Lawyers say commission’s emissions budgets are inconsistent with aim of limiting global warming to 1.5C
New Zealand lawyers are suing the Climate Change Commission, saying
its advice mean the country will fail to meet international
obligations. Photograph: Peter Parks/AFP/Getty Images
|
Lawyers for Climate Action is a group of more than 300 solicitors, barristers and academics seeking to ensure Aotearoa New Zealand meets its international climate obligations.
New Zealand emissions rise as government vows urgent action. Read more |
The group’s president, Jenny Cooper QC, said the commission was failing in its obligations to fulfil New Zealand’s climate change law, the Paris Agreement, and the UN’s 2018 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report.
The IPCC report looked at what the world needs to do to limit global warming to 1.5C. To achieve the goal, net Co2 emissions would have to be reduced by an average of 45% from 2010 levels by 2030, reaching net zero by 2050.
The commission has advised the minister for climate change, James Shaw, who is named as a second respondent in the proceedings, on New Zealand’s targets up until 2030, using the IPCC’s report.
To calculate those targets, Cooper said 45% should be subtracted from New Zealand’s net Co2 levels in 2010, which would equal 484 megatonnes of Co2 by 2030. That is a reduction from the country’s previous target of 596 megatonnes by 2030. Statistics NZ has also adopted this calculation.
The commission took a different approach and applied the 45% reduction to gross Co2 levels in 2010, reaching a 2030 goal of 568 megatonnes and resulting in a much higher amount of Co2 being released than if the lawyers’ calculations are applied.
It falls “well short” of what is required to meet that 1.5C, Cooper said.
The group argues that if Shaw was to adopt the commission’s advice, it would have grave implications for New Zealand and its global reputation. “We need to be emitting less in 2030 than in 2010 and it needs to be a lot less,” Cooper said.
New Zealand declares a climate change emergency. Read more |
The lawyers said they have no interest in slowing down action on climate change through litigation but said it was important to get the calculations right from the start.
The Climate Change Commission said it would review the proceedings but offered no further comment.
In a statement, Shaw said officials were independently analysing the commission’s advice. He said he would consider the Lawyers for Climate Action proceedings but declined to comment further as the matter is before the court.
Links
- (The Guardian) Legal Experts Worldwide Draw Up ‘Historic’ Definition Of Ecocide
- Surge In Court Cases Over Climate Change Shows Increasing Role Of Litigation In Addressing The Climate Crisis
- (AU) Top Judge Urges Lawyers To Take Stand On Climate Change
- (NZ Stuff) What Does The Climate Change Commission's Roadmap Mean For Our Lives?
- (NZ) Managing Retreat: Why New Zealand Is Drafting A New Law To Enable Communities To Move Away From Climate Risks
- (NZ) Climate Change Refugees: The Landmark Case Of Teitiota V New Zealand
- (NZ) Ardern’s Government And Climate Policy: Despite A Zero-Carbon Law, Is New Zealand Merely A Follower Rather Than A Leader?
- (NZ) New Zealand Makes Climate Reporting Compulsory
No comments :
Post a Comment