22/02/2021

(USA) Texas Crisis Exposes A Nation’s Vulnerability To Climate Change

New York TimesChristopher Flavelle | Brad Plumer |

Continent-spanning storms triggered blackouts in Oklahoma and Mississippi, halted one-third of U.S. oil production and disrupted vaccinations in 20 states.

Traffic at a standstill on Interstate 35 in Kileen, Texas, on Thursday. Credit...Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Even as Texas struggled to restore electricity and water over the past week, signs of the risks posed by increasingly extreme weather to America’s aging infrastructure were cropping up across the country.

The week’s continent-spanning winter storms triggered blackouts in Texas, Oklahoma, Mississippi and several other states. One-third of oil production in the nation was halted. Drinking-water systems in Ohio were knocked offline. Road networks nationwide were paralyzed and vaccination efforts in 20 states were disrupted.

The crisis carries a profound warning. As climate change brings more frequent and intense storms, floods, heat waves, wildfires and other extreme events, it is placing growing stress on the foundations of the country’s economy: Its network of roads and railways, drinking-water systems, power plants, electrical grids, industrial waste sites and even homes. Failures in just one sector can set off a domino effect of breakdowns in hard-to-predict ways.

Much of this infrastructure was built decades ago, under the expectation that the environment around it would remain stable, or at least fluctuate within predictable bounds. Now climate change is upending that assumption.

“We are colliding with a future of extremes,” said Alice Hill, who oversaw planning for climate risks on the National Security Council during the Obama administration. “We base all our choices about risk management on what’s occurred in the past, and that is no longer a safe guide.”

While it’s not always possible to say precisely how global warming influenced any one particular storm, scientists said, an overall rise in extreme weather creates sweeping new risks.

Sewer systems are overflowing more often as powerful rainstorms exceed their design capacity. Coastal homes and highways are collapsing as intensified runoff erodes cliffs. Coal ash, the toxic residue produced by coal-burning plants, is spilling into rivers as floods overwhelm barriers meant to hold it back. Homes once beyond the reach of wildfires are burning in blazes they were never designed to withstand.

Credit...Matt Williamson/The Enterprise-Journal, via Associated Press

Problems like these often reflect an inclination of governments to spend as little money as possible, said Shalini Vajjhala, a former Obama administration official who now advises cities on meeting climate threats. She said it’s hard to persuade taxpayers to spend extra money to guard against disasters that seem unlikely.

But climate change flips that logic, making inaction far costlier. “The argument I would make is, we can’t afford not to, because we’re absorbing the costs” later, Ms. Vajjhala said, after disasters strike. “We’re spending poorly.”

The Biden administration has talked extensively about climate change, particularly the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and create jobs in renewable energy. But it has spent less time discussing how to manage the growing effects of climate change, facing criticism from experts for not appointing more people who focus on climate resilience.

“I am extremely concerned by the lack of emergency-management expertise reflected in Biden’s climate team,” said Samantha Montano, an assistant professor at the Massachusetts Maritime Academy who focuses on disaster policy. “There’s an urgency here that still is not being reflected.”

A White House spokesman, Vedant Patel, said in a statement, “Building resilient and sustainable infrastructure that can withstand extreme weather and a changing climate will play an integral role in creating millions of good paying, union jobs” while cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

And while President Biden has called for a major push to refurbish and upgrade the nation’s infrastructure, getting a closely divided Congress to spend hundreds of billions, if not trillions of dollars, will be a major challenge.

Heightening the cost to society, disruptions can disproportionately affect lower-income households and other vulnerable groups, including older people or those with limited English.

“All these issues are converging,” said Robert D. Bullard, a professor at Texas Southern University who studies wealth and racial disparities related to the environment. “And there’s simply no place in this country that’s not going to have to deal with climate change.”

Many forms of water crisis

Credit...Matthew Hatcher/Getty Images

In September, when a sudden storm dumped a record of more than two inches of water on Washington in less than 75 minutes, the result wasn’t just widespread flooding, but also raw sewage rushing into hundreds of homes.

