11/01/2022

(AU ABC) Should You Build Your Home Stronger To Withstand The Possible Impacts Of Climate Change?

ABC News

A prototype image of a house standing through strong winds
In the face of increasing extreme weather events, James Cook University, Suncorp Insurance, CSIRO and Room 11 architecture collaborated to build a home resilient to fire, flood, storm and cyclone. (Supplied: Suncorp)

Key Points
  • Some people are building their home above code to protect from extreme weather
  • Experts say houses will be more exposed under climate change
  • The government is encouraging 'resilience' measures
As the footprint of climate change becomes clearer, the ability of homes to withstand the accelerating impacts of climate change and extreme weather is turning into a significant challenge.

Working as an engineer for the Tropical Cyclone Testing Station, Geoff Boughton has seen hundreds of homes wrecked and ravaged, with families left without anywhere to live.

He most recently witnessed it in Kalbarri and Northampton, an area where houses were not built to withstand the continuous cyclonic wind gusts caused by Seroja.
"They have to start again, and I really don't want that to happen for myself or my family,” he said.
Geoff Boughton outside is home
Geoff Boughton's Perth home is built to withstand a weak cyclone, and intense thunderstorms. (ABC: Tyne Logan)

When building his own home in Perth, well outside of the cyclone-rated region of WA, this was something he considered.

Cyclones are uncommon near Perth, but they're not unheard of.

"When you think of a 1 in 500 year event, if a house lasts for 50 years that makes it a 1 in 10 chance it happening within the lifetime of my house," he said.

“The other thing is, with climate change, we really don’t know what the climate is going to be in 50 years time."

tradie drills nails into roof
During construction, a series of reinforcements were added to Geoff Boughton's roof. (Supplied: Geoff Boughton)

From the outside, his house looks like a typical Perth home, but its structure is far stronger.

It's able to withstand a weak cyclone blowing constant gusts of up to 160kph and is waterproofed for extreme thunderstorm events.

And it didn't cost much.

He said this was achieved through several features, including strengthening a series of structural elements on his roof to prevent it from lifting even if a window was broken.

Geoff Boughton reaches at window
Mr Boughton has higher windows, strengthened roof connections and sealing around his roof. (ABC: Hugh Sando)

The windows are a slightly higher specification to keep water out better, and his roof edge is sealed to prevent water from coming in.

All up, he said the additional features cost him about $4000 from a new build for his timber home.

The fire-proof home

Meanwhile, 100 kilometres south in Waroona, nestled amongst an old forest so thick you can barely see the house, lives Kingsley Dixon.

His house is considered to be in a bushfire-prone area.

Kingsley Dixon has built infrastructure to protect his home from bushfires 1min 41sec

But having lived through bushfires, including the devastating Waroona-Yarloop blaze, he and his husband have gone well beyond basic code in their build.

They have invested tens of thousand of dollars adding a reliable, long-term water supply, superficial sprinklers across the roofing system and fire-resilient landscaping around the house.

"I think we need to move beyond minimum compliance, and ensure what we produce imagines the worst-case fire," he said.
"What if we get the 1 in 1000 year fire, which we haven't experienced?"
Kingsley Dixon outside leafy garden
Kingsley Dixon has spent tends of thousands of dollards safeguarding his home from fire. (ABC: Glyn Jones)

Like Mr Boughton, climate change and the heightened risk of bushfires in his region has reinforced his decision.

Aren't building codes enough?

Both Mr Dixon and Mr Boughton are part of a growing cohort of people building what is know as 'resilience' into their homes.

A resilient house is one that is able to be lived in with relatively little work after a big event.

Building standards are constantly under review to include the changing climate, with their primary focus to protect public health, safety and general welfare.

But University of WA Environmental Engineer Anas Ghadouani said they are often "slow" to incorporate changes, and don't always protect your home from extreme weather events.

