Will climate change put women in the ascendant? - Julian Cribb

Surviving the 21st Century - Julian Cribb

AUTHOR Julian Cribb AM is an Australian science writer and author of seven books on the human existential emergency. His latest book is How to Fix a Broken Planet (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

In one of the more startling side-effects of global warming, the hotter it gets, the more babies are being born female.

The masculo-patriarchy are in for a fresh shock. 

Besides the massive decline in fertility, increasing gender confusion and loss of male identity that is roiling western manhood, there are now signs that one of the consequences of global heating will be a female majority human population.

That’s the evidence from a new study covering millions of births in 34 countries across India and Sub-Saharan Africa, places greatly affected by overheating. 

Essentially, UK scientist Dr Jasmine Ghany and team found that, the hotter it gets, the more the gender ratio at birth skews towards females.

As maximum temperatures climb above 20 degrees C, the tendency increases towards fewer male and more female births – even in societies that prefer boy babies.

The theory appears to be that extreme heat stress on the mother leads to a greater proportion of male babies dying in the womb. That these fatalities are natural, and not the result of sex selection by the parents, is supported by the strong preference for male offspring in the societies.

The irony in all this is that global warming, along with the other nine catastrophic threats to human civilisation and society, is almost entirely man-made. 

It is men who mine the oil, coal and gas, who fell the forests, clear the land, make and distribute the poisons that are disrupting human sex hormones, build the nukes and who lie, habitually and selfishly, about the consequences. 

Women tend to a somewhat more realistic view. 

Figure 1. Births per woman, 1950-2025. Source UN.

For example, women collectively have long understood or sensed the world is overpopulated, and have been methodically lowering the birth rate, almost universally (except in very poor societies), from 5 babies per woman to 2.2 over the past half century.

While superficially, scholars are inclined to ascribe the decline in female fertility to things like education, healthcare, careers and equality for women, it is hard not to suspect something is also happening at the species level – a Baby Bust reciprocal to the Baby Boom that followed the slaughter of 65-85 million people in WWII.

Simultaneously has come the near-panic among the aggressive males who form the modern pronatalist movement, largely led by men of business, (who seem not to grasp that societies with fewer children are richer and that business profit depends not on sheer numbers of consumers but on their ability to afford the goods and services on offer).

In the US, Donald Trump is offering a $1000 bribe to any US citizens who have a baby, while in Russia Putin – more thriftily – has revived an old Soviet custom by awarding a medal to any ‘mother-heroine’ who has ten babies. Hungary’s Viktor Orban is busy subtracting his citizens’ reproductive rights. In all, about 55 countries (of 196) have a strong pronatalist stance.

Figure 2. Total fertility rates, by country, 2024. Source: Population Reference Bureau.

The close identity of pronatalism with misogyny, coercion, religious patriarchy and female subjugation has disturbed many observers. 

 

Likewise, health experts argue it is “not only ineffective, but dangerous to the health and well-being of women and other populations and in direct conflict with modern reproductive goals, reproductive justice, and decades of efforts towards achieving gender parity.”

 

 This all raises the question whether pronatalism is, in reality, simply an emotional reaction by prominent males against their perceived ‘loss of manhood’ and ‘traditional’ male roles.

There are several ways to view the apparent decline in the male gender.

If one inclines to a Gaian perspective, one might be tempted to speculate that the Earth, as a Lovelockian biological meta-organism, is busy curbing the parasitic gender that causes the most harm to the natural balance of life. The hotter they make the planet, the fewer the human males it will tolerate.

Or, if the decline in male sperm counts continues at present rates, human male fertility may collapse globally by 2045.

One unanswerable fact is that males are the architects of their own misfortunes – not something the average male ego can easily acknowledge.

Take sperm counts and gender confusion, for example. There is very little doubt these are driven by the flood of toxic chemicals which a male-dominated petrochemical industry has unleashed over the past half century: plastics, pesticides, phthalates and hundreds of other endocrine disrupting substance are ubiquitous in modern industrial food, drink, clothing, homes and workplaces. But the men responsible seem neither to know nor care.

It is equally plain that global heating is driven by male-dominated industries such as fossil fuels, agriculture, forestry and construction. The fossil fuels sector, for example, is 86% male to 16% female in its composition, whereas women make up 32% of the renewable energy workforce.

From all of the above, it is hard not to conclude that women are better suited as leaders in a 21^st Century in which all of humanity is in peril from the 10 megathreats largely engendered by men.

As I have previously written in this column: “As a rule, women don’t start nuclear wars, dig coal, destroy landscapes and forests, pollute air and oceans or poison their children. They tend to think more about the longer term than do men, and about the future needs of their children and grandchildren. They tend to seek peaceful and constructive solutions to problems rather than fighting over differences in values and beliefs, or resources.”

For the past two centuries every war that ever got started was started by men, or by male-dominated governments – and not one of them by women, who have been among the chief victims among the 200 million dead, of militant manhood. 

Such a situation would be truly catastrophic for a humanity menaced by ten converging megathreats. Wars will not solve any of them.

In arguing that women should lead humanity in this century, it is neither a matter of gender nor politics. It’s one of the emerging rules of human survival. Left to male leadership the world will have autocracy, war, climatic collapse, environmental ruin and universal poisoning – just as it has over the past century or two. Despite this, only about 30 countries (15%) currently have a female head of state.

For humanity as a whole it is now a matter of choosing the kind of leadership which can best get us through the most dangerous emergency in all of human history.

Female thinking can save the planet, and humanity. And this means female thinking by men as well as by women.

But we also need a majority of wise women in positions of power if we are to escape the fate which male aggression, overconsumption and overpollution are building for us. And a majority female population, engendered by global heating, could just help to achieve that.

Julian Cribb Articles

• When the water runs out...
• The great dying
• Australia issues ‘terrifying’ climate warning
• 'Died of a delusion': the fate of modern civilisation?
• Collapse is near, scientists warn
• De-icing the Earth: a fatal human choice. 
• Rivers of Death
• Unlike politicians, thermometers do not lie
• Welcome to BunkerWorld: Home of the rich and fearful
•  Wisdom of the elders
•  The black work of Big Oil
•  Stealing the Breath of Life
•  The Earth Uncloaked - a catastrophe in slow motion 
  
•  Military experts warn of climate wars
•  Tackling the Earth Emergency
•  A distracted world marches steadily towards catastrophe

The Burning Premium: How Climate Change Is Pricing Australians Out of Their Homes - Lethal Heating Editor BDA

Across a continent shaped by fire, flood and cyclone, 
the bill for a warming world is landing not in distant futures 
but in this year's insurance renewal notice.

Key Points

Australian home insurance premiums rose 14% in a single year between 2022 and 2023, the biggest annual increase in a decade, driven by record climate disaster losses. 1 1.6 million Australian households now face insurance affordability stress, spending more than one month's gross income on premiums, up from 1.24 million the previous year. 2 Northern Australia faces the country's highest premiums, with average home and contents costs exceeding $4,600 per year in north Western Australia despite a federal cyclone reinsurance pool. 3 The Climate Council estimates that one in 25 Australian properties could become effectively uninsurable by 2030, with 80% of that risk driven by river flooding. 4 Roughly 3% of Australian bank loan assets, equating to approximately $60 billion in loans, are tied to properties likely to face unaffordable insurance, threatening financial system stability. 5 Parametric insurance and AI-driven risk modelling are emerging as potential tools for covering previously uninsurable climate risks, but significant equity and access gaps remain. 6

The envelope arrived in January, as it always does, bearing the name of a well-known insurer and the quiet menace of an annual renewal.

For a homeowner in Townsville, north Queensland, the figure inside had risen again, this time by more than 20 per cent on the previous year.

She had not made a claim. Her house had not flooded.

But the wet season had been brutal elsewhere in the region, and the insurer's algorithms had recalculated her risk along with everyone else's.

She is not alone, and her experience is not unusual.

Across Australia, the intersection of a warming climate and a hardening global insurance market is producing costs that are beginning to exceed what ordinary households can bear.

The story of climate change and insurance is, at its core, a story about who pays for a problem they did not cause and whether the structures that once protected Australians from disaster can continue to do so.

A Record of Losses

In 2022, major floods inundated much of eastern Australia's coastline and river plains, triggering insured losses of $7 billion, almost double the previous record. ¹

That single year's bill reshaped the pricing decisions of every major insurer operating in the country.

Between 2022 and 2023, the average home insurance premium in Australia rose by 14 per cent, the largest single-year increase in a decade. ¹

The McKell Institute has modelled that the direct cost of natural disasters in Australia could reach $35 billion per year in 2022 dollars by mid-century, an average of more than $2,500 per household per year. ¹

Yet averages, as actuaries are fond of noting, conceal more than they reveal.

For households in high-risk flood zones, cyclone corridors or bushfire-prone valleys, insurance costs are already multiples of the national average.