Washington, like many other cities in the Northeast and Midwest, relies on what’s called a combined sewer overflow system: If a downpour overwhelms storm drains along the street, they are built to overflow into the pipes that carry raw sewage. But if there’s too much pressure, sewage can be pushed backward, into people’s homes — where the forces can send it erupting from toilets and shower drains.

This is what happened in Washington. The city’s system was built in the late 1800s. Now, climate change is straining an already outdated design.

DC Water, the local utility, is spending billions of dollars so that the system can hold more sewage. “We’re sort of in uncharted territory,” said Vincent Morris, a utility spokesman.

The challenge of managing and taming the nation’s water supplies — whether in streets and homes, or in vast rivers and watersheds — is growing increasingly complex as storms intensify. Last May, rain-swollen flooding breached two dams in Central Michigan, forcing thousands of residents to flee their homes and threatening a chemical complex and toxic waste cleanup site. Experts warned it was unlikely to be the last such failure.

Many of the country’s 90,000 dams were built decades ago and were already in dire need of repairs. Now climate change poses an additional threat, bringing heavier downpours to parts of the country and raising the odds that some dams could be overwhelmed by more water than they were designed to handle. One recent study found that most of California’s biggest dams were at increased risk of failure as global warming advances.

In recent years, dam-safety officials have begun grappling with the dangers. Colorado, for instance, now requires dam builders to take into account the risk of increased atmospheric moisture driven by climate change as they plan for worst-case flooding scenarios.

But nationwide, there remains a backlog of thousands of older dams that still need to be rehabilitated or upgraded. The price tag could ultimately stretch to more than $70 billion.

“Whenever we study dam failures, we often find there was a lot of complacency beforehand,” said Bill McCormick, president of the Association of State Dam Safety Officials. But given that failures can have catastrophic consequences, “we really can’t afford to be complacent.”

Built for a different future

Credit...Tamir Kalifa for The New York Times

If the Texas blackouts exposed one state’s poor planning, they also provide a warning for the nation: Climate change threatens virtually every aspect of electricity grids that aren’t always designed to handle increasingly severe weather. The vulnerabilities show up in power lines, natural-gas plants, nuclear reactors and myriad other systems.

Higher storm surges can knock out coastal power infrastructure. Deeper droughts can reduce water supplies for hydroelectric dams. Severe heat waves can reduce the efficiency of fossil-fuel generators, transmission lines and even solar panels at precisely the moment that demand soars because everyone cranks up their air-conditioners.

Climate hazards can also combine in new and unforeseen ways.

In California recently, Pacific Gas & Electric has had to shut off electricity to thousands of people during exceptionally dangerous fire seasons. The reason: Downed power lines can spark huge wildfires in dry vegetation. Then, during a record-hot August last year, several of the state’s natural gas plants malfunctioned in the heat, just as demand was spiking, contributing to blackouts.

“We have to get better at understanding these compound impacts,” said Michael Craig, an expert in energy systems at the University of Michigan who recently led a study looking at how rising summer temperatures in Texas could strain the grid in unexpected ways. “It’s an incredibly complex problem to plan for.”

Some utilities are taking notice. After Superstorm Sandy in 2012 knocked out power for 8.7 million customers, utilities in New York and New Jersey invested billions in flood walls, submersible equipment and other technology to reduce the risk of failures. Last month, New York’s Con Edison said it would incorporate climate projections into its planning.

As freezing temperatures struck Texas, a glitch at one of two reactors at a South Texas nuclear plant, which serves 2 million homes, triggered a shutdown. The cause: Sensing lines connected to the plant’s water pumps had frozen, said Victor Dricks, a spokesman for the federal Nuclear Regulatory Agency.

It’s also common for extreme heat to disrupt nuclear power. The issue is that the water used to cool reactors can become too warm to use, forcing shutdowns.

Flooding is another risk.

