10/08/2021

(AU ABC) Climate Change Report A 'Code Red For Humanity', United Nations Chief Warns

ABC NewsMichael Slezak | Penny Timms

Fires are projected to get worse and more frequent due to climate change. (ABC News: James Carmody)

Key Points
  • Global warming would likely increase to 1.5C by about 2030, the IPCC report says, based on our current trajectory
  • The effects of rising temperatures include rising sea levels, longer fire seasons and worse droughts
  • In 2015, as part of the Paris Agreement, all governments had agreed to try to stop warming at 1.5C
The Earth could be just 10 years from heating by more than 1.5 degrees Celsius — a threshold beyond which even more serious and frequent fires, droughts, floods and cyclones are expected to wreak havoc on humanity.

That is one of the key conclusions of the most comprehensive climate report ever released — produced by the world's most authoritative body on climate science, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Globally, warming has now reached about 1.1C since industrialisation (1850-1900), according to the hundreds of scientists and governments that make up the IPCC. In Australia, warming has reached 1.4C.

The new report was a "code red for humanity", United Nations secretary-general Antonio Guterres declared.

"The alarm bells are deafening and the evidence is irrefutable: Greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel burning and deforestation are choking our planet and putting billions of people at immediate risk," he said.

"This report must sound a death knell for coal and fossil fuels, before they destroy our planet.

"The viability of our societies depends on leaders from government, business and civil society uniting behind policies, actions and investments that will limit temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius."

The UK government immediately called for the rest of the world to take urgent action.

"I hope today's IPCC report will be a wake-up call for the world to take action now, before we meet in Glasgow in November for the critical COP26 summit," UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson said.

If it was not for aerosol pollution emitted by humans, which cools the Earth, they said the greenhouse gasses we have emitted would already have heated the world by 1.5C.

World likely to hit 1.5C by 2030 if nothing changes

The new report found that even in its most ambitious scenario, which the world is failing to stick to, global warming would likely hit 1.5C by about 2035.

On our current trajectory, we are likely to hit 1.5C of warming about 2030.

Even if we radically and immediately cut emissions now, the world is still likely to warm to 1.6C, before dropping again.

In all scenarios, getting the world back under that extra 1.5C would require massive reforestation, or technology to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Technology like that has not yet been proven to work at scale.

The UN secretary-general said there must be no new coal plants built after 2021. (Supplied: Lothar M Peter) 

In 2018, the UN body produced a report estimating that warming rates seen at the time meant the 1.5C barrier would be breached between 2030 and 2050, with the most likely time being around 2040.

The new report said many of the effects of that warming had particular relevance to Australia:
  • Sea levels around Australia and New Zealand, which have already risen higher than the global average, causing coastal erosion, are set to continue rising
  • Fires are projected to get worse and more frequent, and fire seasons will last longer
  • Heavy rainfall and river floods are projected to worsen across Australasia
  • Eastern Australia is projected to get fewer days of rain in winter, but heavier rains when they do occur
  • In eastern Australia, if warming exceeds 2C, then droughts are projected to increase
  • Across southern Australia drought has already increased, and projections suggest that will worsen
Australia committed to reaching net zero 'as soon as possible'

In 2015, as part of the Paris Agreement, the world's governments agreed to pursue efforts to stop warming at 1.5C — a promise they have now all but failed to come good on.

Australia is widely considered to be a laggard on efforts to stop climate change, and it was recently ranked last among 200 countries for its actions.

Strip out the politics, and the climate change story is very different to the one we've been told. Read more
Minister for Emissions Reduction Angus Taylor said Australia was committed to reaching net zero "as soon as possible", preferably by 2050, but did not flag any changes to the government's approach.

He said the government's Technology Investment Roadmap would drive billions of dollars of investment in low-emissions technologies that would make net zero achievable.

"Our technology-led approach to reducing emissions will see Australia continue to play its part in the global effort to combat climate change without compromising our economy or jobs," he said.

One of the authors of the IPCC report is Malte Meinshausen, a climate scientist at the University of Melbourne and former scientific adviser to the German government's climate negotiators.

"I think everybody in the international community would laugh if they would hear that Australia thinks they're doing enough. Of course they're not doing enough," Dr Meinshausen told the ABC.

"They neither have upped their targets for 2030 nor have they put a net zero target onto the table. They are not invited to many of the talks where international climate diplomacy is now going on because they are seen — and rightly so — as a laggard."

Heavy rainfall and river floods are projected to worsen across Australasia. (ABC News: Brendan Esposito, File photo)

Labor's Shadow Minister for Climate Change, Chris Bowen, said the report was "yet more evidence of the costs of inaction, and it was past time the government stop spinning and start delivering for Australians".

"We have a government divided even on the basic science of climate change, let alone able to deliver on the opportunities the changing global economy presents for Australia's future," he said.