A head and shoulders shot of UWA water expert Anas Ghadouani smiling and standing in front of the Swan River.
Professor Anas Ghadouani said building codes did not always protect your home from extreme weather events. (ABC News: Charlotte Hamlyn)

He said the codes juggle a fine balance of risk to impact.

"The regulator can only look at the minimum standard that will resolve in the minimum damage to a neighbourhood with that building code," he said.

He said the current risk analysis provided by building codes often meant a house would not withstand 'freak storms', which are getting more likely with climate change.

"So the building codes are protecting you from a 1 in 100 year event," he said.

"But the problem is some of those events are occurring more frequently than they're statistically supposed to be."

Is it worth the cost?

Building extra strength into your home is being encouraged by government and industry.

Following Tropical Cyclone Seroja, the WA Department of Fire and Emergency Services offered grants of up to $20,000 to build additional protection into their homes.

Melissa Pexton, State Recovery Controller from TC Seroja, said it was about minimising future destruction.

"With an increase in those more devastating events, we really want to try build in resilience at every opportunity," she said.


Youtube One House to Save Many Documentary 22min 47sec

 Earlier this year, the James Cook University, Suncorp Insurance, CSIRO and architecture firm Room 11 collaborated to build what they called the "one house to save many", a home resilient to fire, flood, storm and cyclone.

The directors of Room 11 architects said the final design showed, with thoughtful planning, it could be achieved at a comparable cost to a standard architecturally designed home.
"Things like running the fire in the ceiling and down the walls, and keeping the power-points a meter off the floor costs exactly the same, but your wiring stays dry," associate director Kate Phillips said.
The costs of building resilience into your home can vary significantly, as demonstrated by the costs of Mr Boughton's features compared with Mr Dixon's.

But it's most affordable when building from scratch.

Mr Ghadouni said it ultimately came down to personal choice and the need to weigh up the risk with the cost to build.

"Probably not enough people are acting on it in my view, but people are actually not sure what to do," he said.

He said there was enough climate science on a regional level for the home-owner to be able to make a decision on their risks.

Links

(BBC) Lithium Batteries' Big Unanswered Question

BBC Future Planet - Allison Hirschlag

As the world looks to electrify vehicles and store renewable power, one giant challenge looms: what will happen to all the old lithium batteries?

(Image credit: Getty Images)

As the quiet whirr of electric vehicles gradually replaces the revs and noxious fumes of internal combustion engines, a number of changes are set to filter through our familiar world.

The overpowering smell of gas stations will fade away into odourless charge stations where cars can re-juice their batteries as needed. Meanwhile, gas-powered generator sites that dot the horizon may be retrofitted to house massive batteries that could one day power entire cities with renewable energy.

This electrified future is much closer than you might think. General Motors announced earlier this year that it plans to stop selling gas-powered vehicles by 2035. Audi's goal is to stop producing them by 2033, and many other major auto companies are following suit.

In fact, according to BloombergNEF, two-thirds of the world's passenger vehicle sales will be electric by 2040. And grid-scale systems the world over are growing rapidly thanks to advancing battery storage technology.

While this may sound like the ideal path to sustainable power and road travel, there's one big problem. Currently, lithium (Li) ion batteries are those typically used in EVs and the megabatteries used to store energy from renewables, and Li batteries are hard to recycle.
As demand for EVs escalates, as it's projected to, the impetus to recycle more of them is set to barrel through the battery and motor vehicle industry
One reason is that the most widely used methods of recycling more traditional batteries, like lead-acid batteries, don't work well with Li batteries. The latter are typically larger, heavier, much more complex and even dangerous if taken apart wrong.

In your average battery recycling plant, battery parts are shredded down into a powder, and then that powder is either melted (pyrometallurgy) or dissolved in acid (hydrometallurgy). But Li batteries are made up of lots of different parts that could explode if they're not disassembled carefully. And even when Li batteries are broken down this way, the products aren't easy to reuse.