After a tsunami led to several meltdowns at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi power plant in 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission told the 60 or so working nuclear plants in the United States, many decades old, to evaluate their flood risk to account for climate change. Ninety percent showed at least one type of flood risk that exceeded what the plant was designed to handle.

The greatest risk came from heavy rain and snowfall exceeding the design parameters at 53 plants.

Scott Burnell, an Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokesman, said in a statement, “The NRC continues to conclude, based on the staff’s review of detailed analyses, that all U.S. nuclear power plants can appropriately deal with potential flooding events, including the effects of climate change, and remain safe.”

A nation’s arteries at risk

Credit...Josh Edelson/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

The collapse of a portion of California’s Highway 1 into the Pacific Ocean after heavy rains last month was a reminder of the fragility of the nation’s roads.

Several climate-related risks appeared to have converged to heighten the danger. Rising seas and higher storm surges have intensified coastal erosion, while more extreme bouts of precipitation have increased the landslide risk.

Add to that the effects of devastating wildfires, which can damage the vegetation holding hillside soil in place, and “things that wouldn’t have slid without the wildfires, start sliding,” said Jennifer M. Jacobs, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of New Hampshire. “I think we’re going to see more of that.”

The United States depends on highways, railroads and bridges as economic arteries for commerce, travel and simply getting to work. But many of the country’s most important links face mounting climate threats. More than 60,000 miles of roads and bridges in coastal floodplains are already vulnerable to extreme storms and hurricanes, government estimates show. And inland flooding could also threaten at least 2,500 bridges across the country by 2050, a federal climate report warned in 2018.

Sometimes even small changes can trigger catastrophic failures. Engineers modeling the collapse of bridges over Escambia Bay in Florida during Hurricane Ivan in 2004 found that the extra three inches of sea-level rise since the bridge was built in 1968 very likely contributed to the collapse, because of the added height of the storm surge and force of the waves.

“A lot of our infrastructure systems have a tipping point. And when you hit the tipping point, that’s when a failure occurs,” Dr. Jacobs said. “And the tipping point could be an inch.”

Crucial rail networks are at risk, too. In 2017, Amtrak consultants found that along parts of the Northeast corridor, which runs from Boston to Washington and carries 12 million people a year, flooding and storm surge could erode the track bed, disable the signals and eventually put the tracks underwater.

And there is no easy fix. Elevating the tracks would require also raising bridges, electrical wires and lots of other infrastructure, and moving them would mean buying new land in a densely packed part of the country. So the report recommended flood barriers, costing $24 million per mile, that must be moved into place whenever floods threaten.

Toxic sites, deepening peril

A worker checked efforts to prevent coal ash from escaping into the Waccamaw River in South Carolina after Hurricane Florence in 2018. Credit...Randall Hill/Reuters

A series of explosions at a flood-damaged chemical plant outside Houston after Hurricane Harvey in 2017 highlighted a danger lurking in a world beset by increasingly extreme weather.

The blasts at the plant came after flooding knocked out the site’s electrical supply, shutting down refrigeration systems that kept volatile chemicals stable. Almost two dozen people, many of them emergency workers, were treated for exposure to the toxic fumes, and some 200 nearby residents were evacuated from their homes.

More than 2,500 facilities that handle toxic chemicals lie in federal flood-prone areas across the country, about 1,400 of them in areas at the highest risk of flooding, a New York Times analysis showed in 2018.

Leaks from toxic cleanup sites, left behind by past industry, pose another threat.

Almost two-thirds of some 1,500 superfund cleanup sites across the country are in areas with an elevated risk of flooding, storm surge, wildfires or sea level rise, a government audit warned in 2019. Coal ash, a toxic substance produced by coal power plants that is often stored as sludge in special ponds, have been particularly exposed. After Hurricane Florence in 2018, for example, a dam breach at the site of a power plant in Wilmington, N.C., released the hazardous ash into a nearby river.

“We should be evaluating whether these facilities or sites actually have to be moved or re-secured,” said Lisa Evans, senior counsel at Earthjustice, an environmental law organization. Places that “may have been OK in 1990,” she said, “may be a disaster waiting to happen in 2021.”

