17/01/2022

(AU The Conversation) This WA Town Just Topped 50℃ – A Dangerous Temperature Many Australians Will Have To Get Used To

The Conversation 

Shutterstock

Author
 is Senior Lecturer in Climate Science, The University of Melbourne     
While Australians are used to summer heat, most of us only have to endure the occasional day over 40℃.

Yesterday though, the temperature peaked at 50.7℃ in Onslow, a small Western Australian town around 100km from Exmouth.

Remarkably, the town sits right next to the ocean, which usually provides cooling. By contrast, the infamously hot WA town of Marble Bar has only reached 49.6℃ this summer, despite its inland location.

If confirmed, the Onslow temperature would equal Australia’s hottest on record set in Oodnadatta, South Australia, in January 1960. It would also mark only the fourth day over 50℃ for an Australian location since reliable observations began.

Unfortunately, this extreme heat is becoming more common as the world heats up. The number of days over 50℃ has doubled since the 1980s.

These dangerous temperatures are now being recorded more often – not just in Australia but in cities in Pakistan, India and the Persian Gulf. This poses real threats to the health of people enduring them.

Where did the heat come from?

Hitting such extreme temperatures requires heat to build up over several days.

Onslow’s temperatures had been close to average since a couple of heatwaves struck the Pilbara in the second half of December. So where did this unusual heat come from?

This weather chart from 13th January 2022 illustrates the conditions just half an hour before the record-equalling 50.7℃ was recorded. The blue dashed line marks the trough which meets the coast close to Onslow and helped bring in the hot air. Bureau of Meteorology

In short, from the bakingly hot desert. South to south-easterly winds blew very hot air from the interior of the state up to Onslow. The wind came from an area that has had little to no rainfall since November, so the very hot air was also extremely dry.

Dry air kept the sun beating at full intensity by preventing any cloud cover or storm formation. The result? The temperature rose and rose through the morning and early afternoon, and the temperature spiked at over 50℃ just before 2.30pm local time.

Aren’t we in a cooler La Niña period?

Australia’s weather is strongly linked to conditions in the Pacific Ocean. At the moment we’re in a La Niña event where we have cooler than normal ocean temperatures near the equator in the central and east Pacific.

La Niña is typically associated with cooler, wetter conditions. But its effects on Australian weather are strongest in spring, when we had unusually wet and cool conditions over the east of the continent.

During summer the relationship between La Niña and Australian weather usually weakens, with its strongest impacts normally confined to the northeast of the continent.

During La Niña we typically see fewer and less intense heatwaves across much of eastern Australia, but the intensity of heat extremes in Western Australia is not very different between La Niña and El Niño.

The pattern of extreme heat in Western Australia and flooding in parts of Queensland is fairly typical of a La Niña summer, although temperatures over 50℃ are extremely rare.

men pump water from flooded street
Recent flooding in Queensland is also typical of La Nina summers. RAPID RELIEF TEAM

Climate change is cranking up the heat

Should these temperatures be a surprise? Sadly, no. Australia has warmed by around 1.4℃ since 1910, well ahead of the global average of 1.1℃.

In northern Australia, summer-average temperatures have not risen as much as other parts of the country, because summers in the Top End have also got wetter. That’s in line with climate change models.

When the conditions are right in the Pilbara, however, heat is significantly more extreme than it used to be. Heat events in the region have become more frequent, more intense, and longer-lasting, just as in most other regions.

Most of us have chosen not to live in Australia’s hottest areas. So you might think you don’t need to worry about 50℃ heatwaves. But as the climate continues to warm, heatwave conditions are expected to become much more common and extreme across the continent.

In urban areas, roads and concrete soak up the sun’s heat, raising maximum temperatures by several degrees and making for dangerous conditions.

Even if we keep global warming below 2℃ in line with the Paris Agreement, we can still expect to see our first 50℃ days in Sydney and Melbourne in coming years. In January 2020 the Western Sydney suburb of Penrith came very close, reaching 48.9℃.

man holds child in front of cooling mist machine
Sydney and Melbourne will experience 50℃ days in coming years. Joe Castro/AAP

As you know, it’s going to be very hard to achieve even keeping global warming below 2℃, given the need to urgently slash greenhouse gas emissions in the next decade.

As it stands, the world’s actions on emission reduction suggest we are actually on track for around 2.7℃ of warming, which would see devastating consequences for life on Earth.

We already know what we need to do to prevent this frightening future.

The stronger the action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions globally – including by major carbon emitting countries such as Australia – the less the world will warm and the less Australian heat extremes will intensify.

That’s because the relationships between greenhouse gas emissions, global temperatures and Australian heat extremes are roughly linear.

You may think Australians are good at surviving the heat. But the climate you were born in doesn’t exist any more.

Sadly, our farms, wildlife, and suburbs will struggle to cope with the extreme heat projected for coming decades.

Let’s work to make this 50℃ record an outlier – and not the new normal.

Links

(UK Financial Times) Shell Climate Case Winner Targets Dozens More Companies

Financial Times -

Dutch activists warn 30 groups from BP to Unilever to slash emissions or risk legal action

Members of Milieudefensie celebrate their win against Shell outside the Palace of Justice court in The Hague last May © Peter Boer/Bloomberg

The environmental group that won a landmark court case last year against Shell has warned 30 multinationals to slash their emissions or risk legal action, as pressure mounts on the private sector to comply with global climate goals.