"The current method of simply shredding everything and trying to purify a complex mixture results in expensive processes with low value products," says Andrew Abbott, a physical chemist at the University of Leicester.

As a result, it costs more to recycle them than to mine more lithium to make new ones. Also, since large scale, cheap ways to recycle Li batteries are lagging behind, only about 5% of Li batteries are recycled globally, meaning the majority are simply going to waste.

But as demand for EVs escalates, as it's projected to, the impetus to recycle more of them is set to barrel through the battery and motor vehicle industry.

Extracting and processing lithium requires huge amounts of water and energy, and has been linked to environmental problems near lithium facilities (Credit: Alamy)

The current shortcomings in Li battery recycling isn't the only reason they are an environmental strain. Mining the various metals needed for Li batteries requires vast resources. It takes 500,000 gallons (2,273,000 litres) of water to mine one tonne of lithium.

In Chile's Atacama Salt Flats, lithium mining has been linked to declining vegetation, hotter daytime temperatures and increasing drought conditions in national reserve areas. So even though EVs may help reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions over their lifetime, the battery that powers them starts its life laden with a large environmental footprint.
We can no longer treat the batteries as disposable
– Shirley Meng
If the millions upon millions of Li batteries that will give out after around 10 years or so of use   are recycled more efficiently, however, it will help neutralise all that energy expenditure. Several labs have been working on refining more efficient recycling methods so that, eventually, a standardised, eco-friendly way to recycle Li batteries will be ready to meet skyrocketing demand.

"We have to find ways to make it enter what we call a circular lifecycle, because the lithium and the cobalt and nickel take a lot of electricity and a lot of effort to be mined and refined and made into the batteries. We can no longer treat the batteries as disposable," says Shirley Meng, professor in energy technologies at the University of California, San Diego.

How to recycle Li batteries

A Li battery cell has a metal cathode, or positive electrode that collects electrons during the electrochemical reaction, made of lithium and some mix of elements that typically include cobalt, nickel, manganese and iron. It also has an anode, or the electrode that releases electrons to the external circuit, made of graphite, a separator and an electrolyte of some kind, which is the medium that transports the electrons between cathode and anode.

The lithium ions travelling from the anode to the cathode form an electric current. The metals in the cathode are the most valuable parts of the battery, and these are what chemists focus on preserving and refurbishing when they dismantle an Li battery.

Meng says to think of an Li battery like a bookshelf with many layers, and the lithium ions rapidly move across each shelf, cycling back each time to the top shelf – a process called intercalation. After years and years, the bookshelf naturally starts to break down and collapse. So when chemists like Meng dismantle an Li battery, that's the sort of degradation they see in the structure and materials.

"We can actually find the mechanisms, [and] either using heat or some kind of chemical treatment method, we can put the bookshelf back [together]," says Meng. "So we can let those recycled and refurbished materials go back to the assembly line to the [Li battery] factories to be made into new batteries."

Lithium batteries are more internally complex than lead-acid batteries, composed of many carefully assembled parts (Credit: Getty Images)

Improving Li battery recycling and ultimately making their parts reusable will reinfuse value into the Li batteries already out there. This is why scientists are advocating for the direct recycling process Meng describes – because it can give the most precious parts of Li batteries, like the cathode and anode, a second life. This could significantly offset the energy, waste and costs associated with manufacturing them.

But disassembling Li batteries is currently being done predominantly by hand in lab settings, which will need to change if direct recycling is to compete with more traditional recycling methods. "In the future, there will need to be more technology in disassembly," says Abbott. "If a battery is assembled using robots, it is logical that it needs to be disassembled in the same way."

Carbon Count
The emissions from travel it took to report this story were 0kg CO2. The digital emissions from this story are an estimated 1.2g to 3.6g CO2 per page view. Find out more about how we calculated this figure here.
Abbott's team at the Faraday Institution in the UK is investigating the robotic disassembly of Li batteries as part of the ReLib Project, which specialises in the recycling and reuse of Li batteries.