The 2019-20 summer, remembered as the Black Summer, saw general insurers pay out $3.89 billion across more than 300,000 claims from bushfires, floods and storms. ⁴

Since 2013, insured losses in every single year have exceeded the combined losses of the five years from 2000 to 2004. ¹

The trend is not cyclical.

It is structural.

The Reinsurance Transmission Belt

To understand why premiums rise even for households far from the most recent disaster, one must understand reinsurance, the system by which insurers themselves buy insurance against catastrophic losses.

Global reinsurers, having absorbed mounting losses from extreme weather events across Europe, Asia and the Americas, have tightened their pricing and reduced their capacity. ⁷

This global hardening transmits directly into Australian premium pricing.

Higher costs for reinsurance mean that primary insurers, the ones who sell policies to homeowners, must charge more, or accept losses they cannot sustain.

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority's data shows that housing insurance underwriting has been unprofitable since 2019-20. ¹

This is a critical finding, because it dispels any simple narrative about insurer profiteering.

Premiums are rising not because companies are extracting excess margins, but because the underlying risk has genuinely, materially increased.

Building cost inflation, driven by post-pandemic supply chain pressures, accounts for roughly half of recent premium increases in isolation, but when compounded with climate-driven catastrophe frequency, the combined effect has been severe. ⁸

Sharanjit Paddam, Principal in Climate Analytics at actuarial firm Finity and one of Australia's most cited researchers on insurance affordability, has described the feedback loop clearly: worse climate events lead to higher reinsurance costs, which lead to higher premiums, which lead more households to drop cover, which concentrates risk further among those who remain insured.

The Affordability Precipice

In the year to March 2023, median home insurance premiums rose by 28 per cent to $1,894, with properties in the highest-risk zones — flood-prone areas, bushfire corridors — recording increases of 50 per cent. ⁸

By March 2024, the share of households in what researchers term "affordability stress", spending more than one month's gross income on home insurance, had risen to 15 per cent, up from 12 per cent the previous year. ²

That equates to 1.6 million households, up from 1.24 million twelve months earlier. ²

For those households, insurance costs average 8.8 weeks of income, more than seven times the national median. ⁸

As of 2023, one in 20 Australian households was underinsured, and about one in 30 had no insurance at all. ⁹

That equates to more than two million people living without adequate cover in a country that experiences some of the world's most destructive climate events.

A 2025 Climate Council poll found that 46 per cent of Australians with home insurance reported that extreme weather had already increased their premiums, while 54 per cent feared that cover would become unaffordable or unavailable in their location. ⁹

In 2025, Australians paid up to $700 more for home and contents premiums than in 2024. ⁹

The Geography of Risk

The premium map of Australia increasingly reflects its climate map.

In north Western Australia, average home and contents premiums now exceed $4,600 per year. ³

In the Northern Territory and north Queensland, average premiums exceed $3,000 per year, more than 60 per cent above the national median. ³

Strata insurance in north Western Australia averages more than $18,000 per policy, an increase of 18 per cent in a single year. ³

The Queensland state is deemed the most at risk of an imminent insurance crisis, with five of the ten most vulnerable areas nationally located there. ⁴

Rural and remote communities face additional challenges that compound the raw premium cost.

Sparse infrastructure means that when disaster strikes, rebuilding takes longer, builders charge more for remote work, and supply chains are less resilient.

Indigenous communities, which are disproportionately located in remote and climate-exposed regions, face the intersection of geographic risk, limited market competition and historical underinvestment in mitigation infrastructure.

Lower-income households more broadly tend to live in higher-risk areas precisely because land in those areas has historically been cheaper, a pattern that climate change is now converting into a trap, as Finity's Paddam has observed in his affordability research. ¹⁰

The Cyclone Pool: A Partial Remedy

In response to the acute affordability crisis in northern Australia, the federal government established the Cyclone Reinsurance Pool in 2022, administered by the Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporation and backed by a $10 billion government guarantee. ¹¹

The pool provides reinsurance to insurers for cyclone and related flood damage without a profit margin, reducing the cost of reinsurance that insurers pass on to consumers.

By the time all large insurers had joined by the end of 2023, the pool had begun to deliver modest relief.

The ACCC's fourth annual insurance monitoring report found that average premiums in medium to high cyclone risk areas decreased by 11 per cent compared to pre-pool pricing, with the most prominent reductions in Mackay, Cairns and Townsville, where median premiums fell by approximately 15 per cent. ³

However, the pool's limitations are significant and well-documented.

RACQ, a major Queensland insurer, reported that one in two cyclones over the preceding 40 years would not have been substantially covered by the pool as designed. ¹²

The National Insurance Brokers Association has noted that the pool fails to address insurance-based taxes, with Queensland alone expected to collect more than $2 billion in stamp duty from insurance premiums by the 2027-28 financial year. ¹³

Taxes of this kind can add up to 18 per cent to premium costs, a burden that disproportionately falls on those in highest-risk areas. ⁷

The cyclone pool illustrates both the potential and the insufficiency of targeted government intervention.

It has helped at the margins, but the structural forces driving premiums upward are broader than any single policy mechanism can address.

Regulation, Transparency and the Limits of Markets

Insurers are under no legal obligation to explain the climate-related rationale behind specific premium increases in terms that consumers can interrogate or contest.

The result is a market characterised by opaque pricing, where households are told only the new figure, not the model behind it.

The APRA Insurance Climate Vulnerability Assessment, commenced in July 2023, represents the most systematic attempt yet to model how insurance affordability may change between now and 2050 under different emissions scenarios. ¹⁴

Its findings, which draw on the inputs of major reinsurers including Munich Re and Swiss Re as well as climate scientists, are intended to inform regulatory responses.

The Actuaries Institute has called for a comprehensive policy suite including targeted subsidies, tax reform and risk-reduction infrastructure investment to address affordability in the near term. ⁸

The National Disaster Risk Reduction Framework provides a policy architecture for mitigation investment, but its implementation has been uneven and its funding commitments insufficient relative to the scale of risk now being priced into insurance markets.

The Insurance Council of Australia has called for enhanced land-use planning, stricter building codes and increased investment in flood defences and home-hardening measures as structural solutions. ²

There are genuine limits to what government can do without distorting the risk signals that insurance pricing provides.

If premiums are subsidised heavily enough that they no longer reflect hazard, communities and individuals lose the financial incentive to avoid high-risk locations or invest in resilience.

Yet if premiums are allowed to rise without limit or constraint, the social consequences are severe: uninsured households, collapsed property values, stranded mortgage holders and governments forced to fund recovery from public funds without the efficiency of a functioning insurance market.

Property Values, Mortgages and the Financial System

The consequences of unaffordable insurance extend well beyond individual households.

A 2024 Climate Valuation report warned that flooding exacerbated by climate change could leave communities in Australian suburbs without access to affordable insurance or mortgage lending, services it described as critical to a functioning property market. ¹⁵

Finity research has estimated that roughly 3 per cent of Australian bank loan assets are tied to properties likely to have unaffordable insurance. ⁵

That equates to approximately $60 billion in loans.

Actuary Sharanjit Paddam has stated that if those loans were to fail, the outcome "would cause a severe crisis for the banking system in Australia." ⁵

Banks are already beginning to incorporate climate risk into mortgage lending assessments, and some are moving toward denial of loans for properties in areas where insurance is unavailable.

The risk of a contagion effect is real: as buyers discover that properties cannot be insured, sellers find themselves unable to realise value, property prices fall, and the damage spreads to adjacent areas through the mechanism of perception alone.

The Climate Council's estimate that 1 in 25 Australian properties could become effectively uninsurable by 2030, with 80 per cent of that risk attributable to river flooding, suggests the contagion could arrive sooner than most financial regulators have modelled. ⁴

The Algorithm and the Actuary

Climate models are now central to the actuarial forecasting that determines what households pay for cover.

Insurers are deploying AI and big data tools to price individual properties with a precision that was impossible a decade ago.

This individualised approach means that two houses on the same street can receive dramatically different premiums based on subtle differences in elevation, drainage, construction type or proximity to a watercourse. ⁷

The methodological sophistication is genuine and represents a more accurate translation of risk into price.

But accuracy and equity are not the same thing.

A household that finds itself in a high-risk location, not by choice but by the constraints of income, has limited ability to respond to actuarially precise pricing.

UNSW's Dr Fei Huang, a senior lecturer in risk and actuarial studies, has proposed a multidisciplinary ethical framework that draws from actuarial science, climate science, philosophy, social science and economics to assess the justice implications of insurance pricing decisions. ¹⁰

The question she poses, who bears the cost of insurance affordability, and is that distribution just?, is one that markets alone cannot answer.

New Products and the Adaptation Horizon

Industry and researchers are exploring models beyond the conventional annual premium structure.

