10/01/2022

(AU The Guardian) After Adani: Whatever Happened To Queensland’s Galilee Basin Coal Boom?

The Guardian -

Only the controversial Carmichael mine has opened, while a dozen other projects are shelved, lapsed or discontinued

File photo of the Alpha Coal project in the Galilee basin. The project was sold by Gina Rinehart to conglomerate GVK and is understood to be dormant. Photograph: Andrew Quilty/Greenpeace

Queensland’s huge untapped Galilee coal basin was touted as a jobs and revenue bonanza by its supporters, with the potential to liberate hundreds of millions of tonnes of harmful greenhouse gases.

The Galilee’s potential as a “carbon bomb” was wrapped up in a dozen or more coalmining projects and estimates of billions of dollars of investment.

So far, just one project has made it through the starting gate – Adani’s controversial Carmichael mine, which sent its first coal to port late last year. The mine was supposed to be the first of many.

Yet there is little sign of more coal to come, with many projects shelved, lapsed or discontinued, and uncertain futures for those that remain.

Adani is poised to ship its first coal – is this failure for Australia’s defining climate campaign? Read more
“There was genuine hope, and house and land prices skyrocketed,” says Sean Dillon, the mayor of Barcaldine regional council, which covers several small towns including Alpha, Barcaldine, Aramac and Jericho in the basin.

Dillon says communities have become jaded by the promises of jobs and income.

“Everything was on the cusp and then it just got mothballed. It’s left a few communities scratching their heads,” he says.

Dillon’s own cattle station property north of Alpha sits over one of the proposed mines, known as Kevin’s Corner. That tenement, along with two others, was sold in 2011 by Gina Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting for a reported $1.2bn to the Indian conglomerate GVK.

Dillon says his understanding is that project is now “completely dormant”.

The broader failure of many of the mines to materialise is down to “geography and workforce”. All the mines are greenfield sites – largely undeveloped land still covered in scrub or fields – with high costs to develop the infrastructure needed.

He says most people in the region are not opposed to new coalmines, but there’s a desire for diversification of an economy that’s dominated by agriculture.

A state government-backed plan for a renewable energy precinct in the region has “got people excited”, he says.

“These non-traditional jobs … people are not against them, but they are just more familiar with resource extraction jobs. But they are keen to see some alternative options.”

Approved but not progressed

The one project that has got off the ground, Adani’s Carmichael mine, still retains approvals to mine up to 60m tonnes of coal a year for export to power stations. But the company has said the project is currently downscaled to a 10m-tonne-a-year operation.

In the early 2010s, the Queensland government passed environmental approvals for six mines in the Galilee – including Carmichael – with more than 15,000 operational jobs claimed across the projects.

By 2014, a government-backed assessment of the basin’s coal identified four mines that had gained initial approval, two more going through environmental approvals and a further seven considered at much earlier stages of development.

The Galilee basin in central Queensland. Photograph: Andrew Quilty/Greenpeace

Earlier reports from environment groups and others identified nine of those projects as “megamines” which, if they gained approvals and were at full production, would produce 330m tonnes of coal a year.

When burned, all that coal would emit 857m tonnes of CO2 a year, according to a report from Climate Analytics.

But slowly the projects – and the jobs claims – have fallen away.

The Degulla mine had an estimated 35m tonnes of coal a year waiting to be dug. But in 2013 its Brazil-based owner Vale, one of the world’s biggest miners, put the project on the market.

Vale announced last year it was getting out of coal altogether and told the Guardian this week it still has “exploration tenements in the [Galilee] region that are in [the] process of divestment”.

The Chinese-owned Macmines Austasia abandoned its bid for a mining lease for its $6.7bn China Stone mine in 2019.

A state environmental assessment for another mine, the South Galilee Coal project, lapsed in late 2019. The project’s part-owner had already gone into administration and there’s little sign of action from the mine’s American investor.

Hancock Prospecting has interests in two mines and Clive Palmer’s Waratah Coal also has two mine projects identified.

