Lisa Roberts spent 25 years building a native plant business that was as sustainable as they come, with off-grid solar power and water harvesting, only to see it go up in flames in the recent bushfires.
Her home and nursery in Wandella in southern NSW reduced to rubble, Ms Roberts fled to Canberra, powerless to act as fires threatened another venture in nearby Pialligo. Living in the smoke-choked capital also damaged her vocal cords, which have still not recovered.
That anger is being now channelled into a legal challenge against the NSW Environment Protection Authority. Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action, of which Ms Roberts is a member, began the suit last week with the NSW Environmental Defenders Office "to kick [the EPA] into action", she said.
Today we're announcing a new case against the NSW EPA.EDO chief executive David Morris said the case, in the Land and Environment Court, would seek to force the EPA, which does not have a climate policy, to use its powers to keep communities safe from the increasingly severe impacts of a warming world.
Our clients, the Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action, seek to compel the EPA to fulfill their duty + protect NSW communities by regulating greenhouse gases that cause catastrophic climate change. https://t.co/EnQusvDm8x pic.twitter.com/3RoDQdIRbR — Environmental Defenders Office (@EDOLawyers) April 19, 2020
Mr Morris said the EPA was chosen as a test case among similar agencies nationally in part because of a section of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997.
That section requires the agency to “develop environmental quality objectives, guidelines and policies to ensure environment protection”.
"It's an opportunity for the EPA to recognise they have a legal obligation to take action," he said. "They should have a policy and a plan to address the greatest threat to the environment."
The Land and Environment Court has made significant climate-related decisions before, including in February last year when it found the final, so-called scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions produced by burning coal should be taken into account when considering the environmental impacts of new mines.
Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action chairwoman Jo Dodds says she can't look at the environment without imagining how it will look when it is burnt.
|
Cr Dodds said the legal action was aimed at making the EPA "live up to its remit".
The agency "needs to have adequate policies around climate change", including setting limits on greenhouse emissions and enforcing them, she said.
Cr Dodds said she had to evacuate to the Bega River in 2018 and watch on as aerial water bombers tried to save hers and other homes from being engulfed in flames.
That experience, and the past season's endless fire threat, had left lingering emotional scars.
"I'm always looking at the environment and imagining what it will look like when it burns," she said.
At the time, the Tathra bushfires in March 2018 seemed unseasonal because they erupted in autumn. Last fire season, though, ran from July until February 2020. Credit: Suzie Duffy |
Links
- 'New weapon': courts offer hope for driving serious climate action
- How You Can Take Your Government To Court For Not Acting On The Climate Crisis
- (AU) Can Legal Action Force Governments And Businesses To Respond To Climate Change?
- Climate Change Litigation Update
- (AU) Bushfire Survivors Join Claim Against ANZ For Financing Climate Crisis
- These residents stopped a coal mine, made history and sent ripples through boardrooms around the world
- Environment group seeks to join coal mine appeal after IPC drops out
- State government backs big batteries and solar to drive recovery
No comments:
Post a Comment