Parametric insurance pays a predetermined sum when a specific trigger, such as a cyclone reaching a defined wind speed or a flood exceeding a certain gauge level, is met, without requiring an assessment of individual property damage. ⁶

Advances in satellite technology and artificial intelligence are enabling parametric products to cover risks across large areas, including farms, municipalities and coastal communities, that would be prohibitively expensive to assess individually. ⁶

Community risk pools, in which groups of households share risk collectively rather than purchasing individual policies, represent another model under active consideration.

The Actuaries Institute's Elayne Grace has described sustainable finance as a critical part of the solution, arguing that better data and climate risk frameworks can create pathways for households, investors, insurers and lenders that allow government to focus support on those in greatest need. ²

Insurers that offer discounts on premiums for home-hardening measures, such as cyclone-rated roofing, flood barriers or ember-resistant construction, are beginning to create financial incentives aligned with physical risk reduction.

The ARPC cyclone pool itself includes a discount mechanism for properties that implement recognised mitigation measures, though the ACCC has noted that uptake remains limited. ³

Conclusion: A Country Repricing Itself

Australia is, in the language of finance, in the process of repricing itself.

The cost of living in a place that floods, burns or blows away with increasing frequency is being written, line by line, into the insurance contracts that underpin the country's housing system, its banking system and its social fabric.

The process is not orderly, and it is not equitable.

Those least responsible for the emissions that have accelerated this risk are, in many cases, bearing the highest costs: residents of northern Queensland, remote Indigenous communities, lower-income households in flood-prone areas on the urban fringe.

The federal cyclone pool is a meaningful but insufficient intervention.

Tax reform, land-use planning, building standards and sustained infrastructure investment in risk reduction are the structural levers that can change the trajectory, but they require sustained political commitment that has so far not materialised at the necessary scale.

If emissions trajectories do not change markedly, the McKell Institute's projection of $35 billion in annual natural disaster costs by mid-century will render parts of the country not merely expensive to insure but simply uninsurable in the conventional sense.

Insurance is a mechanism for sharing risk across time and across populations.

When risk becomes certainty, insurance ceases to function.

The question Australia faces is not whether climate change is repricing its housing stock - it already is - but whether policy, innovation and collective will can keep enough of the country within the boundaries of insurability to prevent the kind of cascading failures that would leave the most vulnerable households, and ultimately the broader economy, without the buffer that insurance has always provided.

The renewal notice will keep arriving.

The only question is whether Australians will be able to afford what is inside.

References

1. The Australia Institute (2024) — Premium Price: The Impact of Climate Change on Insurance Costs
2. Insurance Business Australia (2024) — Soaring Premiums Push 1.6 Million Aussie Households into Insurance Crisis
3. ACCC (2025) — Cyclone Reinsurance Pool Lowering Premiums in High Risk Areas but Affordability Concerns Remain
4. World Economic Forum (2022) — Climate Change Is Causing an Insurance Crisis in Australia (citing Climate Council, Uninsurable Nation)
5. Green Central Banking (2025) — Australia's Insurance Gap Is a Risk to the Financial System
6. World Economic Forum (2025) — How Parametric Insurance Is Building Climate Resilience
7. UNSW BusinessThink (2024) — Factors Behind Home Insurance Premium Increases, Dr Fei Huang
8. Insurance Business Australia (2023) — The Home Insurance Affordability Stress Facing Australian Households (Actuaries Institute / Finity)
9. Climate Council (2025) — New Poll Reveals Climate Stress Hitting Aussie Homeowners
10. UNSW BusinessThink (2024) — Home Insurance Is on the Rise. Is There an Affordable Solution?
11. Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporation — The Cyclone Pool
12. RACQ (2025) — Opening Statement to the Cyclone Reinsurance Pool Public Hearing
13. NIBA (2025) — NIBA Responds to ACCC Cyclone Reinsurance Pool Insurance Monitoring Report
14. APRA (2024) — Insurance Climate Vulnerability Assessment
15. Green Central Banking (2025) — Australia and NZ Face Home Insurance Crisis Due to Climate, Experts Warn

Back to top

The Price of Fire and Rain: Climate Change and the Rising Cost of Insurance in Canberra - Lethal Heating Editor BDA

As the bush capital heats up,
the financial risks of living close to nature are being priced
into every homeowner's annual renewal.

Key Points

Canberra's average home insurance premium sits between roughly $2,042 and $2,622, but premiums in bushfire-adjacent suburbs are rising faster than the city-wide average. [1] A January 2020 hailstorm triggered more than 15,000 ACT insurance claims and was declared a national catastrophe by the Insurance Council of Australia. [2] The ACT's western fringe — facing Namadgi National Park and the Brindabella Mountains — is considered the territory's primary source of catastrophic bushfire risk. [3] Australia's five largest insurers are modelling premium affordability to 2050 under two climate scenarios, in collaboration with APRA and leading scientific agencies. [4] Extreme weather costs across Australia are projected to grow from $4 billion per year today to $8.7 billion per year by 2050, compressing insurance affordability territory-wide. [5] The ACT Government is developing a new Climate Change Strategy for 2026–35, targeting net zero emissions by 2045 and improved disaster resilience across all suburbs. [6]

In late January 2020, a hailstorm swept across Canberra on a Monday afternoon and left the city counting the damage for months.

Golf-ball-sized hailstones shattered skylights in Weston Creek and stripped the bark from planes trees in Braddon.

Wind gusts of up to 116 kilometres per hour were recorded at Canberra Airport, and more than 3,150 homes lost power at the storm's peak.^[2]

Within 24 hours, more than 15,000 insurance claims had been lodged from the ACT alone, prompting the Insurance Council of Australia to declare the event a national catastrophe, a designation that unlocks emergency claims-processing protocols.

The total insured loss from that single afternoon exceeded $320 million, with ACT claims accounting for 56 per cent of all claims lodged across ACT, New South Wales and Victoria combined.^[2]

That storm was not a bushfire.

It was a hailstorm, a reminder that climate risk in the Australian Capital Territory is not one-dimensional, and that the financial consequences of an intensifying climate do not discriminate by suburb or income.

In the years since, the conversation about climate and insurance in Canberra has deepened, grown more urgent and for many homeowners more expensive.

A City Built in the Bush

Canberra earned its nickname, the bush capital, not merely as a point of civic pride but as a literal description of its geography.

The city was designed and built within a mosaic of grassland, open woodland and native forest, meaning its urban edges press directly against flammable vegetation.^[3]

To the west and north, the Brindabella Mountains and Namadgi National Park form a vast forested hinterland from which the territory's most severe fire threats historically originate.

The 2003 bushfires, which burned approximately 164,000 hectares, killed four people, destroyed nearly 500 homes and remain seared into the collective memory of the city.^[7]

Since then, no fire of comparable scale has struck the ACT's urban area, but the conditions that make such fires possible have grown more pronounced.

Between 2014–15 and 2018–19, the average and maximum Fire Danger Index across the ACT increased, and the number of days rated as very high fire danger climbed from 11 in 2014–15 to 44 in 2018–19.^[7]

The 2018–19 bushfire season commenced in September and was extended through to the end of April — the longest fire season since 2003.^[7]

A 2026 report from the Climate Council and Emergency Leaders for Climate Action identified Canberra as one of several major Australian cities whose expanding urban fringe now shares many of the characteristics that made the January 2025 Los Angeles fires so catastrophic.^[8]

The city is growing outward, and the direction of that growth, principally westward, runs directly toward its greatest fire risk.

What the Premiums Reveal

National data from insurance analytics firm Finity, published in early 2026, shows that Canberra's average home insurance premium sits between approximately $2,042 and $2,622 per year, placing it among the lower end of capital city averages.^[1]

Darwin recorded the highest average capital city premium at $4,015, followed by Sydney at $3,964 and Brisbane at $3,872, reflecting the disproportionate exposure of those cities to cyclone and flood.^[1]

By the national aggregate measure, Canberra may appear insulated.

That appearance is misleading.

Nationally, the average home insurance premium rose from $1,940 in 2020 to $2,938 by October 2025,  a 51 per cent increase in five years that outpaced general inflation and was driven by catastrophe losses, construction cost inflation and shifts in insurers' risk assessments.^[1]

Premiums in bushfire-prone local government areas within Sydney, Melbourne and Perth increased by between 78 and 138 per cent since 2020, according to research cited by the Climate Council in January 2026.^[8]

Canberra's western and southern fringe suburbs, those closest to the Brindabellas, the Cotter Catchment and parcels of the Canberra Nature Park, face analogous pressures, even if the ACT's relatively compact geography and lower population density have so far moderated the steepest rate rises.

Finity principal Stephen Lau has stated that premium pricing reflects the underlying risk that insurers face, noting that those in high-risk bushfire or flood areas are likely to be charged higher premiums because of the potential risk exposure of their property.^[1]

For Canberra homeowners, that logic is now embedded in their annual renewal notice in ways it was not a decade ago.

The Geography of Risk

Not all Canberra suburbs face the same level of climate exposure, and insurers are increasingly pricing that distinction with granular precision.

