The media magnate’s empire, offering a platform to sceptical voices, is accused of holding significant sway in this arena
|
|
© Harry Haysom
|
Australia’s former centre-right prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, who has allied with Rudd against Murdoch, tells me: “The most effective voice for climate denialism in the English-speaking world has been Murdoch’s.”
The mogul’s son James, speaking more broadly, recently criticised unnamed “media property owners . . . who know the truth but choose instead to propagate lies”.
For all the anxiety about fake news on social media, disinformation on climate seems to stem disproportionately from one old man using old media.
This is the most hopeful moment yet for global action on climate. The world’s three biggest powers have set targets for net-zero carbon emissions: the US and EU by 2050, China by 2060. Yet Rudd and Turnbull believe action requires confronting Murdoch. How central is he to climate inaction, and can he be confronted?
Murdoch probably does shape rightwing views on climate. In an Ipsos Mori survey of 20 countries in 2014, the three countries with least belief in man-made climate change were his main markets of the US, Britain and Australia.
British attitudes have since improved, but the US and Australia retain large fringes of climate deniers, reports YouGov. These two countries have helped block consensus in international summits on climate.
Murdoch, says Rudd, “isn’t just an Australian problem, or even an Anglosphere one. Murdoch has become a planetary problem.”
The mogul owns more than half of Australia’s newspaper industry, plus the TV channel Sky News. Rudd says Murdoch’s media try to intimidate opponents into silence.
“They target you individually, as a political leader, or even a Swedish schoolgirl. They seek to eviscerate your character. My response is: ‘Bugger you, we’re fighting back.’”
Disinformation on climate seems to stem disproportionately from one old man using old mediaBut how much can Murdoch influence the US, where his Fox News averaged just 3.6 million primetime viewers in 2020?
Rudd replies: “In both Australia and the US, he has progressively moved centre-right parties to the far right” by radicalising their base. Murdoch’s media also help set agendas for rightwing social media.
The approach taken varies, from downright climate denial to cheerleading for hydrocarbon industries to casting climate as a cultural-economic issue.
Rudd says Murdoch’s Australian tabloids follow the line that “politically correct centre-left politicians who try to act on climate change are going to take your jobs”.
A News Corp Australia spokesperson insists its publications recognise climate change “is real” and reflect “the different viewpoints being expressed”. They reject the criticisms of News Corp, adding it has not sought to silence anyone on these issues, nor moved Australian politics to the far right.
They accuse Rudd and Turnbull of past political failings, saying: “They are now seeking to rewrite history — and why they did not achieve climate action — to hide their own shortcomings.”
|
|
Murdoch faces rising scrutiny in Australia. Jamie Smyth |
When Turnbull saw the president and the mogul together, he found Trump “deferential, almost obsequious, to Murdoch”. Trump even wanted to invite Murdoch to his bilateral discussion with Turnbull. Perhaps Trump is just another radicalised Fox viewer.
What motivates Murdoch?
Rudd says: “He is an ideologist of the far-right on climate but also in terms of a view of what the Anglosphere should be in global politics. Look at how he campaigned in the Iraq war. He is a tax minimalist, a regulation minimalist, and he’s fatally addicted to the aphrodisiac of power.”
Though Murdoch turns 90 in March, Rudd doesn’t expect a biological solution. “The succession’s determined and it’s going to be [his son] Lachlan Murdoch. And [he] is stitched at the hip to far-right politics in the US and Australia.”
Newer far-right media, such as QAnon conspiracy sites, may leave Murdoch behind. Fox has shed viewers since its recent separation from Trump. January’s Trumpist attack on Washington happened without Murdoch’s support. His decades of propaganda have unleashed forces he cannot control. Fox risks ending up inside the far-right tiger.
|
|
The Rise of the Murdoch Dynasty |
Turnbull says advertisers in Murdoch’s media should be asked “how they justify supporting platforms that have done so much damage to democracy”.
Rudd is campaigning for a boycott of what he calls “Murdoch’s major cash cow in Australia”, the housing website realestate.com.au. He says: “That’s a concrete course of action, which I believe is causing a level of anxiety within News Corporation headquarters.”
I point out to him that extending that principle worldwide might mean boycotting Murdoch’s sports broadcasters.
Rudd says: “We’ve joined the fight. Who will win, not sure, but we’re going to give them a run for their money.”
Links
- Fox News will not change political stance, says Lachlan Murdoch
- The Murdoch Media: Polluting Australia's Airwaves? (video)
- (AU) How Rupert Murdoch Is Influencing Australia’s Bushfire Debate
- Rupert Murdoch's British Papers Delayed As Climate Protesters Stop The Presses
- James Murdoch Criticises Father's News Outlets For Climate Crisis Denial
- (AU) Rupert Murdoch Says 'No Climate Change Deniers Around' – But His Writers Prove Him Wrong
- Murdoch, Coalition Go In Guns Blazing Against Wind And Solar
- (AU) News Corp Has Caused Massive Climate Delay, But Its Grip On Power Is Slipping
- (AU) Media Watch: News Corp's Fire Fight
No comments :
Post a Comment