17/09/2016

A 3-Million-Year Ice Age Is Coming To An End

BBC - Melissa Hogenboom

A dramatic animation shows how much of the Arctic sea ice has melted away in the last 35 years. The ice loss poses a terminal threat to polar bears

The Arctic sea ice, which polar bears depend on for survival, is shrinking.
A new study finds that ice is melting even earlier in spring than thought, and growing back later in autumn.
If this trend continues, polar bears will face longer periods without ice.
Watch how much their world has changed in 35 years:


Links

Arctic Sea Ice Shrinks To Second Lowest Level Ever Recorded

The Guardian - Associated Press

‘Tremendous loss’ of ice reinforces clear downward trend towards ice-free summers due to effects of climate change
Arctic sea ice this summer shrank to its second lowest level since scientists started to monitor it by satellite. Photograph: AP
Arctic sea ice this summer shrank to its second lowest level since scientists started to monitor it by satellite, with scientists saying it is another ominous signal of global warming.
The National Snow and Ice Data Center in Colorado said the sea ice reached its summer low point on Saturday, extending 4.14m sq km (1.6m sq miles). That’s behind only the mark set in 2012, 3.39m sq km.
Center director Mark Serreze said this year’s level technically was 10,000 sq km less than 2007, but that’s so close the two years are essentially tied.
Even though this year didn’t set a record, “we have reinforced the overall downward trend. There is no evidence of recovery here,” Serreze said. “We’ve always known that the Arctic is going to be the early warning system for climate change. What we’ve seen this year is reinforcing that.”
This year’s minimum level is nearly 2.56m sq km smaller than the 1979 to 2000 average. That’s the size of Alaska and Texas combined.
“It’s a tremendous loss that we’re looking at here,” Serreze said.
It was an unusual year for sea ice in the Arctic, Serreze said. In the winter, levels were among their lowest ever for the cold season, but then there were more storms than usual over the Arctic during the summer. Those storms normally keep the Arctic cloudy and cooler, but that didn’t keep the sea ice from melting this year, he said.
“Summer weather patterns don’t matter as much as they used to, so we’re kind of entering a new regime,” Serreze said.
Serreze said he wouldn’t be surprised if the Arctic was essentially ice free in the summer by 2030, something that will affect international security.
“The trend is clear and ominous,” National Center for Atmospheric Research senior scientist Kevin Trenberth said in an email. “This is indeed why the polar bear is a poster child for human-induced climate change, but the effects are not just in the Arctic.”
One recent theory divides climate scientists: Melting sea ice in the Arctic may change the jet stream and weather further south, especially in winter.
“What happens in the Arctic doesn’t stay in the Arctic,” Pennsylvania State University climate scientist Michael Mann said. “It looks increasingly likely that the dramatic decrease in Arctic sea ice is impacting weather in mid-latitudes and may be at least partly responsible for the more dramatic, persistent and damaging weather anomalies we’ve seen so many of in recent years.”

Arctic sea ice extent. The red line is sea ice extent in 2016. Photograph: NSIDC
Links

Extraordinary Global Heat Continues

World Meteorological Organization


The exceptionally long spell of record global heat, a surge in greenhouse gas concentrations,  shocking coral reef bleaching and long-term Arctic sea ice melt all add urgency to the need for world leaders to ratify and implement the Paris Agreement on climate change, according to  the World Meteorological Organization.
United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has convened a special high-level event on 21 September to speed up ratification or accession to the Paris Agreement, reached in December 2015.
“We have witnessed a prolonged period of extraordinary heat, which is set to become the new norm,” said WMO Secretary-General Petteri Taalas. “We have observed both unusually high concentrations of carbon dioxide and the record breaking temperatures. The high temperatures of the sea water has aggravated severe coral reef bleaching.”
“All these findings increase the urgency of action in the implementation of the Paris Agreement to avoid temperatures exceeding the 1.5-2.0°C range above the pre-industrial era,” said Mr Taalas.

Arctic Sea Ice
The US National Snow and Ice Data Centre said Thursday that the Arctic’s ice cover appears to have reached its minimum extent on September 10, 2016, at 4.14 million square kilometers (1.60 million square miles). It was statistically tied at second lowest in the satellite record with the 2007 minimum. The figures are provisional.
The record lowest extent in the 37-year satellite record occurred on September 17, 2012 when sea ice extent fell to 3.39 million square kilometers (1.31 million square miles).
It was a stormy, cloudy, and fairly cool summer. Historically,  such weather conditions slow down the summer ice loss.
“It really suggests that in the next few years, with more typical warmer conditions, we will see some very dramatic further losses,” said Ted Scambos, NSIDC lead scientist.