Credit...Bronte Wittpenn/Austin American-Statesman, via Associated Press

Links

(AU) Senior Australians Want To Buy ‘Green Bonds’ To Help Address Climate

The AgeShane Wright

Older Australians want the Morrison government to create special green infrastructure bonds so they can direct their growing concern about climate change into a financial investment.

As a widespread poll of National Seniors’ members shows more than 82 per cent believe climate change is real, the organisation has petitioned Treasurer Josh Frydenberg to use the government’s growing debt burden to give older people a green investment option.

Older Australians would be able to invest directly in renewable energy projects under a proposal put to the Morrison government by National Seniors. Credit: Jo Buchanan

Australian government debt last week reached a record $818.4 billion and is expected to reach more than $1 trillion by the start of next decade. Some of that extra debt will be issued by government agencies for infrastructure spending in renewable energy and storage projects.

In its submission for the upcoming federal budget, National Seniors says some of that debt should be sold as “green infrastructure bonds” and offered directly to those of retirement age.

Instead of buying these bonds through a broker, as government debt is currently purchased, people could buy them directly over the counter through Australia Post or a registered bank.

The National Seniors want the bonds limited to people over the age pension eligibility age which is slated to rise to 66 years and 6 months on July 1. Bonds would be sold in $5000 lots with people limited to a maximum $50,000 purchase.

Like other types of bonds, such as those for funerals, the green bonds would be exempt from the age pension assets test.

National Seniors said it is clear older people want an investment option that was low-risk, offered a return but which also did something for the environment.

“It is clear the transition to clean energy requires investment in renewable energy generation and storage infrastructure,” it said. “This creates a unique opportunity to combine older Australians’ need for safe investments and their desire to act on climate change.”

The organisation has also revealed a survey of more than 3600 members showing strong support among older people for action on climate change, even if it increases their cost of living.

Its survey showed 82.2 per cent of respondents believed climate change was occurring. There was no difference between people living in rural and remote areas and those in urban centres.

Of those surveyed, 58.6 per cent said action should be taken to deal with climate change even if that increased the cost of living. Another 23.7 per cent said climate change was happening but Australia should not act if it pushed up everyday costs.

Fewer than 10 per cent said climate change was not occurring.

In its submission, National Seniors said there was obvious interest among older people in dealing with climate change. Offering green infrastructure bonds gave people an opportunity to do that while improving the management of their own finances.

Links

'Making Peace With Nature'

Deutsche Welle - Stuart Braun

A new UN blueprint offers an integrated 'peace plan' to tackle three interlinked environmental emergencies — the climate crisis, biodiversity loss and pollution — that cannot be solved in isolation.

Humans are not separate from nature - but a part of it. 

"Our war on nature has left the planet broken," said UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres in the foreword of a new UN Environment Programme (UNEP) report that lays out a program to address the climate crisis, biodiversity loss and pollution in an integrated way. 

As climate change-inducing emissions continue to rise, biodiversity loss accelerates and new pandemics emerge, solutions have proved inadequate in isolation. In response, the Making Peace with Nature report is a "blueprint to urgently solve planetary emergencies" via a synthesis of diverse global environmental assessments.

These include reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, the UNEP's Global Environment Outlook report and research on zoonotic diseases such as COVID-19.

Antonio Guterres: humanity is waging war on nature

Failure to tackle interwoven crises

The UNEP's cross-disciplinary approach aims to tackle interlinked environmental crises within the framework of the UN's 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, and to lay the groundwork for achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.

"The report makes the strongest scientific case yet for why and how that collective determination must be urgently applied to protecting and restoring our planet," wrote Inger Andersen, Executive Director of UNEP, in a forward to Making Peace with Nature

The often piecemeal response to the climate crisis, biodiversity loss and pollution is "not going to get us to where we want," Andersen told DW.