Suburbs on the urban-bushland interface, including parts of Stromlo, Holder, Rivett, Chapman and suburbs adjoining the Canberra Nature Park, carry elevated bushfire exposure, owing to their proximity to large tracts of eucalypt forest and grassland.

Hailstorm risk, meanwhile, is geographically broader, with the January 2020 event demonstrating that Weston Creek, Woden, Tuggeranong, Belconnen and the inner south are all within the corridor where severe convective storms concentrate as warm, humid air from the coast meets cold air descending from the highlands.^[2]

Flood risk, though less acute than in coastal cities, is not absent.

ACT Government flood mapping has identified properties near Sullivans Creek, Tuggeranong Creek, Yarralumla Creek and Weston Creek as lying in zones that would be inundated in a one-in-100-year flood event.^[9]

In November 2025, the ACT Government received $400,000 in federal funding to install a new flood warning system in those high-risk creek catchments, signalling that authorities regard flash flooding as a growing hazard as climate-driven rainfall variability intensifies.^[9]

Researchers from the University of Canberra's resilience studies found in their 2023 tracking survey that residents in Gungahlin, a rapidly expanding outer suburb with limited shade infrastructure and high exposure to urban heat, are among the territory's most climate-vulnerable communities.^[10]

Younger people and renters were consistently identified as facing the greatest gaps in climate financial preparedness, including access to insurance.

Reinsurance and the Global Feedback Loop

The dynamics driving Canberra's premiums are not only local.

Reinsurers, the insurers of insurers, operating on global risk portfolios, have raised their prices substantially in response to a worldwide surge in catastrophe losses, and those costs are transmitted directly into Australian household premiums.^[11]

In the six of seven years preceding 2025, insured natural catastrophe losses globally exceeded US$100 billion annually, a threshold that would have been extraordinary a decade ago but has become the new baseline.^[5]

Aon's Head of Climate Analytics APAC, Dr Tom Mortlock, has described the situation facing the insurance sector as a "Catch-22": climate change is increasing the frequency of extreme weather events, which in some areas disproportionately affects vulnerable communities, while simultaneously pushing up the cost of the very insurance those communities need to recover.^[12]

For Australian insurers, higher reinsurance attachment points, the threshold above which reinsurance coverage activates, mean they are absorbing more of the financial risk of each catastrophe before their reinsurance kicks in.

That exposure has been passed to policyholders through premium increases across retail home and contents lines.

Household insurance actually lost money for the Australian industry for four consecutive years preceding 2024, according to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, even as consumers absorbed rising premiums, a paradox that reveals how sharply catastrophe costs have outpaced pricing.^[11]

How Insurers Model Canberra's Future

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, in collaboration with the Bureau of Meteorology, the Australian Climate Service and the CSIRO, has coordinated a landmark Insurance Climate Vulnerability Assessment with Australia's five largest general insurers, IAG, Suncorp, Allianz, QBE and Hollard, who collectively cover approximately 80 per cent of the general insurance market by premium written.^[4]

The assessment asks those insurers to project home insurance affordability to 2050 under two climate scenarios: one in which current emissions policies are maintained and global warming reaches approximately 2.5°C by 2050, and one in which a delayed policy transition occurs from 2030 onward.^[13]

Under the current policies scenario, the modelling finds that continuous and compounding physical damage from extreme weather events will divert capital away from productive investment, compress household incomes and deepen the affordability crisis for insurance.^[13]

APRA's granular SA2-level modelling, a standard geographic classification roughly equivalent to a suburb cluster, means insurers are developing risk profiles that distinguish between areas like Tuggeranong in the territory's south and Belconnen in the north-west, which face different combinations of heat, fire and storm risk.^[13]

For the ACT specifically, bushfire exposure from the western ranges and hailstorm frequency from convective storm corridors represent the two dominant climate perils that insurers are weighting in their forward models.

An emerging concern in the modelling literature is the treatment of cascading and compounding events, sequences in which a bushfire is followed by heavy rainfall, destabilising fire-scarred slopes and triggering debris flows, which current actuarial models do not yet adequately capture.^[12]

Policy, Planning and the Regulatory Frame

The ACT Government declared a climate emergency in May 2019 and has since built one of the most comprehensive suites of climate policy of any Australian jurisdiction.

The ACT Climate Change Strategy 2019–2025 established emissions reduction targets and adaptation priorities, and a successor strategy covering 2026–35 is currently in public consultation, with the stated aim of achieving a net-zero, climate-resilient city by 2045.^[6]

The 2023 Territory Plan and Planning Act 2023 introduced climate-ready planning reforms, including strengthened tree canopy provisions and requirements for new developments to incorporate climate-wise landscaping.^[14]

Canberra's Living Infrastructure Plan set an ambitious target of 30 per cent tree canopy cover or equivalent across the urban footprint by 2045, with the explicit goal of reducing urban heat and improving stormwater retention during extreme rainfall events.^[14]

A 2022 Climate Change Risk Assessment for the ACT was released to help the government prioritise adaptation and resilience investment, though the ACT's Select Committee on Estimates noted in 2023–24 that there was not yet a comprehensive single climate mitigation or adaptation framework governing government assets.^[15]

One regulatory advantage the ACT holds over other states is the absence of stamp duty on insurance — a tax charged by every other state and territory, which adds nine to eleven per cent to premiums nationally.^[16]

For ACT policyholders, that exemption provides a modest structural buffer against the premium increases being driven by climate risk, though it does not address the underlying hazard.

At the federal level, the government's Hazards Insurance Partnership facilitates data-sharing between the insurance industry and government agencies to improve understanding of affordability, underinsurance and non-insurance patterns, with the ACT contributing to that framework as a territory government.^[16]

Who Bears the Burden

Across Australia, the distributional consequences of rising insurance costs are becoming clearer and more troubling.

A YouGov survey commissioned by the Climate Council in January 2026 found that 54 per cent of insured respondents were concerned that bushfires, floods and severe storms could make home insurance unaffordable or unavailable in their area.^[1]

Almost half of respondents, 46 per cent, said their premiums had already increased due to extreme weather, and 22 per cent said they might consider going without insurance if prices continued to rise alongside climate-related risks.^[1]

According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1.8 million Australian households already hold no home insurance, a figure that climate analysts expect to rise as premiums climb.^[17]

In Canberra, renters and low-income households, groups identified by University of Canberra researchers as having low climate resilience, face particular difficulty, as their capacity to invest in risk-mitigation measures such as ember-proofing or bushfire-rated shutters is constrained by tenure arrangements and financial resources.^[10]

A paper from the Practical Justice Initiative at UNSW warned that without intervention, rising premiums could trigger localised property market instability, with insurers refusing to cover particular postcodes, a "postcode ban" scenario that would sharply reduce property values in affected areas and create pockets of concentrated disadvantage.^[18]

The ACT's relatively high average incomes and educated workforce may insulate more residents than in equivalent regional areas, but the territory's rapidly growing outer suburbs, where younger and lower-income households are increasingly concentrated, represent a widening area of vulnerability.

Building Resilience, Reducing Risk

The insurance industry has begun to move beyond simply pricing risk and toward incentivising its reduction.

Under a scheme known as the Resilient Building Council (RBC) certificate program, homeowners who make verified bushfire-hardening improvements, such as ember screens, fire-rated eaves, sealed sub-floor vents and the clearing of combustible materials within 10 metres of the structure, can present the certificate to their insurer and negotiate a premium reduction.

One Canberra-area homeowner, Paul Cameron, described to the Insurance Business media outlet how submitting photographs to the RBC and obtaining a certificate resulted in a reduction of approximately $500 in his annual premium, a meaningful sum, even if it does not fully offset the underlying premium trajectory.^[1]

The ACT's Emergency Services Agency runs the Strategic Bushfire Management Plan 2019–2024, which prioritises prescribed burns to reduce fuel loads in the peri-urban areas surrounding the city, and the Regional Fire Management Plan 2019–2029, which governs fuel management on land administered by the Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate.^[19]

There is growing recognition that prescribed burning, while reducing fire risk, itself generates greenhouse gas emissions, creating a tension that future policy will need to resolve with greater transparency.^[19]

The Insurance Council of Australia has argued that strengthening the National Construction Code (NCC) to require higher minimum resilience standards for new buildings could save an estimated $4 billion per year nationally, and has advocated that building standards be updated to reflect the bushfire and storm exposure that future climate scenarios project for areas like Canberra's western fringe.^[16]

New Financial Models for a Riskier Future

For policy analysts and insurers alike, the long-term question is not merely how to price the risk Canberra faces but how to ensure that the financial mechanisms which enable recovery remain available to all residents, not only those who can afford a rising annual premium.

