ABC AM - Michael Brissenden
MICHAEL BRISSENDEN: A collection of some of the world's leading scientists and economists will today publish an open letter calling for a global moratorium on new coal mines.
The letter, published later today in the New Scientist magazine and the Guardian newspaper, will argue it makes economic and scientific sense to stop building new coal mines.
The signatories include some Nobel Prize-winning economists, scientists and former business leaders.
One of them is Ian Dunlop, the former Shell executive and former chair of the Australian Coal Association.
I spoke to him earlier this morning.
Now, as I said, it's a collection of scientists, economists, experts and executives like yourself. Why have you decided to put your name to it?
IAN DUNLOP: It's really quite straightforward. The world has now reached the point where it is collectively agreeing that we have to limit temperature increase to certainly below two degrees C.
The leaders, political leaders are going to Paris next week to try and reach an agreement on this. But what we're still seeing is a lot of fog and confusion, I think, around the questions of: what does all that mean? I mean, how do we actually limit temperature to two degrees C and so on?
This is just trying to cut through all of that and say: Look, if you want to stay below two degrees C, there is no option but to stop - as one of the elements, a very important one - the development of new coal mines and the expansion of existing coal mines.
MICHAEL BRISSENDEN: And is that a view, you think, that a majority of the world's leaders share?
IAN DUNLOP: Well, I don't think a lot of the world leaders have really focused on this as yet. But the fact is that unless you do it, we have no way of staying below two degrees C. It's just not possible.
And that's borne out by organisations like the International Energy Agency which, if you look at what they're saying about the ability and how we actually get to two degrees C, it shows that coal demand is actually going to drop from now on by something like 36 per cent by 2040.
Now, in that world there is no space for no new coal mines. So that the proposals we have basically in Australia for, for example, the Adani mine in the Galilee Basin, Shenhua mine in the Liverpool Plains, the KEPCO mines in the Bylong Valley, the Hume Coal mines down in the Southern Highlands: all of these proposals do not fit with a world where you have to limit temperature below two degrees C.
MICHAEL BRISSENDEN: As I'm sure you're aware, Australia argues there's a strong moral case for new coal mines. You know the coal industry well. Isn't it true that coal, for the moment at least, is required to help to pull millions of people in developing countries out of poverty?
IAN DUNLOP: No, it's not true at all: in fact, quite the reverse. There is no moral case for further use of coal, because the use of coal in the way we've been doing it is, quite frankly, going to create enormous poverty.
If you look at a country like India: India is already experiencing climate extremes, as indeed Australia is; only it's been a bit worse there in terms of extreme heat, extreme rainfall and so on.
If we keep on pouring money into coal mines, what we're doing is just going to exacerbate poverty and create an enormous problem.
The real moral case is actually to help countries like India to avoid the high-carbon coal development path and move directly onto low-carbon alternatives: you know, renewables, gas, nuclear and so on.
Unless you stop coal development, the problem is just going to get compounded. And the world just has to face up to the fact that we have no choice but to do that.
MICHAEL BRISSENDEN: Malcolm Turnbull said recently that if Australia were to stop all its coal exports, it wouldn't reduce coal emissions - global emissions - one iota. In fact, he said, "arguably it would increase them because our coal, by and large, is cleaner than the coal in many other countries." Is that true?
IAN DUNLOP: Well, unfortunately that actually doesn't get borne out by the facts.
I mean, the sort of coal we're talking about exporting: in fact, the coal quality is dropping. It doesn't actually end up being very much better than a lot of coal you find in the countries we're talking of exporting it to.
And the solutions that people are talking about in terms of justifying the continuing use of coal - like the expansion of carbon capture and storage, for example - are not happening at anywhere near the scale or to the speed that we're going to require them.
So we actually don't have solutions to the enormous increase in emissions that these developments would actually represent.
But the point - I mean, the real point about this is that Australia has enormous potential to prosper in a low-carbon world and to help the developing world in terms of the export of our technologies.
MICHAEL BRISSENDEN: Ian Dunlop, former chair of the Australian Coal Association.
Audio
27/11/2015
26/11/2015
Fossil Fuel Companies Risk Wasting $2tn of Investors' Money, Study Says
The Guardian - Damian Carrington
Paris climate deal could render oil, gas and coal projects worthless with US, Canada, China and Australia most vulnerable to losing billions
Fossil fuel companies risk wasting up to $2tn (£1.3tn) of investors’ money in the next decade on projects left worthless by global action on climate change and the surge in clean energy, according to a new report.
The world’s nations aim to seal a UN deal in Paris in December to keep global warming below the danger limit of 2C.
The heavy cuts in carbon emissions needed to achieve this would mean no new coal mines at all are needed and oil demand peaking in 2020, according to the influential thinktank Carbon Tracker. It found $2.2tn of projects at risk of stranding, ie being left valueless as the market for fossil fuels shrinks.
The report found the US has the greatest risk exposure, with $412bn of projects that could be stranded, followed by Canada ($220bn), China ($179bn) and Australia ($103bn).
The UK’s £30bn North Sea oil and gas projects are at risk, the report says, despite government efforts to prop up the sector. Shell, ExxonMobil and Pemex are the companies with the greatest sums potentially at risk, with over $70bn each.
The failure of the fossil fuel industry to address climate change is laid out in a second report on Wednesday, in which senior industry figures state there is “a significant disconnect between the changes needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the [2C] level and efforts currently underway”.
Lord John Browne, former BP boss, Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, former Shell and Anglo American chair and others say there must be “fundamental reassessment of the fossil fuel industry’s business models” and that companies should seize commercial opportunities in low-carbon energy.
The Carbon Tracker report looked at existing and future projects being considered by coal, oil and gas companies up to 2025 and determined which could proceed if carbon emissions are cut to give a 50% chance of keeping climate change under 2C.
Many high-cost projects, including Arctic and deepwater drilling, tar sands and shale oil are unneeded and therefore uneconomic in the 2C scenario, the report found, although some are required to replace fields that are already depleting.
