Australians have heard so many messages about so many climate change policies over so many years that they may shrug off the latest talk from Scott Morrison about his solution to the problem.
The Prime Minister spoke on Sunday about doing “better and better and better” at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and to “evolve our policy” over time, while also promising to adapt more to a changing climate.
But
he did not outline any substantive change in policy and his office made
it clear that he was not signalling a more ambitious target for 2030,
the deadline for the government’s 26 per cent cut to emissions.
It
is easy to dismiss this as meaningless but it is also worth remembering
that Morrison can be as cagey with his language as John Howard. A small
shift in his words can prepare for bigger changes to come.Scott Morrison sat down with David Speers for an interview on his response to the Australian bushfire crisis.
This was a considered interview with David Speers on the ABC on Sunday morning. Morrison’s remarks were thoroughly workshopped, totally prepared and carefully calibrated. On the whole, Morrison achieved his goal.
The effect was to give Morrison more room to move in response to a bushfire crisis that has changed the climate change debate. Anxious about cities shrouded in smoke, more Australians are likely to want more action. Morrison has to respond to this reality.
Morrison’s
language on climate change has been extraordinarily passive for too
long. On Sunday he was more direct. He promised action on climate in a
way that offered a way forward for the “modern Liberals” in his party
room without declaring war on the climate change deniers. He accepted
the science and the need for "resilience" and adaptation.
This
should be encouraging for anyone who wants the Coalition party room to
move on from the climate wars of the past decade. Many of the Liberals
and some of the Nationals accept the science. It is wrong to brand them
all as sceptics or deniers.The key word on Sunday – “evolve” – can be used by Liberals to argue for policy change with Morrison's blessing. Whether these moderate voices will push hard for change, and whether they are successful, is difficult to tell.
What happened on Sunday was an adjustment in political positioning, but it is easier to change the marketing than change the product. It is likely to take until the next election to judge whether the government stands for greater action on climate change. Morrison has shifted his language. Whether he shifts his policies is yet to be seen.
Links
- (AU) PM’s Popularity Takes A Dive, As Leading Scientists Fire Back Over Climate Pitch
- (AU) Malcolm Turnbull: Scott Morrison Can't Afford To Waste The Bushfire Crisis When Australia Urgently Needs Its Own Green New Deal
- (AU) PM Morrison Flags Climate Policy Change
- (AU) The Coalition's Toxic Denial Of Climate Change Is Destroying Us
- (AU) Australia Fire Crisis Fuels Protests Calling For Bolder Action On Climate Change
- (AU) The World Has Made The Link Between Australian Coal, Fires And Climate
- (AU) Foreign Media Rips Into Australia Over Causes Behind Bushfire Crisis
- (NYT) As Fires Rage, Australia Sees Its Leader as Missing in Action
- (AU) Australia's Fires Are Terrifying. Will They Get World Leaders To Act On Climate Change?
No comments :
Post a Comment