Such an uncoordinated response has contributed to the fact that the world is on track to warm at least 3 degrees Celcius above pre-industrial levels by 2100  despite a temporary decline in emissions due to the pandemic. That is double the 1.5 warming mandated in the Paris targets, which would require a 45% global emission reduction by 2030.

Meanwhile, over 1 million of an estimated 8 million plant and animal species are at risk of extinction, and pollution-related diseases kill some 9 million people annually, according to an analysis published in The Lancet in 2018.


Again, a symbiotic approach will be central to reversing this trend. The report shows, for example, how limiting biodiversity loss by preserving habitat, halting overharvesting and poaching, as well as reducing pollution will make wild animal populations more viable, and better able adapt to climate change.

'Natural capital' as a core economic measure

As part of the Making Peace with Nature report's holistic approach to tackling widespread environmental decline, the authors especially target the massive economic costs of failure to take rapid action in the next decade.

The report details our reliance on what it calls "natural capital" for livelihoods, prosperity, health and well-being, and outlines how that value is unevenly distributed. Moreover, while humanity depends on the Earth and its ecosystems and draws benefit from nature, this dependence is not accounted for in current economic and financial systems.

"By transforming how we view nature, we can recognize its true value," said António Guterres. "By reflecting this value in policies, plans and economic systems, we can channel investments into activities that restore nature and are rewarded for it."

Natural capital is calculated by assessing, among other factors, the costs and benefits of land degradation, climate change mitigation and adaption, biodiversity loss and air and water pollution.

Extreme poverty and hunger demand growth, explained Inger Andersen, adding that our "produced capital" has doubled since 1990. 

"But our natural capital, these blocks of life, our geology, our air and water, the soil and so on, that capital has lost 40% of value," she told DW. The UNEP calculates that natural capital constitutes around 20% of so-called planetary wealth (in addition to human capital, manufactured capital and so on). However, the standard economic measure, gross domestic product (GDP), both excludes the value of ecosystems that regulate the environment, and fails to measure the loss of natural capital associated with environmental depletion and destruction.

While GDP measures current income, it fails to acknowledge how much of that value is sustainable. "Supporting current income through depletion of natural capital is not sustainable," the report states. 

"You can fish the proverbial waters empty and then have a great quarterly return, and then what?" said Inger Andersen.  

A better measure of sustainable economic growth known as "inclusive wealth" needs to be adopted in lieu of GDP because it accounts for declines in natural capital and acknowledges the adoption of a circular and sustainable economic system.

Environmental degradation needs to be priced into calculations of economic growth, says the UNEP

Protecting biodiversity will be incorporated into climate measures as part of the UNEP 'peace plan'

Putting a price on nature

Mechanisms to limit climate-inducing emissions such as a carbon price and the phase-out of fossil fuel subsidies must be implemented globally, says the report. 

The more than US$5 trillion (€4.2 trillion) in annual subsidies to fossil fuels, non-sustainable agriculture and fishing, non-renewable energy, mining, and transportation must be rechanneled to support low-carbon, sustainable technologies.

Shifting taxation from production and labor to resource use and waste is another way to promote a circular, low-impact economy. Low-interest green financing in developing countries will also encourage a shift away from carbon-intensive and environmentally degrading industries.

Tackling planetary threats as one

But how will such transformative change be implemented globally in the next decade?

As part of what Guterres calls a "peace plan" and a "post-war rebuilding program," the report says that households and civil society groups can initiate and lead transformations in addition to the private sector, labor organizations, educational bodies and media. Governments will need to guide these efforts via international cooperation and legislation. 

2021 will be a defining year for such synergistic cooperation during global climate and biodiversity conferences including the November COP 26 in Glasgow and the COP 15 UN Biodiversity Convention, due to be hosted by China in May.   

"We've put this together precisely so civil society groups, NGOs, academia, educational groups and activists around the world can access it," said Inger Andersen of disseminating the key messages in Making Peace with Nature. 

Shareholders and pension funds who want to make more sustainable investments have also been targeted. "This needs to be an all-of-society effort," she told DW. 

What’s in the air we breathe?

Links