“Business history is littered with examples of incumbents – like Kodak and Blockbuster – who fail to see a transition coming,” said Anthony Hobley, chief executive of Carbon Tracker. “Our report offers these companies a warning [about] avoiding significant value destruction.”
For coal, the report found “it is the end of the road for expansion of the sector”, with no new coal mines required anywhere in the world if dangerous climate change is to be avoided.
“In the [2C] scenario, oil demand peaks around 2020,” found the report. “This means the oil sector does not need to continue to grow, which is inconsistent with the narrative of many companies.”
Spending of $1.3tn on new oil projects and $124bn on existing projects is unneeded, it concluded. For gas, demand in a 2C scenario is significantly lower than companies forecast, with $459bn of new projects and $73bn of existing projects surplus to requirements.
The second report is produced by Critical Resource, a firm that advises fossil fuel companies, and involved senior industry and climate figures, including former European climate commissioner Connie Hedegaard .
The report said “meeting [a 2C] target will result inevitably in steep declines in fossil fuel production over the coming decades” but that the “industry has so far generally been locked in defensive mode”. It added: “While most companies recognise the importance of climate change to their businesses, there is little evidence that most are altering their strategic plans.”
However, it concluded: “Companies [should] urgently develop strategic plans to identify how they can compete commercially in a [2C] world. The aim is to unleash the industry’s creativity and innovation in finding profitable solutions.”
“There is a very big gap between what the industry needs to do to compete in a 2C world and what they are doing,” said Daniel Litvin, MD of Critical Resources. “It may be the case that the most effective use of shareholder funds is to pay out more dividends and invest less.” But he said fossil fuel companies’ expertise in managing large projects across the world and long-term relationships with governments could give them an advantage in low-carbon projects.
Litvin said the fossil fuel industry has been too slow in developing carbon capture and storage technology, which could bury emissions but has yet to be proven at commercial scale. “CCS is critically important,” he said. “It is the only way gas or coal will have a long-term future. Companies have waited for governments to move, but governments largely haven’t, yet the industry is facing an existential threat.”
There are signs of structural shifts towards low-carbon energy in the utility sector, following moves from Enel and E.On, and Litvin said such a shift could happen in the fossil fuel sector with ambitious leadership and the right signals from the Paris climate summit.
“The critical mass point could be as soon as a couple of years down the road, which is pretty soon for an industry that has been around for 100 years,” he said.
Paris climate deal could render oil, gas and coal projects worthless with US, Canada, China and Australia most vulnerable to losing billions
![]() |
| An oil rig in Culver City, California, US. Photograph: David McNew/Getty Images |
Fossil fuel companies risk wasting up to $2tn (£1.3tn) of investors’ money in the next decade on projects left worthless by global action on climate change and the surge in clean energy, according to a new report.
The world’s nations aim to seal a UN deal in Paris in December to keep global warming below the danger limit of 2C.
The heavy cuts in carbon emissions needed to achieve this would mean no new coal mines at all are needed and oil demand peaking in 2020, according to the influential thinktank Carbon Tracker. It found $2.2tn of projects at risk of stranding, ie being left valueless as the market for fossil fuels shrinks.
The report found the US has the greatest risk exposure, with $412bn of projects that could be stranded, followed by Canada ($220bn), China ($179bn) and Australia ($103bn).
The UK’s £30bn North Sea oil and gas projects are at risk, the report says, despite government efforts to prop up the sector. Shell, ExxonMobil and Pemex are the companies with the greatest sums potentially at risk, with over $70bn each.
The failure of the fossil fuel industry to address climate change is laid out in a second report on Wednesday, in which senior industry figures state there is “a significant disconnect between the changes needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the [2C] level and efforts currently underway”.
Lord John Browne, former BP boss, Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, former Shell and Anglo American chair and others say there must be “fundamental reassessment of the fossil fuel industry’s business models” and that companies should seize commercial opportunities in low-carbon energy.
The Carbon Tracker report looked at existing and future projects being considered by coal, oil and gas companies up to 2025 and determined which could proceed if carbon emissions are cut to give a 50% chance of keeping climate change under 2C.
Many high-cost projects, including Arctic and deepwater drilling, tar sands and shale oil are unneeded and therefore uneconomic in the 2C scenario, the report found, although some are required to replace fields that are already depleting.
“Business history is littered with examples of incumbents – like Kodak and Blockbuster – who fail to see a transition coming,” said Anthony Hobley, chief executive of Carbon Tracker. “Our report offers these companies a warning [about] avoiding significant value destruction.”
For coal, the report found “it is the end of the road for expansion of the sector”, with no new coal mines required anywhere in the world if dangerous climate change is to be avoided.
“In the [2C] scenario, oil demand peaks around 2020,” found the report. “This means the oil sector does not need to continue to grow, which is inconsistent with the narrative of many companies.”
Spending of $1.3tn on new oil projects and $124bn on existing projects is unneeded, it concluded. For gas, demand in a 2C scenario is significantly lower than companies forecast, with $459bn of new projects and $73bn of existing projects surplus to requirements.
The second report is produced by Critical Resource, a firm that advises fossil fuel companies, and involved senior industry and climate figures, including former European climate commissioner Connie Hedegaard .
The report said “meeting [a 2C] target will result inevitably in steep declines in fossil fuel production over the coming decades” but that the “industry has so far generally been locked in defensive mode”. It added: “While most companies recognise the importance of climate change to their businesses, there is little evidence that most are altering their strategic plans.”
However, it concluded: “Companies [should] urgently develop strategic plans to identify how they can compete commercially in a [2C] world. The aim is to unleash the industry’s creativity and innovation in finding profitable solutions.”
“There is a very big gap between what the industry needs to do to compete in a 2C world and what they are doing,” said Daniel Litvin, MD of Critical Resources. “It may be the case that the most effective use of shareholder funds is to pay out more dividends and invest less.” But he said fossil fuel companies’ expertise in managing large projects across the world and long-term relationships with governments could give them an advantage in low-carbon projects.
