23/05/2021

(Live Science) The 5 Mass Extinction Events That Shaped The History Of Earth — And The 6th That's Happening Now

Live Science - ,

The death of the dinosaurs was just one of five global events that saw millions of species wiped out. How do these events happen? And how can we stop it happening again?

Can we stop another mass extinction? (Image credit: Getty Images)



For the last 10,000 years, Earth has been in the midst of yet another extinction event that is rapidly removing animals from our planet. 

Scientists define a mass extinction as around three-quarters of all species dying out over a short geological time, which is anything less than 2.8 million years, according to The Conversation. Right now, humans find themselves at the beginning of the latest mass extinction, which is moving much faster than any of the others. Since 1970, the populations of vertebrate species have declined by an average of 68%, and currently more than 35,000 species are considered to be threatened with extinction, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). During the 20th century alone, as many as 543 land vertebrates became extinct, according to a research article in the journal PNAS.

Are humans to blame?

 
Ever since the beginning of the pollutant-pumping industrial revolution in 1760, humans have been the main contributor to Earth's current environmental crisis. From greenhouse gas emissions and ozone depletion to deforestation, plastic pile-up and the illegal animal trade, humans have actively stripped the world of some species and threatened many more.

There are those who argue that climate change and the extinction of animal species are a natural part of life, and in some ways that’s true. After all, the first five mass extinctions occurred without the presence of humans. However, the difference is the speed at which these mass extinctions happen.

Fossil records don't just tell us what creatures existed before us, but also how long a species can naturally survive before becoming extinct without human interference. This is referred to as the background rate, and it is equal to around one species extinction per 1 million species per year. Currently, because of human activity, the actual background rate is tens of thousands of times higher, meaning species are becoming extinct much faster than they should be. Studies have found that some species lost from Earth would have continued to survive for 800 to 10,000 years without the interference of human activities, according to a study published in the journal Science Advances


Pandemic perspective 


 Never before has the world been able — if not forced — to take a step back from normal life and give nature the breathing room it needs. 2020's lockdowns have led to a 17% global decrease in carbon emissions and a 20% fall in nitrogen oxide levels, according to NASA. Waterways cleared up, and animals were seen venturing into cities and towns around the world. While it seems like a wonderful revival for the planet, it's a temporary one as human civilization returns to normal and extinctions return to their previous rate. 

Ecotourism is an industry that fuels conservation efforts worldwide, but it's been on the verge of collapse since global travel restrictions were imposed. Without the income from tourists, conservationists are having trouble protecting vulnerable species from poaching, which during the pandemic has been on the rise, The New York Times reported. Rhinos in Botswana, wild cats in South America and tigers in India have all been targeted over the last year.

 

The 5 mass extinctions

Ordovician-Silurian extinction: ~ 440 million years ago
SPECIES MADE EXTINCT: 85%

By the end of the Ordovician Period the seafloor was teeming with shelled creatures such as trilobites. (Image credit: Alamy)

The first mass extinction on Earth occurred in a period when organisms such as corals and shelled brachiopods filled the world's shallow waters but hadn't yet ventured onto land. Life itself was beginning to spread and diversify, having first emerged around 3.7 billion years ago. But about 440 million years ago, a climatic shift caused sea temperatures to change, and the majority of life in the ocean died. 

At the end of the Ordovician period, a rapid onset of mass glaciation covered the southern supercontinent, Gondwana. Glaciation on this scale locked away high percentages of the world's water and dramatically lowered global sea levels, which stripped away vital habitats from many species, destroying food chains and decreasing reproductive success, according to a study published in the journal Oceanology

It is not known exactly what triggered these events. One theory is  that the cooling process may have been caused by the formation of the North American Appalachian Mountains, according to Ohio State news. Large-scale erosion of these mountainous silicate rocks is associated with the removal of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. 