Market analysts S&P Global said in a bulletin in December there was “yet to be any commitment registered for these projects”.

Palmer’s Galilee Coal project – once known as the China First mine – is linked to his company’s plans to build a power station in the Barcaldine region. Those plans, submitted to the Barcaldine regional council, were called in by the state government in December.

Hancock Prospecting and Waratah Coal did not respond to a request for response. The Queensland Resources Council said no one was available to speak before deadline.

Tim Buckley, an energy market analyst at the pro-renewables Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, says when the Galilee projects were proposed, they threatened to become “a climate bomb that was unparalleled”.

“All but one didn’t even get out of the starting blocks and I think none will,” he says.

Buckley says the entire economic rationale for coal has changed since the projects were announced.

“A decade ago it was about catering for a growth in demand in energy across Asia,” he says. “But now it is about decarbonisation. It is accepted now that coal is on a slow but terminal decline. The world is completely different now.”

Anti-coal protesters outside Waratah Coal headquarters in 2021. Photograph: Russell Freeman/AAP

A December report from the Office of the Chief Economist noted 37 coal projects in Australia at the feasibility stage, but many were delayed.

There was a growing preference for expansions of brownfield sites – previously utilised land – over greenfield investments, the report said, with “an expanding list of lenders/investors who have withdrawn from financing new thermal coal projects”.

Buckley says: “Everyone today that still loves coal sees it as cheaper to buy stranded assets that exist rather than go for greenfield projects.”

The Queensland government is working on a development plan for the resources industry. A draft says that the global market for thermal coal “is likely to decline as countries choose their own path to reduced emissions” but there could still be pockets of growth.

“Queensland’s high-quality thermal coal deposits mean that we are well placed to respond to these opportunities, while continuing to support the coal industry to decarbonise and remain competitive for longer,” the draft says.

In a statement, the Queensland resources minister, Scott Stewart, said the “development of any specific project is a matter for the relevant company”.

He said the government had “long held the position that we support resources projects which stack up financially, environmentally and socially”.

Stewart said the plan would look at “taking advantage of the worldwide demand for new economy minerals which are critical as part of clean energy technology like batteries and renewables”.

Links

(AU SMH) Climate Wars To Die Down In Federal Election As Major Parties Dodge Risks

Sydney Morning HeraldMike Foley

A new paradigm has emerged in the climate wars that will likely see a ceasefire between Labor and the government during the upcoming federal election campaign, as both major parties seek to balance pro-mining sector messages with their upgraded climate action policies.

The Adani coal project in the Bowen Basin was a lightning rod for the storm over climate change in the 2019 election, where the government held all its seats in Queensland’s coal country on the back of a polarising campaign promising strong support for fossil-fuel projects.

The Adani coal project was used by the federal government in 2019 as a to wedge the Labor Party between urban and regional voters. Credit: Alex Ellinghausen

The Greens will ramp up a new Adani-style campaign centring on major gas projects such as the Beetaloo Basin, in the Northern Territory, and Scarborough, which is offshore of Western Australia. But it’s unlikely either will capture the public imagination like Adani.

Ahead of the 2019 election, Prime Minister Scott Morrison derided Labor leader Bill Shorten’s policy to promote electric vehicles and lambasted him for promoting the local job opportunities in the Adani coal mine to regional Queensland while advocating for ambitious action on climate change in metropolitan electorates.

A cautious opposition is determined to avoid a repeat of 2019. Labor leader Anthony Albanese says his party will back coal and gas projects as long as there is demand for their products.

Essential Media pollster Peter Lewis, who has close links to unions and Labor, said a repeat of an Adani-style campaign was unlikely because that issue was distinctive for offering “hope for jobs in local communities that were losing hope”.


Coal use to peak in 2026 as renewables surge past forecasts
“Labor has adopted a smart strategy, in my opinion, to take the heat out of climate issues by refusing to engage the government in debates around specific coal and gas projects,” Mr Lewis said.