Litvin said the fossil fuel industry has been too slow in developing carbon capture and storage technology, which could bury emissions but has yet to be proven at commercial scale. “CCS is critically important,” he said. “It is the only way gas or coal will have a long-term future. Companies have waited for governments to move, but governments largely haven’t, yet the industry is facing an existential threat.”
There are signs of structural shifts towards low-carbon energy in the utility sector, following moves from Enel and E.On, and Litvin said such a shift could happen in the fossil fuel sector with ambitious leadership and the right signals from the Paris climate summit.
“The critical mass point could be as soon as a couple of years down the road, which is pretty soon for an industry that has been around for 100 years,” he said.
WMO: 2015 likely to be Warmest on Record, 2011-2015 Warmest Five Year Period
World Meteorological Organization
UN weather body says man-made global warming and El Niño oceanic phenomenon made 2011-2015 the warmest five-year period on record
Climate Change Breaches Symbolic Thresholds, Fuels Extreme Weather
The global average surface temperature in 2015 is likely to be the warmest on record and to reach the symbolic and significant milestone of 1° Celsius above the pre-industrial era. This is due to a combination of a strong El Niño and human-induced global warming, according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).
The years 2011-2015 have been the warmest five-year period on record, with many extreme weather events - especially heatwaves - influenced by climate change, according to a WMO five-year analysis.
"The state of the global climate in 2015 will make history as for a number of reasons," said WMO Secretary-General Michel Jarraud. "Levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere reached new highs and in the Northern hemisphere spring 2015 the three-month global average concentration of CO2 crossed the 400 parts per million barrier for the first time. 2015 is likely to be the hottest year on record, with ocean surface temperatures at the highest level since measurements began. It is probable that the 1°C Celsius threshold will be crossed," said Mr Jarraud. "This is all bad news for the planet."
Greenhouse gas emissions, which are causing climate change, can be controlled. We have the knowledge and the tools to act. We have a choice. Future generations will not."
"Added to that, we are witnessing a powerful El Niño event, which is still gaining in strength. This is influencing weather patterns in many parts of the world and fuelled an exceptionally warm October. The overall warming impact of this El Niño is expected to continue into 2016," said Mr Jarraud.
WMO issued its provisional statement on the status of the climate in 2015, and an additional five-year analysis for 2011-2015, to inform negotiations at the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Paris.
A preliminary estimate based on data from January to October shows that the global average surface temperature for 2015 so far was around 0.73 °C above the 1961-1990 average of 14.0°C and approximately 1°C above the pre-industrial 1880-1899 period.
This temperature tendency indicates that 2015 will very likely be the warmest year on record. The global average sea-surface temperature, which set a record last year, is likely to equal or surpass that record in 2015. The global average temperatures over land areas only from January to October suggest that 2015 is also set to be one of the warmest years on record over land. South America is having its hottest year on record, as is Asia (similar to 2007), and Africa and Europe their second hottest.
According to preliminary figures as of the end of September 2015, 2011-15 was the world's warmest five-year period on record, at about 0.57°C (1.01°F) above the average for the standard 1961-90 reference period. It was the warmest five-year period on record for Asia, Europe, South America and Oceania, and for North America. WMO compiled the five-year analysis because it provides a longer-term climate signal than the annual report.
Highlights of 2015
The WMO reports on the Status of the Global Climate are based on contributions from WMO`s 191 Members.
The global temperature analysis is principally derived from three complementary datasets maintained by the Hadley Centre of the UK's Met Office and the Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom (combined); the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Centres for Environmental Information; and the Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) operated by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Global average temperatures are also estimated using reanalysis systems, which use a weather forecasting system to combine many sources of data to provide a more complete picture of global temperatures. WMO uses data from the reanalysis produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and the Japan Meteorological Agency.
UN weather body says man-made global warming and El Niño oceanic phenomenon made 2011-2015 the warmest five-year period on record
![]() |
| A picture taken on 1 July 2015 shows a thermometer in Lille as a major heatwave spread through Europe, with temperatures hitting nearly 40C. Photograph: Philippe Huguen/AFP/Getty Images |
Climate Change Breaches Symbolic Thresholds, Fuels Extreme Weather
The global average surface temperature in 2015 is likely to be the warmest on record and to reach the symbolic and significant milestone of 1° Celsius above the pre-industrial era. This is due to a combination of a strong El Niño and human-induced global warming, according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).
The years 2011-2015 have been the warmest five-year period on record, with many extreme weather events - especially heatwaves - influenced by climate change, according to a WMO five-year analysis.
"The state of the global climate in 2015 will make history as for a number of reasons," said WMO Secretary-General Michel Jarraud. "Levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere reached new highs and in the Northern hemisphere spring 2015 the three-month global average concentration of CO2 crossed the 400 parts per million barrier for the first time. 2015 is likely to be the hottest year on record, with ocean surface temperatures at the highest level since measurements began. It is probable that the 1°C Celsius threshold will be crossed," said Mr Jarraud. "This is all bad news for the planet."
Greenhouse gas emissions, which are causing climate change, can be controlled. We have the knowledge and the tools to act. We have a choice. Future generations will not."
"Added to that, we are witnessing a powerful El Niño event, which is still gaining in strength. This is influencing weather patterns in many parts of the world and fuelled an exceptionally warm October. The overall warming impact of this El Niño is expected to continue into 2016," said Mr Jarraud.
WMO issued its provisional statement on the status of the climate in 2015, and an additional five-year analysis for 2011-2015, to inform negotiations at the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Paris.
A preliminary estimate based on data from January to October shows that the global average surface temperature for 2015 so far was around 0.73 °C above the 1961-1990 average of 14.0°C and approximately 1°C above the pre-industrial 1880-1899 period.
