’s a lot slower than planned burns."

In the wake of last summer's catastrophic bushfires, there is heightened national interest in the role of Aboriginal cultural burning, sometimes called traditional burning. What is it, and how does it work? And can it reduce the threat of out-of-control fires in an era of climate change?

A burn on Gunbower Island in May 2018. Source: DELWP, Victoria

What is cultural burning?

For at least 65,000 years, Aborigines have used cultural land-management practices – including fire – to care for country (the term used by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to describe family origins, ownership and associations with particular areas of Australia).

Cultural burns are done by Indigenous custodians, or people given their permission and guidance. The use of fire is specific to each location, its animals and flora and their totemic and cultural value.

There are many interconnected objectives, which include protecting cultural or natural assets by maintaining the health of surrounding country, ceremony, habitat protection and fuel reduction. But fuel reduction – targeted burning to reduce the amount or density of foliage – is often not the primary objective.

Dja Dja Wurrung men Mick Bourke and Trent Nelson apply ochre paint before a planned burn using traditional methods in Boort, Victoria. Credit: Brendan McCarthy/DELWP

Indigenous land management was critical to preventing catastrophic bushfires, the Royal Commission into National Natural Disaster Arrangements was told in 2020, but Aboriginal voices had been ignored.

"Cultural land management is not an add-on or an enhancement, it’s not a practice that can simply be grafted onto the regime of non-Indigenous land managers," Euahlayi man and Australian National University researcher Bhiamie Eckford-Williamson told the commission.

He also said that short-term funding was a barrier to Aboriginal land management.

"It is not possible for groups to develop, to recruit, train and retain staff to maintain that corporate memory, to build relationships with non-Indigenous land-management agencies over time, if their funding is not secure," he explained.

Most Australian wildfires occur in the northern tropical savanna, and most cultural burning also occurs in northern Australia – about 70 per cent of projects occur in the Northern Territory, Queensland or Western Australia, according to the CSIRO.

In Western Australia, for example, the Great Western Woodlands, 16 million hectares of temperate woodland, heathland and mallee, are cared for in part by the Ngadju Nation and the Ngadju Rangers Group.

The Ngadju undertake cultural burns at a certain time — when the grass is green, or a few days after
rain, or when rain is coming. In the warmer seasons, the fire must be started in the morning before the sea breezes rise.
Everywhere we have open woodland, the ground being partially covered with a most thin pasture.
Charles Darwin, 1836
In early colonial artwork, letters and journals, there is considerable historical evidence of Aboriginal use of fire. In 1836, naturalist Charles Darwin visited Sydney and commented on the sparsity of the trees and the prevalence of grasslands, much of which is now thick scrub.

"The extreme uniformity in the character of the Vegetation, is the most remarkable feature in the landscape of the greater part of New S. Wales. Everywhere we have open woodland, the ground being partially covered with a most thin pasture," he wrote.

The use of “prescribed” or “hazard-reduction burning” is the process of applying fire to a predetermined area to achieve a desired outcome – usually the mitigation of the presence or severity of bushfires.

While there are some crossovers between the two practices, cultural burning may also be used to clear important pathways or manage vegetation around significant sites.

But where fire is a concern, it may be possible to use cultural burning where prescribed burning is unsafe – because of the warming climate, it is becoming more challenging for land-management agencies to find periods of time when prescribed burns can be safely lit.

How does cultural burning work?

Most cultural burns use "cool" fires – smaller, low-intensity fires – which reduce the risk of extreme, high flames that can burn whole trees and forest canopies. Protecting the canopy is considered paramount in cultural burning because it holds many precious resources – insects, birds' nests, bats and shade.

And canopy removal fundamentally alters the surrounding ecosystem – sunlight breaks through and dries out the soil. Unlike hazard-reduction burns, where lines of fire can create walls of flame, cultural burning tends to use spot ignitions, creating a mosaic of fires. This leaves space for wildlife to escape.


Oliver Costello, a Bundjalung man from the Northern Rivers region of NSW and chief executive of the Firesticks Alliance, says cultural fire may not be about fuel reduction. He gives the example of a burn near Guyra in NSW where Banbai rangers used cultural burning around an art site that contained a painting of an echidna, a Banbai totem.