Arctic sea ice cover grows each autumn and winter, and shrinks each spring and  summer. The maximum Arctic sea ice extent in March 2016 was the lowest on record. The Greenland ice sheet also began its melt unusually early this year.
The extent of Arctic sea ice at the peak of the summer melt season now typically covers 40 percent less area than it did in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

Heat in August and September
Data from NASA and the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting confirmed that August 2016 set yet another monthly record.
Although the seasonal temperature cycle typically peaks in July, August 2016 wound up tied with July 2016 for the warmest month ever recorded. August 2016’s temperature was 0.16 degrees Celsius warmer than the previous warmest August (2014). The month also was 0.98 degrees Celsius warmer than the mean August temperature from 1951-1980, according to NASA.
The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is due to issue its August global temperature figures on 20 September. WMO uses a combination of international datasets to compile its annual statements on the Status of the Global Climate.
“Prospects of a cooling La Niña episode later this year are uncertain,” said Mr Taalas.  “It is looking likely that 2016 will the hottest year on record, surpassing the incredible temperatures witnessed in 2015,” he said.
Many parts of Europe experienced exceptionally high temperatures in the first half of September. In the United Kingdom, for instance, Gravesend in Kent reached 34.4°C on 13 September – the hottest September day since 1911. Denmark saw temperatures of up to 29.9°C.  France saw temperatures on 12 September which were 8 to 12 ° C above average for this time of year.

Carbon dioxide concentrations
Carbon dioxide concentrations have passed the symbolic milestone of 400 parts per million in the atmosphere so far this year. Levels vary according to the season but the underlying trend is upwards. According to NOAA, the global monthly mean CO2 in July 2016 was 401.72 parts per million, up from 393.13 parts per million in July 2015.

The ocean in a warmer world
The ocean is protecting us from the worst impacts of global warming by not only storing more than 90 per cent of the extra heat from greenhouse gases but also by taking up about a third of the total man-made emissions of carbon dioxide.
New research into the complex interactions between the ocean and the global climate – as evidenced by the recent super El Niño - will be examined at an international scientific gathering in China. The conference will also focus on how the ocean is bearing the brunt of global warming, with huge consequences for the future of the planet.
The Open Science Conference takes place in Qingdao, China, from 18 – 25 September and will bring together more than 600 scientists. It is organized by the World Climate Research Programme’s (WCRP) Core Project on Climate and Ocean – CLIVAR. WMO co-sponsors the World Climate Research Programme.

Links

Folks, it is time to be alarmed about climate change

News & Observer - Russell Philbrick*


If our children's children are going to be able to live meaningful lives upon this planet, we must all study and become alarmed about the changes that we have caused in the atmosphere, the ocean and the earth itself during the past 100 years.
Scientists of the world have been nearly unanimous in proclaiming that mankind is responsible for the major changes occurring in our environment. The scary thing is that no one can define the tipping point, when it will be too late for us to take actions that can prevent a level of catastrophe that we cannot change.
There is a tipping point, where a runaway greenhouse effect would completely cloud our sky while slowly scorching every living thing as the temperature rises. Sea levels will rise to flood more than half of the present living space of the world's population.
We have a sister planet, Venus, where a runaway greenhouse effect occurred. Venus exhibits thick clouds from evaporated oceans and all of the planet's volatile materials, which surround the planet with thick clouds that result in a typical surface temperature more than 800F.
Scientists are supposed to be more factual and less speculative in the things they say. However, there is a time when everyone has a responsibility to raise an alarm. This becomes particularly necessary when the majority of those we elect to write laws and regulations tend to be deniers of facts, ignorant of scientific results and dismissive of even debating and evaluating the potential consequences.
We are facing an election that is extremely important, if we are to begin the process of developing long-term solutions, by electing those who are willing to learn, discuss and develop plans to protect our future on planet Earth. It is a responsibility of every one of us to evaluate the stance on environmental issues of every candidate before we cast our ballots for president, senators, legislators, governor, as well as state and regional offices. We cannot afford to put off, for another four years, the process of beginning to develop plans for our future.
It is most likely that we cannot proceed along the current pathway for very much longer and hope to survive as the human species. We must be willing to accept significant changes in how we use resources for energy from fossil fuels for power generation and transportation and chemicals for increasing food harvests. We must be mindful of pollution of waterways and oceans, harvesting of trees and marine life and other practices that reduce species habitats in oceans and forests.
We do have some reason for hope that mankind can come together to make national and international choices for a common good, even if it has been done only on a much smaller scale in the past.
One particular example began in the 1970s, when scientists examined the potential for chlorofluorocarbons to chemically destroy the stratospheric ozone layer, which protects the troposphere and the surface from receiving the damaging high-energy solar ultraviolet radiation. At that time, CFCs in spray propellants for cosmetics, such as hairsprays, and air-conditioning refrigerants were being released into the atmosphere in sufficient quantity to cause scientists to sound the alarm.
During the 1980s, most all of the governments of the world came together on banning CFCs as spray propellant and regulating the use in refrigerants. During recent years, satellite and ground-based measurements have shown that the ozone decline has been reversed and is gradually returning to normal. The damage has probably been limited to small increases in frequencies of eye cataracts and skin cancers.
So, discussions and logical conclusions can result in agreements to do the right thing, but nothing can happen when politicians are at loggerheads. As a responsible citizen and a concerned member of society, please study this problem of climate change, consider the positions of the candidates on the environment and then vote for the good of future generations.