This temperature tendency indicates that 2015 will very likely be the warmest year on record. The global average sea-surface temperature, which set a record last year, is likely to equal or surpass that record in 2015. The global average temperatures over land areas only from January to October suggest that 2015 is also set to be one of the warmest years on record over land. South America is having its hottest year on record, as is Asia (similar to 2007), and Africa and Europe their second hottest.
According to preliminary figures as of the end of September 2015, 2011-15 was the world's warmest five-year period on record, at about 0.57°C (1.01°F) above the average for the standard 1961-90 reference period. It was the warmest five-year period on record for Asia, Europe, South America and Oceania, and for North America. WMO compiled the five-year analysis because it provides a longer-term climate signal than the annual report.
Highlights of 2015
- El Niño
The full effect of the strong 2015 El Niño on global temperature is likely to continue after El Niño peaks. However, other impacts are already being felt. In early October, NOAA declared that record global ocean temperatures had led to a global coral bleaching event. This began in the North Pacific in the summer of 2014 and spread to the South Pacific and Indian Ocean in 2015.
Consistent with typical El Niño impacts, large areas of Central America and the Caribbean recorded below average rainfall. Brazil, which started the year in drought in southern and eastern areas, saw the focus of the drought shift north with scant rainfall during the dry season over the Amazon. India's monsoon rainfall was 86% of normal. In Indonesia, the low rainfall has likely contributed to the increased incidence of wildfires. Peru was affected by heavy rain and flooding, as was Argentina. - Ocean heat and sea level rise
The oceans have been absorbing more than 90% of the energy that has accumulated in the climate system from human emissions of greenhouse gases, resulting in higher temperatures and sea levels. In the first nine months of 2015, global ocean heat content through both the upper 700 meters and 2000 meters of the oceans reached record high levels. The latest estimates of global sea level indicate that the global average sea level in the first half of 2015 was the highest since satellite observations became available in 1993.
Significant warmth was recorded across large areas of the oceans. The Tropical Pacific was much warmer than average, exceeding 1°C over much of the central and eastern equatorial Pacific, consistent with the signature of a strong El Niño. The northeast Pacific, much of the Indian Ocean and areas in the north and south Atlantic were significantly warmer than average. Areas to the south of Greenland and in the far southwest Atlantic were significantly colder than average. - Regional temperatures
Significant warmer than average temperatures were recorded over the majority of observed land areas, especially western North America, large areas of South America, Africa and southern and eastern Eurasia. China had its warmest January-to-October period on record. For the continent of Africa, 2015 currently ranks as the second warmest year on record. Australia had its warmest October on record and a heatwave early in the month set new records for early season warmth.
One notably cold area was the Antarctic, where a strong anomaly in atmospheric patterns known as the Southern Annular Mode lasted for several months. Eastern areas of north America were colder than average during the year, but none were record cold. After a warm January to September, Argentina experienced its coldest October on record. - Heatwaves
A major heatwave affected India in May and June, with average maximum temperatures exceeded 42°C widely and 45°C in some areas. In southern Pakistan temperatures exceeded 40 °C in June.
Heatwaves affected Europe, northern Africa and the Middle East through the late spring and summer, with many new temperature records set. In May, high temperatures affected Burkina Faso, Niger and Morocco. Spain and Portugal also saw unusually high temperatures. July brought heat waves to a large area from Denmark in the north, to Morocco in the south and Iran in the east. In early August, Jordan experienced a heatwave, whilst Wroclaw (Poland) experienced an all-time high temperature of 38.9°C on the 8th August. The heat continued into September, shifting further into Eastern Europe.
During the spring of 2015 in South Africa, record high temperatures were exceeded on a regular basis. - Rainfall and drought
Areas of high rainfall included: southern areas of the USA, Mexico, Bolivia, southern Brazil, southeast Europe, areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Heavy rain in January led to flooding in Malawi, Zimbabwe and Mozambique, and in February it affected Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia. 2015 saw exceptional seasonal rainfall totals in several parts of Burkina Faso and Mali.
March in Chile saw unusually heavy rains which caused flooding and mudslides. In August, heavy rain in the Buenos Aires province of Argentina saw several monthly and daily rainfall records broken during the month. Mexico had its wettest March on record (since 1941). It was the wettest May on record for the contiguous USA and the wettest month overall in 121 years of record keeping. Between May and October, China experienced 35 heavy rain events. Subsequent flooding affected 75 million people with estimated economic losses of 25 billion dollars.
Long-term rainfall patterns can disguise great variability in short-term totals. There were many instances in 2015 of 24-hour totals exceeding the normal monthly mean. For instance, the Moroccan city of Marrakech received 35.9mm of rain in one hour in August, over 13 times the monthly normal. In Pakistan during the monsoon, one station recorded 540mm of rain in 24 hours; the annual normal is 336mm.
Dry areas included Central America and the Caribbean, northeast South America including Brazil, parts of central Europe and Russia, parts of Southeast Asia, Indonesia and southern Africa. In Western North America, long-term drought conditions continued. Basins across the west depend on snowpack as a water resource. On April 1, the snow water equivalent was 5% of normal.
The dry and warm conditions observed across much of the western USA during the year favoured the development of wildfires. In Alaska, over 400 fires burned 728,000 hectares in May, breaking the previous record of 216 fires and 445,000 hectares. Over 700 wildfires were reported in Alaska during July, burning nearly 2 million hectares during the summer. Large fires burned throughout the Northwest in August and Washington State suffered its largest fire on record. - Tropical Cyclones
Globally, a total of 84 tropical storms formed between the start of the year and 10 November, compared to the 1981-2010 annual average of 85. Hurricane Patricia which made landfall in Mexico on 24 October was the strongest hurricane on record in either the Atlantic or eastern North Pacific basins, with maximum sustained wind speeds of 320 km/hour. In the Northwest Pacific basin, 25 named storms were recorded. Six typhoons made landfall over China, with three leading to combined estimated economic losses of 8 billion dollars.
