22/01/2022

Humans Are Adapting To Climate Change, But Not Quickly Enough, According To New Research

Phys.org - Patrick Lejtenyi, Concordia University

Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

The evidence is overwhelming: climate change is here, and with it come catastrophes, soaring costs, migration and now, in the face of reality, human adaptation.

Across the globe, people are learning to live with a climate that is unlike the one they and generations before them experienced.

And while around the globe are feeling its effects, their individual responses to new -based threats have been largely piecemeal and inadequate, finds a new study by the Global Adaptation Mapping Initiative (GAMI).

It's an international network of researchers focusing on gathering and synthesizing on adaptation.

In a recently published article in Nature Climate Change, the authors, including Concordia assistant professor of geography, planning and environment Alexandra Lesnikowski, offer an overview of the existing literature and find significant areas where global efforts need improvement.

The 126 researchers used machine learning to assess almost 50,000 scientific documents touching on adaptation, eventually synthesizing 1,682 articles that they determined have content related to implemented adaptation response.

They conclude that the literature shows people are responding to climate threats, but there remains a lack of data on whether these responses are reducing overall risks. And, they found, the responses have not yet resulted in significant transformative change.

Local acts, global facts

"It was no surprise to find that most of the adaptations being documented are at the very local level, including individuals, households and local governments," Lesnikowski says.

"But this suggests that there is an imbalance that has emerged, with a lot happening at the local level and much less on a larger scale, at the regional or national level. And we also did not find much research looking at adaptation done in the ."

Just as the divides between the global North and South, rich and poor, rural and urban remain, the researchers found that adaptation measures and techniques varied widely depending on the region.

Europe and North America, she notes, tended to focus their adaptation efforts around infrastructure and technology. In poorer areas of Africa and Asia, however, adaptation took on a more behavioral and cultural aspect.

The study further found that while many societies are engaging in some form of adaptation behavior as a result of climate change, the efficacy of those measures has not been effectively measured.

"Less than two per cent of the articles we analyzed actually have good empirical detail on whether or not the adaptation reduced key risks," Lesnikowski says.

The articles they examined did suggest a link between adaptation and mitigation, such as reduction in greenhouse gas production.

But there is limited research on overall risk reduction outcomes—for instance, whether changes in risk-management practices or infrastructure standards are reducing the negative impacts of extreme weather events.

"This is a huge gap in our empirical understanding of whether or not adaptation is actually doing what it's supposed to in around the world. And what works in one place will not necessarily work in another."

They also found little evidence of transformational adaptations, the kind of deep structural changes that significantly alter risk exposure or social vulnerability.

These are usually major initiatives, such as moving entire communities from high-risk areas or radically changing agricultural practices. The relatively small steps taken to date is a source of worry for Lesnikowski and her colleagues.

Continuing business as usual, she says, "raises the question of whether our current approaches to adaptation are going to be sufficient to deal with escalating risks and growing social vulnerability, particularly at higher levels of global warming."

Links

(AU The Guardian) Make No Mistake – Labor And The Coalition Have Starkly Different Climate Policies

The Guardian - Thom Woodroofe

Both sides have committed to net zero emissions but voters will hopefully reward the one that knows how to get there

‘If the government was serious about protecting coal workers, they’d have a plan to begin to transition rather than continuing to provide them false hope.’ Photograph: Reuters Staff/Reuters

Author
Thom Woodroofe is the Chief of Staff to the President & CEO of the Asia Society, Kevin Rudd AC.
Thom is a fellow of the Asia Society Policy Institute where he works on U.S.-China climate cooperation, China’s climate diplomacy, and Asia’s transition to net-zero emissions.
Twitter @thomwoodroofe
Shortly before the 1996 election, Paul Keating warned the country that “when the government changes, the country changes”.

With both major parties entering this year with a commitment to reaching net zero emissions by 2050, none of us should be fooled that this means there is barely a crack of daylight between them when it comes to tackling the climate crisis.


That is because the climate policies of each of the two parties put us on track for a vastly different country as soon as the end of this decade.

And while there is a tendency to only focus on international targets and timelines when it comes to the fight against climate change, the reality is that these fundamentally affect what kind of economy, society, and environment we want to live in.

There are five clear areas where the divergence between the two major parties is most stark and will shape what life in Australia will look like by 2030.
Up to 395,000 new clean energy export jobs could be created in the coming decades if we choose wisely
First, when it comes to the cost of electricity that will power our households and businesses.

Australia might lead the world when it comes to individual rooftop solar power systems, but we lag behind when it comes to the penetration of renewables into our electricity grid. Only a quarter or so of our grid is currently fuelled by renewables, with close to two-thirds of our electricity still coming from coal.