*Russell Philbrick is a professor of physics at N.C. State University.

Links

Turning Up The Heat To Push Many Australian Plants To The Brink, New Study Finds

Fairfax - Peter Hannam

Australia's inland plants are among those most likely to be affected by rising temperatures, challenging the concept the country's weather extremes would make them less susceptible to global warming, a new study has found.
The research, published in the Global Change Biology journal, studied the upper-canopy leaves of 218 plant species across 19 sites around the world.
Trees start to lose leaf function and can die if exposed to prolonged excessive heat. Photo: Nick Moir
Ten of the sites were in Australia, reflecting the nation's remarkable array of biomes, said Owen Atkin of the ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology at the Australian National University, who led the study.
The potential for damage from warming temperatures was found to be most severe in hot inland areas in mid-latitude regions. In Australia, these areas include study sites near Kalgoorlie in WA, Alice Springs in the Red Centre and Renmark in SA.
Studies have tended to focus more on the impacts of rising temperatures on fauna rather than plants.  Photo: Nick Moir
"We've been getting some amazing extremes," Professor Atkin said. Leaf temperatures can be 5-10 degrees above the air temperatures, putting them in the mid-50s in some places in January.
Upper canopy leaves tend to die when thresholds are breached, reducing the ability of the plants to grow.
"If those events happen often enough, then the tree may well die," he said. "Their tolerance is not high enough to cope with these new extremes."
The findings are important because previous studies of warming have tended to focus on how animals will respond. Since the inland regions where the heatwave extremes are becoming the worst are on the edges of important wheat and other agriculture zones, the results also underscore the need to develop more heat-tolerant varieties, Professor Atkin said.

Heatwaves in Australia: Dr Sarah Perkins-Kirkpatrick explains the ins and outs of this sweltering weather phenomenon. Produced in association with UNSWTV.

Andy Leigh, an ecologist at the University of Technology Sydney, such the study was important because it spanned a range of global conditions.
While Australia was known to have plants able to cope with a variable climate "there's a limit to how far we can push acclimation", she said.
Some plants would be able to adjust better than others to higher temperatures but the result of surviving would be less reproduction or other activity.
"Anything that costs plants effort is gong to come at the cost of productivity," Associate Professor Leigh said.
A separate report out on Tuesday by Nature Climate Change found that a 1 degree increase in global temperature would reduce global wheat yields by between 4.1 and 6.4 per cent.

Links

16/09/2016

NASA Begins Study Of Australia's Great Barrier Reef

NASA

The Gulfstream III carrying NASA's PRISM instrument being readied for science flights from Cairns, Australia. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/BIOS.
A NASA airborne mission designed to transform our understanding of Earth's valuable and ecologically sensitive coral reefs has set up shop in Australia for a two-month investigation of the Great Barrier Reef, the world's largest reef ecosystem.
At a media briefing today at Cairns Airport in North Queensland, Australia, scientists from NASA's COral Reef Airborne Laboratory (CORAL) mission and their Australian collaborators discussed the mission's objectives and the new insights they expect to glean into the present condition of the Great Barrier Reef and the function of reef systems worldwide.
"CORAL offers the clearest, most extensive picture to date of the condition of a large portion of the world's coral reefs," said CORAL Principal Investigator Eric Hochberg of the Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences (BIOS), Ferry Reach, St. George's, Bermuda, prior to the briefing. "This new understanding of reef condition and function will allow scientists to better predict the future of this global ecosystem and provide policymakers with better information for decisions regarding resource management."
Bleached and stressed coral on the Great Barrier Reef. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/BIOS.
CORAL's three-year mission combines aerial surveys using state-of-the-art airborne imaging spectrometer technology developed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, with in-water validation activities. The mission will provide critical data and new models for analyzing reef ecosystems from a new perspective. CORAL will generate a uniform data set for a large sample of reefs across the Pacific Ocean. Scientists can use these data to search for trends between coral reef condition and the natural and human-produced biological and environmental factors that affect reefs.
Over the next year, CORAL will survey portions of the Great Barrier Reef, along with reef systems in the main Hawaiian Islands, the Mariana Islands and Palau.
In Australia, CORAL will survey six discrete sections across the length of the Great Barrier Reef, from the Capricorn-Bunker Group in the south to Torres Strait in the north. Two locations on the reef — one north (Lizard Island Research Station) and one south (Heron Island Research Station) — will serve as bases for in-water validation activities. Scientists from Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the University of Queensland in Brisbane are collaborating with NASA and BIOS to conduct additional complementary in-water validation activities.