Four named storms formed in the Northern Indian Ocean. Rainfall associated with tropical storm Komen contributed to severe flooding and landslides in Myanmar. Bangladesh also suffered from flash floods and landslides. Yemen suffered from unprecedented back-to-back cyclones in early November, with Chapala becoming first tropical cyclone to make landfall, followed by Megh.
The South Pacific saw 9 named storms. Tropical cyclone Pam made landfall over Vanuatu as a category 5 cyclone on 13 March destroying many homes. - Arctic and Antarctic
Since consistent satellite records began in the late 1970s, there has been a general decline in Arctic sea ice extent throughout the seasonal cycle. In 2015, the daily maximum extent, which occurred on 25th February 2015, was the lowest on record at 14.54 million km2. The minimum sea ice extent was on 11th September when the extent was 4.41 million km2, the fourth lowest in the satellite record.
In the southern hemisphere, the daily maximum extent of 18.83 million km2 was recorded on 6th October in Antarctica. This is the 16th highest maximum extent in the satellite record. The minimum extent, recorded on 20 February, was 3.58 million km2, the 4th highest on record. - Climate Change Attribution
Scientific assessments have found that many extreme events in the 2011-15 period, especially those relating to extreme high temperatures, have had their probabilities over a particular time period substantially increased as a result of human-induced climate change – by a factor of 10 or more in some cases.
Of 79 studies published by Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society between 2011 and 2014, more than half found that anthropogenic climate change contributed to extreme events. The most consistent influence has been on extreme heat, with some studies finding that the probability of the observed event has increased by 10 times or more.
Examples include the record high seasonal and annual temperatures in the United States in 2012 and in Australia in 2013, hot summers in eastern Asia and western Europe in 2013, heatwaves in spring and autumn 2014 in Australia, record annual warmth in Europe in 2014, and the Argentine heatwave of December 2013.
Some longer-term events, which have not yet been the subject of formal attribution studies, are consistent with projections of near- and long-term climate change. These include increased incidence of multi-year drought in the subtropics, as manifested in the 2011-15 period in the southern United States, parts of southern Australia and, towards the end of the period, southern Africa. There have also been events, such as the unusually prolonged, intense and hot dry seasons in the Amazon basin of Brazil in both 2014 and 2015 which, while they cannot yet be stated with confidence to be part of a long-term trend, are of considerable concern in the context of potential "tipping points" in the climate system as identified by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
The WMO reports on the Status of the Global Climate are based on contributions from WMO`s 191 Members.
The global temperature analysis is principally derived from three complementary datasets maintained by the Hadley Centre of the UK's Met Office and the Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom (combined); the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Centres for Environmental Information; and the Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) operated by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Global average temperatures are also estimated using reanalysis systems, which use a weather forecasting system to combine many sources of data to provide a more complete picture of global temperatures. WMO uses data from the reanalysis produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and the Japan Meteorological Agency.
![]() |
| Ocean heat content down to a depth of 700m. Three-month (red), annual (black) and 5-year (blue) averages are shown. Source: NOAA NCEI. |
![]() |
| Ocean heat content down to a depth of 2000m. Three-month (red), annual (black) and 5-year (blue) averages are shown. Source: NOAA NCEI |
Australian Emissions To Grow 6 Per Cent Under Direct Action
Renew Economy - Sophie Vorrath
One week shy of UN climate talks in Paris, a new report has warned that Australia will fall well short of achieving any “real” emissions reductions under its current climate policy, but instead would grow its national emissions by a huge 6 per cent, from around minus 2 per cent on 2000 levels today, to 4 per cent above 2000 levels by 2020.
The report, released on Monday by energy market analysts RepuTex, says the only way Australia will meet its international commitment to cut emissions by 5 per cent on 2000 levels will be via the “accounting benefit” gained through the Kyoto Protocol.
The report also warns that the projected increases in real emissions over 2015-20 will come at a cost, doubling the rate of Australia’s annual abatement task out to 2030.
“While emissions are increasing, we continue to anticipate that the government will utilise more than 130 million carry-over credits under Kyoto, which will give us a large accounting buffer to meet our 2020 target,” said Hugh Grossman, Executive Director of RepuTex.
“While we will meet our international commitment, Australia’s absolute emissions will not reach minus 5 per cent on 2000 levels.”
“We project real emissions will increase to plus 4 per cent on 2000 levels by 2020, or 6 per cent from today, despite current government policy,” he said.
The report comes after the release of the results from the second ERF auction, which contracted for 45 million Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) to be delivered over 10 years, spending $550 million.
After two auctions – or one year of the scheme – the ERF has contracted 93 million ACCUs, committing $1.2 billion, allocated to 131 projects. This will be supplied over approximately 10 years, an average of 9.3 million per year.
And while Australia will be able to increase its emissions and still meet its 2020 target, analysis indicates that allowing emissions to grow will place significant pressure on Australia’s 2030 abatement task, potentially more than doubling the amount of annual abatement required to meet Australia’s long-term target.
“Unfortunately, current policy can’t keep up with emissions increases. While the ERF has been successful, the rate of annual Australian emissions growth is significantly outpacing any emissions reductions contracted under the scheme,” said RepuTex executive director Hugh Grossman.
“After two auctions, the ERF will supply an average of 9.3 million ACCUs per year prior to 2020, but emissions will grow 43 million tonnes per year over the same period”
According to RepuTex, the surge in Australia’s emissions growth is largely a result of increasing economic output from emissions intensive activities, even accounting for a slowdown in commodity prices.
“Australia is set to experience a period of emissions growth,” Grossman said. “Emissions have increased 2 per cent in the electricity sector over the past year, and coal will continue to dominate the fuel mix in the short-term.”
“In addition, we will see new and expanding Coal and LNG facilities come online over the next five years, plus growing demand for coal in Asia. So given the growing rate of output, domestic emissions are set to increase, despite the ERF.”