Greens leader Adam Bandt took aim at both major parties.

"The rest of the world understands that if we don't do more by 2030, we all go over the climate cliff, so the Liberals' 2030 denial and Labor's 2030 silence are putting Australian lives at risk," Mr Bandt said.

"After this report, failure to lift 2030 targets is criminal negligence."

1.5C limit a promise the world is set to break

Chair of the IPCC, Mark Howden from ANU, said to keep climate change at relatively safe levels, changes needed to be implemented quickly.

"We really need to be heading towards 45 per cent reduction by 2030 and keeping that going post 2030," he said.

"At the moment, those emission reduction commitments under the Paris Agreement are not sufficient to keep temperatures down to 2 degrees, let alone 1.5 degrees."

Reaching the target of net zero emissions needed to happen much earlier than most were considering, said Nerilie Abram, a climate scientist from ANU and the ARC Centre for Excellence for Climate Extremes.

"For Australia to be doing its fair share, actually we really should be trying to get to net zero emissions in the 2030s," she said.

Leslie Hughes, professor of Biology at Macquarie University and councillor at the Climate Council, agreed.

"What we do by 2030 would determine our future," she said.

On that, Professor Hughes said the solutions were clear.

"There must be no new oil, coal or gas exploration or infrastructure. We've got to stop subsidising fossil fuels. We've got to electrify everything and then run everything from renewable energy. We've got to change our diets," she said.

"We've really got to change most of the ways that we do things. But we know how to do it and there are ample opportunities to do so."

That message was echoed by Mr Guterres.

"There must be no new coal plants built after 2021. OECD countries must phase out existing coal by 2030, with all others following suit by 2040," he said.

"Countries should also end all new fossil fuel exploration and production, and shift fossil fuel subsidies into renewable energy.

"By 2030, solar and wind capacity should quadruple and renewable energy investments should triple to maintain a net zero trajectory by mid-century."

Sea level rise of up to five metres

The report again warned that every incremental increase in warming raised the risk of cataclysmal effects, some of which would be irreversible over millennia.

The loss of ice from the Greenland Ice Sheet, the second largest body of ice on Earth, was expected to continue over the next century regardless of what we do now, contributing to between 28cm and 55cm of sea level rise expected by 2100.

The Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets hold enough water to raise sea levels significantly if they melt. (Supplied: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution/Matt Osman, File photo) 

But the report warned two metres of sea level rise by 2100 and a catastrophic five metres by 2150 could not be ruled out, since there were uncertainties about how the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets would change.

Professor Howden said the possibility of that amount of sea level rise was "seriously scary".

"In the longer term, sea level is committed to rise for centuries to millennia due to continuing deep ocean warming and ice sheet melt, and will remain elevated for thousands of years," the report concluded.

Droughts and flooding rains

As the report was being prepared, the world was being ravaged by extreme weather. 

At the time of writing, wildfires were devastating parts of Greece, in what the Prime Minister called a "nightmarish summer". He blamed the fires on climate change.

Less than a year ago, Australia was shaken by the Black Summer bushfires, which were exacerbated by climate change.

Those natural disasters will intensify as the climate continues to warm.

"We're going to see impacts right across the climate system," Professor Abram said.

"We're losing ice. The sea levels are rising. Temperature extremes are getting worse.

"We just need to look around the world over the past couple of months to see the effects of those extremes that would have been essentially impossible without the human influence on climate."

Greece's Prime Minister blamed the country's wildfires on climate change. (AP: Thodoris Nikolaou)

She said if heating went beyond 1.5C, the risk of much worse effects would increase.

"We also run a greater risk of passing some of these tipping points in the climate system," she said.

The report was reassuring when it came to some of the worst tipping points.

It found that Arctic permafrost, which contains vast quantities of trapped greenhouse gases, did not seem to be on the brink of collapse, and its melting could be limited.

Similarly, the collapse of the Gulf Stream, a huge ocean current that plays a part in regulating the northern hemisphere's climate, did not appear imminent, the report concluded, although it was weakening.

Global reaction ahead of crucial climate meeting

The first IPCC report was released in 1990 and updates since have set the stage for international agreements like the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement.

This report comes out just months before the world meets as part of COP26 in Glasgow, where countries are expected to ratchet up their ambition under the Paris Agreement in pursuit of stopping warming at 1.5C.

Alok Sharma, UK Minister for State and COP26 president, called on governments around the world to keep that target alive.

"The science is clear, the impacts of the climate crisis can be seen around the world and if we don't act now we will continue to see the worst effects impact lives, livelihoods and natural habitats," Mr Sharma said.

"We can do this together by coming forward with ambitious 2030 emission reduction targets and long-term strategies with a pathway to net zero by the middle of the century, and taking action now to end coal power, accelerate the rollout of electric vehicles, tackle deforestation and reduce methane emissions."

