24/02/2022

(AU The Age) Energy Crossroads’: Gas Proposal Sparks Protests As Experts Warn Of Shortfall

The Age - Miki Perkins

Geelong residents are calling on the Victorian government to reject a plan to build a large gas-import facility in Corio Bay, but energy experts say the state is headed for a gas shortfall without quick intervention.

Fuel supplier Viva Energy, which runs Australia’s Shell and Liberty petrol stations, last year announced its Geelong oil refinery site would become an “energy hub” that would include a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal to import gas from elsewhere in Australia and overseas.

Geelong residents are concerned about a proposal to locate a gas import terminal at Viva Energy’s refinery. Credit: Eddie Jim

Locals have formed a campaign, Geelong Renewables Not Gas, to lobby against the proposal, saying they are opposed to any fossil fuel-related projects in an era of climate change and are concerned about the local safety implications for the site’s neighbours.

“The climate impacts of a gas import terminal are huge. We don’t want to see any more Victorian fossil fuel projects going ahead,” spokesperson Sally Fisher said.

They are also concerned about potential accidents as LNG tankers approach the terminal, saying about 30,000 Geelong residents live within 3.5 kilometres of the proposed shipping channel and gas terminal.

Renewables
Gas losing favour in electricity market as renewables power on

“We think the Geelong region would produce far more secure, long-term jobs if we take action on climate change,” Ms Fisher said.

Victoria is Australia’s largest consumer of residential gas, which accounts for about 15 per cent of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions.

While the use of gas to generate electricity is declining, its use in residential homes and commercial settings has remained relatively stable.

The Viva proposal is currently the only LNG terminal mooted for Victoria, after planning minister Richard Wynne rejected a proposal from power company AGL for a terminal at Crib Point in Western Port, saying it would have had an unacceptable effect on the wetland environment.

Australia’s energy market operator, AEMO, is predicting a gas supply squeeze in Victoria and NSW by next year due to declining output from gas fields in Bass Strait, which once supplied 40 per cent of the east coast’s needs.

Although the Victorian government has committed to net zero emissions by 2050, much of the focus has been on transitioning to renewables and not the future of gas, said Tony Wood, the energy and climate change director at the Grattan Institute.

The Viva Energy refinery on Corio Bay. Credit: Eddie Jim

“Putting solar panels on your roof is one thing but replacing all the gas appliances in your home is much more challenging,” Mr Wood said.

Later this year the Victorian government will release its gas substitution plan, plotting the transition away from gas.

This will include more efficient use of gas, electrification, reduced fugitive emissions and increased use of alternative gases, such as hydrogen and biogas, a spokesperson said.

Residents would have an opportunity to raise concerns about the Corio Bay project through the planning process, they said.

Editorial
Electricity

Viva Energy’s proposal at the refinery’s existing 235-hectare industrial site, is one of several proposed LNG import terminals across the south-eastern seaboard.

The most advanced of these is billionaire Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest’s Squadron Energy import terminal at Port Kembla, which is under construction.

Gas from this terminal would need to be piped south to Victoria.

The proposed Viva import terminal had the advantage of being able to scale up or down according to demand and could be removed when no longer required, unlike a long-distance pipeline, Mr Wood said.

Environment Victoria campaigns manager Greg Foyster, who lives in Geelong, said the city was at an “energy crossroads”, with renewable projects, including Victoria’s biggest battery on the city’s doorstep in nearby Moorabool, at odds with the gas terminal proposal.

“Building a gas import terminal takes Victoria in entirely the wrong direction,” Mr Foyster said. “We should be investing in renewable energy and storage, not more big polluting fossil fuel projects.”

Environment Victoria is not convinced there is a looming gas shortage.

Analysis it commissioned last year found there was enough gas supply capacity in Victoria until 2027.

Over the following three years there would be a shortfall of between 26 and 85 petajoules, but the adoption of gas-demand reduction measures, like energy efficiency and electrification, eliminated the forecast shortfall, it found.

Viva Energy’s chief business development and sustainability officer Lachlan Pfeiffer said it was predicted there would be gas shortfalls on cold winter days in 2023.

“This is about filling that gap until the end of the decade and bringing in a new supply source,” he said.