“As new facilities come online, emissions will follow. You can’t have one without the other.
The good news, however, is that RepuTex’s forecast for emissions growth of 6 per cent over the next five years is more favourable for the government than its own official figures. The Department of Environment forecast that emissions will increase by 20 per cent over the same period.
Much of this is driven by activity in the resources sector, with Australia’s thermal coal exports forecast to rise 11 percent to 223 million tonnes between 2014 and 2020, according to the Department of Industry.
In addition, new LNG facilities under construction such as Gorgon, Wheatstone, and APLNG are set to become operational in 2016, while new coal mines including Maules Creek, Grosvenor, and Eagle Downs will further increase emissions over 2015 to 2017.
“If emissions increase from today, that growth will need to be made up for later, which will place pressure on policy, and invariably industry, to find more cuts each year,” said Grossman.
“It is more efficient to generate cuts from today’s levels, rather than let any gains be unwound, and then pay to start over again later. By that point the market will have less time to reduce more emissions.”
The government will undertake a review of its Direct Action Plan policy in June 2017, reporting by November 2017. Any policy amendments are expected to take effect by 2018-19, at the earliest, in almost two to three years’ time.
According to RepuTex, the review timeline, combined with the dwindling ERF budget, may place pressure on the government to explore an interim policy.
“Given the remaining ERF budget, there are likely to be just two more auctions in 2016 until funding is exhausted. That will mean there is no mechanism to curb emissions, or support new abatement projects until 2018-19 at the earliest,” said Grossman.
“That may place pressure on the government to explore an interim policy prior to the 2016 federal election, such as more ERF funding, or the scale up of voluntary “early market” rules, to incentivise new projects, particularly from high emitting companies,” he said.
The Paris climate conference will run from November 30 to December 11, with Prime Minister Malcom Turnbull to attend the first day of the conference.
One week shy of UN climate talks in Paris, a new report has warned that Australia will fall well short of achieving any “real” emissions reductions under its current climate policy, but instead would grow its national emissions by a huge 6 per cent, from around minus 2 per cent on 2000 levels today, to 4 per cent above 2000 levels by 2020.
The report, released on Monday by energy market analysts RepuTex, says the only way Australia will meet its international commitment to cut emissions by 5 per cent on 2000 levels will be via the “accounting benefit” gained through the Kyoto Protocol.
The report also warns that the projected increases in real emissions over 2015-20 will come at a cost, doubling the rate of Australia’s annual abatement task out to 2030.
“While emissions are increasing, we continue to anticipate that the government will utilise more than 130 million carry-over credits under Kyoto, which will give us a large accounting buffer to meet our 2020 target,” said Hugh Grossman, Executive Director of RepuTex.
“While we will meet our international commitment, Australia’s absolute emissions will not reach minus 5 per cent on 2000 levels.”
“We project real emissions will increase to plus 4 per cent on 2000 levels by 2020, or 6 per cent from today, despite current government policy,” he said.
The report comes after the release of the results from the second ERF auction, which contracted for 45 million Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) to be delivered over 10 years, spending $550 million.
After two auctions – or one year of the scheme – the ERF has contracted 93 million ACCUs, committing $1.2 billion, allocated to 131 projects. This will be supplied over approximately 10 years, an average of 9.3 million per year.
And while Australia will be able to increase its emissions and still meet its 2020 target, analysis indicates that allowing emissions to grow will place significant pressure on Australia’s 2030 abatement task, potentially more than doubling the amount of annual abatement required to meet Australia’s long-term target.
“Unfortunately, current policy can’t keep up with emissions increases. While the ERF has been successful, the rate of annual Australian emissions growth is significantly outpacing any emissions reductions contracted under the scheme,” said RepuTex executive director Hugh Grossman.
“After two auctions, the ERF will supply an average of 9.3 million ACCUs per year prior to 2020, but emissions will grow 43 million tonnes per year over the same period”
According to RepuTex, the surge in Australia’s emissions growth is largely a result of increasing economic output from emissions intensive activities, even accounting for a slowdown in commodity prices.
“Australia is set to experience a period of emissions growth,” Grossman said. “Emissions have increased 2 per cent in the electricity sector over the past year, and coal will continue to dominate the fuel mix in the short-term.”
“In addition, we will see new and expanding Coal and LNG facilities come online over the next five years, plus growing demand for coal in Asia. So given the growing rate of output, domestic emissions are set to increase, despite the ERF.”
“As new facilities come online, emissions will follow. You can’t have one without the other.
The good news, however, is that RepuTex’s forecast for emissions growth of 6 per cent over the next five years is more favourable for the government than its own official figures. The Department of Environment forecast that emissions will increase by 20 per cent over the same period.
Much of this is driven by activity in the resources sector, with Australia’s thermal coal exports forecast to rise 11 percent to 223 million tonnes between 2014 and 2020, according to the Department of Industry.
In addition, new LNG facilities under construction such as Gorgon, Wheatstone, and APLNG are set to become operational in 2016, while new coal mines including Maules Creek, Grosvenor, and Eagle Downs will further increase emissions over 2015 to 2017.
“If emissions increase from today, that growth will need to be made up for later, which will place pressure on policy, and invariably industry, to find more cuts each year,” said Grossman.
“It is more efficient to generate cuts from today’s levels, rather than let any gains be unwound, and then pay to start over again later. By that point the market will have less time to reduce more emissions.”
The government will undertake a review of its Direct Action Plan policy in June 2017, reporting by November 2017. Any policy amendments are expected to take effect by 2018-19, at the earliest, in almost two to three years’ time.
According to RepuTex, the review timeline, combined with the dwindling ERF budget, may place pressure on the government to explore an interim policy.
“Given the remaining ERF budget, there are likely to be just two more auctions in 2016 until funding is exhausted. That will mean there is no mechanism to curb emissions, or support new abatement projects until 2018-19 at the earliest,” said Grossman.