UNSW researchers have proposed a Medicare-style national model for bushfire insurance, arguing that Australia can no longer sustain a purely market-based approach as climate risk concentrates unevenly across geographies and income groups.^[18]

Other models discussed in the Senate committee inquiry into climate risk and insurance premiums include public-private risk pools, resilience bonds and expanded government-backed reinsurance facilities similar to the existing Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporation model for cyclone risk, which could be broadened to encompass bushfire exposure in high-risk territories like the ACT.^[16]

Australia's mandatory climate reporting regime, legislated in September 2024, will require large insurers to disclose climate-related risks and opportunities under a phased approach, creating a more transparent information environment for policyholders seeking to understand how their premiums are derived from climate risk assessments.^[5]

For ACT policyholders, consumer protection currently operates through the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, which provides a dispute resolution pathway for those who believe their insurance claims have been unfairly handled, though there is no dedicated mechanism to address the structural unaffordability that escalating premiums represent for lower-income residents.^[5]

Looking Toward 2035 and 2050

The picture that emerges from the modelling literature is not one of linear, gradual change.

It is one of accelerating risk, compressed timeframes and compounding consequences.

By 2050, the costs of climate-related extreme weather events across Australia are projected to reach $35.2 billion annually, nearly nine times the current estimated annual cost of $4 billion.^[5]

UNSW researchers predict that more than 445,000 Australian homes will become uninsurable within 30 years under current climate trajectories, rising to 718,000 by 2100.^[18]

For Canberra specifically, CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology projections point to a warming and drying trend, with increased frequency and severity of very high and extreme fire danger days, longer fire seasons extending into spring and autumn, and more intense convective rainfall events producing flash flooding in creek catchments already identified as high risk.^[15]

The population of the ACT is expected to reach more than 600,000 by 2050, meaning more people will be living at the urban-bushland interface that defines the city's greatest climate exposure.^[14]

Under a high-emissions scenario, APRA's assessment suggests that communities exposed to floods, fires and heat stress face being priced out of the insurance market entirely before mid-century, a prospect that would fundamentally alter the social and economic fabric of affected neighbourhoods.^[13]

Conclusion: The Cost of Living in the Bush Capital

There is something clarifying about how insurance prices risk.

It does not traffic in political debate or ideological reservation.

It works from data, from models, from the accumulated evidence of what has been lost before and what may be lost again.

In Canberra, that evidence increasingly points in one direction.

The city's character, its eucalypt-lined streets, its grassland reserves, its suburbs pressed against forested hills, is inseparable from the risk profile that climate science is now quantifying with growing precision.

The January 2020 hailstorm cost the industry hundreds of millions of dollars in a single afternoon.

The 2003 bushfires, which originated from the same western ranges that still define the city's greatest fire threat, demonstrated what an urban-interface fire can cost in human and financial terms.

What has changed is not merely the frequency and severity of such events, but the certainty with which scientists, regulators and insurers now project their escalation.

The ACT Government's investment in adaptation, from living infrastructure to updated planning codes to prescribed burn programs, provides a meaningful foundation, but it cannot, on its own, neutralise the physical risks that a warming global climate is compounding with each passing decade.

For homeowners in Canberra's western suburbs, for renters in Gungahlin, for small business owners in Woden Valley, the rising cost of insurance is not an abstraction.

It is a number that appears on a renewal notice and demands a decision: pay it, reduce coverage, or take the gamble of going without.

In a city built within the bush, that gamble carries consequences the 2003 fires have already made painfully clear.

If the trajectory of premiums, perils and policy continues as projected, the financial cost of calling Canberra home will rise well before 2035, and the question of who can afford to remain will become one of the territory's defining social challenges of the coming generation.

References

1. Insurance Business Australia — "Australian home insurance premiums climb 51% in five years," February 2026. Includes Finity data on capital city premium ranges and consumer survey findings.
2. The Canberra Times — "Canberra storm declared a catastrophe with thousands of claims made," January 2020.
3. ACT Emergency Services Agency — Bushfires information page. Describes Canberra's urban-bushland interface and western fire threat.
4. Australian Prudential Regulation Authority — Insurance Climate Vulnerability Assessment overview, 2024.
5. Insurance Council of Australia — Climate Action page. Includes projections of extreme weather costs to 2050 and disclosure regime details.
6. ACT Government Climate Choices — ACT Climate Change Strategy 2026–35 consultation page.
7. ACT State of the Environment 2019 — Fire section. Data on fire seasons, Fire Danger Index and prescribed burns.
8. Region Canberra — "What the ACT needs to do to keep inevitable LA-style fire threat at bay," January 2026. Covers Climate Council and Emergency Leaders for Climate Action report.
9. The Canberra Times — "ACT to receive $400k for new flood warning system," November 2025.
10. University of Canberra — "Living well in a changing climate." Research on climate resilience tracking across ACT communities, 2023.
11. APRA — Speech by Executive Board Member Suzanne Smith to Insurance Council of Australia Annual Conference. Discusses reinsurance pressures and household insurance profitability.
12. UNSW BusinessThink — "Climate risk and insurance affordability in Australia," January 2026.
13. Insurance Business Australia — "Climate costs set to shake the insurance sector, APRA report finds." Covers Oxford Economics modelling for the APRA Insurance CVA.
14. ACT Government — Canberra's Living Infrastructure Plan: Cooling the City. Details tree canopy targets and planning reforms.
15. ACT State of the Environment 2023 — Climate Change section. Includes 2022 Climate Change Risk Assessment and commentary on adaptation framework gaps.
16. Insurance Council of Australia — Submission to the Senate Committee Inquiry on the Impact of Climate Risk on Insurance Premiums and Availability, July 2024.
17. The Canberra Times — "How climate change is contributing to soaring insurance costs," July 2020. References ABS data on uninsured households.
18. The Canberra Times — "Bushfires: Climate change risk sparks call for Medicare-like model of insurance," May 2020. UNSW Practical Justice Initiative research.
19. ACT State of the Environment 2023 — Fire section. Details the Strategic Bushfire Management Plan 2019–2024 and prescribed burn policy.

Back to top

Donald Trump and the climate crisis: the US is in reverse while China ploughs ahead - Guardian Editorial

The Guardian Newspaper  -  Editorial

The president’s destructive policies enrich fossil fuel billionaires,
while Beijing has bet big on the green transition

‘It is just one part of Mr Trump’s assault on environmental controls and promotion of fossil fuels. But it may be his most consequential.’ Photograph: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty

Devastating wildfires, flooding and winter storms were among the 23 extreme weather and climate-related disasters in the US which cost more than a billion dollars last year – at an estimated total loss of $115bn. 

The last three years have shattered previous records for such events. Last Wednesday, scientists said that we are closer than ever to the point after which global heating cannot be stopped.

Just one day later, Donald Trump and Lee Zeldin, the head of the US Environmental Protection Agency, announced the elimination of the Obama-era endangerment finding which underpins federal climate regulations. Scrapping it is just one part of Mr Trump’s assault on environmental controls and promotion of fossil fuels. But it may be his most consequential. 

Any fragment of hope may lie in the fact that a president who has called global heating a “hoax” framed this primarily as about deregulation – perhaps because the science is now so widely accepted even in the US .

The administration claimed, without evidence, that Americans would save $1.3tn. Never mind insurance or healthcare costs; a recent report found that US earnings would be 12% higher without the climate crisis. 

The Democratic senator Sheldon Whitehouse called the decision “corruption, plain and simple”. In 2024, Mr Trump reportedly urged 20 fossil fuel tycoons to stump up $1bn for his presidential campaign – while vowing to remove controls on the industry.

In the same week as this reckless and destructive US decision, it emerged that China had recorded its 21st month of flat or slightly falling carbon emissions. As Washington tears up environmental regulations, Beijing is extending carbon reporting requirements. 

China remains the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, though its per capita and cumulative historical emissions are still far behind those of the US. But clean energy drove more than 90% of its investment growth last year.

The Carbon Brief website, which published the emissions analysis , says the numbers suggest that the decline in China’s carbon intensity – emissions per unit of GDP – was below the target set in the last five-year plan, making it hard to meet its commitments under the Paris agreement. 

The shift in emissions may not prove enduring. There is fear that China’s focus may change; the next five-year plan, due in March, will be key. Some subsidies for renewable power have already been withdrawn. 

The installation of huge quantities of renewable energy infrastructure has been accompanied by a surge in constructing coal-fired power plants, though the hope is that these are intended primarily as a fallback.

There are other grave concerns, including evidence of the use of forced labour of Uyghur Muslims in solar-panel production in Xinjiang. 

China’s chokehold on critical minerals hampers the ability of others to develop their own technology. And while its cheap renewables technology has resulted in the cheapest electricity in history, it has also hit manufacturers in other countries.

No one can compensate for the grim reversal of belated US action on emissions. There is also a vacuum in climate diplomacy that China shows no signs of filling. But Beijing has a vested interest in encouraging others to cut emissions, even if some nations now want to challenge its “green mercantilism”. 

 In contrast, US billionaires look forward to prospering at the cost of wallets and lives – not only at home, but around the world. 