The team has also found a way to achieve direct recycling of the anode and cathode using an ultrasonic probe, "like what the dentist uses to clean your teeth," he explains. "It focuses ultrasound on a surface which creates tiny bubbles that implode and blast the coating off the surface."

This process avoids having to shred the battery parts, which can make recovering them exceedingly difficult.

According to Abbott's team's research, this ultrasonic recycling method can process 100 times more material over the same period than the more traditional hydrometallurgy method. He says it can also be done for less than half the cost of creating a new battery from virgin material.

Abbott believes the process can easily be applied to scale, and used on larger grid-based batteries, because they typically have the same battery cell structure, they just contain more cells. However, the team is currently only applying it to production scrap, from which parts are easier to separate, because they're already free of their casings.

 The team's robotic dismantling tests are ramping up though. "We have a demonstrator unit that currently works on whole electrodes and we hope in the next 18 months to be able to showcase an automated process working in a production facility," says Abbott.

Degradable batteries

Some scientists are advocating for a move away from Li batteries in favour of ones that can be produced and broken down in more eco-friendly ways. Jodie Lutkenhaus, a professor of chemical engineering at Texas A&M University, has been working on a battery that is made of organic substances that can degrade on command.

"Many batteries today are not recycled because of the associated energy and labour cost," says Lutkenhaus. "Batteries that degrade on command may simplify or lower the barrier to recycling. Eventually, these degradation products could be reconstituted back into a fresh new battery, closing the materials life-cycle loop."

It's a fair argument considering that, even when a Li battery is dismantled and its parts are refurbished, there will still be some parts that can't be saved and become waste. A degradable battery like the one Lutkenhaus' team is working on could be a more sustainable power source.

Organic Radical Batteries (ORBs) have been around since the 2000s, and function with the help of organic materials that are synthesised to store and release electrons. "An Organic Radical Battery has two of these [materials], both acting as electrodes, that work in concert to store and release electrons, or energy, together," explains Lutkenhaus.

The team uses an acid to break their ORBs down into amino acids and other byproducts, however, conditions need to be just right for the parts to degrade properly. "Eventually we found that acid at elevated heat worked," says Lutkenhaus.

There are a number of challenges ahead for this degradable battery though. The materials needed to create it are expensive, and it has yet to provide the amount of power required for high-demand applications like EVs and power grids. But perhaps the greatest challenge degradable batteries like Lutkenhaus's face is competing with the already well-established Li battery.

As demand for electric vehicles surges in the coming decades, the need for a way to recycle their batteries will grow too (Credit: Getty Images)

The next step for scientists pushing direct recycling of Li batteries forward is working with battery manufacturers and recycling plants to streamline the process from build to breakdown.

"We are really encouraging all the battery cell manufacturers to barcode all the batteries so with robotic AI techniques we can easily sort out the batteries," says Meng. "It takes the entire field to cooperate with each other in order to make that happen."

Li batteries are used to power many different devices, from laptops to cars to power grids, and the chemical makeup differs depending on the purpose, sometimes significantly. This should be reflected in the way they're recycled. Scientists say battery recycling plants must separate the various Li batteries into separate streams, similar to how different types of plastic are sorted when recycled, in order for the process to be most efficient. 

And even though they face an uphill battle, more sustainable batteries are slowly but surely coming onto the scene. "We can already see designs entering the market which make assembly and disassembly easier, and it is probable that this will be an important topic in future battery development," says Abbott.

On the production side, battery and car manufacturers are working on cutting down on the materials needed to build Li batteries to help reduce energy expenditure during mining and the waste each battery creates at the end of its life.

Electric car manufacturers have also begun to reuse and repurpose their own batteries in a number of different ways. For example, Nissan is refurbishing old Leaf car batteries and putting them in automated guided vehicles that bring parts to its factories.