“That may place pressure on the government to explore an interim policy prior to the 2016 federal election, such as more ERF funding, or the scale up of voluntary “early market” rules, to incentivise new projects, particularly from high emitting companies,” he said.
The Paris climate conference will run from November 30 to December 11, with Prime Minister Malcom Turnbull to attend the first day of the conference.
A New Way to Look at Planet Earth
GOOD - Gabriel Reilich
It’s the year 2015 and we’re accustomed to seeing images of Earth from space. But advancements in satellite technology continue to yield profound new ways of looking at our home from afar. For example, NASA put together some stunning composite images of our planet as part of its Blue Marble: Next Generation photography endeavor. By combining thousands of photos, they’ve created a view of our planet without any obstruction from clouds. There are images for each month of the year. When you cycle through these images, something remarkable happens. The first part of this video is made using these unaltered NASA images—no effects are involved.
The second part uses those same images, combined with data from the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) regarding the projected warming of Earth and the shrinking of the arctic ice cap. This combination of NASA and GFDL data reveals something unsettling about the next 100 years. Luckily, there’s something we can do about it. Humankind has the unique ability to see into the future, as demonstrated by these visual projections. It’s a special gift that our species has. The question is, what will we choose to do with this knowledge?
It’s the year 2015 and we’re accustomed to seeing images of Earth from space. But advancements in satellite technology continue to yield profound new ways of looking at our home from afar. For example, NASA put together some stunning composite images of our planet as part of its Blue Marble: Next Generation photography endeavor. By combining thousands of photos, they’ve created a view of our planet without any obstruction from clouds. There are images for each month of the year. When you cycle through these images, something remarkable happens. The first part of this video is made using these unaltered NASA images—no effects are involved.
The second part uses those same images, combined with data from the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) regarding the projected warming of Earth and the shrinking of the arctic ice cap. This combination of NASA and GFDL data reveals something unsettling about the next 100 years. Luckily, there’s something we can do about it. Humankind has the unique ability to see into the future, as demonstrated by these visual projections. It’s a special gift that our species has. The question is, what will we choose to do with this knowledge?
25/11/2015
'Stronger Commitment' Wanted On Paris Climate Change Pledge
Huffington Post - Sam McKeith
Most Australians want the federal government to push for larger cuts to greenhouse gas emissions at next week's UN Conference on Climate Change in Paris.
That's the major finding from a new Lowy Institute poll, which reveals 62 percent of Australians want the Turnbull government to take a stronger position to the talks than its current target of a 26-28 percent cut in emissions by 2030.
Indeed, just 36 percent of those polled want the government to stick to its current target, the poll found.
"The majority of adult Australians say the Government should be prepared to make stronger commitments on emissions reductions," the Lowy Institute said.
The think tank said the poll, which surveyed 1,000 Australians in October and November, also confirmed an upward trend in concern about climate change, with 52 percent of respondents now considering it a "serious and pressing problem".
Despite the rising concern, Australians are torn on how to deal with carbon emissions, the poll found, with a split between those favouring the government's direct action plan and those supporting the reintroduction of a carbon tax.
The poll follows somewhat of a turnaround from the coalition on the global meeting, with Turnbull confirmed to be attending the event.
The man he replaced as PM, Tony Abbott, was not tipped to attend the meeting after he scrapped the carbon tax, cut Australia's renewable energy target and critiqued wind farms.
Before Turnbull was installed as PM, it was thought Foreign Minister Julie Bishop was going to take Australia's seat at the UN meeting, which runs from November 30 to December 11.
With Turnbull at the helm, there has been a perceived shift in Australia's stance on tackling climate change, especially after he backed a Paris agreement to include a long-term goal.
Environment Minister Greg Hunt said on Wednesday he was confident a global agreement would be reached at Paris.
"In the end I'm optimistic there will be a real and genuine agreement in Paris," he told reporters in Canberra.
He said Australia was playing its part on carbon emissions on the world stage.
"Beyond 2020, our commitment to reduce emissions by 26 to 28 percent by 2030 is strong, it is credible, it is significant and Australia's target compares well with that of other countries in the period from 2005 to 2030," he said.
Australia is considered one of the world's worst greenhouse gas emitters per capita, according to the Climate Council.
![]() |
| The Lowy Institute says most Australians want the government to take a tougher stance on climate change. STR via Getty Images |
Most Australians want the federal government to push for larger cuts to greenhouse gas emissions at next week's UN Conference on Climate Change in Paris.
That's the major finding from a new Lowy Institute poll, which reveals 62 percent of Australians want the Turnbull government to take a stronger position to the talks than its current target of a 26-28 percent cut in emissions by 2030.
Indeed, just 36 percent of those polled want the government to stick to its current target, the poll found.
"The majority of adult Australians say the Government should be prepared to make stronger commitments on emissions reductions," the Lowy Institute said.
The think tank said the poll, which surveyed 1,000 Australians in October and November, also confirmed an upward trend in concern about climate change, with 52 percent of respondents now considering it a "serious and pressing problem".
Despite the rising concern, Australians are torn on how to deal with carbon emissions, the poll found, with a split between those favouring the government's direct action plan and those supporting the reintroduction of a carbon tax.
The poll follows somewhat of a turnaround from the coalition on the global meeting, with Turnbull confirmed to be attending the event.
The man he replaced as PM, Tony Abbott, was not tipped to attend the meeting after he scrapped the carbon tax, cut Australia's renewable energy target and critiqued wind farms.
Before Turnbull was installed as PM, it was thought Foreign Minister Julie Bishop was going to take Australia's seat at the UN meeting, which runs from November 30 to December 11.
With Turnbull at the helm, there has been a perceived shift in Australia's stance on tackling climate change, especially after he backed a Paris agreement to include a long-term goal.
Environment Minister Greg Hunt said on Wednesday he was confident a global agreement would be reached at Paris.
"In the end I'm optimistic there will be a real and genuine agreement in Paris," he told reporters in Canberra.