The 'epoch of incredulity'
Australians are three times more worried about climate change than COVID-19, and a mental health crisis is looming. Read more
Teresa Ribera, Deputy Prime Minister of Spain said: "This report provides unequivocal evidence that we must scale up efforts to adapt to climate change, including through stepping up financing to build resilience.

And we cannot afford to delay real and rapid emissions cuts — not only with the long horizon of 2050, but by 2030."

The IPCC Working Group 1 report was written by hundreds of scientists and synthesised more than 14,000 pieces of research.

The final summary for policymakers was approved, after changes, by 195 countries through the United Nations.

Links

(AU The Guardian) Australia ‘Lagging At The Back Of The Pack’ Of OECD Countries On Climate Action, Analysis Finds

The Guardian

Australia ranks 20th or worse in seven of eight categories despite Coalition claim it is leading the way in reducing emissions

Energy analyst Dr Hugh Saddler says ‘over the past 15 years Australia has squandered its golden opportunity to decouple its energy sector from fossil fuels’. Photograph: Jessica Hromas/The Guardian

Claims by the Morrison government that Australia has done more to cut greenhouse gas emissions than other countries have been challenged by an analysis that found it has gone backwards compared to similar countries over the past 15 years.

Energy analyst Dr Hugh Saddler ranked the performance of 23 OECD countries and Russia on eight climate measures, including share of electricity from non-fossil fuels, per capita emissions from transport and overall emissions intensity of each economy.

He found Australia was ranked 20th or worse in seven of the eight categories. In relative terms, it had not improved in any category since 2005 and had gone backwards compared to other developed countries in four.

Saddler, an honorary associate professor at the Australian National University’s Crawford School of Public Policy, said his research – published by the progressive thinktank the Australia Institute – showed the country was “lagging at the back of the pack” among developed countries in transforming its economy.

He contrasted it with Morrison’s claim, made ahead of a virtual climate summit hosted by the US in April, that Australia’s record in reducing emissions was better than many of the other major countries appearing at the event.

Australia has been talking up its climate credentials – but do the claims stack up?  Read more
“Despite the last decade of growth in solar and wind energy, fossil fuels still dominate Australia’s energy sector and its rate of electrification – that is, getting off coal, oil and gas for energy – is one of the worst in the OECD,” Saddler said.

The emissions analysis precedes the release on Monday night of a landmark report by the world’s leading climate scientists that will assess the state of the global climate.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s sixth assessment report is a comprehensive review of the world’s knowledge of the climate crisis and how rapidly human actions are altering the planet.

Saddler said his research showed the government’s “so-called gas-fired economic recovery”, under which the Coalition has committed hundreds of millions of dollars to fossil fuel power and opening up new gas basins, was “absolutely counter to the needs of Australia’s energy system transition”.

“Over the past 15 years, Australia has squandered its golden opportunity to decouple its energy sector from fossil fuels, unlike so many other OECD countries,” he said. “As a result Australians are left with high-polluting and inefficient power, heating, housing and transport. This also drives up our cost of living and drives down our energy productivity.”

The government defends its performance on climate by arguing the fall in Australia’s emissions since 2005 – about 20%, according to the most recent national accounts – is better than many comparable counties.

Morrison and other government MPs have repeatedly cited the figure when asked why Australia’s 2030 emissions reduction target is only half that set by the US and European Union, and less than half that promised by Britain. They say Australia has a record of “over-achieving” on emissions targets.

But Saddler’s research backs earlier analyses that suggest this claim is misleading.

We’re on the brink of catastrophe, warns Tory climate chiefRead more
He found all of Australia’s emissions reductions since 2005 have been due to farming activities, mainly due to a large fall in the amount of “land-clearing”.

In basic terms, the annual destruction of forests and other ecosystems for agriculture and timber collection decreased over the decade from 2007 to 2017 – it still happens, but at a slower rate.

Saddler’s report said if this change in how land was used was excluded from national emissions accounts Australia’s emissions had increased by 7% since 2005.

He said it was a key, and often overlooked, point when comparing Australia’s emissions were compared to other countries.

“Large one-off reductions in land-clearing are in no way evidence of a trend towards the decarbonisation of the Australian economy,” the report said.

“For the purposes of international comparison, it is important to note that most other developed countries have no capacity to benefit from large reductions in land-clearing for the simple reason that they cleared most of their land centuries ago.”

Saddler excluded changes in land use by choosing indicators that measured changes in energy consumption and emissions. They included energy combustion emissions, energy consumption, energy productivity (the amount of economic output for each unit of energy consumed), non-fossil fuel share of electricity and transport emissions.

Findings included:

  • Australia had the second most emissions-intensive energy system after Poland, a big coal producer.

  • It achieved the second smallest increase in energy productivity across the 15 years, ahead of only Portugal. This is despite federal and state energy ministers releasing a national energy productivity plan in 2015.

