The world needs to develop new technologies to suck excess carbon dioxide out of the air, because efforts to cut emissions are moving far too slowly, said the only Australian-based scientist on a major new international science group.
Nerilie Abram, a paleoclimatologist at the Australian National University, said the new Climate Crisis Advisory Group, to be officially launched later on Thursday, would aim to provide “the best scientific advice” on the urgency of slashing greenhouse gas emissions.
|
|
The ANU’s Dr Nerilie Abram after returning from an expedition
with the British Antarctic Survey in early 2018. Credit: Paul Rogers
|
The group will be chaired by Sir David King, the former UK government’s chief scientific adviser, and includes a range of 14 experts including Fatih Birol, the head of the International Energy Agency.
|
China relations 
|
|
‘Utter nonsense’: CSIRO blasted for dropping Chinese climate
partner
|
The launch comes a day after the AFP news agency reported on a leaked draft of the next Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) report.
It warned “the worst is yet to come”, with species extinction, more disease, unlivable heat and cities hit by rising sea levels among the coming calamities, according to a summary carried by Al Jazeera.
“We need to take much more action than the current trajectory we’re on,” Professor Abram said.
However, since temperature increases are likely to exceed the Paris Climate Agreement of curbing warming to 1.5-2 degrees compared with pre-industrial levels, technologies will be needed to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and also restore damaged climate systems.
|
|
Steam rises from cooling towers at the Niederaussem coal-fired
power plant in Germany. The electricity sector has low-carbon
alternatives but other sectors are so far lagging. Credit: Getty
|
“It’s very reasonable to think that we can create new industries and also rejuvenate the biosphere,” Dr Canadell said. “There are plenty of potential wins if done well.”
So-called direct air capture machines that extract carbon dioxide remain in their early stages of development. Other methods could include mass afforestation or the development of so-called blue carbon sinks that foster new seagrass beds and other marine vegetation to remove C02.
“We need all the weapons,” Dr Canadell said.
Andy Pitman, head of the ARC Centre for Excellence for Climate Extremes, said there was considerable concern “across the climate community that emissions are not being reduced remotely fast enough”.
|
Great Barrier Reef 
|
|
Australia criticises United Nations warning that Great Barrier
Reef is in danger |
Professor Abram also weighed in on this week’s revelation that UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee had recommended lowering the status of the Great Barrier Reef to “in danger” because of climate change.
Federal Environment Minister Sussan Ley has vowed to fight the change, claiming the move reversed earlier assurances the status of the World Heritage site would be unchanged.
“It’s already in great danger,” Professor Abram said. “No amount of political spin changes that scientific evidence.”
The Great Barrier Reef lost about half its coral cover in three mass bleaching events in five years to 2020. Scientists, including at the reef’s Marine Park Authority, warn that global warming of 2 degrees will likely kill off the great bulk of the remaining coral.
The IPCC meets in early August, with the formal release of its Group 1 report scheduled for August 9.
Links
- This time, the ‘danger’ sign must go up
- Damp winter and spring likely to lift flood risk for country’s east
- NSW government asked by UN to hand over Warragamba dam impact study
- ‘Irrigation hunger games’: Battle over Australia’s food bowl soon to heat up
- Could algal blooms in the state’s dry heart harbour a fatal disease?
- Kids shouldn’t be forced to play away their future
No comments :
Post a Comment