He said Australia was playing its part on carbon emissions on the world stage.
"Beyond 2020, our commitment to reduce emissions by 26 to 28 percent by 2030 is strong, it is credible, it is significant and Australia's target compares well with that of other countries in the period from 2005 to 2030," he said.
Australia is considered one of the world's worst greenhouse gas emitters per capita, according to the Climate Council.
1997 vs. 2015: Animation Compares El Niños Side-by-Side
Climate Central - Andrea Thompson
With this year’s El Niño shaping up to rival the strongest on record, comparisons to the last major El Niño, in 1997-1998, are inevitable. A new animation showing the development of each event side-by-side is the latest example, and provides a window into the similarities and differences between the two climate events.
Credit: NCAR
Those similarities and differences matter because they can affect how an El Niño’s typical impacts on global weather — from drought to deluges — shape up, the reason it receives such rapt attention.
On Tuesday, the World Meteorological Organization declared this El Nino a strong one, and some scientists have noted that sea surface temperatures in a key part of the eastern Pacific are higher than in previous events by this point of the year. Forecasters with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Columbia University said in their August update that temperatures in that region could reach more than 3.5°F above normal when this event peaks in the winter, something only recorded three times in the 65 years of record-keeping, including the 1997-1998 event (as well as 1982-1983 and 1972-1973).
With the inevitable comparisons between this El Niño and the 1997-1998 event — remembered for the incredible rains and mudslides it brought to California (along with Chris Farley’s memorable Saturday Night Live sketch) — Matt Rehme at the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Visualization Lab, worked up an animation showing the progression of each event from January through August.
"I was a little shocked just how closely 2015 resembles 1997 visually," Rehme said in a statement.
But as any El Niño researcher will tell you, no two El Niño events are alike, and the impacts from this one aren’t guaranteed to be just like 1997-1998.
The most obvious difference between this year and that event, clearly visible in the animation, is the “blob” of warm water off the west coast of North America, a symptom of the relentless high pressure pattern that has kept the West hot and dry over much of the last few years and led to the deep drought in California.
Right now, it is unclear how this warm patch will interact with the typical El Niño impacts (which aren’t guaranteed to materialize). That warmth could mean that any storms that hit drop more rain instead of much-needed snow that could help replenish depleted reservoirs.
Another difference is that “in 1997, there was no ‘peek-a-boo’ with El Niño the winter before it really got going,” as there was this past winter, Michelle L’Heureux, a NOAA El Niño forecaster, said in an email. The early months of 1997 started off relatively cool in the eastern tropical Pacific, “so the fact we have this strong El Niño … following earlier tropical ocean warmth is unique,” she said.
Also, the warmth that has built up so far this year, while reaching impressive heights in part of the eastern Pacific, hasn’t reached the very far eastern Pacific right at the coast of South America yet.
“It's certainly warm, but not yet on par with 1997/98,” L’Heureux said, which affects predictions for El Niño impacts in Peru.
So while it’s interesting to compare this El Niño to other events, and doing so helps researchers learn the range of variation El Niño can exhibit, just how the impacts shape up this year are a matter of waiting to see what winter brings.
Links
With this year’s El Niño shaping up to rival the strongest on record, comparisons to the last major El Niño, in 1997-1998, are inevitable. A new animation showing the development of each event side-by-side is the latest example, and provides a window into the similarities and differences between the two climate events.
Credit: NCAR
Those similarities and differences matter because they can affect how an El Niño’s typical impacts on global weather — from drought to deluges — shape up, the reason it receives such rapt attention.
On Tuesday, the World Meteorological Organization declared this El Nino a strong one, and some scientists have noted that sea surface temperatures in a key part of the eastern Pacific are higher than in previous events by this point of the year. Forecasters with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Columbia University said in their August update that temperatures in that region could reach more than 3.5°F above normal when this event peaks in the winter, something only recorded three times in the 65 years of record-keeping, including the 1997-1998 event (as well as 1982-1983 and 1972-1973).
With the inevitable comparisons between this El Niño and the 1997-1998 event — remembered for the incredible rains and mudslides it brought to California (along with Chris Farley’s memorable Saturday Night Live sketch) — Matt Rehme at the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Visualization Lab, worked up an animation showing the progression of each event from January through August.
"I was a little shocked just how closely 2015 resembles 1997 visually," Rehme said in a statement.
But as any El Niño researcher will tell you, no two El Niño events are alike, and the impacts from this one aren’t guaranteed to be just like 1997-1998.
The most obvious difference between this year and that event, clearly visible in the animation, is the “blob” of warm water off the west coast of North America, a symptom of the relentless high pressure pattern that has kept the West hot and dry over much of the last few years and led to the deep drought in California.
Right now, it is unclear how this warm patch will interact with the typical El Niño impacts (which aren’t guaranteed to materialize). That warmth could mean that any storms that hit drop more rain instead of much-needed snow that could help replenish depleted reservoirs.
![]() |
| An aerial view of a mudslide along the Southern California Coast just north of Los Angeles, taken in April 1998. Credit: USGS |
Another difference is that “in 1997, there was no ‘peek-a-boo’ with El Niño the winter before it really got going,” as there was this past winter, Michelle L’Heureux, a NOAA El Niño forecaster, said in an email. The early months of 1997 started off relatively cool in the eastern tropical Pacific, “so the fact we have this strong El Niño … following earlier tropical ocean warmth is unique,” she said.
Also, the warmth that has built up so far this year, while reaching impressive heights in part of the eastern Pacific, hasn’t reached the very far eastern Pacific right at the coast of South America yet.
“It's certainly warm, but not yet on par with 1997/98,” L’Heureux said, which affects predictions for El Niño impacts in Peru.
So while it’s interesting to compare this El Niño to other events, and doing so helps researchers learn the range of variation El Niño can exhibit, just how the impacts shape up this year are a matter of waiting to see what winter brings.
Links
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)









