During a record-breaking hot presidential election year, American news networks failed to report on climate change
 |
| Oscar the Grouch from Sesame Street. Photograph: Everett/REX/Shutterstock |
In 2016, evening newscasts and Sunday shows on ABC, CBS, and NBC, as well as Fox Broadcast Co.’s Fox News Sunday, collectively decreased their total coverage of climate change by 66 percent compared to 2015In all of 2016, these news programs spent a combined grand total of 50 minutes talking about climate change. More than half of that come from CBS Evening News, which nevertheless only spent half as much time talking about climate change in 2016 as it had in 2015.
 |
| Network climate change coverage in 2015 and 2016. Illustration: Media Matters for America |
During 2016 there was also an ongoing presidential campaign in which the candidates’ views on climate science and policy should have been featured prominently. Unfortunately, climate change was rarely raised in the primary debates, and never in the general election debates. In fact, on Sunday news programs, Bernie Sanders brought up climate change four times more often than the program hosts.
 |
| Number of times Sunday news show hosts and Bernie Sanders brought up the topic of climate change in 2016. Illustration: Media Matters for America |
ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox News Sunday did not air a single segment informing viewers of what to expect on climate change and climate-related policies or issues under a Trump or Clinton administration. While these outlets did devote a significant amount of coverage to Trump’s presidency, airing 25 segments informing viewers about the ramifications or actions of a Trump administration as they relate to climate change, all of these segments aired after the election.As Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI) noted, this was a dismal failure by the American news networks:
In a year when the American people were deciding who our next leader should be, you would think there would have been more discussions about climate change in our news programs, not less. This isn’t just shameful, it’s irresponsible. The climate is changing, and it’s affecting everything from the weather to our national security and our economy. Its impacts are already being felt and the American people deserve to know more about it.
PBS was the oasis in this desert of climate news coverage. PBS
NewsHour was the only show that examined what impact a Trump or a
Clinton presidency would have on climate-related issues and policies
before the election. The PBS news program aired more than double the
number of climate news segments as any of its network competitors, and
interviewed or quoted three times more scientists than even CBS Evening
News. ABC World News Tonight failed to interview or quote a single scientist about climate change.
Perhaps unsurprisingly given his climate denial, Trump’s proposed budget would completely defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which partially funds PBS. About half of that federal funding goes to local PBS stations that broadcast PBS NewsHour.
Some of those stations – especially those in rural areas which rely
particularly heavily on federal funding – would likely have to shut
down, were Trump to get his budgetary wish.
With so little news coverage on the subject, it’s also unsurprising how confused Americans are about climate change – just 49% of Americans realize that most scientists think global warming is happening, and only 53% understand that humans are causing the problem. While concern among Americans about global warming is at an eight-year high, only 64% worry a great deal or fair amount.
That’s entirely understandable – if our leaders deny the problem, and our news networks don’t report on it, Americans are lacking the information signaling that global warming is an urgent threat. That’s why, although Americans (including Trump voters) would prefer that their political leaders take steps to address the problem, they don’t few it as a high priority, and thus aren’t bothered by the lack of political action.
When future generations look back in disbelief at our failure to take the needed steps to preserve a stable climate, the history books will take a harsh view of today’s media outlets and political leaders who refused to inform the public or protect its health and welfare in the face of such an immense known threat.
Links
 |
| Number of network evening news program climate segments in 2016. Illustration: Medai Matters for America |
With so little news coverage on the subject, it’s also unsurprising how confused Americans are about climate change – just 49% of Americans realize that most scientists think global warming is happening, and only 53% understand that humans are causing the problem. While concern among Americans about global warming is at an eight-year high, only 64% worry a great deal or fair amount.
That’s entirely understandable – if our leaders deny the problem, and our news networks don’t report on it, Americans are lacking the information signaling that global warming is an urgent threat. That’s why, although Americans (including Trump voters) would prefer that their political leaders take steps to address the problem, they don’t few it as a high priority, and thus aren’t bothered by the lack of political action.
When future generations look back in disbelief at our failure to take the needed steps to preserve a stable climate, the history books will take a harsh view of today’s media outlets and political leaders who refused to inform the public or protect its health and welfare in the face of such an immense known threat.
Links
- How Broadcast Networks Covered Climate Change In 2016
- Following Dramatic Drop In Coverage, U.S. Senators Condemn Irresponsible Lack Of Climate Change Coverage
- Trump’s Proposed Budget Would Cut Support For The Network Leading The Way In Climate Reporting
- Why News Outlets Only Sometimes Push Back Against Climate Denial
- NBC Nightly News Highlights The "Fingerprint Of Climate Change" In Record Winter Heat
No comments:
Post a Comment