The Great Barrier Reef: Australia's national treasure
Located in the Coral Sea off Queensland, the Great Barrier Reef encompasses more than 2,900 individual reefs and 900 islands. It is more than 1,400 miles (2,300 kilometers) long and covers an area of about 133,000 square miles (344,400 square kilometers). The largest single structure made by living organisms on Earth, the reef teems with biodiversity, including about 400 species of coral. It attracts about 2 million visitors a year; in turn, tourism and fishing generate billions annually and employ tens of thousands of people. However, the reef faces environmental pressures from various human and climate change impacts.
"The Great Barrier Reef is Australia's national treasure, so having a broader understanding of its condition and what's threatening it will help us better understand how we can protect it," said Tim Malthus, research leader of CSIRO's Coastal Monitoring, Modeling and Informatics Group in Canberra, Australia. "Along with surveying several large sections of the reef, CORAL will also survey the health of corals in the Torres Strait, a complex high-tide area that has been historically less studied. It is also opportunistic for us to see if the reef is recovering after the recent bleaching event."
Stuart Phinn, professor of geography at the University of Queensland (UQ), said CORAL will provide Australian coral reef science and management with unique new maps and mapping approaches. These will expand ongoing efforts to map and understand Great Barrier Reef dynamics. "Being able to support and collaborate on NASA's CORAL project will enable groups like ours to advance our capabilities and transfer them to Australian science and management agencies," Phinn said. "Part of this includes building a process for mapping the entire reef. UQ and CORAL will exchange field data, knowledge and experience to cross-validate mapping and monitoring approaches."

An urgent need for better data
Around the world, concerns among scientists, resource managers and the public that coral reef ecosystems are degrading at alarming rates due to human-induced factors and global change have motivated increased assessment and monitoring efforts. The urgency of the problem has forced estimates of global reef status to be synthesized from a variety of local surveys with disparate aims, methods and quality.
The problem with current assessments of reef degradation, said Hochberg, is that the data supporting these predictions are not uniform and surprisingly sparse. "Virtually all reef assessments to date rely on in-water survey techniques that are laborious, expensive and limited in spatial scope," he said. "Very little of Earth's reef area has been directly surveyed. More importantly, there are no existing models that quantitatively relate reef conditions to the full range of biological and environmental factors that affect them -- models that can help scientists better understand how coral reefs will respond to expected environmental changes. CORAL addresses an urgent need in the face of ongoing worldwide reef degradation, and also serves as a pathfinder for a future satellite mission to globally survey the world's reefs."
Natural, balanced coral reefs comprise mosaics of coral, algae and sand on the seafloor that, together, drive the structure and function of reef ecosystems. When corals die, algae rapidly take over their skeletons. A non-stressed, healthy reef will usually increase coral coverage as it recovers from disturbance. But when a stressed reef is disturbed, the carbonate structure of its coral erodes, and the reef ultimately becomes a flat-bottom community dominated by algae, shifting rubble and sand, with little to no coral recovery. Such ecosystem phase shifts, as they are called, represent a radical change in a reef's character, marked by a decline in the diversity of reef flora and fauna.
CORAL will generate scientific data products describing coral reef condition, measuring three key components of reef health for which we currently have limited data: composition, primary productivity and calcification. Primary productivity is a measure of how much energy is available to drive biological activity in a reef system. Calcification measures the net gain in carbonates, which determine a reef's long-term growth.