“This is very much not about gas versus renewables. We are fully supportive of renewables coming into the system, but you will absolutely need both in the transition in the short to medium term.”

How a small regional community beat a multinational coal giant
Graeme Bethune, the chief executive of energy advisory firm Energy Quest and chairman of the Australian Gas Industry Trust, said a considerable amount of gas would still be used in Victoria by 2030.

“In energy, things take a long time to change. You can’t turn the ship around on a five cent piece,” he said.

Mr Bethune said his firm had made similar predictions to AEMO about a gas shortfall.

Viva is yet to determine where the gas would come from, but Woodside Petroleum has inked an accord to potentially use the proposed terminal to import gas from its controversial Scarborough gas project in Western Australia.

Mr Pfeiffer said the Viva proposal would go through a rigorous safety assessment, a full Environment Effects Statement and be regulated by WorkSafe and the Environment Protection Authority.

Links

(AU The Guardian) Australia Spending Billions On New Gas Pipelines That May End Up Worthless Stranded Assets

The Guardian

Australia’s building boom comes amid $485.8bn in pipeline construction activity globally

A liquefied natural gas project site. A Global Energy Monitor report says there are are 600km of pipelines currently under construction and 12,200km of proposed new infrastructure across Australia. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images

Australia is spending billions to build thousands of kilometres of new gas pipelines that may end up worthless stranded assets as the world moves to deal with climate change.

The warning comes in a new report by Global Energy Monitor tracking 600km of pipelines currently under construction and 12,200km of proposed new infrastructure across Australia, with the total value of this work amounting to $25.8bn (USD$18.6bn).

According to the report, these projects include “substantial capacity expansions planned along the existing national network”, which “highlights the Australian government’s unbridled enthusiasm” for the gas industry despite the risk of creating stranded assets.

Should they all go ahead, these pipelines would lock in decades of new production in several basins on the east coast including Beetaloo and Narrabri, and the Scarborough gas field in the north-west, by connecting them to export terminals.


  The location of existing and potential future supply and infrastructure options across Australia in the 2021 National Gas Plan.
 Photograph: Commonwealth of Australia

While the projects tracked in the report are consistent with what appears in the 2021 National Gas Plan, it also includes the west-east pipeline proposed by former Dow Chemical Global chairman Andrew Liveris.

Liveris, the deputy chair of oil and gas engineering consultancy Worley and director of the world’s largest oil company, Saudi Aramco, revived the idea of a $6bn trans-continental pipeline in 2020 as an architect of the Australian government’s gas-fired recovery in response to the global pandemic.

The proposal – first suggested in the mid-1970s – has long been considered unviable for a range of reasons and the most recent iteration has faced opposition even from within the fossil fuel sector.

Australia’s building boom comes amid $485.8bn in pipeline construction activity globally – made up of 408 new pipelines, 70,900km of which are currently under construction and an additional 122,500km planned – despite a global push to divest from new fossil fuel investment.

“The world is at an inflection point, where it can hasten the transition to renewables or further entrench itself in fossil fuels,” the report says. “It is choosing the latter.”

The burning of fossil fuels such as gas is a key driver of global heating. Last year the International Energy Agency said limiting global heating to 1.5C, a goal set out in the Paris agreement, meant exploration and exploitation of new fossil fuel basins had to stop in 2021.

Dan Gocher, Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility’s director of climate and the environment, said the scale of construction in Australia showed the “toxic level of influence” fossil fuel companies had on government.

“We don’t need the gas,” Gocher said. “Gas demand on the east coast is forecast to flatline or decline. And once state governments get serious about addressing domestic gas demand that demand will really start to decrease.

“It’s a massive stranded asset risk either for the taxpayers that build them or the companies that operate them.”

Tim Buckley, energy transition analyst and director of Clean Energy Finance, said despite “platitudes to decarbonisation” companies were not taking divestment risk seriously.

But he said that would change over the next few years as governments and regulatory authorities begin to crack down on “greenwash” and large investors grow serious about pulling their money out of fossil fuel production.

“You can’t keep investing half a trillion bucks in gas pipelines and think that in any way that aligns with the Paris targets,” Buckley said.