The fire encouraged the growth of native grasses and reduced the density of vegetation so that echidnas could move around the area more easily and find food. Rangers saw more evidence of echidnas after burning and more growth of a local endangered species, the black grevillea.

"The country has a culture and we’re a part of that culture. When you apply the right fire to that culture, you’re maintaining your identity with country, maintaining the land," Costello says.

A small area of fire in a cultural burn on Gunbower Island, May 2018. Source: DELWP, Victoria

How do you learn cultural burning?

Despite European colonisation and land theft, Aboriginal cultural lore and knowledge of burning practices remain across Australia. A revival is being led through initiatives such as the Firesticks Alliance, an Indigenous-led network that does training, on-ground cultural burning and scientific monitoring of its ecological effects.

Fire knowledge has been handed down through generations of Aboriginal families. Costello learnt from his stepfather, a senior Dalabon man from Arnhem Land, who knew how to use fire the traditional way. 

When his stepfather died, Costello realised how much knowledge had gone with him. It motivated Costello to go to university and focus on Indigenous knowledge systems and sustainability in an era of climate change.

“In NSW land management, no one was using cultural burning methodology and protocols, and no one was supporting people to burn their country,” he says.

Over the past decade, the Firesticks Alliance has organised fire workshops in Cape York with Dr Tommy George, a Kuku Thaypan elder. George and his brother, Dr George Musgrave, (now both deceased) were granted honorary doctorates for their knowledge of fire management and ecology.

Workshops such as those held on the south coast of NSW and on Yorta Yorta country at Barmah on the Murray River draw participants from around the country.

Firesticks Alliance practitioners burn on private and public land, including in NSW national parks. Since the 2019-20 summer bushfires, the alliance has fielded a huge increase in inquiries from private landholders and public land-management agencies.

One landowner in NSW credits cultural burning with saving structures on his remote bush property during the Gospers Mountain fire.

The owners of this house in Ngurrumpaa on the NSW Central Coast believe a cultural burn saved their property. Credit: Rhett Wyman

Does cultural burning work?

There is a small but growing body of Western academic research on cultural burning and it chimes with what Aboriginal experts have always known.

For example, scientists analysing data on fire-scarred land in northern Australia on behalf of the Nature Conservancy, an environmental organisation, found that early dry-season cultural burning reduced the extent of destructive late-season fires by about 30 per cent compared with the four years before the burning program began.
There has been healthy plant and grass regeneration, including kangaroo grass, a traditional dietary staple, and yam daisy.
In Victoria, traditional owners have also noticed a change. There have been more than a dozen cultural burns on Dja Dja Wurrung country, and Trent Nelson says there has been healthy plant and grass regeneration, including kangaroo grass, a traditional dietary staple, and yam daisy, which is used for fibre.

Cultural burning is being brought into Victoria’s existing burning program, with more planned in addition to “fuel management” burning done by Forest Fire Management Victoria. They will be conducted in areas nominated by traditional owners, who will lead the burns.

The CSIRO has published a number of papers that find cultural burning delivers a range of social and economic benefits for Aboriginal people, including the protection of heritage, the retention of language and identity and career development opportunities.

Mick Bourke lights a fire using traditional methods in Boort, Victoria in September 2019. Credit: Brendan McCarthy/DELWP

Can it help against climate-fuelled bushfires?

Aboriginal people were devastated to see the damage wrought by last summer's catastrophic bushfires, says Oliver Costello.

“We have this knowledge about land management ... and we’re really sad because people haven’t been listening to us,” he says. “We have been saying this is going to happen: this country is really thick and it will burn.”

Prime Minister Scott Morrison has argued hazard-reduction burns are at least as important as cutting carbon emissions in Australia’s fight against bushfires, although the Climate Council and federal opposition say this is a distraction from the government’s lack of action on climate change.
We are drawing on the oldest, living knowledge system around fire and it works for us.
Oliver Costello
But analysis from forest scientists at the University of Melbourne found hazard-reduction burns had little to no effect in slowing the severe fires that devastated more than 5 million hectares across NSW. It would be best used around assets to protect them from less intense fires, the research found.