Not all scientists agree with this, however. Alternative theories suggest that toxic metal may have dissolved into ocean waters during a period of oxygen depletion, wiping out marine life, according to National Geographic. Other scientists suggest that a gamma-ray burst from a supernova ripped an enormous hole in the ozone layer, allowing deadly ultraviolet radiation to kill life below, according to APS News, and another theory suggests that volcanism was the cause, according to a study published in the journal Geology.

Late Devonian extinction: ~ 365 million years ago
SPECIES MADE EXTINCT: 75%

Dunkleosteus were one of the giants of the sea before a mass extinction killed them off. (Image credit: Alamy)




Often referred to as the "age of fish," the Devonian period saw the rise and fall of many prehistoric marine species. Although by this time animals had begun to evolve on land, the majority of life swam through the oceans. That was until vascular plants, such as trees and flowers, likely caused a second mass extinction, according to a 1995 study published in the journal GSA Today

As plants evolved roots, they inadvertently transformed the land they lived on, turning rock and rubble into soil, according to the BBC. This nutrient-rich soil then ran into the world's oceans, causing algae to bloom on an enormous scale. These blooms essentially created giant "dead zones," which are areas where algae strips oxygen from the water, suffocating marine life and wreaking havoc on marine food chains. Species that were unable to adapt to the decreased oxygen levels and lack of food died. 

This theory, however, is debated, and some scientists believe that volcanic eruptions were responsible for the decrease in oxygen levels in the ocean, according to a study in the journal Geology.

One sea monster that was wiped from the world's oceans was a 33-foot-long (10 meters) armored fish called Dunkleosteus. A fearsome predator, this giant fish had a helmet of bone plates that covered its entire head and created a fang-like cusp on its jaw.

Permian-Triassic extinction: ~ 253 million years ago
SPECIES MADE EXTINCT: 96% MARINE LIFE; 70% TERRESTRIAL LIFE

Some of the earliest land dinosaurs, such as dimetrodons, were among the first to become extinct. (Image credit: Alamy)



This extinction event, often referred to as the "Great Dying," is the largest to ever hit Earth. It wiped out some 90% of all the planet's species and decimated the reptiles, insects and amphibians that roamed on land. What caused this catastrophic event was a period of rampant volcanism, Live Science previously reported. At the end of the Permian period, the part of the world we now call Siberia erupted in explosive volcanoes. This released a large amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, causing a greenhouse effect that heated up the planet. As a result, weather patterns shifted, sea levels rose and acid rain beat down on the land. 

In the ocean, the increased levels of carbon dioxide dissolved into the water, poisoning marine life and depriving them of oxygen-rich water, according to the Sam Noble Museum in Oklahoma. At the time, the world consisted of one supercontinent called Pangaea, which some scientists believe contributed to a lack of movement in the world's oceans, creating a global pool of stagnant water that only perpetuated carbon dioxide accumulation. Rising sea temperatures also reduced oxygen levels in the water, Live Science previously reported. 

Corals were a group of marine life forms that were among the worst affected — it took 14 million years for the ocean reefs to rebuild to their former glory.

Triassic-Jurassic extinction: ~ 201 million years ago
SPECIES MADE EXTINCT: 80%

Tricinosuchus was one of the many species to go extinct at the start of the Jurassic Period. (Image credit: Alamy )
The Triassic period erupted in new and diverse life, and dinosaurs began to populate the world. Unfortunately, numerous volcanoes also erupted at that time. Although it remains unclear exactly why this fourth mass extinction occurred, scientists think that massive volcanic activity occurred in an area of the world now covered by the Atlantic Ocean, according to MIT News. Similar to the Permian extinction, volcanoes released enormous amounts of carbon dioxide, driving climate change and devastating life on Earth. Global temperatures increased, ice melted, and sea levels rose and acidified. As a result, many marine and land species became extinct; these included large prehistoric crocodiles and some flying pterosaurs. 