Links

• 2025 in Review: Billion-Dollar Disasters and Climate Extremes – Climate Central
• ‘Point of no return’: Scientists warn Earth is nearing climate tipping points – The Guardian
• Trump EPA moves to scrap Obama-era endangerment finding – The Guardian
• Climate action now widely accepted among US politicians – The Guardian
• Trump’s anti-climate agenda would leave Americans poorer, report finds – The Guardian
• ‘Corruption, plain and simple’: Democrats condemn EPA rollback – The Guardian
• Trump asked oil executives for $1bn in campaign donations, sources say – The Washington Post
• Analysis: China’s CO₂ emissions have now been flat or falling for 21 months – Carbon Brief
• Analysis: China’s emissions have now caused more global warming than the EU – Carbon Brief
• Solar is now ‘cheapest electricity in history’, confirms IEA – Carbon Brief

A World on Fire: The Worldwide Consequences of Climate Change - Lethal Heating Editor BDA

As scientific indicators break records and human costs mount, 
the gap between what is happening and what is being done
grows ever harder to justify.

Key Points

2024 became the first calendar year to exceed 1.5°C of warming above pre-industrial levels, signalling the world is at the threshold of the Paris Agreement's most ambitious target. [1] Ocean heat content, sea-level rise, glacier mass loss, and Arctic sea-ice decline are all accelerating, threatening the stability of Earth's major physical systems. [2] The poorest and least-emitting nations, particularly small island states and sub-Saharan Africa, bear the heaviest climate burdens, driving urgent demands for loss and damage finance. [3] Compound climate events, combining heatwaves, wildfires, floods and disease outbreaks, are reshaping global risk faster than most institutions can adapt. [4] Critical ecosystems including coral reefs and the Amazon rainforest are approaching or crossing tipping points that could trigger cascading, irreversible change. [5] Current national climate plans remain far short of the action required to limit warming, with implementation gaps widening even as impacts intensify. [6]

A Threshold Crossed

In early 2025, the World Meteorological Organisation confirmed what scientists had long feared: 2024 was the first calendar year on record in which global average temperatures exceeded 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.^[1]

That figure, enshrined in the 2015 Paris Agreement as the upper limit of the safer warming corridor, has functioned for a decade as the aspirational ceiling of international climate ambition.

Its breach, even if temporary and driven partly by a strong El Niño event, has sharpened debate among scientists about whether the world is entering a phase of sustained overshoot, a period in which temperatures remain above 1.5°C for years or decades before being drawn back down, if ever, through large-scale carbon removal.

The IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report, completed in 2023, concluded that without immediate and deep emissions reductions, the world is on track to reach 1.5°C of permanent warming sometime in the early 2030s.^[7]

The consequences differ sharply by region: tropical zones face more intense droughts and crop failures, low-lying coastlines confront accelerating inundation, and the polar regions continue to warm at roughly four times the global average rate.

For communities already living at the edge of what is survivable, the distinction between a temporary and a permanent overshoot is academic.

Indicators Racing Ahead

Of all the physical indicators scientists track, ocean heat content has proven the most relentless.

The WMO's State of the Global Climate 2024 report recorded new highs in ocean heat content for the third consecutive year, with the top 2,000 metres of the world's oceans absorbing energy at an unprecedented rate.^[2]

Global mean sea level rose by approximately 4.5 millimetres per year between 2013 and 2022, more than double the rate measured in the 1990s, driven by both ice melt and thermal expansion of warming ocean water.

Antarctica and Greenland are losing ice mass at accelerating rates, and a 2023 study published in Nature Climate Change found that melting from the Antarctic Ice Sheet alone has locked in at least 27 centimetres of eventual sea-level rise, regardless of future emissions cuts.^[8]

Arctic sea ice in 2023 reached its lowest annual maximum extent on record, while boreal and tropical glacier systems from the Andes to the Himalayas continue shrinking at rates that threaten the freshwater supply of hundreds of millions of people.

These indicators collectively point toward Earth system instability, a condition in which multiple interlocking systems shift simultaneously and push each other further from their historical equilibria.

Locked-In Change and the Limits of Planning

Some of what is coming cannot now be prevented, only managed.

Scientists refer to "committed warming," the additional temperature rise already guaranteed by greenhouse gases already in the atmosphere, as well as "committed sea-level rise," the eventual inundation that will result from ice sheets already destabilised even if emissions stopped today.

The most recent IPCC projections suggest global sea levels will rise by between 0.3 and 1 metre by 2100 under moderate emissions scenarios, with the possibility of higher rises if ice sheet dynamics accelerate beyond current models.

Policymakers in coastal cities from Jakarta to Miami are beginning to factor in these inevitabilities, with some jurisdictions moving infrastructure inland, raising building standards, and in some cases planning managed retreat from vulnerable areas.

The Netherlands, which has lived below sea level for centuries, has invested heavily in adaptive infrastructure, but experts note that the scale and speed of future rise may outpace even the most ambitious engineering solutions.^[9]

In Australia, the Productivity Commission and state planning agencies have begun incorporating sea-level scenarios into coastal development guidelines, though critics argue the timelines used remain too conservative.

Compound Events and Cascading Crises

The single-disaster model that once defined emergency management has become dangerously inadequate.

Climate scientists now speak of "compound events," instances in which two or more extreme conditions strike simultaneously or in rapid succession, multiplying harm beyond what any single event would cause.

In 2022, Pakistan experienced simultaneous heatwaves and record monsoon flooding, killing more than 1,700 people, displacing 33 million and wiping out roughly 10 per cent of the country's GDP.^[10]

In southern Europe, overlapping heatwaves and droughts in 2023 contributed to wildfire seasons of extraordinary destructiveness, with Greece alone losing more than 96,000 hectares of forest in a single summer.

Health systems face cascading demands: a flood event generates drowning deaths, then waterborne disease outbreaks, then vector-borne disease surges as standing water breeds mosquitoes, then long-term mental health crises among displaced populations.

These sequences are now occurring faster than humanitarian systems can reset between events, creating what some researchers describe as a "chronic emergency" condition in the world's most vulnerable regions.

Science Confirmed, and Surpassed

The past three years have not merely confirmed earlier scientific projections about climate impacts. In several critical areas, they have exceeded them.

The extraordinary 2023 spike in sea surface temperatures, which exceeded previous records by an anomalous margin, surprised even senior climate scientists and triggered urgent investigations into possible changes in Earth's energy balance.^[11]

Antarctic sea ice in 2023 finished the year at a level roughly one million square kilometres below any previously recorded winter maximum, a deviation so large that scientists described it as "statistically mind-boggling."

Extreme rainfall events have become more intense more quickly than many models predicted, consistent with basic physics, since warmer air holds more moisture, but the pace has accelerated faster than projected scenarios suggested.

At the same time, the toll of extreme heat on human health has confirmed projections from heat mortality studies: Europe's 2022 summer heat killed an estimated 61,000 people, a figure that aligns with and in some countries exceeds prior modelled estimates.^[12]

A Crisis of Health

Climate change is reshaping the geography of human disease.

The range of malaria-transmitting mosquitoes has expanded upward in altitude and poleward in latitude as warming renders previously inhospitable regions suitable for breeding.^[13]

Dengue fever, once confined to tropical zones, has established itself in southern Europe and parts of the continental United States, with 2023 recording the highest global dengue caseload ever reported.

Heat-related deaths, particularly among the elderly, outdoor workers and urban populations without access to cooling, are rising steadily, with the Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change estimating that heat-related mortality among people over 65 increased by 85 per cent between 2000 and 2022.^[14]

Undernutrition is worsening in climate-exposed agricultural regions: the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation estimates that climate shocks cost low- and middle-income countries hundreds of billions of dollars in agricultural losses annually, with direct effects on child stunting and maternal health.

Mental health consequences, including climate anxiety, post-disaster trauma and grief over environmental loss, are increasingly documented but remain poorly resourced in both rich and poor countries.

Humanitarian Systems Under Pressure

International humanitarian agencies, including the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and the UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, have documented a marked increase in climate-related emergency responses over the past decade.

Extreme weather events now account for more than 80 per cent of all humanitarian crises tracked globally, and the financial requirements of those responses consistently outpace available funding.^[15]

Forecast-based financing, a model in which aid is released automatically when weather forecasts reach pre-agreed thresholds, has shown promise in countries including Bangladesh and Ethiopia, allowing communities to take protective action before a disaster strikes rather than waiting for relief after the fact.

Early warning systems have demonstrably saved lives: the 2023 cyclone Mocha in Myanmar and Bangladesh was tracked well in advance, allowing mass evacuations that kept the death toll far below historical equivalents, though coverage gaps in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of South Asia remain severe.

The Cost in Lives and Dollars

Projections of climate-related mortality through to 2050 carry wide confidence intervals but point in a consistent direction.