Speed bumps ahead

The steadily increasing market demand for EVs already has companies across the automobile industry spending billions of dollars on increasing the sustainability of Li batteries. However, China is currently the largest producer of Li batteries by far, and subsequently ahead when it comes to recycling them.

So far, China produces the most lithium batteries, and it also has more capability to recycle them than other producers (Credit: Getty Images)

Widely adopting standardised methods for recycling Li batteries that include sorting streams for the different types will get them a big step closer. Meanwhile, using AI technology to refurbish the most useful parts, such as the cathode, could help countries with small supplies of Li battery components to not have to rely so much on China.

Developing new batteries that might rival the Li battery will also likely shake up the industry by creating some healthy competition. "I do think it does the world better if we diversify the portfolio for battery storage, particularly for grid storage," says Meng.

The advent of a less complex, safer battery that is cheaper to make and easier to separate at the end of its life is the ultimate answer to the current sustainability problem with EVs. But until such a battery makes an appearance, standardising Li battery recycling is a significant move in the right direction.

And in about 2025, when millions of EV batteries reach the end of their initial life cycles, a streamlined recycling process will look much more appealing to economies the world over. So perhaps, by the time EVs become the predominant form of transport, there will be a good chance their batteries will be gearing up for a second life.

Links

(AU AAP) Aussie Birds Disappearing Due To Warming

AAP - John Kidman

Eleven bird species are endemic to the Australian Wet Tropics including the golden bowerbird. Image by ADAM MCKEOWN

It’s called “the escalator to extinction”: as mountain habitats are warmed by climate change, resident plants and animals are continually forced upslope until they simply run out of room.

Scientists the world over have long feared the impact of such events but now concede it’s actually happening across one of the planet’s most spectacular rainforest regions, in far north Queensland.

Researchers Stephen Williams and Alejandro de la Fuente have just completed an assessment of bird populations in the Australian Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, stretching 650 kilometres from Townsville to Cooktown.

Examining the abundance and distribution of 42 species, they found compelling evidence that as temperatures rise, lowland birds are moving uphill and displacing other species.

Birds that live at high altitudes along the rugged coastline – most of them rare upland species – have been pushed out of the lower levels of their ranges, with their numbers declining by almost half.

Meanwhile lowland bird populations in the same areas have increased 190 per cent.

With data collected over 16 years from 114 sites between sea level and 1500 metres, the James Cook University pair say their findings suggest a bleak outcome.

“The outstanding universal value of the Australian Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, one of the most irreplaceable biodiversity hotspots on earth, is rapidly degrading,” they say.

“These observed impacts are likely to be similar in many tropical montane ecosystems globally.”

Worldwide estimates of extinctions over the remainder of the century as a result of climate change suggest potential losses of between 15 and 35 per cent of all species.

The projected impact is expected to be especially severe in mountain ecosystems with more than 80 per cent of species facing high extinction risk.

The global significance of montane ecosystems is heightened in the tropics, with approximately half the world’s species of plants and vertebrates believed to be endemic to 34 identified global biodiversity hotspots.

Professor Williams and Mr de la Fuente say bird species will especially continue to experience upslope shifts.

“Left with nowhere else to go, montane species are predicted to become increasingly susceptible to stochastic extinctions or declining populations,” they say.

“This so-called escalator to extinction has been predicted, and now observed, in a number of places and taxa around the world.”

Australian Wet Tropics rainforests were World Heritage listed in 1988 and are described as the planet’s sixth-most irreplaceable protected area.

They are home to 370 bird species, 11 of them – including the endangered southern cassowary – found nowhere else.

Nine of the endemic species are confined to upland rainforests.

They include the tooth-billed bowerbird, golden bowerbird, bridled honeyeater, fernwren, Atherton scrubwren, mountain thornbill, grey-headed robin, northern logrunner and Bower’s shrikethrush.

Links