Tipping this balance isn’t just a quixotic ideal, it’s essential if we want lower electricity prices and enhanced productivity. It affects everyday life. If we get the balance right, the average electricity bill could be more than 25 % cheaper by the end of this decade. For most Australians, the choice should therefore be seen less as about renewables versus coal, and more about the cost of electricity.

Doubts over Coalition’s net zero target as report finds soil carbon emissions may increase as climate warms. Read more
But tipping the balance also takes time. In the last 15 years, renewables have increased around 20 % — largely as a result of a mandatory renewable energy target.

Thankfully, both sides of politics now believe we can increase the share of renewables by almost a further 50 % by the end of this decade if we start now.

The difference is the government would do so by relying on the policies of the states and territories to get there, whereas Labor would seek to go further through rewiring the electricity grid, and installing community batteries plus local solar banks.

Even more stark is the question of what kind of cars we will be driving by 2030.

Electric vehicles currently account for just 2% of new car sales in Australia. By 2030, Labor wants this to be close to 90%. That would take Australia from effectively last place on the podium of comparable nations to somewhere near the top.

By contrast, the government hopes electric vehicles will account for just under a third of new car sales by the end of this decade despite the fact some European countries have already reached more than double that.

The difference is between becoming the developed world’s dumping ground of immovable combustible engine vehicles, or benefiting from what will by then likely be the cheaper electric alternatives.

This brings us to the third point of divergence between the two parties. The path we choose at home will also play a part in determining how we are seen on the international stage.

Whatever your view of the Cop26 outcome last November, one thing is clear: Australia emerged as a diminished global power that seemed hell bent on continuing to bury its head in the sand when it comes to climate change.

We showed up with simply a pamphlet as opposed to policies. We allowed our national pavilion to be sponsored by the oil and gas industry. We blocked critical parts of the negotiating text. And then we trashed the outcome before the ink was even dry by flat out refusing to take another look at our lacklustre 2030 emissions reduction target over the next year.

This did real damage to brand Australia.

Reclaiming the mantle of international climate credibility requires us to not just show up, but to sign up to the climate fight. Actions speak louder than words when it comes to how the international community engages with this issue.

And with climate change becoming a critical foreign policy and national security priority for governments, it also means we face the real risk of the imposition of carbon tariffs by the end of this decade if we do not.

That would only mean a higher cost of living for most Australians.

But by far the biggest and most important difference between the two parties’ climate policies goes to what kind of economy we want at the end of this decade. And what kind of jobs that follow – especially in our regions.

The government’s insistence over the summer that somehow Cop26 did not ring the death knell for coal has been like watching the Black Knight in Monty Python insist he just has a flesh wound.

To be clear: for the first time, almost the entire world was prepared to sign up to a commitment to phase out coal, including Australia’s own negotiating team. China and India may have only been willing to go so far as committing to a phase down, but both countries’ net zero plans will require them to wean themselves off coal in the next two decades.

That includes Australian coal.

The hard truth is that coal may be Australia’s second largest export but it clearly won’t last forever. The government’s own “modelling” admits coal will at least halve in price by the middle of the century. So we either begin the hard work to find a replacement for our trade balance sheet or we do not. That’s not about killing an industry overnight, it’s about not cutting off our nose to spite our face.

If the government was serious about climate action and serious about protecting our coal workers, the regions and our national economy, they’d have a plan to begin to transition this workforce rather than continuing to provide its workers false hope.

Thankfully, we are blessed with a perfect storm when it comes to the alternative: the best climate for renewable technologies to thrive, a thirsty Asian market for green energy exports such as hydrogen, and a workforce that will need a just transition away from coal precisely where many of these massive renewable energy powerhouse projects would need to be constructed.

As the Business Council of Australia and the ACTU have said, up to 395,000 new clean energy export jobs could be created in the coming decades if we choose wisely.

Instead, the government is clearly banking in the short term on the fact that for many Australians seeing a future without coal is hard. And it’s true: fossil fuels still have a deep place in the Australian economic psyche long after the mining boom.

As the Climate of the Nation report demonstrates, most Australians think the coal industry accounts for close to 10% of the workforce when in fact it only makes up 0.4% with fewer than 10,000 workers nationwide. More Australians work at McDonald’s.

While it is true that Australia’s contribution to global emissions cuts will not in and of itself bend the curve of individual climate impacts, if every country did what Australia was doing, the Great Barrier Reef would disappear.

Either way, by 2030 these climate impacts will become more frequent and intense as a result of our collective inaction, and even worse if we squander the rest of this decade. While this is the hardest to measure, it is yet another cautionary tale for the path we choose to follow.

