Worst-Case Climate Change Scenario Could Be More Extreme Than Thought, Scientists Warn

The Independent - Harry Cockburn

Economic growth could prompt greater greenhouse gas emissions than previously forecast, study says

Even our best efforts at limiting emissions may not be enough to avert disaster Shutterstock

Scientists may have to recalibrate their projections of what a “worst case” climate change scenario is, as new studies take into account greater global economic growth than previously forecast.
Climate scientists forecasting how the earth’s climate will change over time examine trends in greenhouse gas emissions, which are largely dependent on how the global economy behaves.
As countries get richer, the amount they consume goes up, and so too do greenhouse gas emissions.
Scientists use four scenarios called representative concentration pathways (RCPs) that attempt to depict possible futures for our planet.
The standard worst case scenario, RCP 8.5, assumes rapid and unrestricted economic growth which will see rampant burning of fossil fuels. In addition, it also assumes no further action will be taken to limit warming than the policies countries are already pursuing.
However, scientists at the University of Illinois say there is a one-in-three chance that by the end of the century emissions will have exceeded those estimated in the RCP 8.5 scenario.
“Our estimates indicate that, due to higher than assumed economic growth rates, there is a greater than 35 per cent probability that year 2100 emissions concentrations will exceed those given by RCP8.5,” Peter Christensen told the New Scientist.
Glen Peters of the Centre for International Climate Research in Norway points to the rise in carbon emissions in Europe over the past four years as economic growth has sped up. In 2017, EU emissions rose by 1.8 per cent.
However, the worst case scenario remains unlikely as economic growth does not rule out environmentally-beneficial policy.
“We’ve already locked in a certain amount of climate policy,” Mr Peters said.
Nonetheless, the latest research also means higher levels of emissions may now have to be factored in to the other climate scenarios.

A group of emperor penguins face a crack in the sea ice, near McMurdo Station, Antarctica Kira Morris

Numerous climate models have previously predicted an apocalyptic future for existence on earth. From rapid icecap melt and catastrophic sea level rise, to rising temperatures making some areas uninhabitable, and mass extinctions of species in affected areas.
But even our best efforts may not be enough to avert disaster.
The Paris climate agreement commits the world’s countries to preventing global warming to no more than 2C above pre-industrial temperatures by the end of the century.
However, even if all countries meet their non-binding targets, some projections estimate global temperatures could still rise by more than 3C, and possibly by over 4C.
This would have a devastating effect on the planet, raising sea levels as much as 1.5 metres, putting cities like Amsterdam and New York under water and causing widespread famine.

Links

• Worst-case climate change scenario is even worse than we thought
• London's iconic red buses to run on coffee in bid to cut emissions
• Americans who believe in conspiracies likely to doubt climate change
• Our expectations 'making spring weather seem more extreme than it is'
• Climate change means chicks hatch too late to eat caterpillars
• Bloomberg ‘to write $4.5m cheque to keep US in Paris Climate agreement
• James Beard Banning hybrid cars is a good start, but we must do more
• How 'supermud' bricks could help tackle the world's housing crisis
• Carbon emissions from global shipping to be halved by 2050, says IMO
• Norway's sovereign wealth fund may extend emissions blacklist
• Sandwiches eaten in UK 'have same environmental impact as 8m cars'
• London's iconic red buses to run on coffee in bid to cut emissions
• Michael Bloomberg to bring his war on coal to Europe after US success
• Ex-chief scientist backs climate change lawsuit against Government
• Coal contributions to British power generation fall to 135 year low
• David Usborne Trump maintains illusion of forward motion by taking America backwards
• What is the Paris agreement and what would happen if Trump withdrew?
• India and China to make up for Trump's damaging stance on climate
• Deep sea mining could help develop mass solar energy
• World leaders 'should ignore Donald Trump on climate change'
• Trump takes major step to wiping out Obama’s climate-change record
• Environmental policies are 'driving down consumer energy bills'
• UK carbon emissions at same level as when first petrol car invented
• Environmental laws must be protected after Brexit, warn climate groups
• China scraps construction of 85 planned coal power plants
• Is carbon offset an effective addition to your green lifestyle?
• Finland plans to completely phase out coal by 2030
• Global carbon emissions stall after US and China reduce coal use
• Germany pushes to ban petrol-fuelled cars within next 20 years
• EU countries meet their carbon-cutting targets six years early
• How one power plant is chipping away at the UK's carbon footprint
• Beijing hit by second smog 'red alert' in two weeks
• Tristan Smith Shipping and aviation are climate change's main culprits
• Government slammed after scrapping £1bn project to cut carbon emission
• How ski resorts are gaining green credentials
• UK theatres doing their bit to reduce carbon emissions