There are alternative theories explaining this mass extinction, which suggest that rising carbon dioxide levels released trapped methane from permafrost, which would have resulted in a similar series of events, according to Discover magazine

K-Pg extinction: ~ 66 million years ago
SPECIES MADE EXTINCT: 75%

All non-avian dinosaurs were killed in the fifth mass extinction. (Image credit: Getty Images)

The most famous of all the mass extinction events is the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction — better known as the day the dinosaurs died. The event is sometimes also known as the K-T extinction, and geologists call it the“K-Pg extinction because the letter "C" is shorthand for a previous geological period called the Cambrian.  The "K" is from the German word "Kreide," which means "Cretaceous."

Crash-landing into what is today Yucatán, Mexico, an asteroid over 8 miles (13 kilometers) wide plunged into Earth at around 45,000 mph (72,000 km/h). This punched a hole 110 miles (180 km) wide and 12 miles (19 km) deep, called the Chicxulub crater. The impact would have scorched all the land around it within 900 miles (1,450 km) and ended the 180 million-year reign of the dinosaurs on Earth.  

What followed the impact were months of blackened skies caused by debris and dust being hurled into the atmosphere, Live Science previously reported. This prevented plants from absorbing sunlight, and they died out en masse and broke down the dinosaurs' food chains. It also caused global temperatures to plummet, plunging the world into an extended cold winter. Scientists estimate that most extinctions on Earth at the time would have occurred in just months after the impact. However, many species that could fly, burrow or dive to the depths of the oceans survived. For example, the only true descendants of the dinosaurs living today are modern-day birds — more than 10,000 species are thought to have descended from impact survivors.

Deep impact
HOW AN ASTEROID BROUGHT ABOUT THE END OF THE WORLD FOR THE DINOSAURS




Death by volcano
HOW MASSIVE ERUPTIONS CAUSED THE BIGGEST MASS EXTINCTION ON EARTH



Turning back the clock

Pandas became the poster species for extinction back in 1980s, when there were fewer than 1,114 individuals recorded in China. (Image credit: Getty)


Humans might be the driving force behind this accelerated extinction event, but we are also the answer to stopping it. The world is awash with scientists, conservationists and environmentalists working in the laboratory, in conservation areas and in political battlegrounds to protect endangered species.

From tackling global pollution emissions in the 2016 Paris Agreement to the U.K.'s Global Resource Initiative that combats deforestation, legislation will always be at the forefront of the fight against mass extinction. In particular, one of the biggest direct threats to endangered life is the illegal animal trade.

In the wake of the current pandemic, wildlife markets have been thrust into the spotlight as not only being environmentally irresponsible, but potentially dangerous to human health through zoonotic diseases — those that jump from animals to humans — such as COVID-19. These markets, trading live exotic animals or products derived from them, are found throughout the world. For example, bear farms in Asia cage 20,000 Asiatic black bears for their bile, resulting in the decline of the wild population, according to Animals Asia.

Lawmakers are tackling these kinds of markets with growing success. In Vietnam, for example, Prime Minister Nguyen Xuân Phúc signed a new directive that bans wildlife imports and closes illegal wildlife markets, according to a report in The Guardian.

New eyes in the sky

One of the best ways to help prevent species from becoming extinct is to monitor their populations and identify any
problems before it's too late to help. Currently camera traps and surveys conducted on foot or from aircraft are the main method of data collection. However, recent research has used a combination of satellite imagery and artificial intelligence to observe animals from space. Using high-resolution aerial photographs of Africa’s grasslands, researchers created an algorithm to sweep over thousands of miles and count every elephant pictured in the blink of an eye.

The technology, however, is still in its infancy and is limited to areas where large animals, such as elephants, aren’t obscured by forest habitats. "The main question here would be the size of the animals and their habitats. We can’t see through clouds, obviously, but also we can’t see through forested areas. Therefore we can’t look for animals that are in dense forest," Olga Isupova, a computer scientist at the University of Bath and creator of the elephant-tracking AI, told How It Works magazine, a sister publication to Live Science. "If they’re in open areas, then it’s just a question of their size."