With both sides of politics now committed to net zero emissions, voters will hopefully reward those that can actually spell out how we can get there and how we can transition our workers and our economy in the process and deliver a lower cost of living. Not those that want to have their cake and eat it too. And this might mean that if anyone is now wedged politically on climate, it is the government.

Voters should choose carefully.

What kind of Australia we want to live in, and what kind of Australia we want our children and grandchildren to inherit is firmly on the ballot.

Links

(AU ABC) Gascoyne Bushfires Burn For Two Weeks, Killing Livestock, Destroying Land And Devastating Pastoralists

ABC Pilbara - Michelle Stanley

Four fires have been burning across the Gascoyne region for the past two weeks. (Supplied: Department of Fire and Emergency Services)







Key Points
  • 340,000 hectares of land in WA's Gascoyne has been destroyed by fire
  • Hundreds of livestock on Meedo Station died in the blaze
  • Meedo's Chris Higham says pastoralists are thankful for no loss of human life
For the past two weeks, pastoralists, including Tim and Chris Higham, in Western Australia's Gascoyne region have been battling ferocious bushfires that have destroyed property and livestock.

Meedo Station, 800 kilometres north of Perth, has for more than 16 years been home to the Higham family, who run cattle, sheep and goats.

When lightning struck on January 6, three fires broke out in the area, plus another further north. 

Combined with strong winds and a significant fuel load, two of the fires joined together to form one mammoth blaze.

A woman wearing a hat and mask across her mouth stands in a dusty yard of goats.
Chris Higham says she has never seen such a ferocious bushfire. (Supplied: Kaufmann Productions PL)

"We've had fires previously, but nothing quite as ferocious as this one," Mrs Higham said.

"The [fire] that came up from Woodleigh Station covered ground in 10 hours that they'd modelled it to do in 48.
"It was very fast, very hot."
In an early estimation, Mrs Higham believed at least 60 per cent of her station's productive land and kilometres of fencing had been destroyed in the blaze.

At least 300 sheep and an unknown number of goats were believed to have died.

Mrs Higham said she could not yet put a figure on the loss to the station.
"There are patches that look like a bit of a moonscape.
"It's just been razed." 

Yellow grass in flames near small scrubby trees
The Gascoyne region received unusually high rainfall in 2021, creating a significant fuel load. (Supplied: Department of Fire and Emergency Services)

Fires contained, but extreme temps, winds forecast

The Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES) said the four fires had been brought under control and were contained, but authorities were cautious, with extreme temperatures and winds forecast over the weekend.

Let ABC Emergency helpFirefighter battles bushfire
ABC Emergency brings warnings and coverage of emergencies to one place before, during and after times of crisis and disaster. Read more

More than 340,000 hectares have been burnt across the Gascoyne Complex fires, according to DFES incident controller Peter Norman.
"They were very fast [moving] but in this type of grassland and heat, that is understandable in these temperature and wind conditions," he said.
"They were moving [up to] 10 kilometres per hour at their peak.

"It's very undulating, very steep … very hard to get enough machines and resources there to stop that."

Burning scrub with black smoke
The Gascoyne Complex bushfires in January. (Supplied: Department of Fire and Emergency Services)

Mr Norman said pastoralists in the region were assisted by crews from DFES, the Parks and Wildlife Service, and local government, and volunteer bushfire brigades attended from across the state.

Ground crews were also aided by a Coulson 737 FireLiner, which had a retardant capability. 

"They travel at 850km/hr with 15,000 litres of water or retardant to quell any escalating incident, Mr Norman said.

According to DFES, 90,000 litres of retardant was dropped over the Gascoyne Complex fires. 

A white plane with red markings drops bright red liquid. In the foreground stockyards.
A second Coulson 737 FireLiner has been supplied by the NSW Rural Fire Service. (Supplied: Department of Fire and Emergency Services)

Best of years up in smoke

After decades of drought, 2021 had been a particularly good year for rainfall in the region.

The town of Carnarvon, 100km north of the station, recorded more than 400 millimetres for the year, compared to an average of 187.

According to Mrs Higham, it had been a "one-in-a-hundred-year" season, which added to the loss.

Land beneath a dark grey-orange bushfire smoke
Three fires on pastoral stations in the Gascoyne converged to form one massive bushfire. (Supplied: Chris Higham, Meedo Station)

Despite the devastation, the Highams are trying to remain positive. 

"It's stock, it's dirt, it's significant, but it's not as significant as losing people," Mrs Higham said.
"At the end of the day, we've got to count our blessings." 
YouTube How to prepare for bushfires | Emergency Tips 3min 10sec

Links