Milieudefensie, the Dutch wing of Friends of the Earth, has written to companies including BP, ExxonMobil, ABN Amro, ING, Unilever, Vitol and KLM, all of which have entities incorporated in the Netherlands and large international footprints.

“You are receiving this letter because you lead an enterprise with control over and influence on a substantial amount of CO2 emissions,” director Donald Pols wrote to chief executives on Thursday. “Action is a mandatory obligation. And system players, such as your enterprise, bear a special responsibility.”

The warning signals that the corporate world faces a new front in the battle against climate change as the group uses its Dutch court victory, which imposed a mandate on Shell to cut its carbon emissions by 45 per cent by 2030, as a precedent to force action at other companies.

Roger Cox, the Dutch lawyer who represented Milieudefensie against Shell, told the Financial Times in December that he expected an “avalanche” of copycat cases against oil companies, banks, insurers, car manufacturers and other industries.

At the 2015 climate summit in Paris, 195 countries agreed to “pursue efforts” to limit any temperature increase to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels, but governments have since done little to compel industries or individuals to change, and global emissions have continued to rise.

Peer de Rijk, policy officer at Milieudefensie, said the ruling against Shell last May had shown that companies were required to act regardless of current legislation or consumer behaviour.

“The [Shell] verdict gives us so many possibilities and it is so clear-cut what the court says about responsibility of the companies,” he said. Shell is appealing against the ruling.

Milieudefensie has called on the chief executives to publish by April 15 a plan to cut all carbon emissions, including those produced by their customers, by 45 per cent by 2030.

The group said it was willing to work with the companies to develop policies that complied with the Paris climate accord and acknowledged that some of the organisations may already have climate plans in place. But it emphasised that lawsuits would follow against those that did not comply.

“If they do not move [far] enough, quick enough, we will of course consider going to court,” de Rijk said.

Dutch lender ING said it had received the letter and that it shared Milieudefensie’s “concerns about climate change”.

The bank said it aimed to reduce its funding to upstream oil and gas by 12 per cent by 2025 and was a member of the UN-backed Net-Zero Banking Alliance, which is committed to aligning global lending and investment activity with the goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050.

Vitol, the world’s biggest independent oil trader, said it had received the letter and was ready to engage with Milieudefensie. The company, which is registered in the Netherlands, has made no commitment to reduce emissions to date.

Exxon said it aimed to cut emissions from its own operations by 20-30 per cent by 2030. BP declined to comment.

Unilever, the British consumer goods group previously headquartered in the Netherlands, said it aimed to achieve net zero carbon emissions across its entire value chain by 2039 and to halve the value chain emissions of its products “on a per consumer basis” by 2030.

ABN Amro and KLM could not immediately be reached for comment.

Links

(The Guardian) Six In 10 Americans ‘Alarmed’ Or ‘Concerned’ About Climate Change – Study

The Guardian -

New report finds ‘alarmed’ group doubled in size over five years, while only two in 10 Americans are ‘doubtful’ or ‘dismissive’

Fridays for Future global climate strike in Washington, DC on 22 October 2021.
Fridays for Future global climate strike in Washington, DC on 22 October 2021. Photograph: Allison Bailey/REX/Shutterstock

A new report has revealed that a record number of Americans are now alarmed about the climate crisis.

The study, published by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, found that Americans overall are becoming increasingly worried about global heating, more engaged with the issue and more supportive of finding solutions to the issue.

The study categorized Americans into six distinct groups based on their beliefs, attitudes, policy support and behavior about climate change.

The six distinct groups are:
  • The Alarmed, who are the most engaged and very worried about global warming;
  • The Concerned, who think global warming is a significant threat but prioritize it less and are less likely to take action;
  • The Cautious, who are aware of climate change but are uncertain about its causes and are not very worried;
  • The Disengaged, who are largely unaware of global warming; the Doubtful, who doubt it is happening or human-caused and
  • The Dismissive, who firmly reject its reality and oppose most climate change policies.
The study revealed that the largest group, Alarmed (33%) greatly outnumber the dismissive (9%) by more than three to one. Approximately six in 10 Americans (59%) are either Alarmed or Concerned while only approximately two in 10 (19%) are Doubtful or Dismissive.

Over the last five years, the Alarmed group has nearly doubled in size, growing 15 percentage points in total. From just March 2021 to September 2021 alone, the Alarmed segment increased by 9 percentage points. Meanwhile, the Dismissive group shrank from 11% to 9% in the past five years, with only about one in 10 Americans now firmly rejecting the reality of human-caused global warming.

When the group first began its surveys in 2008, the Concerned was the largest segment. Two years later, the group decreased slightly while the Cautious grew and became roughly equally as large. On the contrary, the Alarmed was the second smallest group as recently as early 2015.

The Cautious, Doubtful and Dismissive groups have all shrunk in recent years.

“The growth of the Alarmed segment … is encouraging because progress on climate change requires strong, coordinated, and sustained action, and the Alarmed are the most likely to demand and support these actions by leaders,” the study said.

Links