Nevertheless, it has huge potential to advance our ability to monitor species. “We are currently looking at how we can improve the algorithm itself to look specifically for smaller objects. We could also look for those animals who appear in herds,” Isupova said. “For example, with penguin colonies, the model can detect the whole colony and then have an additional algorithm that approximates the count based on the size of the colony. Also, you can look for the footprints of the animals. The animal itself can be quite small, but if there are many of them and they leave lots of footprints after them, we can also try to track that.”

An aerial image of Addo Elephant National Park, showing the algorithm counting elephants. (Image credit: Maxar Technology)

Saved by cloning

 Another potential solution to combat extinction could be to clone species. In February 2021, scientists revealed they had successfully cloned a black-footed ferret from an animal that had died more than 30 years ago. Native to North America, these small mammals were thought to be extinct until a small colony was found in the early 1980s, which were entered into a breeding program and reintroduced around the United States.

Due to inbreeding, the population of around 650 ferrets is at risk of extinction once again. This inspired researchers to create a genetic copy from the preserved cell of a wild female, named Willa, who died in the 1980s. The process of cloning was similar to that used to clone Dolly the sheep back in the early 1990s. Scientists hope that after time spent in captivity, cloned members of the species can successfully re-enter the wild, offering a new conservation tool to protect endangered species.

It is legal, scientific and technological advances such as these that will help to conserve Earth's wildlife and hopefully slow down the sixth mass extinction.

Links

(UK Financial Times) G7 Agrees To Stop Overseas Funding Of Coal To Limit Global Warming

Financial Times |

Member states pledge to keep temperature rise to 1.5C relative to pre-industrial times

US special presidential envoy for climate John Kerry meets Germany’s foreign minister Heiko Maas ahead of the G7 climate pledge on Friday on coal. © Odd Andersen/Pool/Reuters

G7 countries have vowed to stop all new financing for overseas coal projects by the end of this year, in a breakthrough in the global effort to fight climate change.

“International investments in unabated coal must stop now,” the G7 environment ministers, including the Biden administration’s John Kerry and the UK’s Alok Sharma, said in a communique on Friday.

They pledged to take “concrete steps” to end new direct government support for international thermal coal power generation, where no effort is made to capture the emissions.

The strongly worded statement sets the stage for more climate pledges when G7 country leaders, including British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and US President Joe Biden, meet in Cornwall next month.

“This commitment sends a clear signal to the world that coal is on the way out,” said Sharma, the president of the COP26 climate summit. “We have all agreed to accelerate the transition away from dirty coal capacity.”

Coal mining has come under pressure this week after the International Energy Agency said that no new coal mines should be needed if the world is to cut emissions to net zero by 2050.

The G7 countries also pledged to make “accelerated efforts” to limit global warming to 1.5C relative to pre-industrial times — a major shift from previous statements that focused on limiting warming to 2C, a slightly easier target. 

“This is the first time we have come together with a public statement about 1.5C,” said Kerry, the US climate envoy, who urged all the world’s major economies to follow suit.

The 2015 Paris accord binds all signatories to limit warming to “well below” 2C, and also says that 1.5C — seen as a stretch target — would be even better.

“This is a watershed moment . . . There’s a tremendous difference between 1.5C and 2C,” said Alden Meyer, a senior associate with think-tank E3G.

However the ministers failed to reach any concrete agreement on climate-related aid to developing countries, which is shaping up to be one of the thorniest issues at the UN COP26 summit in November.

They reiterated the goal of mobilising $100bn annually by 2025, which remains unmet, but did not outline plans for helping developing countries financially beyond 2025.

There had been concerns that the G7 might be unable to make a clear commitment to end international coal financing if Japan did not support the pledge, as it was seen as the most reluctant due to its reliance on coal.

On Friday, Kerry noted the “work that we did with Japan, and Japan’s important steps and important effort to find unity on the road ahead”.

The move increases pressure on China as a heavy consumer of coal.

The communique also came just days after the publication of the International Energy Agency’s landmark report that called for an end to all new coal, oil and gas exploration.