  • It has significantly increased its share of wind and solar energy but other countries have moved faster – it slipped from 13th (in 2005) to 14th (in 2019) on a ranking of the share of electricity from new renewable energy generation.

  • It was one of only three countries to have increased total energy combustion emissions.

  • Prior to Covid-19, it had the third highest per capita transport emissions, behind the US and Canada. Both North American countries reduced per capita transport emissions faster between 2005 and 2019 than Australia.
Links

(UK BBC) Climate Change: Time Running Out To Stop Catastrophe - Alok Sharma

BBC - Francesca Gillett

Former Business Secretary Alok Sharma is now leading COP26, the climate summit in Glasgow in November. PA Media

The world is "dangerously close" to running out of time to stop a climate change catastrophe, the UK government's climate chief Alok Sharma has said.

Mr Sharma - who is leading COP26, the climate summit hosted by the UK this year - said the effects were already clear with floods, fires and heatwaves.

"We can't afford to wait two years, five years, 10 years - this is the moment," he told the Observer.

But he did not condemn the government for allowing more fossil fuel projects.

And he defended his decision to travel to more than 30 countries in seven months.

Mr Sharma's interview with the Observer comes ahead of a major report being released on Monday from the United Nations' climate change researchers.

The report is set to be the strongest statement yet from the UN group on the science of climate change - and will likely give details about how the world's oceans, ice caps and land will change in the next decades.

The summary has been approved in a process involving scientists and representatives of 195 governments, which - having signed off on the findings - will be under pressure to take more action at COP26 in November.

Doug Parr, chief scientist with Greenpeace UK, said "world leaders have done a terrible job of listening" to warnings about climate change.

"This year, this has to change. We don't need more pledges, commitments and targets - we need real action right here right now."

Wildfires are currently raging in Greece, forcing thousands to evacuate their homes - and fires have also been burning in Turkey and California in the US. This summer, western Europe also saw its worst flooding in decades, which killed dozens of people.

Mr Sharma said if urgent action was not taken, the consequences would be "catastrophic".

"I don't think there's any other word for it," he said. "You're seeing on a daily basis what is happening across the world. Last year was the hottest on record, the last decade the hottest decade on record."

What is climate change? 3min 14sec

He added: "We're seeing the impacts across the world - in the UK or the terrible flooding we've seen across Europe and China, or forest fires, the record temperatures that we've seen in North America. Every day you will see a new high being recorded in one way or another across the world."

 Mr Sharma said the report released on Monday is "going to be the starkest warning yet that human behaviour is alarmingly accelerating global warming".

"I don't think we're out of time but I think we're getting dangerously close to when we might be out of time. We will see [from the IPCC] a very, very clear warning that unless we act now, we will unfortunately be out of time."

"Africa has been waiting for the rest of the world to catch up and act on climate change for years," Fredrick Njehu, Christian Aid's senior climate change and energy adviser for Africa, highlighting the "changing rainfall patterns or overbearing heat" endured by the continent in recent years.

He added: "The important thing now is that rich world governments make up for lost time and act quickly to reduce emissions and deliver promised financial support for the vulnerable."

Fossil fuel criticism

Glasgow is set to host the COP26 summit in November - which is the UN climate change conference.

The summit is seen as vital if climate change is to be brought under control, and leaders from 196 countries will meet to try and agree action.

But campaigners have accused the UK of hypocrisy, as there are plans to tap a new oil field off Shetland. The government has also said more oil and gas wells can be drilled in the North Sea, and there are plans for a new coal mine in Cumbria.

Earlier this year, the global energy watchdog the International Energy Agency said there cannot be any new investment in oil, gas or coal projects if we want to limit global warming to 1.5C. Experts say the impacts of climate change are far more severe when the increase is greater than 1.5C.

Mr Sharma refused to criticise the government's plan for the projects, saying: "Future [fossil fuel] licences are going to have to adhere to the fact we have committed to go to net zero by 2050 in legislation.

"There will be a climate check on any licences."

Climate change: How 1.5C could change the world. 2min 21sec

Mr Sharma's interview comes after he was criticised for flying abroad for meetings - and visiting more than 30 countries in seven months.

However, since then some environmental campaigners including Greenpeace have defended him, saying face-to-face meetings are important to persuade other nations to tackle climate change.

Mr Sharma told the Observer that in-person meetings were "incredibly vital and actually impactful".

"It makes a vital difference, to build those personal relationships which are going to be incredibly important as we look to build consensus," he said.

It also emerged in the Sunday Mirror that Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab did not self-isolate after returning from France, which was on the amber plus list meaning all arrivals must quarantine.

A government spokesman said it was Mr Raab's job to represent the UK abroad and he followed Covid guidelines on return.

There is an exemption for ministers to avoid quarantine when returning from abroad.

Links