A 2021 analysis by McKinsey Global Institute estimated that under a high-emissions scenario, annual heat-related mortality could increase by 73 deaths per 100,000 people in the most affected regions of South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa by mid-century.^[16]

Economic health costs, encompassing lost labour productivity, increased healthcare demand and reduced cognitive performance from heat exposure, are projected to reach trillions of dollars annually at the global scale.

Researchers acknowledge significant uncertainty in these figures, since they depend on emissions trajectories, adaptation investments and the pace of warming, but the directional conclusion, that inaction is far costlier than action, is robust across most modelling approaches.

Health Systems Stretched

The hospitals and clinics of low- and middle-income countries were already under strain before climate change intensified.

In the Sahel region of Africa, health facilities are regularly disrupted by flooding, extreme heat and the displacement of populations fleeing drought, compounding their capacity to manage existing burdens of disease.

Bangladesh has developed one of the world's most sophisticated community health worker networks for climate-related illness, including cyclone preparedness protocols embedded into primary care, offering a model that other vulnerable nations are beginning to replicate.

The WHO's 2023 health and climate change country profiles documented that fewer than half of national health systems in the world have climate change adaptation plans in place, and that funding for health adaptation remains a small fraction of what is needed.^[17]

Food, Water and Displacement

In the Horn of Africa, four consecutive failed rainy seasons between 2020 and 2022 drove the worst drought in 40 years, pushing more than 22 million people into acute food insecurity and displacing millions across Ethiopia, Kenya and Somalia.^[18]

Climate change did not cause the drought alone, but attribution science, the discipline that estimates how much climate change altered the probability and severity of specific events, found it made such droughts significantly more likely.

Himalayan glacier retreat is reducing dry-season river flows across South and Central Asia, threatening irrigation systems that support hundreds of millions of farmers.

The World Bank projects that without significant adaptation investment, climate change could force more than 216 million people to migrate within their own countries by 2050, with the largest movements in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and Latin America.^[19]

An Unequal Burden

The injustice at the heart of the climate crisis is, by now, well established in the scientific literature, even if it remains imperfectly addressed in policy.

Countries in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and the Pacific emit a fraction of global greenhouse gases yet suffer some of the most severe impacts, measured in lives lost, economic damage as a share of GDP and loss of culturally and ecologically significant places.

A 2023 study in Nature Sustainability found that the economic damages attributable to climate change over the past several decades have disproportionately fallen on nations with the lowest historical emissions, effectively constituting a large-scale transfer of wealth from poor to rich countries through climatic harm.^[20]

Indigenous communities on every continent face simultaneous threats to their lands, livelihoods and cultural practices from climate impacts, with their prior knowledge of ecosystems and seasonal patterns increasingly disrupted by conditions outside any living memory.

Intersecting Inequalities

Climate change does not affect everyone within a country equally.

Women and girls in agricultural societies bear disproportionate burdens when harvests fail or water sources move further away, since they typically carry primary responsibility for food preparation, water collection and childcare in crisis conditions.

Older people and people with disabilities face heightened mortality risk during heatwaves, floods and displacement events, often because evacuation systems are designed for the mobile and the digitally connected.

Adaptation strategies that embed gender-responsive and disability-inclusive design, from early warning systems delivered via community radio to emergency shelters with accessible facilities, consistently achieve better outcomes, though they remain the exception rather than the norm.

Loss, Damage, and the Finance Gap

The establishment of a dedicated Loss and Damage Fund at COP28 in Dubai in 2023 was hailed as a historic breakthrough for climate justice, but the initial pledges of around US$700 million were widely considered a fraction of what is required.^[3]

Estimates of annual loss and damage costs in developing countries already run to hundreds of billions of dollars, with projections suggesting they could reach one to two trillion dollars annually by mid-century under moderate warming scenarios.

The architecture of the fund, including which countries can access it, how claims are assessed and who ultimately controls disbursement, remains contested, with vulnerable nations pushing for direct access and accountability mechanisms that do not replicate the slow bureaucracies of existing climate finance channels.

Islands on the Edge

For small island developing states, the climate crisis is not a future scenario but a present reality.

In Tuvalu, the government has negotiated an unprecedented agreement with Australia that provides its citizens with pathways to migrate as their homeland becomes uninhabitable, while legally preserving the nation's sovereignty even if its physical territory disappears beneath the waves.^[21]

The Maldives, Kiribati and the Marshall Islands are each developing different strategies, balancing land reclamation, managed migration and diplomatic advocacy for stronger global emissions commitments.

These nations have emerged as some of the most effective voices at UN climate negotiations, consistently pressing for ambition that matches the scientific evidence rather than the political convenience of major emitters.

Voices at the Negotiating Table

The Alliance of Small Island States and the Climate Vulnerable Forum have played an outsized role in shaping climate diplomacy relative to their economic and political weight.

At COP28, their advocacy contributed to the historic agreement to transition away from fossil fuels, the first time a COP decision had explicitly named fossil fuels as the source of the problem, though critics noted the language fell short of the binding phase-out commitments that science demands.^[22]

The next round of national climate plans, due under the Paris Agreement by 2025, will test whether the political commitments made at successive COPs translate into policies with genuine teeth.

Reefs and Forests at the Brink

The Great Barrier Reef, the world's largest coral reef system and one of Australia's most significant natural and economic assets, experienced its most widespread mass bleaching event on record in 2024, with surveys finding bleaching across more than 73 per cent of individual reefs assessed.^[5]

Coral bleaching occurs when water temperatures rise above the threshold that the symbiotic algae living within coral tissue can tolerate; the algae are expelled, turning the coral white and leaving it vulnerable to starvation and disease.

In the Amazon, more than a decade of deforestation combined with intensifying drought has pushed significant portions of the eastern and southern basin toward a dieback threshold, beyond which the forest can no longer generate enough of its own rainfall to sustain itself.

A 2022 study in Nature Climate Change found that 75 per cent of the Amazon showed signs of losing resilience over the preceding two decades, indicating a trend toward a drier, more savanna-like ecosystem.^[23]

The Ocean's Hidden Crisis

Beneath the surface, ocean acidification, caused by the absorption of carbon dioxide into seawater, is altering the chemistry of marine environments at a rate not seen in at least 300 million years.

Shellfish, crustaceans and the microscopic organisms that underpin marine food webs face increasing difficulty building and maintaining their calcium carbonate structures in more acidic water.

Commercial fisheries in the North Pacific are already reporting declines in shellfish populations linked to acidification, and projections suggest that by mid-century, large portions of the Southern Ocean will be chemically corrosive to certain shell-forming organisms, with cascading effects throughout the food chain.^[24]

Glaciers and the Water Tower Crisis

The term "water towers" describes mountain ranges whose glaciers store freshwater that feeds rivers during dry seasons, providing reliable irrigation and drinking water to lowland populations.

The Hindu Kush Himalaya, the Alps, the Andes and the ranges of Central Asia are all losing ice at accelerating rates, with the WMO reporting that 2022 was the worst year for glacier mass loss in the Alps on record.^[2]

As glaciers shrink, they initially produce more meltwater, a temporary boost that masks the coming decline; when the ice runs out, rivers will run low or dry in the seasons when farmers and cities most need them.

The AMOC: A Sleeping Giant

Among the most consequential and least certain risks in the climate system is the possible weakening or collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, the vast ocean conveyor that moves warm water northward into the North Atlantic and returns cold water southward at depth.

A 2023 study in Nature Communications suggested that the AMOC may be approaching a tipping point that could trigger a rapid and potentially irreversible slowdown within this century, though the finding remains contested among oceanographers, with some arguing the methodology overstates the certainty of the conclusion.^[25]

A substantial AMOC weakening would cool northwest Europe, intensify sea-level rise along the eastern seaboard of North America, disrupt monsoon systems across Africa and Asia, and dramatically alter the distribution of marine productivity in the Atlantic.

Nature's Defenders

Against the scale of these threats, ecologists are developing a portfolio of tools for preserving biodiversity under continued warming.

Assisted migration, the deliberate movement of species toward more suitable climatic conditions, has been piloted successfully with some tree species in North America and Australia, though it raises significant ecological and ethical questions about which species to prioritise and who decides.

Habitat connectivity, protecting and restoring wildlife corridors that allow species to move in response to shifting conditions, is widely regarded as among the most cost-effective biodiversity adaptation investments, and is increasingly embedded in national biodiversity strategies following the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework agreed in 2022.

Economic Shockwaves

Climate shocks are becoming a structural economic force, not merely a series of one-off disasters.

The World Bank has documented how repeated extreme events are undermining debt sustainability in climate-vulnerable developing countries, with relief borrowing after disasters compounding existing fiscal pressures and reducing the funds available for adaptation investment.

Food price inflation, driven partly by climate-related harvest failures, is a consistent feature of the macroeconomic landscape in the 2020s, contributing to social unrest in countries from West Africa to South America where households spend a large proportion of their income on food.^[26]

Sectors Under Siege

Insurance is among the sectors experiencing the most acute financial stress from climate change.