Kerry said the group believed “very deeply” in the importance and significance of the IEA report.

The decline of coal
Chart showing coal-fired electricity generation, TWh (’000).
Expected to fall from peak of more than 10,000 TWh in 2018 to less than 1,000 in 2050


Ministers said they would phase out new financing for international fossil fuel energy projects, “except in some limited circumstances.”

But they noted that natural gas may be needed to help with the transition to cleaner fuels “on a time-limited basis”.

Rebecca Newsom, head of politics at Greenpeace UK, said the action on fossil fuels “needs to go much further, ending all new coal, oil and gas projects at home as well as their financing internationally”.

The commitment to end overseas coal funding, she added, “leaves China isolated globally with its ongoing international financing for the most polluting fossil fuel”.

Links

(PERU BBC) Why Peru Is Reviving A Pre-Incan Technology For Water

BBC Future Planet - Erica Gies

Peru is turning to ancient indigenous techniques and natural ecosystems to keep its taps running, as climate change threatens to dry out its water supply.

Image credit: Erica Gies

Author
Erica Gies is a journalist and author based in Victoria, British Columbia, and San Francisco.
Her book on slow water, Water Always Wins, will be published in North America by University of Chicago Press and in the UK by Head of Zeus.
The emissions from travel it took to report this story were 0kg CO2, as it was based on material from a previous book research trip.
Funding for this reporting was provided by National Geographic Society.

Pre-pandemic, in the austral winter, I drove north out of Lima, up into Peru's highlands to the village of Huamantanga (wa-mon-TONG-a). I was traveling with scientists who were studying local farmers' use of a 1,400-year-old technique to extend water availability into the long dry season.

Wending our way through the narrow Chillón River Valley, a slim swath of irrigated green crops hemmed in by sheer walls of tawny rock, we crossed the river and began grinding up a single-lane dirt road clinging to the side of a steep mountain.

At about 3,500m (11,500ft), we reached a plateau with fields of avocados, hops, potatoes and beans and, finally, the village, where two-storey buildings of mud bricks and concrete lined narrow dirt streets. Burros, horses, cows, dogs and people puttered around.

The Andes Mountains are one of six places in the world where complex civilisations emerged, spurred by precipitation so seasonal it was a catalyst for hydrological innovations again and again. People cultivated deep knowledge of water and the underground, deploying strategies that still astonish – and which some still use.

Horses stand at the ready in Huamantanga, an Andean village where people still use an ancient system called amunas to move wet-season water underground. Credit: Erica Gies

Today, modern Peruvians are redeploying that ancient knowledge and protecting natural ecosystems such as high-altitude wetlands to help the country adapt to climate change. It's one of the world's first efforts to integrate nature into water management on a national scale.
Like the slow food movement, slow water approaches are bespoke: they work with local landscapes, climates and cultures rather than try to control or change them
Peru is among the world's most water-insecure countries. The capital Lima, home to a third of the country's population, sprawls across a flat desert plain and receives just 13mm (0.5 inches) of annual rainfall. To support that human abundance, it relies on three rivers born in the Andes that rise behind the city, soaring to 5,000m (16,400ft) in just 150 kilometres (93 miles). Lima residents are not alone in this reliance on mountain water. An estimated 1.5 billion people worldwide could depend on water flowing from mountains by 2050, up from 200 million in the 1960s.

Water scarcity in Peru is getting worse as a result of climate change. Within living memory, mountain glaciers have melted and the rainy season has shrunk to just a couple of months. Already Lima's water utility Sedapal can only supply customers 21 hours a day, a rate that Ivan Lucich, executive director of the national water regulator Sunass, says he expects to further decline in the coming years. A 2019 World Bank report evaluating drought risk in Peru concluded that the capital's current strategies to manage drought – dams, reservoirs, storage under the city – will be inadequate by as early as 2030.

