Abbot Point Port Expansion Faces More Red Tape With ‘Material Change Of Use’ Consultation Period

Courier Mail - John McCarthy

Adani’s port project will now go through another public consultation period for a “material change of use’’ ruling. Picture: Charlie Peel

ADANI is facing a potential new court threat after the State Government’s Co-ordinator General threw more red tape at the company’s Abbot Point port expansion.
After six referral agency reviews and three environmental impact statements under three different governments, the port project will now go through another public consultation period for a “material change of use’’ ruling.
While the consultation and the CG’s eventual decision is a normal approval process and has never been appealed before, the Government admits it could be open to judicial review from activists which could add to delays.
The decision is understood to have stunned Adani who weren’t aware they would have to go through the process and found out when the media release was issued yesterday.
Mines and State Development Minister Anthony Lynham said he understood the company’s frustration but the process can’t be short circuited.
He has also flagged a review of the approval process which has caused extensive delays for Adani and other mining projects like GVK and New Hope’s Acland mine.
“I understand they are disappointed because they are keen but this is a normal part of the process,’’ Mr Lynham said.
“I’m working with the Attorney-General and my department to achieve the dual aims of an efficient process and taking the community with us.’’
Green groups have already challenged Adani’s mine in the Land Court and Supreme Court. It is also facing judicial review in the Federal Court.
The port’s recent federal approval is also likely to be challenged after activist group GetUp! started a fundraising campaign to oppose it.
The Queensland Resources Council said Queensland was no longer perceived as a place where development decision could be made quickly.
“The material change of use is a standard process but we do wonder about the benefit of another public consultation for a project that has been through multiple public consultations,’’ QRC chief executive Michael Roche said.
“I would not be surprised if there was a (judicial) review so the Government does have to make sure they tick all the boxes.’’