“When you build a gas pipeline you build it for 50 years, we’ve got a climate emergency which we need to act on in eight years. How can you build an asset like that when you have to change by 2050?”

Global Energy Monitor is a San Francisco-based energy monitor that tracks new fossil fuel developments and advocates for a transition to clean energy. It also publishes the Global Coal Plant Tracker, which follows investment in new coal power plants worldwide.

Links

(AU The Interpreter) Transforming Australian Diplomacy For Climate Leadership

The Interpreter, Lowy Institute - Melissa Conley Tyler

Practical measures will foster enduring regional ties beyond the immediate challenge of responding to global warming.

A photograph of a solar eclipse with data taken by the Extreme Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope instrument onboard the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory spacecraft. (NASA Goddard Space Flight Centre/Flickr)


Author
Melissa Conley Tyler is Program Lead with the Asia-Pacific Development, Diplomacy & Defence Dialogue.
For 13 years she served as National Executive Director of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, an independent international policy institute established as a branch of Chatham House in 1924, with close links to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
In 2017, Melissa co-authored Think Tank Diplomacy, the first book-length discussion of the role of policy institutes in the international sphere.
One of the former Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade officials involved with a new group “Diplomats for Climate Action Now” recently voiced regret that during his decades representing Australia, he never really got to promote climate leadership.

What would it look like if Australia’s diplomacy were given the job and resources to be as active as possible in pursuing global climate goals?

A new report from the Asia-Pacific Development, Diplomacy & Defence Dialogue (AP4D) offers a vision.

Five steps would be essential to put the plan into practice.

First, Australia should play an active and consistent role in multilateral forums and organisations in support of global climate goals.

A key challenge is to build trust.

Australia could help foster support by taking a leading role in promoting international processes in climate financing. Australia could use its talent for devising rules to develop governance around global climate agreements.

Second, in Australia’s region, the necessary green energy transition will require the establishment of relevant regulations, standards and certification regimes.

Australia should focus its diplomacy on creating green energy pathways in the region, including working bilaterally and through multilateral institutions.
If Australia is able to transform itself into a renewable energy superpower, helping meet Southeast Asia’s energy needs, it will gain greater heft in terms of regional influence.
Third, Australia can support climate leadership through its development cooperation program, for example through the establishment of an ASEAN electricity market.

This goes beyond opportunities in renewable energy cooperation. Australia can also collaborate on sustainable land management, limiting the encroachment on wild habitats and exposure to zoonotic disease, and focus on marine innovation and preservation.

The protection and careful management of wild habitats and marine environments presents an opportunity to bring Indigenous perspectives to the fore, allowing for the integration of traditional knowledge and local wisdom into contemporary climate change dialogue and responses.

Fourth, Australia’s knowledge base will enable it to work with the region to develop renewable energy and other technology through research partnerships.

Australia can become an educational partner to develop climate skills through scholarships and training across the tertiary sector, as well as become increasingly involved in low-emissions technology partnerships.

Finally, Australia must take care to recognise that it is not the only player in this space. For example, on the development of a green energy market in Southeast Asia, Australia has the ability to work with other countries such as Japan, China and South Korea.

Australia should be realistic about its value-add. Australia can use its membership in minilateral groupings such as the Quad to progress its vision on climate change.

Such an approach has clear diplomatic dividends for Australia. Being seen as a climate leader in Southeast Asia will bring Australia positive benefits in terms of its image and soft power.

It will demonstrate that Australia is listening to the needs and wants of its neighbours and will help Australia develop a national identity more closely linked to its neighbourhood.

If Australia is able to transform itself into a renewable energy superpower, helping meet Southeast Asia’s energy needs, it will gain greater heft in terms of regional influence.

The objectives should include directly supplying energy (via cable from northern Australia and green hydrogen shipped from elsewhere in the country), exporting green commodities, developing associated infrastructure and providing the critical minerals used in renewable technology such as solar panels and electric vehicles.

By working with Southeast Asian governments on policy creation, including establishing regulations, standards and certification regimes for the energy transition, Australia stands to benefit from the “habits of cooperation” far more than in areas limited to tackling climate change.

Links