Distichia muscoides, with its small alpine flowers, are a dominant plant in the mountain wetland bofedales that help the landscape retain water. Credit: Erica Gies

Several years ago, desperate for water security, the country's leaders did something radical: they passed a series of national laws requiring water utilities to invest a percentage of their customers' bills in "natural infrastructure". These funds – called Mechanismos de Retribucion por Servicios Ecosistemicos (Mechanisms of Reward for Ecosystem Services) or MRSE – go to nature-based water interventions, such as restoring ancient human systems that work with nature, protecting high-altitude wetlands and forests, or introducing rotational grazing to protect grasslands. Before, it was considered a misuse of public funds if utilities invested in the watershed. Now it's required.
As climate change brings water change worldwide, conventional water control structures are increasingly failing
As climate change brings water change worldwide, conventional water control structures are increasingly failing. Such human interventions tend to confine water and speed it away, erasing natural phases when water stalls on land. Nature-based solutions, on the other hand, make space and time for these slow phases.

In researching my forthcoming book on the subject, I've come to think of them as "slow water". Like the slow food movement, slow water approaches are bespoke: they work with local landscapes, climates and cultures rather than try to control or change them. They provide multiple other benefits too, including carbon storage and homes for threatened plants and animals.

For these reasons, conserving wetlands, river floodplains and mountain forests for water management is a growing movement worldwide, including among institutions such as the United Nations and the World Bank. But most projects to date are small and disconnected, so people tend to think of them as attractive side features, rather than a key tool.

It's akin to the long-held attitude toward solar and wind power that is swiftly becoming outdated: they're nice but were thought not to be capable of playing a major role in meeting our energy needs. Peru's national programme, however, has the potential to demonstrate how effective slow water solutions can be when implemented on the scale of watersheds.

Yet despite Peru's forward-thinking policies, putting it into practice has been slow going, due in part to high turnover in government – including five presidents in five years. Another big hurdle, and one that most countries face: overcoming ingrained practices in the water sector to try something new.

Bofedales, or cushion bogs, have low-growing, tuffety, spongey plants well adapted to local conditions of "summer every day and winter every night". Credit: Erica Gies

In 2018, Global Affairs Canada and the United States Agency for International Development pledged to invest $27.5m (£19.6m) over five years to help Peru get its innovative programme off the ground. The money went to Forest Trends, an NGO that has been working on nature-based solutions for water in Peru since 2012.

The executive director of its Lima office, Fernando Moimy, has long championed the idea, first in government as the former chief of Sunass, then via Forest Trends. The NGO's initiative, called Natural Infrastructure for Water Security, aims to provide technical know-how, says Gena Gammie, deputy director of the project.

Now the effort is gaining momentum. Forty of the country's 50 water utilities are collecting MRSE funds and have raised more than $30m (£21m). Sunass expects them to raise at least $43m (£31m) by 2024. That money is being invested in more than 60 projects across the country. Among those being supported by Lima's water utility Sedapal are projects shoring up an ancient water storage technique and protecting rare, high-altitude cushion bogs.

Planting the water

This is what had brought me on the precipitous journey through the Peruvian highlands north of Lima, to the village of Huamantanga, with scientists studying the region's age-old water management techniques.

The people who live here are comuneros: members of an agricultural collective. They use water canals called amunas – a Quechua word meaning "to retain" – to divert wet-season flows from mountain streams and route them to natural infiltration basins. The strategy, invented by an ancient people called the Huari (WAR-i), is still practiced here and in a few other Andean villages.

Because the water moves more slowly underground as it travels through gravel and soil, it emerges downslope from springs months later, when the comuneros collect it to water their crops. Because much of their irrigation soaks into the ground and eventually makes its way back to the rivers that supply Lima, repairing abandoned amunas scattered throughout the highlands could extend water into the dry season for city dwellers too. Hence Sedapal's interest.