The government faces a challenge from the Climate 200 group of philanthropists, which is backing independent candidates who champion strong environmental policies in government-held seats, such as North Sydney, Kooyong, Goldstein and Wentworth.

Mr Lewis said the independents would “act as a handbrake” on a repeat of the 2019 campaign, where the government mounted a scare campaign over what it called Labor’s “economy-wrecking” climate policies.

“The dynamics this time are different to 2019. Then, Labor was effectively wedged between its inner-city voters and rural base. This time, it is the Coalition feeling the wedge from the community independents challenging Liberal seats like those held by Josh Frydenberg, Tim Wilson,” Mr Lewis said.

“I think the government is more susceptible to the claims of double-dealing, with (Nationals leader) Barnaby Joyce deeply unpopular with urban voters.”

Greens leader Adam Bandt has called out Labor over a failure to rule out support for the Beetaloo Basin, which is being explored by private companies drawing on federal grants, describing the potential emissions from the gas there as a “climate bomb”.

“If you thought Adani was bad, Beetaloo is terrible,” Mr Bandt said in October.

Greens environment spokeswoman Sarah Hanson-Young said her party would challenge both major parties’ support for fossil fuels.

Energy
“The Greens are really clear about this: we need to see a change of government but you’re going to have to have the Greens in there to hold Labor to account on climate and the environment. Labor’s wanting to walk both sides of the fence and we need the Greens in there to be the honest arbiters.”

Former Greens leader Bob Brown led a convoy of campaigners through Queensland in 2019, calling for the Adani project to be cancelled. Mr Brown has rejected Labor’s accusations that he prevented the opposition winning crucial regional seats in that state, but credited his efforts with the election of Greens senator Larissa Waters.

However, Labor’s environment movement is backing the opposition’s approach, arguing that Mr Brown’s divisive campaign was damaging to the green cause.

Labor Environment Action Network co-convenor Felicity Wade said: “It was good for the Greens, bad for the planet. Adani proceeded and a climate-denying government was returned. They will try a repeat with Beetaloo.

“Middle Australia is not yet convinced that fossil fuels have to go; the first step must be the positive one of delivering the new industries of a renewable energy superpower.

Bob Brown credited his Stop Adani convoy with the election of Greens Queensland Senator Larissa Waters in 2019. Credit: Alex Ellinghausen

Environmental protection
“But the environment movement has got wiser about tactics that divide Australians and empower the deniers. This time, they won’t be handing the Greens an easy way to undermine those trying to build a national consensus on climate action.”

The federal government last year committed for the first time to reach net zero emissions by 2050, a significant advancement, even if it remains welded to a relatively low mid-term target to reduce carbon emissions by just 28 per cent by 2030.

Labor has kept its commitment to net zero by 2050, and slightly downgraded the 2030 target from the 2019 campaign from 45 per cent by 2030 to 43 per cent.

Links

(AU ENS) Australia Links Increasing Megafires To Climate Change

Environment News Service

Megafire attacks Narrowneck in the Blue Mountains, Katoomba, New South Wales, Australia, October 21, 2013 (Photo by Gary Hayes)

CANBERRA – Climate change has driven a measurable increase in Australia’s forest fire activity over the last 30 years, finds new research conducted by Australia’s national science agency, CSIRO.

The study identified a lengthening of the fire season towards autumn and winter, along with an increase in fire activity in cooler and warmer regions such as the alpine forests in Tasmania and the tropical rainforests of Queensland.

Australia’s mean temperature has increased by 1.4 degrees Celsius since 1910, with a rapid increase in extreme heat events, while rainfall has declined in the southern and eastern regions of the continent.

The CSIRO research, published in the journal “Nature Communications,” is the first of its kind and combines analysis of previous forest fire sites with eight drivers of fire activity, including climate, fuel accumulation, ignition and management techniques such as prescribed burning.

A small forest fire grows on a dry, windy evening in Seddon, South Australia, August 12, 2021 (Photo courtesy New Matilda)

Scientists were able to identify increases driven by the changing climate as distinct from increases due to natural variability based on 32 years of satellite data and 90 years of ground-based datasets from climate and weather observations, plus simulated fuel loads for Australian forests.