PRISM: Shining new light on coral reef condition
To accomplish its science objectives, CORAL will use JPL's Portable Remote Imaging Spectrometer (PRISM). PRISM will literally peer through the ocean's surface to generate high-resolution images of reflected light in the specific regions of the electromagnetic spectrum important to coral reef scientists. Mounted in the belly of a modified Tempus Solutions Gulfstream IV aircraft, PRISM will survey reefs from an altitude of 28,000 feet (8,500 meters) to generate calibrated scientific data products.
"PRISM builds on an extensive legacy of JPL spectrometers that have successfully operated for NASA and non-NASA missions," said Michelle Gierach, NASA CORAL project scientist at JPL. "It provides the coral reef science community with high-quality oceanographic imagery at the accuracy, range, resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, sensitivity and uniformity needed to answer key questions about coral reef condition. PRISM data will be analyzed against data for 10 key biological and environmental factors affecting coral reef ecosystems, acquired from pre-existing data sources."
NASA collects data from space, air, land and sea to increase our understanding of our home planet, improve lives and safeguard our future. NASA develops new ways to observe and study Earth's interconnected natural systems with long-term data records. The agency freely shares this unique knowledge and works with institutions around the world to gain new insights into how our planet is changing.

Links

U.S. Defence Experts And Military Officers Sound Alarm About Climate Change

Ottawa Citizen - David Pugliese


U.S. teachers are not teaching their students enough about climate change, new study shows. Jonathan Hayward / AP
Climate change is increasing the risk of international conflict and putting U.S. national security at risk, warns a coalition of 25 retired officers and Democrat and Republican security experts.
“There are few easy answers, but one thing is clear: the current trajectory of climatic change presents a strategically-significant risk to U.S. national security, and inaction is not a viable option,” said a statement signed by the security advisors and published by the Center for Climate and Security in Washington.
The advisors include retired General Anthony Zinni, former commander of the U.S. Central Command, retired Admiral Samuel Locklear, head of the U.S. Pacific Command until last year, Geoffrey Kemp, President Ronald Reagan’s national security advisor, Dov Zakheim, George W. Bush’s Under-Secretary of Defense and Army Chief of Staff General Gordon Sullivan who served under U.S. President Bill Clinton.
The advisors are calling on the next U.S. president to create a cabinet-level position to deal with climate change-related security issues.
Another report, from another panel of retired officers, warned that extreme weather is threatening U.S. coastlines and military installations.
“The complex relationship between sea level rise, storm surge and global readiness and responsiveness must be explored down to the operational level, across the Services and Joint forces, and up to a strategic level as well,” the report noted.
Meanwhile, the Associated Press is reporting that Arctic sea ice this summer shrank to its second lowest level since scientists started to monitor it by satellite. Scientists say this is another ominous signal of global warming.
Here is the rest of the Associated Press article:
The National Snow and Ice Data Center in Colorado said the sea ice reached its summer low point on Saturday, extending 1.6 million square miles (4.14 million square kilometers). That’s behind only the mark set in 2012, 1.31 million square miles (3.39 million square kilometers).
Center director Mark Serreze said this year’s level technically was 3,800 square miles (10,000 square kilometers) less than 2007, but that’s so close the two years are essentially tied.
Even though this year didn’t set a record, “we have reinforced the overall downward trend. There is no evidence of recovery here,” Serreze said.
“We’ve always known that the Arctic is going to be the early warning system for climate change. What we’ve seen this year is reinforcing that.”
This year’s minimum level is nearly 1 million square miles (2.56 million square kilometers) smaller than the 1979 to 2000 average. That’s the size of Alaska and Texas combined.
“It’s a tremendous loss that we’re looking at here,” Serreze said.
It was an unusual year for sea ice in the Arctic, Serreze said.
In the winter, levels were among their lowest ever for the cold season, but then there were more storms than usual over the Arctic during the summer. Those storms normally keep the Arctic cloudy and cooler, but that didn’t keep the sea ice from melting this year, he said.
“Summer weather patterns don’t matter as much as they used to, so we’re kind of entering a new regime,” Serreze said.
Serreze said he wouldn’t be surprised if the Arctic was essentially ice free in the summer by 2030, something that will affect international security.
“The trend is clear and ominous,” National Center for Atmospheric Research senior scientist Kevin Trenberth said in an email. “This is indeed why the polar bear is a poster child for human-induced climate change, but the effects are not just in the Arctic.”
One recent theory divides climate scientists: Melting sea ice in the Arctic may change the jet stream and weather further south, especially in winter.
“What happens in the Arctic doesn’t stay in the Arctic,” Pennsylvania State University climate scientist Michael Mann said.
“It looks increasingly likely that the dramatic decrease in Arctic sea ice is impacting weather in mid-latitudes and may be at least partly responsible for the more dramatic, persistent and damaging weather anomalies we’ve seen so many of in recent years.”

Links

Lethal Heating is a citizens' initiative