Researcher Boris Ochoa-Tocachi stands in a mortared portion of an amuna, now running low on water, having delivered its flow to the infiltration basins. Credit: Erica Gies

In Huamantanga's main square, in front of a Catholic church, I met Katya Perez, a social researcher with the NGO Condesan who studies how people interact with water systems. She has cultivated relationships with the comuneros here, collecting their knowledge and traditions for maintaining the amunas. For example, they have ceremonies around cleaning and blessing the canals, because they know that annual silt removal keeps them functioning well.
If we plant the water, we can harvest the water. But if we don't plant the water, then we will have problems – Lucila Castillo Flores
From town, the amunas lie further above us, at about 4,500m (14,800ft), so we rent horses from villagers and ride up through the sun-drenched puna grassland, which is scattered with scrubby chamise bushes and lupine in decadent purple flower. The mountains stack behind each other into seeming infinity and a giant bird – possibly an Andean condor – wafts overhead. Finally, I spy an amuna.

Built by carefully placing rocks together, it's about two feet wide and a couple of feet deep and winds like a sinuous snake along the contour of the hills. It's July, mid-dry season, and the amuna is nearly empty of water, having delivered its liquid riches to a rocky, bowl-shaped depression where it infiltrated into the ground. One comunera, Lucila Castillo Flores, a grandmother in a skirt and white-brimmed hat, likens what happens here to sowing water, using the verb sembrar: to plant. "If we plant the water, we can harvest the water," Flores says. "But if we don't plant the water, then we will have problems."

Just before the diversion into the amuna, researchers installed a small weir, a metal plate set vertically across the stream with a V-shaped notch. A classic tool to monitor stream flow, the weir creates a small pond, raising the water level so it flows through the V even when low, explained one of my scientist companions, hydrological engineer Boris Ochoa-Tocachi, chief executive of the Ecuador-based environmental consultancy firm ATUK and an advisor to Forest Trends.

Water height is measured with a pressure transducer, an instrument submerged in the weir's pond. Greater weight on the sensor means higher water. Data collected here informed a study of the amunas that was part of Ochoa-Tocachi's thesis at Imperial College in London and published in Nature Sustainability in 2019.

This weir measures how much water is flowing into the amuna, while further down, the water emerging from a connected underground spring is also monitored. Credit: Erica Gies

Hopping back onto the horses, we rode partway down the mountain and dismounted at a spring fed by amunas. Here, water that had been traveling through rock and soil seeped out into a burbling stream. "You see, it's actually a lot of water compared to the stream that we saw in the weir," Ochoa-Tocachi says, with obvious satisfaction.

One of the most remarkable things about the amunas is that the comuneros know which canal feeds which spring, meaning they understand the path water takes underground. Co-author Perez's interviews with local people documented this knowledge, which had been passed down through the generations.

Urbanites tend to discount the expertise of rural and Indigenous people, says Ochoa-Tocachi, but the researchers were able to verify their information as "very accurate" by adding tracers to amunas' flows and then using sensitive detectors to track those molecules' emergence in the spring-fed ponds. This finding "surprised us", says Ochoa-Tocachi. "It shows that we can use indigenous knowledge to complement modern science to provide solutions to current problems."

He and his coauthors then modeled how restoring the many abandoned amunas scattered throughout the Andean highlands could increase water supply for Lima, which already comes up about 5% short – a deficit of about 43 million cubic metres.

Comunera Lucila Castillo Flores, pictured here in her house, explains how people in the community maintain the amunas to provide water through the year.  Credit: Erica Gies

Focusing just on the largest watershed of the three that supply Lima, they calculated a diversion of about 35% of the wet-season stream flows into the amunas, leaving the rest in the river to support aquatic life. They assumed that half of the diverted water would also go to the environment, deep underground or released into the atmosphere via plants.

Nevertheless, what remained was 99 million cubic metres – more than double what Lima needs. They also showed that the diverted water spends between two weeks to eight months underground, with an average delay of 45 days. Slowing this water would increase river flows at the start of the dry season by 33%, postponing Lima's need to dip into its reservoirs.