CSIRO scientist Dr. Pep Canadell said the research is one of the most extensive studies of its kind performed to date, and is important for understanding how continued changes to the climate might impact future fire activity.

Dr. Canadell is chief research scientist in the CSIRO Climate Science Centre and executive director of the Global Carbon Project, an international consortium of scientists under the umbrella of Future Earth and a scientific partner of the World Climate Research Programme.

“While all eight drivers of fire activity played varying roles in influencing forest fires, climate was the overwhelming factor driving fire-activity,” Dr. Canadell said.

The research results show the frequency of forest megafire years – when more than one million hectares burned – has jumped since the year 2000. Megafire years are likely to continue under future projected climate change,” Dr. Canadell said.

Globally, fire activity is decreasing, yet the extent of forest fires in Australia is increasing.

The CSIRO study looked at the 30 years from 1988 through 2019. The average annual area of forest burned in Australia increased 350 percent in the first 15 years of that period, and it jumped to a startling 800 percent increase from 2001 through 2019.

“In Australia, fire frequency has increased rapidly in some areas and there are now regions in the southeast and south with fire intervals shorter than 20 years. This is significant because it means some types of vegetation won’t reach maturity and this could put ecosystems at risk,” Dr. Canadell explained.

“Understanding these trends will help to inform emergency management, health, infrastructure, natural resource management and conservation,” he said.

But environmental advocates point out that Australia is not doing as much as most other nations to prevent and manage climate change.

On the annual Climate Change Performance Index released November 9, Australia dropped four places to 58th out of 64 places overall, ahead of only Korea, Taiwan, Canada, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Kazakhstan.

The Index ranked Australia last on climate policy, in 64th place.

Australia received very low ratings for its performance across the index’s four categories: emissions, renewable energy, energy use and climate policy.

The report, released at the COP26 climate conference in Glasgow by Germanwatch, the New Climate Institute and the Climate Action Network, ranked Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the United Kingdom and Morocco as the five highest-ranked nations on the index, with the first three places left empty to illustrate that no country is doing enough.

“Although renewable energy is booming in Australia, all the work has been done by state and territory governments and the private sector, which is why Australia is rock bottom on the table of national climate policies,” said Australian Conservation Foundation climate and energy program manager Gavan McFadzean.

“While 130 countries have lifted their near term climate ambition, Australia has not, relegating us to the bottom of the pack with the likes of Saudi Arabia and Iran,” he said.

“The Australian government’s refusal to budge on 2030 targets has been widely criticized in Glasgow and is out of step with public opinion at home, with a major poll this year showing a majority of Australians, in every federal seat, wants stronger climate action this decade,” McFadzean said.

Comments about Australia by the Climate Change Performance Index, CCPI, are critical of the country’s lack of ambition.

“Australia’s federal climate policies are based on its Technology Investment Roadmap, TIR, aimed at supporting technologies intended to help reduce emissions by 2040, yet with continuation of fossil fuel-based energy consumption,” CCPI said in its analysis.

In October 2021, the Australian government, led by Liberal Prime Minister Scott Morrison, confirmed its long-term emissions reduction plan aiming for net zero by 2050, but announced no new policies or plans.

The Morrison Government does not have any policies on phasing out coal or gas, but carbon capture, utilization and storage as well as hydrogen are being promoted as low emissions technologies.

Even though the renewable electricity sector is growing, the experts believe that Australia has failed to take advantage of its potential, and other countries have outpaced it.

Now, after a decade of bitter opposition to development of a Queensland coal mine, the Indian conglomerate Adani is ready to ship coal to India from the North Queensland Export Terminal.

Environmental advocates warn the burning of Adani coal will worsen climate change with CO2 emissions, and there are fears that coal mining, handling and transport will damage the Great Barrier Reef, already suffering the coral bleaching brought on by climate change.

Links