Former Victorian emergency management commissioner Craig Lapsley describes cultural burning as a “holistic land-management strategy” and says last summer's bushfires showed that land-management agencies need to test new approaches.

“I don’t think we valued Indigenous people, and what they believed as a long-term well-tested strategy, I don’t think we have taken that seriously at all,” says Lapsley.

Costello wants land-management agencies to support the Firesticks Alliance to develop a national mentoring program so there can be 100 skilled cultural fire practitioners nationwide.

"We are drawing on the oldest, living knowledge system around fire and it works for us,” he says. “But you also need to share some of the resources and power you have.”

Lighting small fires as part of a burn on Gunbower Island in 2018. Source: DELWP, Victoria.

Links

(AU) Snub': Australia Leaves 2030 Climate Goals Unchanged In UN Submission

Sydney Morning HeraldPeter Hannam

Australia has resubmitted its Paris climate goal and modified its target as "a floor" that can be met without using credits from the previous accord, but has omitted any indication it will join other nations in raising its ambition.

In its first update in five years to the so-called nationally determined contribution (NDC), the federal government defended its unchanged plan to cut 2005-level emissions by 26-28 per cent by 2030 as an "ambitious, fair and responsible" effort to keep global average temperature rises to below two degrees.

Australia has formally updated its Paris commitments, leaving the option open to more ambitious emissions cuts in the future. Credit: AP

"The target is a floor on Australia’s ambition," the statement, released to the United Nations without any media release, said. "We are aiming to over-achieve on this target and newly released emissions projections show Australia is on track to meet and beat our 2030 target without relying on past over-achievement."

Australia was one of dozens of countries to submit updated NDCs late in 2020. Most of the country's biggest trading partners have set targets for reaching net-zero, and some of them - including the United Kingdom, the European Union and South Korea - have also lately lifted their previous 2030 goals.

Climate groups welcomed the government's recognition that Australia likely won't need to resort to tapping any "carbon credits" generated from the 2012-2020 Kyoto Protocol to meet its Paris target, but said its failure to lift its ambition was disappointing.

Climate policy
National emissions likely began to rebound in September quarter
"Australia's re-submission without improvement is a snub and de facto a denial of the urgent need for more action on climate," Bill Hare, director of Climate Analytics, said, noting that all nations were requested to have increased their Paris commitment by the end of 2020 because pledges made in 2015 fell well short of what was needed to prevent dangerous climate change.

Professor Hare said Australia's updated submission also doesn't definitively rule out the use of Kyoto credits in future.

"The Morrison government is having two bob each way and is leaving the door open, he said. "To be real on this Australia should join other countries in ensuring the [still unfinished] Paris rule book does not permit carryover."

Angus Taylor, the Energy and Emissions Reduction Minister, said Australia's emissions trajectory had improved significantly in the past two years alone, with projected pollution out to 2030 coming in some 639 million tonnes of carbon dioxide-equivalent.

Energy
Renewable energy to beat Labor's 50 per cent 'wrecking ball' target
"This improvement is largely due to the Morrison government committing $5.3 billion to new emissions reduction measures through the last two budgets," he said.

"We are confident that we will meet and beat our 2030 target without relying on over-achievement from our Kyoto-era targets," he said. "But make no mistake, those credits were hard-earned by Australians."

Greens leader, Adam Bandt, though, said in not lifting Australia's 2030 target, Prime Minister Scott Morrison was "giving up the fight against global warming", since existing goals were far from what was needed.

The PM "brags about meeting his 2030 targets, but that’s like boasting he will drive the country over a cliff at 200km/hour instead of 250km/hour," Mr Bandt said.

Frank Jotzo, director of the Centre for Climate and Energy Policy at the Australian National University, said the absence of a higher NDC target was "pretty much as expected" but still left Australia exposed as a laggard as other nations develop plans to decarbonise their economies by 2050.

"It's now clear the existing 2030 target is easy to meet, and it's likely a significantly stronger goal could be met," Professor Jotzo said. "If the federal government isn't willing to engage fully on this, it may be in the interest of states to push ahead with a proper, long-term lower emissions strategy [of their own]."