Because engineers who make decisions about water projects require hard data like this to deploy projects, such research is critical to changing how we manage water. It translates slow water projects' efficacy into the language engineers use. Encouraged by the findings, Sedapal plans to invest $3m (£2.1m) in shoring up 12 amunas above Huamantanga, building two more, and restoring the neighboring grassland, according to Oscar Angulo, water and sanitation coordinator for natural infrastructure investment with Forest Trends.

Soggy cushions

Sedapal and other water utilities in Peru are also investing in natural ecosystems. Leaving Lima again, this time heading north-east along the Rimac River, I accompanied a conference of regional water experts to a rare, high-altitude tropical peatland called bofedale, or cushion bog. Unique to the Andes, bofedales are dominated by plants well adapted to tropical mountain conditions of "summer every day and winter every night", thriving in intense sun, stiff winds, a short growing season, daily frost and seasonal snow. The low-growing, firm but spongey plants are pocked with small star-shaped flowers and interspersed with little pools of water.

This bofedale above the Andean town of Carampoma has been attacked by peat poachers (Credit: Erica Gies)

Peatlands, including bofedales, have a higher percentage of organic matter than other soils, making them unusually good at holding water. Though peatlands cover just 3% of land area, they store 10% of all freshwater (not to mention 30% of the world's soil carbon). In the steep landscape of the Andes, bofedales slow water runoff, preventing floods and landslides. 

As the glaciers that once stored water melt, bofedales play an even more important role in holding water for supply in the dry season. Because they stay green year-round, bofedales are also biodiversity hotspots, frequented by birds and mammals, including deer, pumas, Andean fox, pampas cats, and vicuña and guanaco, wild ancestors of domesticated alpacas and llamas.

After hours of driving up into the clouds, we reached a spot at about 4,500m  (14,800ft) elevation where the valley widened, holding a seasonal lake and bofedale. But something was terribly wrong. Squares of soil five feet (1.5m) long and a foot (30cm) deep had been cut out in a checkerboard pattern by peat poachers to sell to plant nurseries in Lima.

This peat, laid down over millennia, was destroyed in a few minutes. The remaining patches, freshly exposed to the elements, smelled of decay as organic matter oxidised. We stumbled across the uneven surface of the valley, our footsteps kicking up red duff and dust.

But in March, officials travelled up the long road to the local village, Carampoma, for a ceremony to kick off Sedapal's $850,000 (£600,000) investment to restore the devastated area and to protect the healthy bofedales that remain. The project will work with the community to move grazing away from affected areas and to introduce surveillance of bofedales.

When peat poachers cut out squares from the bofedale, neighboring plants dry out and die. Credit: Erica Gies

Peru has laws to protect wetlands, but enforcement jurisdiction is murky. To clarify the situation, Forest Trends is meeting with authorities and developing a manual for the community so local people will know what to do (such as take photos and GPS coordinates) and which authorities to notify, says Angulo. To restore the damaged wetlands, people will reintroduce plants harvested carefully from a nearby site and ensure water flow to support them. Scientists don't know how long it will take to restore the peat, but Angulo says he hopes that nature can start to repair itself quickly with a little help.

In all of these projects, benefits for the local community are critical, says Angulo, so they are motivated to keep up land and water management practices that ultimately benefit the wider watershed. Without that, "two to three years after, it will not be sustainable", he says.

Although every country has unique water issues, landscapes and cultures, other places can learn from Peru's experience. Europeans dependent upon the Alps for water and Asians who rely on the Himalayas are also losing their glaciers to climate change and will need new ways to capture floods to protect homes and businesses and to store water for later. Human activity that degrades land's ability to hold water can be reversed, whether it be deforestation of Kenya's mountain water towers, or overgrazing in the western United States.

Expanding slow water solutions across watersheds has a steep learning curve, but the seriousness of the climate crisis requires quick action. "We don't have all the information we'd love to have today to make the best possible decisions. But we can make good decisions," says Gammie, adding that scientific monitoring is allowing them "to learn and improve as we go".

BBC Future Planet Links