In Australia, some insurers have withdrawn from markets covering cyclone-prone regions of Queensland and flood-risk zones in New South Wales, rendering properties effectively uninsurable and raising questions about the future of private markets in climate risk.

Agriculture faces input cost increases from water scarcity and crop failures, while the tourism industry is confronting existential questions about the viability of attractions, including coral reefs, alpine ski fields and low-lying tropical destinations, that depend on climatic conditions now in transition.

Infrastructure Under Threat

Power grids designed for historical temperature ranges are failing during extreme heat events, creating dangerous feedback loops in which the hottest days, when cooling is most needed, are precisely when electricity supply is most vulnerable.

Extreme rainfall is overwhelming stormwater infrastructure in cities from Sydney to Jakarta, while rising seas and storm surges are accelerating the deterioration of coastal roads, ports and flood barriers.

Governments including Australia's have begun incorporating climate risk into infrastructure standards and asset management frameworks, though the pace of upgrading existing infrastructure lags well behind the pace of changing conditions.^[27]

Displacement and Conflict

The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre reported that weather-related disasters generated 26.4 million new internal displacements in 2023, the majority linked to storms and flooding.^[4]

Attribution of migration to climate change alone is methodologically complex, since people move for overlapping reasons, but a growing body of research documents that climate shocks significantly increase the probability of migration from agriculture-dependent communities, particularly when events destroy assets rather than merely disrupting income.

The Sahel, the Horn of Africa and low-lying coastal Bangladesh are among the regions where climate-related displacement is most systematically documented and where the interaction between climate stress, food insecurity and conflict risk is clearest.

Climate as a Security Threat

Defence establishments in the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom have formally incorporated climate change into their strategic threat assessments, treating it as a "threat multiplier" that exacerbates fragility, resource competition and conflict risk in already unstable regions.^[28]

The Australian Defence Force has noted increased demands for disaster response domestically and in the Pacific, and the Department of Defence's 2023 climate change and national security risk assessment identified the Indo-Pacific as a region of particular concern given the combination of rapid warming, coastal exposure and governance challenges in many smaller island nations.

Warnings That Save Lives

The UN Secretary-General's Early Warnings for All initiative, launched in 2022, aims to ensure that every person on Earth has access to weather early warning systems by 2027, a goal motivated by the stark finding that countries without such systems suffer death tolls from comparable disasters up to eight times higher than those with them.^[29]

Progress has been made in South and Southeast Asia, where cyclone early warning networks have dramatically reduced mortality over three decades, but coverage remains patchy across sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Central America.

Cities Redesigning Themselves

Urban planners in heat-stressed cities including Athens, Medellín and Melbourne have begun designating "cooling centres," retrofitting green infrastructure and revising building codes to require better insulation and heat-reflective materials.

Rotterdam has invested heavily in water squares, urban parks designed to temporarily store floodwater during rain events before slowly releasing it into the drainage system, a nature-based solution now replicated in cities across Europe and Asia.

Australian jurisdictions are revising planning rules to reduce urban heat island effects through mandated tree canopy cover and restrictions on heat-absorbing dark surfaces in residential developments, though implementation is uneven across states and territories.

Communities Leading the Way

Some of the most robust climate adaptation has been driven not by governments but by communities acting on their own knowledge and circumstances.

Indigenous ranger programmes in northern Australia, which integrate traditional ecological knowledge with modern monitoring tools, have demonstrated measurable improvements in fire management, invasive species control and ecosystem resilience across vast areas of country.

In Fiji, village-level relocation processes guided by traditional governance structures have moved coastal communities to higher ground in ways that maintained social cohesion, offering a model of managed retreat that external planners have struggled to replicate through top-down processes.

The Promise Gap

The WMO and UNEP's 2024 Emissions Gap Report found that current national climate policies, even if fully implemented, would lead to roughly 3°C of warming by 2100, roughly double the Paris Agreement's upper limit.^[6]

The gap between the ambition expressed in national plans and the policies actually in place is itself significant: many countries have committed to targets without enacting the legislation, regulations or spending needed to reach them.

The 2023 Global Stocktake, the Paris Agreement's mechanism for assessing collective progress, found that while renewable energy deployment was accelerating rapidly, fossil fuel production remained at levels inconsistent with 1.5°C scenarios and adaptation finance for the most vulnerable countries remained grossly inadequate.

Tracking the Real World

A new generation of monitoring tools is improving the ability of scientists and policymakers to observe climate impacts in near-real time.

Satellite-based methane monitoring now allows attribution of large emission events to specific facilities within days of their occurrence, strengthening accountability for the oil and gas sector.

Machine learning systems trained on historical climate data can generate attribution analyses of extreme weather events within weeks of their occurrence, compressing a process that once took years and bringing scientific findings into the timeframe of public and political attention.^[30]

These tools will not, by themselves, close the gap between scientific knowledge and political action. But they are making it considerably harder to claim that the consequences of inaction are unknown.

What Is Still Possible

The accumulation of evidence reviewed here does not support complacency, but neither does it foreclose the possibility of meaningful action.

The world has already warmed to the point where some change is irreversible: glaciers will continue to retreat, seas will continue to rise, and communities already exposed to dangerous heat and flooding will face greater risk. No political agreement or technological breakthrough can undo that.

What remains within human agency is the scale of further warming and the investment in adaptation that can determine whether the most vulnerable communities have the resources to survive and rebuild.

Every fraction of a degree of warming avoided translates into real reductions in mortality, crop failure, displacement and ecosystem loss. Every dollar invested in early warning systems, climate-resilient infrastructure and loss and damage finance translates into lives preserved and futures kept open.

The science is no longer the uncertain variable. What remains uncertain is whether the political systems of a warming world will respond at the scale and speed that the evidence demands. The answer to that question will be the defining fact of this century, as consequential for future generations as any choice their predecessors have ever made.

References

1. World Meteorological Organisation, "2024 Confirmed as Warmest Year on Record at About 1.5°C Above Pre-Industrial Era", WMO, 2025.
2. World Meteorological Organisation, State of the Global Climate 2024, WMO, Geneva, 2025.
3. UNFCCC, "The Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage", UNFCCC, 2024.
4. Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, Global Report on Internal Displacement 2024, IDMC, Geneva, 2024.
5. Australian Institute of Marine Science, "Great Barrier Reef Condition Summary 2024", AIMS, 2024.
6. United Nations Environment Programme, Emissions Gap Report 2024, UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.
7. IPCC, Sixth Assessment Report: Synthesis Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, 2023.
8. DeConto, R. et al., "Future Antarctic Ice Loss and Sea Level Rise", Nature Climate Change, 2021.
9. Delta Programme, "Delta Programme: Working on the Delta", Government of the Netherlands, 2024.
10. UNDP, "Pakistan Floods 2022: Flash Appeal", United Nations Development Programme, 2022.
11. Cheng, L. et al., "Record-Breaking Ocean Warming in 2023", Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2024.
12. Ballester, J. et al., "Heat-Related Mortality in Europe During the Summer of 2022", Nature Medicine, 2023.
13. Ryan, S.J. et al., "Global Expansion of Dengue Risk Under Climate Change", The Lancet Planetary Health, 2022.
14. Romanello, M. et al., "The 2023 Report of the Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change", The Lancet, 2023.
15. IFRC, World Disasters Report 2023, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva, 2023.
16. McKinsey Global Institute, "Climate Risk and Response: Physical Hazards and Socioeconomic Impacts", McKinsey & Company, 2020.
17. World Health Organisation, "Health and Climate Change Country Profiles 2023", WHO, Geneva, 2023.
18. UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, "Horn of Africa Drought Crisis", OCHA, 2022.
19. World Bank, "Climate Change Could Force 216 Million People to Migrate Within Their Own Countries by 2050", World Bank, 2021.
20. Bressler, R.D. et al., "Impacts of Climate Change Disproportionately Burden Low-Emitting Nations", Nature Sustainability, 2023.
21. Australian Government, "Australia-Tuvalu Falepili Union", Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2023.
22. UNFCCC, "UAE Consensus: COP28 Decision", UNFCCC, Dubai, 2023.
23. Boulton, C.A. et al., "Pronounced Loss of Amazon Rainforest Resilience Since the Mid-2000s", Nature Climate Change, 2022.
24. CSIRO, "Ocean Acidification Research", CSIRO, 2023.
25. Ditlevsen, P. and Ditlevsen, S., "Warning of a Forthcoming Collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation", Nature Communications, 2023.
26. FAO, The State of Food and Agriculture 2023, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, 2023.
27. Infrastructure Australia, "Climate Change Risks to Australia's Infrastructure", Australian Government, 2022.
28. Australian Government Department of Defence, 2023 Defence Strategic Review, Commonwealth of Australia, 2023.
29. United Nations, "Early Warnings for All", UN Executive Action Plan, 2022.
30. World Weather Attribution, "Attribution Science: Linking Extreme Weather to Climate Change", worldweatherattribution.org, 2024.

Back to top