Tom Arup, a spokesman for the Investor Group on Climate Change, said major economies, including the UK, EU, the United States and Japan were moving towards explicit new and more ambitious 2030 targets and Australia "remains at risk of being internationally isolated on climate change". 

Links

Majority Of Countries Miss Paris Agreement Deadline To Increase Climate Ambition

Climate Home News

The EU, the UK and Argentina were the only large emitters to present tougher climate targets by the UN’s 2020 deadline, with China and the US lagging 

Steep climb: after coronavirus crisis dominated 2020, most countries have catching up to do to deliver on the Paris Agreement goals (Photo: IMF / Raphael Alves/Flickr)

Most countries have missed a UN deadline to strengthen their 2030 climate targets – the first test of the “ratchet mechanism” of the Paris Agreement.

The European Union’s 27 member states and the UK were among 70 countries to submit updated national contributions by 31 December 2020 – in line with a five-year cycle to close the gap between action and the pact’s overall goal to limit global heating “well below 2C” and strive for 1.5C.

Latin American countries including Argentina, Colombia, Chile, Costa Rica and Peru met the end-of-year deadline and enhanced their ambition alongside nearly a dozen each of small island states and least developed countries.

Together, they account for 28% of global greenhouse gas emissions, according to the World Resources Institute’s tracker.

But none of the world’s other top polluters submitted tougher carbon-cutting plans to the UN, in a year defined by the coronavirus pandemic.

China was notably absent from a last-minute flurry of submissions, despite president Xi Jinping announcing incrementally stronger 2030 targets earlier in December and stressing his commitment to the Paris process.

Niklas Höhne, founder of the NewClimate Institute, described the start of the new year as a “mixed picture” which looked “much better” than what was expected six month ago but left “a lot to be done in 2021”.

While many countries have failed to enhance their climate plan this year, a growing number of countries are subscribing to a mid-century net zero emissions goal, Höhne said – “a positive sign” that needs to translate into short-term action. “I am optimistic that we can get more ambition going in 2021,” he added.

China’s pledge in September to aim for carbon neutrality by 2060 was “the biggest announcement of the last 10 years of climate policy,” he told Climate Home.

But new 2030 measures to reduce the carbon intensity of its GDP by 65% from 2005 levels and increase the share of non-fossil fuel energy to 25% announced at a climate ambition summit last month fell short of aligning short-term action with Beijing’s long-term goal.

“China has an opportunity to do more than what it has laid out,” said David Waskow, international climate director at the World Resources Institute, adding that the country’s next five-year-plan expected in March could provide part of the basis for a more ambitious NDC.

India, Canada, Indonesia, Iran and Saudi Arabia were among major emitters that didn’t submit an updated climate plan by the 2020 deadline.

Until president-elect Joe Biden brings the US back into the Paris accord, which he promised to do on his first day in office on 21 January, the US is not expected to present a climate plan.

Russia, Mexico, and Australia merely restated existing carbon-cutting commitments, with Canberra promising to publish a long-term decarbonisation strategy ahead of the Cop26 climate talks in Glasgow in November.

In its submission, Australia said it was on track to “meet and beat” its current 2030 goal “without relying on past overachievement” – suggesting it won’t use old Kyoto-era credits to meet its Paris commitment.

Brazil submitted a new plan at the start of December, which effectively weakened its 2030 emissions targets. It removed all reference to stopping illegal deforestation and restoring forests but included a goal to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060.

Japan and New Zealand reaffirmed their previous targets, while promising to present enhanced plans before the Glasgow summit. South Korea translated its 2030 goal into absolute emissions cuts and pledged to enhance its ambition “at the earliest possible time before 2025”.

The climate ambition summit co-hosted by the UN, the UK and France on the fifth anniversary of the Paris Agreement provided a spur for both the UK and the EU to agree deeper emissions cuts of respectively at least 68% and 55% between 1990 and 2030.

This “should enable others to follow,” said Höhne, calling on richer nations like the US, Japan, Australia and New Zealand to step up their ambition in the months ahead.

“The critical question is what can countries do to strengthen action by Cop26. It’s nearly a year to go to Cop26 and there should be high expectations that these countries come back with something better by then,” Waskow, told Climate Home. So far, they had “little to show,” he added.

Links